[1]徐启飞,林岿然,赵广辉.跗骨窦入路切开复位微创解剖接骨板内固定治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2020,32(10):26-30.
　XU Qifei,LIN Kuiran,ZHAO Guanghui.A clinical study of open reduction and minimally invasive anatomic bone plate internal fixation through sinus tarsal approach for treatment of Sanders typeⅡandⅢcalcaneus fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2020,32(10):26-30.
点击复制

跗骨窦入路切开复位微创解剖接骨板内固定治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的临床研究()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第32卷
期数:
2020年10期
页码:
26-30
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A clinical study of open reduction and minimally invasive anatomic bone plate internal fixation through sinus tarsal approach for treatment of Sanders typeⅡandⅢcalcaneus fractures
作者:
徐启飞; 林岿然; 赵广辉
(平顶山市第一人民医院,河南 平顶山 467000)
Author(s):
XU Qifei; LIN Kuiran; ZHAO Guanghui
The First People’s Hospital of Pingdingshan,Pingdingshan 467000,Henan,China
关键词:
跟骨;  骨折固定术; 内;  跗骨窦入路;  临床试验
Keywords:
calcaneus;  fracture fixation; internal;  sinus tarsal approach;  clinical trial
摘要:
目的:探讨跗骨窦入路切开复位微创解剖接骨板内固定治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的临床疗效与安全性。方法:回顾性分析54例SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折患者的病例资料,其中采用跗骨窦入路切开复位微创解剖接骨板内固定治疗26例(跗骨窦入路组),采用外侧扩大的L形入路切开复位解剖锁定接骨板内固定治疗28例(外侧扩大的L形入路组)。比较2组患者骨折至手术时间、手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、跟骨高度和宽度、B?ler角、Gissane角、美国足与踝关节协会(American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society,AOFAS)踝与后足功能评分及并发症发生情况。结果:跗骨窦入路组的骨折至手术时间、手术时间、术中出血量及术后48 h引流量均少于外侧扩大的L形入路组[(4.9±1.8)d,(9.4±2.3)d,t=11.240,P=0.009;(49.5±10.1)min,(74.7±15.4)min,t=7.870,P=0.013;(64.4±21.0)mL,(115.4±24.6)mL,t=7.450,P=0.038;(34.7±17.6)mL,(60.4±19.7)mL,t=6.540,P=0.042]。术后12个月,2组患者的跟骨高度、跟骨宽度、B?ler角、Gissane角、AOFAS踝与后足功能评分比较,组间差异均无统计学意义[(41.7±2.1)mm,(40.2±2.0)mm,t=1.478,P=0.450;(31.7±2.4)mm,(32.4±2.2)mm,t=0.179,P=0.180; 31.2°±2.7°,29.6°±2.2°,t=2.710,P=0.680; 131.4°±2.1°,134.3°±2.4°,t=0.778,P=0.790;(91.8±5.4)分,(90.1±4.9)分,t=0.220,P=0.750]。跗骨窦入路组1例出现腓肠神经损伤症状,经口服营养神经药物治疗后缓解,均未出现切口感染、皮缘坏死及延迟愈合等并发症; 外侧扩大的L形入路组3例出现切口感染、皮缘坏死,其中2例经换药后切口愈合,1例出现跟骨接骨板外露,给予局部皮瓣覆盖后愈合良好。2组患者的并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.927,P=0.336)。结论:采用跗骨窦入路切开复位微创解剖接骨板内固定和外侧扩大的L形入路切开复位解剖锁定接骨板内固定治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折临床疗效、安全性相当,但前者术前准备时间短、手术创伤小、手术时间短。
Abstract:
To explore the clinical curative effects and safety of open reduction and minimally invasive anatomic bone plate internal fixation through sinus tarsal approach for treatment of Sanders typeⅡandⅢcalcaneus fractures.Methods:The medical records of 54 patients with Sanders typeⅡandⅢcalcaneus fractures were analyzed retrospectively.Twenty-six patients were treated with open reduction and minimally invasive anatomic bone plate internal fixation through sinus tarsal approach(group A),while the others were treated with open reduction and anatomic locking bone plate internal fixation through extended lateral L-shaped approach(group B).The duration from fracture to surgery,operative time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative drainage volume,calcaneus height,calcaneus width,B?ler angle,Gissane angle,American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society(AOFAS)ankle-hindfoot function scores and complication incidence were compared between the 2 groups.Results:The duration from fracture to surgery and operative time were shorter and the intraoperative blood loss and postoperative 48-hour drainage volume were less in group A compared to group B(4.9+/-1.8 vs 9.4+/-2.3 days,t=11.240,P=0.009; 49.5+/-10.1 vs 74.7+/-15.4 minutes,t=7.870,P=0.013; 64.4+/-21.0 vs 115.4+/-24.6 mL,t=7.450,P=0.038; 34.7+/-17.6 vs 60.4+/-19.7 mL,t=6.540,P=0.042).There was no statistical difference in calcaneus height,calcaneus width,B?ler angle,Gissane angle and AOFAS ankle-hindfoot function scores between the 2 groups at 12 months after the surgery(41.7+/-2.1 vs 40.2+/-2.0 mm,t=1.478,P=0.450; 31.7+/-2.4 vs 32.4+/-2.2 mm,t=0.179,P=0.180; 31.2+/-2.7 vs 29.6+/-2.2 degrees,t=2.710,P=0.680; 131.4+/-2.1 vs 134.3+/-2.4 degrees,t=0.778,P=0.790; 91.8+/-5.4 vs 90.1+/-4.9 points,t=0.220,P=0.750).Sural nerve injuries were found in 1 patient and the symptoms relieved after oral application of neurotrophic drugs and no complications such as incision infection,cutaneous margin necrosis and delayed healing were found in group A.Incision infection and cutaneous margin necrosis were found in 3 patients in group B,and the incisions healed in 2 patients after dressing change and in 1 patient with calcaneal bone plate exposure after treatment with local skin flap transplantation.There was no statistical difference in complication incidences between the 2 groups(χ2=0.927,P=0.336).Conclusion:Open reduction and minimally invasive anatomic bone plate internal fixation through sinus tarsal approach is similar to open reduction and anatomic locking bone plate internal fixation through extended lateral L-shaped approach in the clinical curative effects and safety in treatment of Sanders typeⅡandⅢcalcaneus fractures,however,the former has the advantages of shorter preoperative preparation time and operative time and less operative injury.

