[1]曹进,胡珊珊,郑华江,等.闭合复位弹性髓内钉内固定与切开复位锁定加压钢板 内固定治疗青少年肱骨干骨折的疗效比较[J].中医正骨,2015,27(01):9-12.
 CAO Jin,HU Shanshan,ZHENG Huajiang,et al.A clinical comparison of closed reduction and elastic stable intramedullary nail internal fixation versus open reduction and locking compression plate internal fixation for treatment of humeral shaft fractures in adolescents[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(01):9-12.
点击复制

闭合复位弹性髓内钉内固定与切开复位锁定加压钢板 内固定治疗青少年肱骨干骨折的疗效比较()
分享到:

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第27卷
期数:
2015年01期
页码:
9-12
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2015-01-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
A clinical comparison of closed reduction and elastic stable intramedullary nail internal fixation versus open reduction and locking compression plate internal fixation for treatment of humeral shaft fractures in adolescents
作者:
曹进胡珊珊郑华江姚陆丰仲肇平
浙江省宁波市第六医院,浙江 宁波 315040
Author(s):
CAO JinHU ShanshanZHENG HuajiangYAO LufengZHONG Zhaoping
The 6th hospital of Ningbo city,Ningbo 315040,Zhejiang,China
关键词:
肱骨骨折 骨折固定术 青少年
Keywords:
humeral fractures fracture fixationinternal adolescent
摘要:
目的:比较闭合复位弹性髓内钉内固定与切开复位锁定加压钢板内固定治疗青少年肱骨干骨折的临床疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性分析采用闭合复位弹性髓内钉内固定和切开复位锁定加压钢板内固定治疗的57例青少年肱骨干骨折患者的病例资料,男36例,女21例; 年龄14~18岁,中位数16岁。均为闭合性损伤。受伤至手术时间2~5 d,中位数3 d。闭合复位弹性髓内钉内固定28例,切开复位锁定加压钢板内固定29例。记录2组患者手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间,随访观察术后骨折愈合、患肢功能恢复及并发症发生情况,并进行比较。结果:57例患者均顺利完成手术,弹性髓内钉组手术时间较锁定加压钢板组短,且术中出血量少[(32.1±5.6)min,(103.8±25.2)min,t=30.770,P=0.000;(13.9±3.9)mL,(171.0±58.2)mL,t=14.246,P=0.000]; 但2组患者住院时间比较,组间差异无统计学意义[(8.8±1.10)d,(9.1±1.3)d,t=1.006,P=0.319]。57例患者均获随访,随访时间12~36个月,中位数25个月; 骨折均愈合,弹性髓内钉组骨折愈合时间较锁定加压钢板组长[(10.7±2.2)周,(9.3±1.9)周; t=2.440,P=0.018]。采用Constant评分标准评价肩关节功能,弹性髓内钉组优26例、良1例、可1例,锁定加压钢板组优26例、良2例、可1例,2组间差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.407,P=0.684)。采用Mayo肘关节功能评分标准评价肘关节功能,弹性髓内钉组优25例、良2例、可1例,锁定加压钢板组优25例、良2例、可2例,2组间差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.378,P=0.705)。2组患者均无感染、内固定断裂、骨折畸形愈合等并发症发生。弹性髓内钉组并发骨折延迟愈合1例,未行特殊处理,术后16周骨折愈合。锁定加压钢板组术后并发桡神经损伤4例,经积极功能锻炼后,患肢功能恢复; 拆除内固定后并发再骨折1例,再次行切开复位锁定加压钢板固定后骨折愈合。2组患者并发症发生率比较,组间差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.802,P=0.371)。结论:采用闭合复位弹性髓内钉内固定和切开复位锁定加压钢板内固定治疗青少年肱骨干骨折,均有利于患肢功能的恢复,疗效相当,安全可靠; 前者较后者手术时间短、损伤小,但骨折愈合时间长。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical curative effect and safety of closed reduction and elastic stable intramedullary nail(ESIN)internal fixation versus open reduction and locking compression plate internal fixation for treatment of humeral shaft fractures in adolescents.Methods:The medical records of 57 adolescent patients with closed fracture of humeral shaft were analyzed retrospectively.The patients consisted of 36 males and 21 females,ranged in age from 14 to 18 years(Median=16 yrs),and ranged in disease course from 2 to 5 days(Median=3 days).Closed reduction and ESIN internal fixation were performed in 28 patients(ESIN group)and open reduction and locking compression plate internal fixation were performed in 29 patients(locking compression plate group).Then the operative time,blood loss,hospital stay,fracture healing,limbs functional recovery and complications were recorded and compared between the 2 groups.Results:The surgery were performed successfully on 57 patients.ESIN group has shorter operation time and less intraoperative blood loss compared to locking compression plate group(32.1+/-5.6 vs 103.8+/-25.2 min,t=30.770,P=0.000; 13.9+/-3.9 vs 171.0+/-58.2 ml,t=14.246,P=0.000),while there was no statistical difference in the hospital stay between the 2 groups(8.8+/-1.10 vs 9.1+/-1.3 days,t=1.006,P=0.319).The patients in the 2 groups were all followed up for 12-36 months with a median of 25 months.All fractures united and fracture healing time was longer in ESIN group compared to locking compression plate group(10.7+/-2.2 vs 9.3+/-1.9 weeks; t=2.440,P=0.018).According to Constant shoulder performance score,26 patients obtained an excellent result,1 good and 1 fair in the ESIN group; while 26 patients obtained an excellent result,2 good and 1 fair in the locking compression plate group; there was no statistical difference between the 2 groups(Z=-0.407,P=0.684).According to Mayo elbow performance score,25 patients obtained an excellent result,2 good and 1 fair in the ESIN group; while 25 patients obtained an excellent result,2 good and 2 fair in the locking compression plate group; there was no statistical difference between the 2 groups(Z=-0.378,P=0.705).No complications such as infection,breakage of internal fixators and fracture malunion were found in the 2 groups.One case of fracture delayed-union was found in ESIN group and the fracture united at 16th week after the surgery without special treatment.Four cases of postoperative radial nerve injury were found in locking compression plate group,and the function of affected limb recovered after active functional exercises.One case of refracture was found after removing internal fixator,and the fracture united after open reduction and locking compression plate internal fixation.There was no statistical difference in complication rates between the 2 groups(chi(2)=0.802,P=0.371).Conclusion:For treatment of humeral shaft fracture in adolescents,closed reduction internal fixation with ESIN and open reduction internal fixation with locking compression plate are similar to each other in limb function recovery,clinical curative effect and safety; however,the former has short operation time,less injury and long fracture healing time.

