[1]吕岩,王爱国,马富强,等.切开复位T形钛板联合带线锚钉内固定治疗单纯后踝骨折合并距腓前韧带损伤的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2023,35(01):30-35.
　LV Yan,WANG Aiguo,MA Fuqiang,et al.A clinical study of open reduction combined with T-type titanium plate and suture anchor internal fixation in the treatment of posterior malleolus fractures complicated with anterior talofibular ligament injury[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2023,35(01):30-35.
点击复制

切开复位T形钛板联合带线锚钉内固定治疗单纯后踝骨折合并距腓前韧带损伤的临床研究()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第35卷
期数:
2023年01期
页码:
30-35
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-01-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A clinical study of open reduction combined with T-type titanium plate and suture anchor internal fixation in the treatment of posterior malleolus fractures complicated with anterior talofibular ligament injury
作者:
吕岩1; 王爱国2; 马富强2; 李翔2; 白玉2
(1.河南中医药大学第一临床医学院,河南 郑州 450046; 2.郑州市骨科医院,河南 郑州 450052)
Author(s):
LV Yan1; WANG Aiguo2; MA Fuqiang2; LI Xiang2; BAI Yu2
1.First School of Clinical Medicine,Henan University of Chinese Medicine,Zhengzhou 450046,Henan,China 2.Zhengzhou Orthopedics Hospital,Zhengzhou 450052,Henan,China
关键词:
踝关节;  踝损伤;  踝部骨折;  外侧韧带; 踝;  距腓前韧带;  骨折固定术; 内;  缝合锚;  临床试验
Keywords:
ankle joint;  ankle injuries;  ankle fractures;  lateral ligament; ankle;  anterior talofibular ligament;  fracture fixation; internal;  clinical trial
摘要:
目的:比较切开复位T形钛板联合带线锚钉内固定与单纯切开复位T形钛板内固定治疗单纯后踝骨折合并距腓前韧带(anterior talofibular ligament,ATFL)损伤的临床疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性分析48例单纯后踝骨折合并ATFL损伤患者的病例资料,均采用切开复位T形钛板内固定治疗,其中术中采用带线锚钉修复ATFL损伤24例(ATFL修复组)、未修复ATFL损伤24例(ATFL未修复组)。比较2组患者的骨折愈合时间,术前和术后1年的踝部疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分、距骨前移距离,术后1年的美国足与踝关节协会(American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society,AOFAS)踝与后足功能评分,以及并发症发生情况。结果:①骨折愈合时间。ATFL修复组骨折愈合时间与ATFL未修复组比较,差异无统计学意义[(11.83±1.13)周,(11.67±0.82)周,t=0.586,P=0.561]。②踝部疼痛VAS评分。术前,2组患者踝部疼痛VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义[(6.08±0.72)分,(6.04±0.55)分,t=0.226,P=0.822]; 术后1年,ATFL修复组患者踝部疼痛VAS评分低于ATFL未修复组[(1.04±0.46)分,(2.54±1.22)分,t=-5.649,P=0.000],2组患者踝部疼痛VAS评分均低于术前(t=32.906,P=0.000; t=14.103,P=0.000)。③距骨前移距离。术前,2组患者距骨前移距离比较,差异无统计学意义[(10.71±1.12)mm,(10.54±1.02)mm,t=0.538,P=0.593]; 术后1年,ATFL修复组患者距骨前移距离小于ATFL未修复组[(2.25±0.74)mm,(4.88±1.48)mm,t=-7.762,P=0.000],2组患者距骨前移距离均小于术前(t=31.259,P=0.000; t=15.140,P=0.000)。④AOFAS踝与后足功能评分。术后1年,ATFL修复组患者AOFAS踝与后足功能评分高于ATFL未修复组[(92.71±6.56)分,(84.71±6.68)分,t=4.186,P=0.000]。⑤安全性。ATFL修复组1例出现外踝处皮肤感觉减退,ATFL未修复组5例出现慢性踝关节不稳、2例出现距骨骨软骨损伤。2组患者均未出现骨不连、感染、内固定失效等并发症。ATFL修复组并发症发生率低于ATFL未修复组(χ2=5.400,P=0.020)。结论:与采用单纯切开复位T形钛板内固定相比,采用切开复位T形钛板联合带线锚钉内固定治疗单纯后踝骨折合并ATFL损伤,能更好地缓解踝关节疼痛、改善踝关节功能、减少并发症发生,但二者在促进骨折愈合方面疗效相当。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of open reduction combined with T-type titanium plate and suture anchor internal fixation and open reduction combined with T-type titanium plate internal fixation in the treatment of posterior malleolus fractures complicated with anterior talofibular ligament(ATFL)injury.Methods:The medical data of 48 patients with posterior malleolus fractures complicated with ATFL injury,who were treated with open reduction combined with T-type titanium plate internal fixation,were retrospectively analyzed,including 