参考文献/References:

[1] 钟裕新.经皮撬拔空心钉固定与“L”型外侧切开复位钢板内固定治疗跟骨骨折的临床疗效及安全性分析[J].心电图杂志(电子版),2019,8(1):74-75.
[2] 张昌军,戴磊,王宪卫.改良经跗骨窦微创小切口切开复位钢板内固定术治疗跟骨骨折的应用效果分析[J].临床研究,2019,27(6):22-23.
[3] DING L,HE Z M,XIAO H J,et al.Risk factors for postoperative wound complications of calcaneal fractures following plate fixation[J].Foot Ankle Int,2013,34(9):1238-1244.
[4] KUMAR S,KRISHNA L G,SINGH D,et al.Evaluation of functional out come and complications of locking calcaneum plate for fracture calcaneum[J].J Clin Orthop Trauma,2015,6(3):147-152.
[5] 陈剑,丁晓,史风雷,等.小切口跟骨锁定钢板外置治疗跟骨骨折[J].中医正骨,2013,25(4):49-50.
[6] 刘长松,王波.107例跟骨骨折术后疗效及并发症浅析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2011,13(8):793-795.
[7] WANG Q X,CHEN W,SU Y L,et al.Minimally invasive treatment of calcaneal fracture by percutaneous leverage,anatomical plate,and compression bolts—the clinical evaluation of cohort of 156 patients[J].J Trauma,2010,69(6):1515-1522.
[8] CANALES S T,BEATY J H.坎贝尔骨科手术学:第11版[M].王岩,译.北京:人民军医出版社,2009:2715.
[9] 王亦璁.骨与关节损伤[M].4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:1544-1547.
[10] 张世民,李海丰,黄轶刚.骨折分类与功能评定[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2008:210-212.
[11] SANDERS R,VAUPEL Z M,ERDOGAN M,et al.Operative treatment of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures:long-term(10-20 years)results in 108 fractures using a prognostic CT classification[J].J Orthop Trauma,2014,28(10):551-563.
[12] 姚兴友.跟骨关节内骨折的临床治疗体会[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2018,18(11):68.
[13] 吴群生.切开复位可塑性钛板内固定联合自体髂骨植骨治疗跟骨关节内骨折[J].中医正骨,2017,29(2):57-59.
[14] CLARE M P,CRAWFORD W S.Managing complications of calcaneus fractures[J].Foot Ankle clin,2017,22(1):105-116.
[15] AGREN P H,WRETENBERG P,SAYED-NOOR A S.Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures:a prospective,randomized,controlled multicenter trial[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2013,95(15):1351-1357.
[16] 施磊,陈先进.闭合复位横向钉联合轴向钉内固定治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折[J].中医正骨,2019,31(9):67-70.
[17] WHITE E A,SKALSKI M R,MATCUK Jr G R,et al.Intra articular tongue-type fractures of the calcanus:anatomy,injury patterns,and an approach to management[J].Emerg Radiol,2019,26(1):67-74.
[18] RAMMELT S,SANGEORZAN B J,SWORDS M P,et al.Calcaneal fractures-should we or should we not operate?[J].Indian J Orthop,2018,52(3):220-230.
[19] 陆义安,薛锋.跟骨骨折切开复位内固定术后切口愈合不良的危险因素分析[J].中医正骨,2018,30(4):43-45.
[20] KETZ J,CLARE M,SANDERS R.Corrective osteotomies for malunited extra-articular calcaneal fractures[J].Foot Ankle Clin,2016,21(1):135-145.
[21] PARK C H,LEE D Y.Surgical treatment of Sanders type 2 calcaneal fractures using a sinus tarsi approach[J].Indian J Orthop,2017,51(4):461-467.
[22] 张昌军,戴磊,王宪卫.改良经跗骨窦微创小切口切开复位钢板内固定术治疗跟骨骨折的应用效果分析[J].临床研究,2019,27(6):22-23.
[23] HSU A R,ANDERSON R B,COHEN B E.Advances in surgical management of intraarticular calcaneus fractures[J].J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2015,23(7):399-407.
[24] 包学迅,夏臣杰,赵必允,等.经跗骨窦小切口治疗SandersⅡ型跟骨关节内骨折[J].中国骨伤,2017,30(8):755-758.
[25] JIMéNEZ-ALMONTE J H,KING J D,LUO T D,et al.Classifications in brief:Sanders classification of intra articular fractures of the calcaneus[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2019,477(2):467-471.

