[1]位新维,喻景奕.经皮单通道与经皮单侧双通道脊柱内镜下髓核摘除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较研究[J].中医正骨,2022,34(05):21-27.
　WEI Xinwei,YU Jingyi.A comparative study of percutaneous endoscopic spinal discectomy through uniportal versus unilateral biportal for treatment of lumbar disc herniation[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2022,34(05):21-27.
点击复制

经皮单通道与经皮单侧双通道脊柱内镜下髓核摘除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较研究()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第34卷
期数:
2022年05期
页码:
21-27
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2022-05-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A comparative study of percutaneous endoscopic spinal discectomy through uniportal versus unilateral biportal for treatment of lumbar disc herniation
作者:
位新维; 喻景奕
(周口市中心医院,河南 周口 466000)
Author(s):
WEI Xinwei; YU Jingyi
Zhoukou Central Hospital,Zhoukou 466000,Henan,China
关键词:
腰椎;  椎间盘移位;  椎间盘切除术; 经皮;  内窥镜;  临床试验
Keywords:
lumbar vertebrae;  intervertebral disc displacement;  diskectomy; percutaneous;  endoscopes;  clinical trial
摘要:
目的:比较经皮单通道与经皮单侧双通道脊柱内镜下髓核摘除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法:选取2018年6月至2020年4月在周口市中心医院住院治疗的腰椎间盘突出症患者为研究对象。采用随机数字表将符合要求的患者随机分为单通道组和单侧双通道组。2组均采用经皮脊柱内镜下髓核摘除术治疗,其中单通道组采用经皮单通道技术、单侧双通道组采用经皮单侧双通道技术。观察记录患者的切口长度、手术时间。采用疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分评价腰部疼痛情况,采用Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)评价腰椎功能。术后6个月,采用日本骨科协会(Japanese Orthopaedic Association,JOA)腰痛疾患疗效评分标准评价综合疗效。结果:共纳入60例患者,单通道组和单侧双通道组各30例。①一般指标。单通道组的切口长度和手术时间均短于单侧双通道组[(0.77±0.18)cm,(1.52±0.59)cm,t=2.583,P=0.012;(43.57±9.42)min,(50.64±10.66)min,t=2.156,P=0.035]。②腰部疼痛VAS评分。时间因素与分组因素不存在交互效应(F=2.380,P=0.119)。2组患者腰部疼痛VAS评分总体比较,组间差异有统计学意义,即存在分组效应(F=17.195,P=0.000)。手术前后不同时间点腰部疼痛VAS评分的差异有统计学意义,即存在时间效应(F=1 352.911,P=0.000)。2组患者的腰部疼痛VAS评分随时间变化均呈下降趋势,但2组的下降趋势不完全一致(F=1 058.132,P=0.000; F=447.262,P=0.000)。术前、术后6个月,2组患者腰部疼痛VAS评分的组间差异均无统计学意义[(8.19±1.07)分,(8.45±1.59)分,t=0.647,P=0.428;(0.59±0.10)分,(0.61±0.18)分,t=0.289,P=0.595]。术后1 d、3个月,单通道组腰部疼痛VAS评分均低于单侧双通道组[(3.24±0.27)分,(4.03±0.56)分,t=62.087,P=0.000;(1.04±0.32)分,(1.43±0.76)分,t=6.174,P=0.019]。③ODI。术前、术后6个月,2组患者ODI比较,组间差异均无统计学意义[(45.32±11.67)%,(44.67±10.59)%,t=0.589,P=0.558;(2.81±0.87)%,(3.05±1.03)%,t=1.256,P=0.214]。术后6个月,2组患者ODI均较术前降低(t=22.561,P=0.000; t=23.478,P=0.000)。④JOA评分。术前、术后6个月,2组患者JOA评分比较,组间差异均无统计学意义[(8.69±2.53)分,(9.07±1.97)分,t=0.789,P=0.433;(27.98±3.21)分,(28.14±4.05)分,t=1.274,P=0.208]。术后6个月,2组患者JOA评分均较术前增高(t=25.698,P=0.000; t=25.017,P=0.000)。⑤综合疗效。术后6个月,单通道组优16例、良11例、可3例,单侧双通道组优15例、良10例、可5例。2组患者的综合疗效比较,差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.450,P=0.653)。结论:经皮单通道与经皮单侧双通道脊柱内镜下髓核摘除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症,二者的疗效相当,但后者的切口和手术时间相对较长。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic spinal discectomy through uniportal versus unilateral biportal for treatment of lumbar disc herniation(LDH).Methods:The LDH patients who were treated in Zhoukou Central Hospital from June 2018 to April 2020 were selected as the subjects.Sixty patients were enrolled in the study,and were randomly divided into uniportal group and unilateral biportal group by using random digits table,30 cases in each group.All patients in the 2 groups were treated with percutaneous endoscopic spinal discectomy.The patients in uniportal group were treated through uniportal,and the ones in unilateral biportal