[1]吴天然,陈夏平,李铭雄,等.微创孟氏架外固定治疗老年股骨顺转子间骨折的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2016,28(05):5-8.
　WU Tianran,CHEN Xiaping,LI Mingxiong,et al.A clinical study of minimally invasive external fixation with Meng's fixator for treatment of femoral antegrade intertrochanteric fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(05):5-8.
点击复制

微创孟氏架外固定治疗老年股骨顺转子间骨折的临床研究()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第28卷
期数:
2016年05期
页码:
5-8
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2016-05-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A clinical study of minimally invasive external fixation with Meng's fixator for treatment of femoral antegrade intertrochanteric fractures in the aged
作者:
吴天然; 陈夏平; 李铭雄; 吴成专; 陈长贤; 刘联群; 王瑞雄; 叶志强; 张昭兴
福建省泉州市正骨医院,福建 泉州 362000
Author(s):
WU Tianran; CHEN Xiaping; LI Mingxiong; WU Chengzhuan; CHEN Changxian; LIU Lianqun; WANG Ruixiong; YE Zhiqiang; ZHANG Zhaoxing
Quanzhou Orthopedic Hospital,Quanzhou 362000,Fujian,China
关键词:
髋骨折;  转子间骨折;  外固定器;  股骨近端防旋髓内钉;  老年人;  临床试验
Keywords:
hip fractures;  intertrochanteric fractures;  external fixators;  proximal femoral nail antirotation;  aged;  clinical trial
摘要:
目的:观察微创孟氏架外固定治疗老年股骨顺转子间骨折的临床疗效及安全性。方法:回顾性分析205例老年股骨顺转子间骨折患者的病例资料,其中采用微创孟氏架外固定96例,采用股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail antirotation,PFNA)固定109例。男98例,女107例。年龄63～99岁,中位数76岁。按照股骨转子间骨折的Evans分型,Ⅰa型20例、Ⅰb型43例、Ⅰc型86例、Ⅰd型56例。受伤至手术时间3～7 d,中位数4 d。比较2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合时间、术后开始部分负重行走时间及并发症发生率,比较2组术后3个月采用Harris髋关节功能评分标准评定的临床疗效。结果:所有患者均获随访,随访时间12～24个月,中位数16个月。孟氏架组的手术时间、骨折愈合时间及术后开始部分负重行走时间均短于PFNA组[(33.09±3.18)min,(52.23±6.99)min,t=-12.370,P=0.000;(12.00±0.80)周,(16.30±1.30)周,t=-12.524,P=0.000;(13.40±1.10)d,(27.80±1.10)d,t=-12.546,P=0.000],其术中出血量小于PFNA组[(11.10±2.20)mL,(100.30±12.20)mL,t=-12.390,P=0.000]。术后孟氏架组出现2例针孔感染、2例下肢深静脉血栓形成、4例固定物松动、3例髋内翻,PFNA组出现1例切口感染、2例下肢深静脉血栓形成、2例内固定物松动、1例髋内翻,2组患者并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.379,P=0.099)。孟氏架组优71例、良15例、差10例,PFNA组优80例、良20例、差9例,2组患者的临床疗效比较,差异无统计学意义(Z=0.473,P=0.789)。结论:孟氏架外固定治疗老年股骨顺转子间骨折,疗效及安全性与PFNA内固定相当,但其具有手术时间短、术中出血少、骨折愈合快、患者可早期行走等优点,值得临床推广应用。
Abstract:
Objective:To observe the clinical curative effect and safety of minimally invasive external fixation with Meng's fixator in treatment of femoral antegrade intertrochanteric fractures in the aged.Methods:The medical records of 205 aged patients with femoral antegrade intertrochanteric fractures were analyzed retrospectively.Ninety-six patients were treated with minimally invasive external fixation with Meng's fixator(Meng's fixator group),while the others were treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation(PFNA group).The patients consisted of 98 males and 107 females,and ranged in age from 63 to 99 years(Median=76 yrs)and ranged in disease course from 3 to 7 days(Median=4 days).According to the Evans classification of intertrochanteric fractures,the fractures belonged to typesIa(20),Ib(43),Ic(86)and Id(56).The operative time,blood loss,fracture healing time,postoperative partial weight-bearing walk start time and complication incidences were compared between the 2 groups.The clinical curative effect were evaluated according to Harris hip function scoring standard and were compared between the 2 groups at 3 months after the surgery.Results:All patients in the 2 groups were followed up for 12-24 months with a median of 16 months.The operative time,fracture healing time and postoperative partial weight-bearing walk start time were shorter in Meng's fixator group compared to PFNA group(33.09+/-3.18 vs 52.23+/-6.99 min,t=-12.370,P=0.000; 12.00+/-0.80 vs 16.30+/-1.30 weeks,t=-12.524,P=0.000; 13.40+/-1.10 vs 27.80+/-1.10 days,t=-12.546,P=0.000),while the blood loss was less in Meng's fixator group compared to PFNA group(11.10+/-2.20 vs 100.30+/-12.20 ml,t=-12.390,P=0.000).After the surgery,pin hole infection(2),lower extremity deep venous thrombosis(2),loosening of internal fixator(4)and coxa vara(3)were found in Meng's fixator group; while incision infection(1),lower extremity deep venous thrombosis(2),loosening of internal fixator(2)and coxa vara(1)were found in PFNA group.There was no statistical difference in complication incidences between the two groups(χ2=2.379,P=0.099).Seventy-one patients obtained an excellent result,15 good and 10 poor in Meng's fixator group; while 80 patients obtained an excellent result,20 good and 9 poor in PFNA group.There was no statistical difference in clinical curative effects between the 2 groups(Z=0.473,P=0.789).Conclusion:External fixation with Meng's fixator is similar to PFNA internal fixation in the total curative effect and safety in treatment of femoral antegrade intertrochanteric fractures in the aged,while the former has the advantages of shorter operative time,less blood loss,faster fracture healing and earlier ambulation,so it is worthy of popularizing in clinic.