24 cases with ATFL injury repaired by suture anchors(the ATFL repair group)and 24 cases with ATFL injury unrepaired(the ATFL non-repair group).The fracture healing time,ankle pain visual analogue scale(VAS)scores and anterior tibial translocation(ATT)measured before operation and at one year after operation,American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society(AOFAS)Ankle-Hindfoot Scale scores measured at one year after operation,and the occurrence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results:①Fracture healing time.There was no significant difference in fracture healing time between the ATFL repair group and the ATFL non-repair group(11.83±1.13 vs 11.67±0.82 weeks,t=0.586,P=0.561).②Ankle pain VAS score.Before operation,there was no significant difference in ankle pain VAS scores between the two groups(6.08±0.72 vs 6.04±0.55 points,t=0.226,P=0.822).One year after operation,the ankle pain VAS score in the ATFL repair group was lower than that in the ATFL non-repair group(1.04±0.46 vs 2.54±1.22 points,t=-5.649,P=0.000).For both groups,the ankle pain VAS scores were lower than those before operation(t=32.906,P=0.000; t=14.103,P=0.000).③ATT.Before operation,there was no significant difference in the ATT between the two groups(10.71±1.12 vs 10.54±1.02 mm,t=0.538,P=0.593).One year after operation,the ATT in the ATFL repair group was smaller than that in the ATFL non-repair group(2.25±0.74 vs 4.88±1.48 mm,t=-7.762,P=0.000).For both groups,the ATT was smaller than that before operation(t=31.259,P=0.000; t=15.140,P=0.000).④AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale score.One year after operation,the AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale score in the ATFL repair group was higher than that in the ATFL non-repair group(92.71±6.56 vs 84.71±6.68 points,t=4.186,P=0.000).⑤Safety.In the ATFL repair group,one case suffered from hypoesthesia on the lateral malleolus,while in the ATFL non-repair group,five cases developed chronic ankle instability,and two cases had osteochondral lesions of the talus.There were no complications,such as nonunion,infection,and failure of internal fixation in the two groups.The incidence of complications in the ATFL repair group was lower than that in the ATFL non-repair group(χ2=5.400,P=0.020).Conclusion:Compared with open reduction combined with T-type titanium plate internal fixation,open reduction combined with T-type titanium plate and suture anchor internal fixation in the treatment of posterior malleolus fractures complicated with ATFL injury can relieve ankle pain,improve ankle function,and reduce complications in a better way.They are equivalent in promoting fracture healing.

参考文献/References:

[1] STRINGFELLOW T D,WALTERS S T,NASH W,et al.Management of posterior malleolus fractures:a multicentre cohort study in the United Kingdom[J].Foot Ankle Surg,2021,27(6):629-635.
[2] LEVACK A E,GAUSDEN E B,DVORZHINSKIY A,et al.Posterior malleolus fracture displacement is associated with rotational ankle fracture stability in patients without medial malleolar fractures[J].HSS J,2020,16(Suppl 2):238-244.
[3] 唐波,徐亚风,于鑫,等.特殊踝关节骨折-单纯后踝骨折的治疗策略[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2019,27(2):181-185.
[4] 惠桂生,杨昆,袁炜庆,等.腓骨长肌肌腱前半部解剖重建距腓前韧带治疗慢性踝关节外侧不稳[J].中医正骨,2021,33(5):74-76.