group through unilateral biportal.The incision length and operative time were observed and recorded.The low back pain and lumbar function were evaluated by using pain visual analogue scale(VAS)score and Oswestry disability index(ODI)respectively,and the total clinical outcomes were evaluated by using Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA)therapeutic effect rating standards for low back pain on month 6 after the surgery.Results:①The incision length and operative time were shorter in uniportal group compared to unilateral biportal group(0.77±0.18 vs 1.52±0.59 cm,t=2.583,P=0.012; 43.57±9.42 vs 50.64±10.66 minutes,t=2.156,P=0.035).②There was no interaction between time factor and group factor in low back pain VAS score(F=2.380,P=0.119).There was statistical difference in the low back pain VAS scores between the 2 groups in general,in other words,there was group effect(F=17.195,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in low back pain VAS scores between different timepoints before and after the surgery,in other words,there was time effect(F=1 352.911,P=0.000).The low back pain VAS scores presented a time-dependent decreasing trend in the 2 groups,while the 2 groups were inconsistent with each other in the variation tendency(F=1 058.132,P=0.000; F=447.262,P=0.000).There was no statistical difference in low back pain VAS scores between the 2 groups before the surgery and on month 6 after the surgery(8.19±1.07 vs 8.45±1.59 points,t=0.647,P=0.428; 0.59±0.10 vs 0.61±0.18 points,t=0.289,P=0.595).The low back pain VAS scores were lower in uniportal group compared to unilateral biportal group on day 1 and month 3 after the surgery(3.24±0.27 vs 4.03±0.56 points,t=62.087,P=0.000; 1.04±0.32 vs 1.43±0.76 points,t=6.174,P=0.019).③There was no statistical difference in ODI between the 2 groups before the surgery and on month 6 after the surgery(45.32±11.67 vs 44.67±10.59%,t=0.589,P=0.558; 2.81±0.87 vs 3.05±1.03%,t=1.256,P=0.214).The ODI decreased in the 2 groups on month 6 after the surgery compared to pre-surgery(t=22.561,P=0.000; t=23.478,P=0.000).④There was no statistical difference in JOA scores between the 2 groups before the surgery and on month 6 after the surgery(8.69±2.53 vs 9.07±1.97 points,t=0.789,P=0.433; 27.98±3.21 vs 28.14±4.05 points,t=1.274,P=0.208).The JOA score increased in the 2 groups on month 6 after the surgery compared to pre-surgery(t=25.698,P=0.000; t=25.017,P=0.000).⑤The total clinical outcomes were evaluated on month 6 after the surgery.Sixteen patients obtained an excellent result,11 good and 3 fair in uniportal group; while 15 ones obtained an excellent result,10 good and 5 fair in unilateral biportal group.There was no statistical differences in the total clinical outcomes between the 2 groups(Z=-0.450,P=0.653).Conclusion:Percutaneous endoscopic spinal discectomy through uniportal is similar to percutaneous endoscopic spinal discectomy through unilateral biportal in the clinical outcomes in treatment of LDH,while the former displays the advantages of shorter incision length and operative time compared to the latter.

参考文献/References:

[1] 袁帅,蒋毅.腰椎间盘突出症的临床诊治[J].中国临床医生杂志,2018,46(12):1387-1389.
[2] 周建国,廖文胜.经皮椎间孔脊柱内镜技术治疗高龄腰椎间盘突出症的疗效分析[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2020,30(5):405-409.
[3] 陶学顺,余润泽,章玉冰,等.改良经皮椎间孔脊柱内镜技术对老年腰椎间盘突出症患者的疗效[J].中国老年学杂志, 2019,39(12):2921-2924.
