[1]郝连升,王新昌,陈健,等.微创经皮钢板内固定与切开复位内固定治疗闭合性胫骨远端骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2016,28(10):14-17,23.
 HAO Liansheng,WANG Xinchang,CHEN Jian,et al.A retrospective trial of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis versus open reduction internal fixation for treatment of closed distal tibial fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(10):14-17,23.
点击复制

微创经皮钢板内固定与切开复位内固定治疗闭合性胫骨远端骨折的对比研究()
分享到:

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第28卷
期数:
2016年10期
页码:
14-17,23
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2016-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A retrospective trial of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis versus open reduction internal fixation for treatment of closed distal tibial fractures
作者:
郝连升王新昌陈健黄峰
山东省聊城市中医医院,山东 聊城 252000
Author(s):
HAO LianshengWANG XinchangCHEN JianHUANG Feng
Liaocheng Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Liaocheng 252000,Shandong,China
关键词:
胫骨骨折 骨折闭合性 外科手术微创性 骨折固定术 疗效比较研究
Keywords:
tibial fractures fracturesclosed surgical proceduresminimally invasive fracture fixationinternal comparative effectiveness research
摘要:
目的:比较微创经皮钢板内固定(minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis,MIPPO)与切开复位内固定治疗闭合性胫骨远端骨折的临床疗效及安全性。方法:回顾性分析82例闭合性胫骨远端骨折患者的病例资料,其中47例采用MIPPO治疗、35例采用切开复位内固定治疗。男67例,女15例。年龄19~67岁,中位数39岁。左侧31例,右侧51例。根据骨折AO分型,A型61例、B型13例、C型8例。合并腓骨骨折69例,其中腓骨中上1/3骨折23例、中下1/3骨折46例。受伤至手术时间1~5 d,中位数3 d。比较2组患者的手术时间、切口长度、术中出血量、术后1 d疼痛数字分级评分、骨折愈合时间及术后16个月的Baird-Jackson踝关节功能评分,并观察并发症发生情况。结果:所有患者均获得了16个月的随访。2组患者的手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义[(46.83±2.14)min,(50.76±1.38)min,t=1.761,P=0.953]; MIPPO组的切口长度、术中出血量、骨折愈合时间、疼痛数字分级评分及Baird-Jackson踝关节功能评分均优于切开复位内固定组[(8.15±1.02)cm,(23.65±2.46)cm,t=2.794,P=0.031;(80.32±10.09)mL,(253.76±27.12)mL,t=3.642,P=0.025;(80.32±10.09)d,(119.32±7.13)d,t=2.014,P=0.039;(2.19±0.72)分,(5.74±1.46)分,t=2.173,P=0.041;(96.83±2.14)分,(80.76±1.38)分,t=2.592,P=0.025]。MIPPO组4例骨折延迟愈合,未出现切口感染及钢板外露等并发症。切开复位内固定组2例术后9个月骨折未愈合,行髂骨植骨钢板内固定术; 2例发生切口感染,清创换药后愈合; 1例发生钢板外露及切口感染,清创、抗感染治疗后行皮瓣转移术。2组患者并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.221,P=0.638)。结论:MIPPO治疗闭合性胫骨远端骨折,手术时间及安全性与切开复位内固定相当,但其具有切口小、术中出血量少、术后疼痛轻、骨折愈合时间短、踝关节功能恢复好等优点,值得临床推广应用。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical curative effects and safety of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis(MIPPO)versus open reduction internal fixation(ORIF)in the treatment of closed distal tibial fractures.Methods:The medical records of 82 patients with closed distal tibial fractures were analyzed retrospectively.Forty-seven patients were treated with MIPPO(MIPPO group),while the others were treated with open reduction and internal fixation(ORIF group).The patients consisted of 67 males and 15 females,and ranged in age from 19 to 67 years(Median=39 yrs).The fractures located in left tibia for 31 patients and right tibia for 51 patients.According to the AO classification of fracture,the tibial fractures belonged to types A(61),B(13)and C(8).Tibial fractures combined with fibular fractures were found in 69 patients,and the fibular fractures were located at top third of fibula in 23 patients and bottom third of fibula in 46 patients.The patients ranged in disease course from 1 to 5 days(Median=3 days).The operative time,incision length,blood loss,pain numerical rating scale(NRS)score at 1 day after surgery,fracture healing time and Baird-Jackson ankle function scores at 16 months after surgery and complication incidences were evaluated and compared between the 2 groups.Results:All patients in the 2 groups were followed up for 16 months.There was no statistical difference in the operative time between the 2 groups(46.83+/-2.14 vs 50.76+/-1.38 min,t=1.761,P=0.953).The MIPPO group surpassed the ORIF group in incision length,blood loss,fracture healing time,pain NRS scores and Baird-Jackson ankle function scores(8.15+/-1.02 vs 23.65+/-2.46 cm,t=2.794,P=0.031; 80.32+/-10.09 vs 253.76+/-27.12 mL,t=3.642,P=0.025; 80.32+/-10.09 vs 119.32+/-7.13 d,t=2.014,P=0.039; 2.19+/-0.72 vs 5.74+/-1.46 points,t=2.173,P=0.041; 96.83+/-2.14 vs 80.76+/-1.38 points,t=2.592,P=0.025).The delayed union of fractures were found in 4 patients and no complication such as incision infection and plate exposure were found in MIPPO group; while non-union of fractures(2),incision infection(2)and plate exposure combined with incision infection(1)were found in ORIF group.There was no statistical difference in complication incidences between the two groups(χ2=0.221,P=0.638).Conclusion:MIPPO is similar to ORIF in operative time and safety in treatment of closed distal tibial fractures,while the former has the advantages of smaller incision,less intraoperative blood loss,less postoperative pain,shorter fracture healing time and better ankle functional recovery,so it is worthy of popularizing in clinic.