参考文献/References:

[1] Evans EM.The treatment of trochanteric fractures of the femur[J].J Bone Joint Surg Br,1949,31B(2):190-203.
[2] 国家中医药管理局.中医病证诊断疗效标准[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1994:170.
[3] 黄文虎,朱法国,任东彪,等.闭合复位股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2014,26(5):52-54.
[4] 刘云鹏,刘沂.骨与关节损伤和疾病的诊断分类及功能评定标准[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2002:216-217.
[5] 高化,王宝军,赵亮,等.股骨转子间骨折围手术期的并发症及死亡原因分析[J].中华骨科杂志,2015,35(8):819-824.
[6] Russell TA,Sanders R.Pertrochanteric hip fractures:time for change[J].J Orthop Trauma,2011,25(4):189-190.
[7] 姜自伟,黄枫,郑晓辉,等.老年股骨转子间骨折患者的围手术期风险评估与控制[J].中医正骨,2015,27(8):33-35.
[8] 梁现会,尚志平.股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗老年股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2014,26(7):38-39.
[9] Sahin EK,Imerci A,Klnlk H,et al.Comparison of proximal femoral nail antirotation(PFNA)with AO dynamic condylar screws(DCS)for the treatment for unstable peritrochanteric femoral fractures[J].Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol,2014,24(3):347-352.
[10] Hélin M,Pelissier A,Boyer P,et al.Does the PFNATM nail limit impaction in unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture?A 115 case-control series[J].Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2015,101(1):45-49.
[11] 龚江浩.股骨近端防旋髓内钉联合抗骨质疏松药物治疗不稳定型老年股骨转子间骨折的临床观察[J].中医正骨,2015,27(4):39-32.
[12] 冯刚,潘志军,叶有晨.股骨转子间骨折围手术期隐性失血的比较研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2012,32(7):648-653.
[13] 朱云森,江敞,李俊.氨甲环酸对老年股骨转子间骨折髓内固定术围手术期隐性失血的影响[J].中医正骨,2015,27(6):16-18.
[14] Brunner A,Büttler M,Lehmann U,et al.What is the optimal salvage procedure for cut-out after surgical fixation of trochanteric fractures with the PFNA or TFN?A multicentre study[J].Injury,2016,47(2):432-438.
[15] 孟和.中西医结合骨科外固定治疗学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:90-92.
[16] 张明强.生物型加长柄半髋关节置换术治疗高龄不稳定股骨转子间骨折疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2015,27(2):56-57.
[17] 赵云昌.人工股骨头置换治疗老年粉碎性股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(8):31-32.