[4] HEO D H,SON S K,EUM J H,et al.Fully endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion using a percutaneous unilateral biportal endoscopic technique:technical note and preliminary clinical results[J].Neurosurg Focus,2017,43(2):E8.
[5] 朱斌,田大胜,陈磊,等.单边双通道内镜技术在腰椎疾病中的应用研究进展[J].中华骨科杂志,2020,40(15):1030-1038.
[6] 中华医学会骨科学分会脊柱外科学组,中华医学会骨科学分会骨科康复学组.腰椎间盘突出症诊疗指南[J].中华骨科杂志,2020,40(8):477-487.
[7] 陈仲强,刘忠军,党耕町.脊柱外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:194.
[8] 肖亚杰,刘士臣,李惠贞,等.经皮脊柱内镜技术与传统开放手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症并发症的系统评价与Meta分析[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2019,29(4):325-335.
[9] HU Z J,FANG X Q,ZHOU Z J,et al.Effect and possible mechanism of muscle-splitting approach on multifidus muscle injury and atrophy after posterior lumbar spine surgery[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2013,95(24):e192.
[10] 呼国臣,胡伟,刘向阳,等.椎间孔镜下经椎板间入路椎间盘摘除术治疗髓核游离型椎间盘突出症疗效分析[J].中国临床医生杂志,2020,48(9):1073-1075.
[11] 薛静波,陈浩翔,李学林,等.经皮全脊柱内镜经椎板间隙入路治疗中央型腰椎管狭窄症[J].中国微创外科杂志,2020,20(4):322-325.
[12] YUE J J,LONG W.Full endoscopic spinal surgery techniques:advancements,indications,and outcomes[J].Int J Spine Surg,2015,9:17.
[13] PARK S M,KIM G U,KIM H J,et al.Is the use of a unilateral biportal endoscopic approach associated with rapid recovery after lumbar decompressive laminectomy?a preliminary analysis of a prospective randomized controlled trial[J].World Neurosurg,2019,128:e709-e718.
[14] KIM J E,CHOI D J.Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression by 30°endoscopy in lumbar spinal stenosis:Technical note and preliminary report[J].J Orthop,2018,15(2):366-371.
[15] HEO D H,LEE D C,PARK C K.Comparative analysis of three types of minimally invasive decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis:biportal endoscopy,uniportal endoscopy,and microsurgery[J].Neurosurg Focus,2019,46(5):E9.
[16] PRANATA R,LIM M A,VANIA R,et al.Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery versus microscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].World Neurosurg,2020,138:e450-e458.
[17] KIM S K,KANG S S,HONG Y H,et al.Clinical comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic technique versus open microdiscectomy for single-level lumbar discectomy:a multicenter,retrospective analysis[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2018,13(1):22.
[18] LIN G X,HUANG P,KOTHEERANURAK V,et al.A systematic review of unilateral biportal endoscopic spinal surgery:preliminary clinical results and complications[J].World Neurosurg,2019,125:425-432.
[19] 田大胜,朱斌,刘建军,等.单边双通道内镜技术治疗脱出游离型腰椎间盘突出症[J].中国微创外科杂志,2020,20(12):1083-1087.
[20] 田大胜,刘建军,朱斌,等.单边双通道内镜技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症和腰椎椎管狭窄症[J].中华骨科杂志,2020,40(17):1155-1164.
[21] HEO D H,KIM J S,PARK C W,et al.Contralateral sublaminar endoscopic approach for removal of lumbar juxtafa-cet cysts using percutaneous biportal endoscopic surgery:technical report and preliminary results[J].World Neurosurg,2019,122:474-479.
[22] AN J W,LEE C W.Surgical treatment of extra-foraminal gas containing pseudocyst compressing L5 nerve root by using unilateral biportal endosopy:a case report[J].World Neurosurg,2019,124:145-150.
[23] PARK S M,KIM H J,KIM G U,et al.Learning curve for lumbar decompressive laminectomy in biportal endoscopic spinal surgery using the cumulative summation test for learning curve[J].World Neurosurg,2019,122:e1007-e1013.
(收稿日期:2021-01-28 本文编辑:郭毅曼)

相似文献/References:

[1]吴青坡,孙国绍,王林杰.后路椎管减压联合腰椎椎弓根钉动态稳定装置内固定 治疗单节段腰椎退行性疾病[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):42.