参考文献/References:

[1] Park J,Yang KH.Treatment of an open distal tibia fracture with segmental bone loss in combination with a closed proximal tibia fracture:a case report[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2012,132(8):1121-1124.
[2] 黄培镇,黄学员,杨达文,等.微创经皮内固定在胫骨远端关节外骨折的运用[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2015,23(2):51-52.
[3] Rüedi TP,Buckley RE,Moran CG.骨折治疗的AO原则[M].2版.危杰,刘璠,吴新宝,等译.上海:上海科学技术出版社,2010:624-625.
[4] Baird RA,Jackson ST.Fracture of the distal part of the fibular with associated disruption of the deltoid ligament.Treatment without repair of the deltoid ligament[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Am),1987,69(9):1346-1352.
[5] Manuel P,Natalio C,Leonardo L,et al.Minimally-invasive alternatives in the treatment of distal articular tibial fractures[J].Fuß & Sprunggelenk,2012,10(1):37-45.
[6] 武政,刘向栋,周煜虎,等.微创经皮锁定加压钢板内固定术治疗胫骨远端骨折疗效观察[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2015,24(7):736-738.
[7] 唐岩,邢宏,田野,等.锁定钢板内固定治疗胫骨远端骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2011,26(2):181-182.
[8] 张浩,申国庆,高发旺,等.MIPPO技术在胫骨远端骨折手术治疗中的应用[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2013,28(4):374-375.
[9] 王薪华,孙根发,赵炜,等.微创经皮钢板技术治疗胫骨复杂骨折的临床研究[J].实用骨科杂志,2015,21(1):84-85.
[10] 陈细明,蔡树辉,吴育锋,等.手法复位经皮解剖型锁定钢板外固定治疗锁骨骨折[J].中医正骨,2014,26(7):28-29.
[11] 张一鸣,张学民,陆洲.经皮解剖型锁定钢板固定治疗胫骨远端骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(2):47-48.
[12] 董福慧.“微创”骨伤科技术的制高点[J].中国骨伤,2006,19(1):1-2.
[13] Shin YW,Sung YB,Choi JY,et al.Analysis of risk factors for nonunion after intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fracture in adult[J].J Korean Fract Soc,2011,24(4):313-320.
[14] 潘治军,杨涛,思玉楼,等.280例骨不连病例原因分析[J].中国骨伤,2013,26(4):284-286.
[15] 韦旭明,孙振中,姜为民,等.前外侧和内侧经皮接骨板治疗胫骨远端骨折的对比研究[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2015,23(12):29-33.
[16] 潘奇华.胫骨平台骨折常规治疗联合中药干预的疗效观察[J].浙江中医药大学学报,2014,38(2):167-169.
[17] 邓红敏.闭合复位胫骨远端内侧低切迹锁定加压钢板治疗胫骨远端骨折[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2015,23(11):52-54.
[18] 方略,陈建列,黄晓涛,等.清热解毒法及补益气血法在防治骨折围手术期感染中的相关研究[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2015,23(3):78-80.