相似文献/References:

[1]方策,倪新宇,王宏伟,等.迟氏正骨手法复位单臂外固定支架固定治疗 老年股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):22.
[2]姜自伟,黄枫,郑晓辉,等.老年股骨转子间骨折患者的围手术期风险评估与控制[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):33.
[3]张明强.生物型加长柄半髋关节置换术治疗 高龄不稳定股骨转子间骨折疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):56.
[4]朱云森,江敞,李俊.氨甲环酸对老年股骨转子间骨折髓内固定术 围手术期隐性失血的影响[J].中医正骨,2015,27(06):16.
　ZHU Yunsen,JIANG Chang,LI Jun.Effect of tranexamic acid on perioperative hidden blood loss in aged patients receiving intramedullary fixation for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(05):16.
[5]李书良,李启义,李建明,等.锁定钢板内固定联合自体髂骨植骨治疗 股骨近端粉碎性骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(05):31.
[6]王智勇,陈柯,田可为,等.联合应用摇杆技术和钳夹技术微创治疗股骨转子部骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(05):36.
[7]郑艳峰,吴勋,周荣昌,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定与动力髋螺钉内固定治疗 老年股骨转子间骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):24.
　ZHENG Yanfeng,WU Xun,ZHOU Rongchang,et al.A comparative study of proximal femoral nail antirotation internal fixation versus dynamic hip screw internal fixation for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(05):24.
[8]王定,胡丰根,胡奇志,等.前侧入路可吸收螺钉内固定治疗Pipkin骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(03):49.
[9]汪迎春,吕一.经皮微创股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗 高龄股骨转子间骨折的手术室护理[J].中医正骨,2015,27(01):77.
[10]李亚楠.老年股骨转子间骨折合并2型糖尿病的围手术期护理[J].中医正骨,2016,28(02):77.
[11]温超海,何忠,李永斌,等.闭合复位伽玛钉改良成锁定支架内固定治疗 老年股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):32.
[12]孙群周,阮成群,李光明,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗 老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):20.
[13]赵云昌.人工股骨头置换治疗老年粉碎性股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):31.
[14]倪新宇,方策.外固定器治疗股骨转子间骨折的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2015,27(07):48.
[15]龚江浩.股骨近端防旋髓内钉联合抗骨质疏松药物治疗 不稳定型老年股骨转子间骨折的临床观察[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):29.
　GONG Jianghao.A combination therapy of proximal femoral nail antirotation and anti-osteoporotic drugs for the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(05):29.
[16]张磊,柴浩.股骨近端髓内钉与动力髋螺钉固定治疗 老年股骨转子间骨折的系统评价[J].中医正骨,2015,27(03):27.
　ZHANG Lei,CHAI Hao.Systematic review on proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw fixation for treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(05):27.
[17]马江涛,俞敏,俞高峰,等.快速康复外科理论在老年股骨转子间骨折治疗中的应用[J].中医正骨,2015,27(01):39.
[18]费国芳,费红良,王金法.两种内固定方法治疗老年不稳定性股骨转子间骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2016,28(05):9.
　FEI Guofang,FEI Hongliang,WANG Jinfa.Comparison of two kinds of internal fixation for treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(05):9.
[19]杨小海,徐峰,尹自飞,等.亚洲型股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗老年股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2016,28(05):58.
[20]雒荣昌,袁西岐,周世超,等.闭合复位股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗老年股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2016,28(11):47.

更新日期/Last Update: 2016-10-30