[2]李林军.应用膨胀式椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗合并骨质疏松的 胸腰椎退行性疾病[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):49.
[3]孙广江,崔海舰.络病理论指导下应用独活寄生汤加减治疗腰椎间盘突出症[J].中医正骨,2015,27(12):37.
　SUN Guangjiang,CUI Haijian.Clinical study on oral application of Duhuo Jisheng Tang Jiajian(独活寄生汤加减)under the guidance of collaterals disease theory for treatment of lumbar disc herniation[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(05):37.
[4]陈冠军,陈扬,庄汝杰.可灌注骨水泥椎弓根螺钉系统 在老年腰椎疾患手术中的应用[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):40.
[5]万宏波,马海燕,蒋云霞,等.口服益气化瘀汤联合功能锻炼治疗腰椎退行性疾病 术后残留腰腿痛的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(06):1.
　WAN Hongbo,MA Haiyan,JIANG Yunxia,et al.Clinical study on oral application of Yiqi Huayu Tang(益气化瘀汤)combined with functional exercise for the treatment of postoperative residual lumbocrural pain in patients with lumbar degenerative disease[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(05):1.
[6]王世龙.腰椎椎管内外痛风石1例[J].中医正骨,2012,24(02):69.
[7]秦杰,李振宇.三法十式手法配合中药腰痹汤治疗腰椎间盘突出症[J].中医正骨,2011,23(02):71.
[8]颜 峰.椎间融合术配合中药外敷治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症[J].中医正骨,2016,28(01):38.
[9]喻秋萍,唐萌芽,王峥峰,等.身痛逐瘀汤治疗腰椎间盘突出症的系统评价[J].中医正骨,2016,28(06):24.
　YU Qiuping,TANG Mengya,WANG Zhengfeng,et al.Efficacy of Shentong Zhuyu Tang(身痛逐瘀汤)for treatment of lumbar disc herniation:a systematic review[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(05):24.
[10]董永强,何鑫东,张伟伟,等.经皮椎间孔镜髓核摘除术联合McKenzie疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2016,28(07):38.
　DONG Yongqiang,HE Xindong,ZHANG Weiwei,et al.Observation on the curative effect of fire-needle therapy for treatment of supraspinal and interspinal ligament injuries[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(05):38.
[11]刘彦璐,林耐球,李绍旦,等.正骨手法结合中药外敷治疗腰椎间盘突出症[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):26.
[12]邵礼晖,潘浩.Coflex棘突间动态稳定系统治疗腰椎退变性疾病40例[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):37.
[13]郭新军,朱卉敏,王衡,等.一次性纤维环缝合器在腰椎间盘突出症髓核摘除术中的应用[J].中医正骨,2015,27(03):59.
[14]林斌,黎秋生,何勇,等.椎弓根螺钉单侧固定与双侧固定治疗腰椎间盘突出症 对邻近节段退变的影响[J].中医正骨,2015,27(01):16.
　LIN Bin,LI Qiusheng,HE Yong,et al.Effect of unilateral versus bilateral fixation with pedicle screws on adjacent segment degeneration in patients with lumbar disc herniation[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(05):16.
[15]贾龙,张华.“治未病”思想指导下腰椎间盘突出症的辨证防治[J].中医正骨,2017,29(01):36.
[16]聂富祥,贺海怿,朱文辉,等.一次性可扩张通道下微创经椎间孔入路腰椎间融合术治疗单节段腰椎退行性疾病[J].中医正骨,2017,29(05):34.
[17]宋仁谦,周英杰,赵刚.经皮可灌注骨水泥椎弓根螺钉固定治疗合并严重骨质疏松症的腰椎退行性疾病[J].中医正骨,2017,29(05):37.
[18]张史飞,任绍东,屠永刚,等.椎弓根螺钉双皮质固定治疗合并骨质疏松的腰椎不稳症[J].中医正骨,2017,29(09):73.
[19]邓罗义,孙红,宁旭.神经根沉降征及其在腰椎退行性疾病诊断中的应用价值[J].中医正骨,2018,30(08):50.
[20]李智斐,李嘉琅,张翼升,等.医用臭氧治疗腰椎间盘突出症的作用机制及应用进展[J].中医正骨,2018,30(10):59.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
通讯作者:位新维 E-mail:abc54433@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01