[5] 李勇奇,罗瑞,杨云峰.后踝骨折及后pilon骨折分型的研究进展[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2022,15(3):234-240.
[6] 俞光荣,赵宏谋,杨云峰,等.切开复位内固定治疗后踝骨折的疗效分析[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2011,25(7):774-777.
[7] 庄志雄,许新明,曹欣荔,等.改良斜轴位磁共振成像扫描在距腓前韧带损伤中的应用价值[J].中国现代医学杂志,2017,27(8):90-96.
[8] 蒋协远,王大伟.骨科临床疗效评价标准[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:123-124.
[9] 王智,孙超,张树,等.慢性踝关节不稳的临床检查方法与评分量表系统[J].足踝外科电子杂志,2018,5(2):1-7.
[10] KITAOKA H B,ALEXANDER I J,ADELAAR R S,et al.Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot,midfoot,hallux,and lesser toes[J].Foot Ankle Int,1994,15(7):349-353.
[11] MASON L W,MARLOW W J,WIDNALL J,et al.Pathoanatomy and associated injuries of posterior malleolus fracture of the ankle[J].Foot Ankle Int,2017,38(11):1229-1235.
[12] 冯彦江,杨生民,李西要,等.部分切断下胫腓后韧带浅层辅助复位治疗旋后外旋型踝关节骨折中合并Die-punch骨块的后踝骨折[J].中医正骨,2020,32(8):65-68.
[13] 谢诗涓,金丹,余斌,等.后侧pilon骨折与后踝骨折的影像形态学比较研究[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2015,8(6):517-522.
[14] GARDNER M J,BRODSKY A,BRIGGS S M,et al.Fixation of posterior malleolar fractures provides greater syndesmotic stability[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2006,447:165-171.
[15] 李琦,尚林,马富强,等.第三腓骨肌肌腱解剖重建距腓前韧带治疗陈旧性距腓前韧带损伤[J].中医正骨,2021,33(4):71-74.
[16] BARTONíCEK J,RAMMELT S,KOSTLIVY K,et al.Anatomy and classification of the posterior tibial fragment in ankle fractures[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2015,135(4):505-516.
[17] TENENBAUM S,SHAZAR N,BRUCK N,et al.Posterior Malleolus Fractures[J].Orthop Clin North Am,2017,48(1):81-89.
[18] ODAK S,AHLUWALIA R,UNNIKRISHNAN P,et al.Management of posterior malleolar fractures:a systematic review[J].J Foot Ankle Surg,2016,55(1):140-145.
[19] MILLER M A, MCDONALD T C,GRAVES M L,et al.Stability of the syndesmosis after posterior malleolar fracture fixation[J].Foot Ankle Int,2018,39(1):99-104.
[20] WANG Z,SUN J,YAN J,et al.Comparison of the efficacy of posterior-anterior screws,anterior-posterior screws and a posterior-anterior plate in the fixation of posterior malleolar fractures with a fragment size of ≥15 and <15[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2020,21(1):570.
[21] YI J,CHA J G,LEE Y K,et al.MRI of the anterior talofi-bular ligament,talar cartilage and ossubfibulare:comparison of isotropic resolution 3D and conventional 2D T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequences at 3.0 T[J].Skeletal Radiol,2016,45(7):899-908.
[22] MEDERAKE M,HOFMANN U K,IPACH I.Arthroscopic modified Brostr? operation versus open reconstruction with local periosteal flap in chronic ankle instability[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2022,142(12):3581-3588.
[23] CAMACHO L D,ROWARD Z T,DENG Y,et al.Surgical management of lateral ankle instability in athletes[J].J Athl Train,2019,54(6):639-649.
[24] WEI S,LIU S,HAN F,et al.Clinical outcomes of a modified all-inside arthroscopic repair of anterior talofibular ligament for chronic ankle instability:a preliminary report[J].Medicine(Baltimore),2019,98(36):e16734.
[25] KO K R,LEE W Y,LEE H,et al.Repair of only anterior talofibular ligament resulted in similar outcomes to those of repair of both anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligaments[J].Knee Surg Sports TraumatolArthrosc,2020,28(1):155-162.