相似文献/References:

[1]温超海,何忠,李永斌,等.闭合复位伽玛钉改良成锁定支架内固定治疗 老年股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):32.
[2]肖善富,张喜善,于凤珍.髌下小切口钢丝纽扣式内固定治疗胫骨髁间隆突骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):34.
[3]朱峰,宋相建,吴蔚,等.手法复位经皮克氏针内固定治疗 儿童闭合性肱骨远端全骨骺分离[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):51.
[4]裘人华,胡培阳,裘天强,等.闭合复位外固定架固定治疗Colles骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):59.
[5]葛波涌,王玉波,王明太,等.交锁髓内钉内固定治疗胫骨干骨折的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):8.
　GE Boyong,WANG Yubo,WANG Mingtai,et al.Clinical study on the internal fixation with interlocking intramedullary nail for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(10):8.
[6]邓红敏,刘志诚.转子间斜行截骨结合股骨近端防旋髓内钉固定治疗 股骨近端骨折术后髋内翻畸形[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):17.
[7]孙群周,阮成群,李光明,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗 老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):20.
[8]方策,倪新宇,王宏伟,等.迟氏正骨手法复位单臂外固定支架固定治疗 老年股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):22.
[9]全先辉,万春友,刘磊,等.Taylor空间支架外固定治疗胫腓骨开放性骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):30.
[10]茆军,张惠法,严培军,等.Ilizarov外固定支架结合克氏针固定治疗Pilon骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):32.
[11]谭新欢,聂伟志,隋显玉,等.闭合复位经皮穿针内固定与切开复位接骨板内固定治疗 PaleyB1型跟骨骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(12):16.
　TAN Xinhuan,NIE Weizhi,SUI Xianyu,et al.A retrospective trial of closed reduction and percutaneous internal fixation with Kirschner wire versus open reduction and internal fixation with bone plate for the treatment of Paley type B1 calcaneal fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(10):16.
[12]吴青松,孙鹏,李立,等.数字骨科技术辅助切开复位内固定术治疗 跟骨骨折的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(12):20.
　WU Qingsong,SUN Peng,LI Li,et al.Clinical study on open reduction internal fixation assisted by digital orthopaedic technique in the treatment of calcaneal fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(10):20.
[13]杨英果,王晓民,班兴平.内外侧联合弧形切口切开复位内固定治疗复杂跟骨骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(06):51.
[14]谭新欢,聂伟志,朱育林,等.跟骨骨折微创治疗的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2015,27(05):73.
[15]汤样华,曾林如,岳振双,等.跟骨后结节骨折内固定失败原因分析[J].中医正骨,2016,28(06):71.
[16]徐毅,李海勋,李智豪.跗骨窦切口微创接骨板内固定治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折[J].中医正骨,2016,28(08):41.
[17]齐兵,王振,姚小锐.三维截骨矫形距下关节融合锁定钛板内固定术治疗Stephens-SandersⅢ型陈旧性跟骨骨折畸形愈合[J].中医正骨,2016,28(11):56.
[18]李浩,沈永辉,季卫平.氦氖激光照射预防新鲜闭合性跟骨骨折术后切口并发症的临床观察[J].中医正骨,2016,28(11):59.
[19]陈先进,张军,张道平,等.撬拨复位双向空心螺钉内固定联合植骨治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折[J].中医正骨,2016,28(12):61.
[20]吴群生.切开复位可塑性钛板内固定联合自体髂骨植骨治疗跟骨关节内骨折[J].中医正骨,2017,29(02):57.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
通讯作者:徐启飞 E-mail:pdsxqf@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-10-20