相似文献/References:

[1]江涛,江林,史俊德,等.动气针法在踝关节骨折术后中后期康复中的应用[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):20.
 JIANG Tao,JIANG Lin,SHI Junde,et al.Application of Dongqi acupuncture(动气针法)to postoperative rehabilitation in the middle-late period in patients with ankle joint fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(10):20.
[2]许兵,叶小雨,王萧枫,等.小管径经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗 骨质疏松性椎体重度压缩骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):29.
[3]肖善富,张喜善,于凤珍.髌下小切口钢丝纽扣式内固定治疗胫骨髁间隆突骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):34.
[4]葛波涌,王玉波,王明太,等.交锁髓内钉内固定治疗胫骨干骨折的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):8.
 GE Boyong,WANG Yubo,WANG Mingtai,et al.Clinical study on the internal fixation with interlocking intramedullary nail for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(10):8.
[5]王 强.胫腓下联合骨牵引配合手法整复小夹板外固定治疗 儿童闭合移位性股骨干骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):15.
[6]袁伟,周晓莉.T形掌指骨微型钢板内固定治疗锁骨近端骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):47.
[7]何 涛.有限切开植骨钢板内固定治疗 SchatzkerⅡ、Ⅲ型胫骨平台骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(09):22.
[8]何忠,黄宗权,王强,等.胫骨中下段螺旋形骨折合并后踝裂纹骨折的诊治体会[J].中医正骨,2015,27(09):28.
[9]白晨平.微型钢板内固定治疗掌指骨骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):26.
[10]何 涛.带尾孔髌骨针联合缆索内固定系统治疗闭合性髌骨骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):41.
[11]全先辉,万春友,刘磊,等.Taylor空间支架外固定治疗胫腓骨开放性骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):30.
[12]陈利军,田野,刘文刚,等.非典型膝关节外伤后胫骨近端隐匿性骨折的影像诊断[J].中医正骨,2015,27(06):26.
[13]武富良,柴占京,李振龙.3种固定方法治疗开放性胫骨骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(03):46.
[14]赵春栋,周松,高开拓.伤科消肿汤口服联合甘露醇静脉滴注治疗胫腓骨骨折术后肢体肿胀的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2016,28(12):21.
 ZHAO Chundong,ZHOU Song,GAO Kaituo.Clinical study on oral application of Shangke Xiaozhong Tang(伤科消肿汤)combined with intravenous drip infusion of mannitol for treatment of postoperative limb swelling in patients with peroneotibial fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(10):21.
[15]计忠宇,于鸿,马红茹,等.长腿石膏固定治疗儿童胫腓骨骨折865例[J].中医正骨,2016,28(12):67.
[16]于东方.锁定钢板外固定治疗胫骨开放性骨折[J].中医正骨,2017,29(07):66.
[17]曹曦,崔伟,路通.胫骨骨折骨不连的原因分析及治疗进展[J].中医正骨,2017,29(08):50.
[18]盛红枫,张培祥,张魁,等.益肾活血方口服治疗胫骨下段骨折术后骨折不愈合[J].中医正骨,2017,29(11):60.
[19]张伟业,万春友,张涛,等.外固定器轴向载荷分担比测试在Taylor空间支架外固定治疗胫腓骨开放性骨折中的应用[J].中医正骨,2019,31(10):21.
 ZHANG Weiye,WAN Chunyou,ZHANG Tao,et al.Application of axial load sharing ratio test on external fixator to the surgery of Taylor spatial frame external fixation for treatment of open tibiofibular fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2019,31(10):21.
[20]王珺琛,曹湘予,杨玉山,等.Ilizarov骨搬移技术治疗胫腓骨开放性骨折胫骨大段骨缺损[J].中医正骨,2019,31(10):55.

更新日期/Last Update: 2016-10-20