参考文献/References:

[1] 王亦璁.骨与关节损伤[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2001:553-558.
[2] 王兴盛,练克俭,翟文亮.肱骨干骨折临床治疗进展[J].中医正骨,2007,19(4):67-70.
[3] 毛权,王国平,金登峰,等.三种不同方法在肱骨干骨折治疗中的应用及比较[J].中医正骨,2005,17(3):14-15.
[4] 徐敏鸥,王蕾,金敬华,等.外固定支架辅助下微创经皮钢板内固定治疗肱骨干骨折[J].中医正骨,2013,25(5):41-42.
[5] 房经武,高海兴,王金国,等.Ilizarov外固定器结合中药治疗肱骨干骨折骨不连[J].中医正骨,2012,24(9):52-53.
[6] 何才勇,周琦石,黄枫.锁定加压接骨板内固定治疗肱骨干骨折58例[J].中医正骨,2009,21(7):49-50.
[7] 胡孔才,曹进,诸葛天瑜,等.闭合复位弹性髓内钉内固定治疗儿童肱骨干骨折[J].中医正骨,2010,22(9):58-59.
[8] Constant CR,Murley AH.A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,1987,(214):160-164.
[9] 蒋协远,王大伟.骨科临床疗效评价标准[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:50-51.
[10] Gordon JE,Gregush RV,Schoenecker PL,et al.Complications after titanium elastic nailing of pediatric tibial fractures[J].J Pediatr Orthop,2007,27(4):442-446.
[11] Rathjen KE,Riccio AI,De La Garza D.Stainless steel flexible intramedullary fixation of unstable femoral shaft fractures in children[J].J Pediatr Orthop,2007,27(4):432-441.
[12] Thakkar NN.Complications of titanium and stainless steel elastic nail fixation of pediatric femoral fractures[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2010,92(5):1318.
[13] 张峻玮,姜春阳,黄明利.钛制弹性髓内钉结合夹板弹力带固定治疗肱骨干骨折[J].中医正骨,2011,23(9):50.
[14] Gerber C,Mast JW,Ganz R.Biological internal fixation of fractures[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,1990,109(6):295-303.
[15] Palmer RH.Biological osteosynthesis[J].Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract,1999,29(5):1171-1185.