[26] ZHOU Y F,ZHANG Z Z,ZHANG H Z,et al.All-inside arthroscopic modified Brostr? technique to repair anterior talofibular ligament provides a similar outcome compared with open Brostr?-gould procedure[J].Arthroscopy,2021,37(1):268-279.
[27] FENG S M,MAFFULLI N,MA C,et al.All-inside arthroscopic modified Brostr?-Gould procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability with and without anterior talofibular ligament remnant repair produced similar functional results[J].Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2021,29(8):2453-2461.
[28] ZENG G,HU X,LIU W,et al.Open Brostr?-gould repair vs arthroscopic anatomical repair of the anterior talofibular ligament for chronic lateral ankle instability[J].Foot Ankle Int,2020,41(1):44-49.
[29] AHN H W,LEE K B.Comparison of the modified Brostr? procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability with and without subfibular ossicle[J].Am J Sports Med,2016,44(12):3158-3164.
[30] LE T,LIU H,JENKINS S M,et al.Single knotless suture anchor repair of anterior talofibular ligament following distal fibula nonunion excision[J].Arthrosc Tech,2022,11(3):e449-e455.
(收稿日期:2022-08-03 本文编辑:时红磊)

相似文献/References:

[1]江涛,江林,史俊德,等.动气针法在踝关节骨折术后中后期康复中的应用[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):20.
　JIANG Tao,JIANG Lin,SHI Junde,et al.Application of Dongqi acupuncture(动气针法)to postoperative rehabilitation in the middle-late period in patients with ankle joint fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(01):20.
[2]方华宴,李兴华,王爱国.手术治疗踝关节骨折手术失败导致的复杂陈旧性踝关节脱位[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):45.
[3]田正强.消肿止痛散外敷联合绷带固定治疗急性踝关节扭伤[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):28.
[4]何忠,黄宗权,王强,等.胫骨中下段螺旋形骨折合并后踝裂纹骨折的诊治体会[J].中医正骨,2015,27(09):28.
[5]朱彦昭,申成春,蒋丽娜,等.早期手术修复踝关节骨折合并的三角韧带完全断裂[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):46.
[6]戴国钢,刘剑伟,黄雷,等.第一跗跖关节滑膜嵌顿10例报告[J].中医正骨,2015,27(07):75.
[7]刘辉,刘波,伍萨,等.踝关节不稳患者踝关节等速肌力和动态平衡能力的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):7.
　LIU Hui,LIU Bo,WU Sa,et al.Clinical study on ankle isokinetic muscle strength and dynamic balance ability of patients with ankle joint instability[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(01):7.
[8]刘 超.续骨活血汤和接骨紫金丹在三踝骨折治疗中的应用[J].中医正骨,2015,27(06):57.
[9]王瑞雄,刘志强,陈王,等.胫骨螺旋形骨折合并同侧后踝骨折的诊治体会[J].中医正骨,2015,27(05):45.
[10]李光阳,吴祥宗,陶志东,等.改良外侧入路在三踝骨折切开复位内固定术中的应用[J].中医正骨,2015,27(05):48.
[11]陈诚,成永忠,程灏,等.旋后-外旋型三踝骨折的筋骨结构关系研究[J].中医正骨,2016,28(01):6.
　CHEN Cheng,CHENG Yongzhong,CHENG Hao,et al.Study on the structural relationship of supination-extorsion-type trimalleolar fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(01):6.
[12]邬博来,辛景义.距腓前韧带和跟腓韧带解剖重建治疗习惯性踝关节扭伤[J].中医正骨,2017,29(03):60.
[13]包学迅,王贺辉,郁耀平,等.TightRope钢板内固定治疗三踝骨折合并下胫腓联合损伤[J].中医正骨,2017,29(08):65.
[14]杨宗宇,刘非,崔亮,等.同种异体半腱肌解剖重建距腓前韧带和跟腓韧带治疗慢性踝关节外侧不稳[J].中医正骨,2017,29(09):64.
[15]李春阳,赵洪涛.腓骨入路切开复位内固定治疗旋后外旋型踝关节骨折[J].中医正骨,2019,31(05):59.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
通讯作者:王爱国 E-mail:wag0726@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01