相似文献/References:

[1]温超海,何忠,李永斌,等.闭合复位伽玛钉改良成锁定支架内固定治疗 老年股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):32.
[2]肖善富,张喜善,于凤珍.髌下小切口钢丝纽扣式内固定治疗胫骨髁间隆突骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):34.
[3]裘人华,胡培阳,裘天强,等.闭合复位外固定架固定治疗Colles骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):59.
[4]沈海,刘昕,彭玉兰,等.复位架牵引下手法复位经皮穿针内固定治疗 儿童肱骨髁上骨折的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):1.
 SHEN Hai,LIU Xin,PENG Yulan,et al.Clinical study on reduction frame traction combined with manipulative reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wire internal fixation for treatment of humeral supracondylar fractures in children[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(01):1.
[5]葛波涌,王玉波,王明太,等.交锁髓内钉内固定治疗胫骨干骨折的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):8.
 GE Boyong,WANG Yubo,WANG Mingtai,et al.Clinical study on the internal fixation with interlocking intramedullary nail for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(01):8.
[6]邓红敏,刘志诚.转子间斜行截骨结合股骨近端防旋髓内钉固定治疗 股骨近端骨折术后髋内翻畸形[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):17.
[7]孙群周,阮成群,李光明,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗 老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):20.
[8]方策,倪新宇,王宏伟,等.迟氏正骨手法复位单臂外固定支架固定治疗 老年股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):22.
[9]全先辉,万春友,刘磊,等.Taylor空间支架外固定治疗胫腓骨开放性骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):30.
[10]茆军,张惠法,严培军,等.Ilizarov外固定支架结合克氏针固定治疗Pilon骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):32.
[11]朱峰,宋相建,吴蔚,等.手法复位经皮克氏针内固定治疗 儿童闭合性肱骨远端全骨骺分离[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):51.
[12]钱平康,徐锋,孙斌峰,等.肱骨近端内锁定系统固定结合植骨治疗肱骨近端骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(09):36.
[13]余斌峰,王伟良,林锡鹏.加长型肱骨近端内固定锁定系统治疗肱骨干骨折 合并同侧肱骨近端骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):23.
[14]黄杨,王昌兴,邹阳.AO钛制弹性髓内钉内固定与切开复位钢板内固定治疗 小儿肱骨干中下段骨折的比较研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(07):22.
 HUNAG Yang,WANG Changxing,ZOU Yang.A comparative study of AO titanium elastic stable intramedullary nail internal fixation versus open reduction plate osteosynthesis for the treatment of mid-distal humeral fractures in children[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(01):22.
[15]王海敏,汤志刚,诸葛天瑜,等.桥接组合式内固定系统固定治疗肱骨远端骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(12):63.
[16]蒋健,杨晓.尺侧小切口复位结合经皮交叉克氏针内固定 治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):60.
[17]彭玉兰,周英,王英.分步手法复位肘关节外翻位固定联合外用中药治疗 婴幼儿肱骨髁上骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):56.
[18]李卫国,孙献武,谭训香,等.闭合复位内外固定结合中医康复治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2016,28(05):1.
 LI Weiguo,SUN Xianwu,TAN Xunxiang,et al.Clinical study on closed reduction and internal & external fixation combined with TCM rehabilitation in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(01):1.
[19]张川,张作君,蔡鸿敏,等.带肘肌肌瓣尺骨鹰嘴不规则截骨入路和V形截骨入路治疗肱骨远端C3型骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2017,29(12):26.
 ZHANG Chuan,ZHANG Zuojun,CAI Hongmin,et al.A retrospective trial of irregular osteotomy approach versus V-shape osteotomy approach in anconeus flap olecranon osteotomy for treatment of type C3 distal humeral fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2017,29(01):26.
[20]吴博,季卫平,王波,等.AO克氏针张力带与髌骨针张力带内固定治疗儿童GartlandⅢ型肱骨髁上骨折的对比研究…[J].中医正骨,2017,29(12):34.
 WU Bo,JI Weiping,WANG Bo,et al.A comparative study of internal fixation with AO Kirschner wire tension band versus patella needle tension band for treatment of Gartland typeⅢhumeral supracondylar fractures in children[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2017,29(01):34.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
2014-07-22收稿 2014-09-11修回
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-01-30