[1]张川,张作君,蔡鸿敏,等.带肘肌肌瓣尺骨鹰嘴不规则截骨入路和V形截骨入路治疗肱骨远端C3型骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2017,29(12):26-30.
　ZHANG Chuan,ZHANG Zuojun,CAI Hongmin,et al.A retrospective trial of irregular osteotomy approach versus V-shape osteotomy approach in anconeus flap olecranon osteotomy for treatment of type C3 distal humeral fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2017,29(12):26-30.
点击复制

带肘肌肌瓣尺骨鹰嘴不规则截骨入路和V形截骨入路治疗肱骨远端C3型骨折的对比研究()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第29卷
期数:
2017年12期
页码:
26-30
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2017-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A retrospective trial of irregular osteotomy approach versus V-shape osteotomy approach in anconeus flap olecranon osteotomy for treatment of type C3 distal humeral fractures
作者:
张川; 张作君; 蔡鸿敏; 昌中孝; 杨林平; 赵明; 李星星; 王国杰; 段小波
河南省洛阳正骨医院/河南省骨科医院,河南 洛阳 471002
Author(s):
ZHANG Chuan; ZHANG Zuojun; CAI Hongmin; CHANG Zhongxiao; YANG Linping; ZHAO Ming; LI Xingxing; WANG Guojie; DUAN Xiaobo
Luoyang Orthopedic-Traumatological Hospital,Luoyang 471002,Henan,China
关键词:
肱骨骨折;  尺骨鹰嘴;  骨折固定术; 内;  截骨术;  临床试验
Keywords:
Key words humeral fractures;  olecranon process;  fracture fixation; internal;  osteotomy;  clinical trial
摘要:
目的:比较带肘肌肌瓣尺骨鹰嘴不规则截骨入路和V形截骨入路治疗肱骨远端C3型骨折的临床疗效和安全性。方法:2013年1月至2015年11月,采用带肘肌肌瓣的尺骨鹰嘴截骨入路行双柱解剖锁定接骨板内固定治疗肱骨远端C3型骨折患者29例,15例采用尺骨鹰嘴不规则截骨(不规则截骨组)、14例采用尺骨鹰嘴V形截骨(V形截骨组)。比较2组患者的手术时间、肘关节屈伸活动范围、总体疗效及并发症发生情况。总体疗效评价采用Mayo肘关节功能评分量表。结果:所有患者均顺利完成手术,2组患者的手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义[(122.6±12.6)min,(114.6±10.3)min,t=1.711,P=0.098]。所有患者均获得随访; 不规则截骨组随访11～29个月,中位数20.5个月; V形截骨组随访14～37个月,中位数24个月。不规则截骨组中术前合并尺神经损伤和桡神经损伤的患者分别于术后3个月和术后5个月恢复。不规则截骨组2例发生异位骨化; 1例出现切口浅表感染,应用抗生素后治愈。V形截骨组1例发生异位骨化; 1例以张力带钢丝固定尺骨鹰嘴截骨块的患者,术后1周功能锻炼时钢丝断裂,再次手术更换钢丝固定,2个月后鹰嘴截骨部位愈合。2组患者均未发生截骨部位延迟愈合或不愈合。2组患者的并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P=1.000)。末次随访时,2组患者的肘关节屈伸活动范围比较,差异无统计学意义(88.7°±11.3°,86.7°±10.8°,t=0.458,P=0.651); 按照Mayo肘关节功能评分量表评定总体疗效,不规则截骨组优4例、良7例、可4例,V形截骨组优5例、良6例、可3例。2组患者的总体疗效比较,差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.516,P=0.606)。结论:经带肘肌肌瓣尺骨鹰嘴不规则截骨入路和V形截骨入路治疗肱骨远端C3型骨折的疗效和安全性相当。
Abstract:
ABSTRACT Objective:To compare the clinical curative effects and safety of irregular osteotomy approach versus V-shape osteotomy approach in anconeus flap olecranon osteotomy for treatment of type C3 distal humeral fractures.Methods:Twenty-nine patients received double rods anatomical locking plate internal fixation through anconeus flap olecranon osteotomy approach for treatment of type C3 distal humeral fracture from January 2013 to November 2015.Fifteen patients were treated with irregular osteotomy of olecranon(irregular osteotomy group),while the others were treated with V-shape osteotomy of olecranon(V-shape osteotomy group).The operative times,elbow flexion-extension range,total curative effect and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups,and the total curative effects were evaluated by using Mayo elbow joint function scale.Results:The surgery was finished successfully in all patients and there was no statistical difference in operative time between the 2 groups(122.6+/-12.6 vs 114.6+/-10.3 min,t=1.711,P=0.098).All patients in the 2 groups were followed up.The patients in irregular osteotomy group were followed up for 11-29 months with a median of 20.5 months,and the patients in V-shape osteotomy group were followed up for 14-37 months with a median of 24 months.The patients with pre-surgery ulnar nerve injury or radial nerve injury in irregular osteotomy group recovered at 3 and 5 months after the surgery respectively.In irregular osteotomy group,the heterotopic ossifications were found in two patients and the superficial incision infection was found in one patient,who was cured after application of antibiotics.In V-shape osteotomy group,the heterotopic ossification was found in one patient and the tension band steel-wire which was fixing the olecranon bone block broke in one patient when he was taking functional exercise at 1 week after surgery,then reoperation was performed to replace the broken steel-wire,and the osteotomy site of olecranon was healed 2 months later.Neither delayed union nor nonunion of osteotomy site was found in both of the 2 groups.There was no statistical difference in complication incidences between the 2 groups(P=1.000).There was no statistical difference in elbow flexion-extension range between the 2 groups at the last follow-up(88.7+/-11.3 vs 86.7+/-10.8 degrees,t=0.458,P=0.651).The clinical comprehensive curative effects were evaluated according to Mayo elbow joint function scale.Four patients obtained an excellent result,7 good and 4 fair in irregular osteotomy group; while 5 patients obtained an excellent result,6 good and 3 fair in V-shape osteotomy group.There was no statistical difference in clinical total curative effects between the 2 groups(Z=-0.516,P=0.606).Conclusion:Irregular anconeus flap olecranon osteotomy approach and V-shape anconeus flap olecranon osteotomy approach are similar to each other in the curative effects and safty in treatment of type C3 distal humeral fractures.

参考文献/References:

[1] MORREY BF.The elbow and its disorders:functional evaluation of the elbow[J].3rd ed.Philadelphia:Saunders,2000:82.
[2] ATALAR AC,DEMIRHAN M,SALDUZ A,et al.Functional results of the parallel-plate technique or complex distal humerus fractures[J].Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc,2009,43(1):21-27.
[3] HABIB M,TANWAR YS,JAISWAL A,et al.Anconeus pedicle olecranon flip osteotomy:an approach for the fixation of complex intra-articular distal humeral fractures[J].Bone Joint J,2014,96-B(9):1252-1257.
[4] DAKOURÉ PW,NDIAYE A,NDOYE JM,et al.Posterior surgical approaches to the elbow:a simple method of comparison of the articular exposure[J].Surg Radiol Anat,2007,29(8):671-674.
[5] CHEN G,LIAO Q,LUO W,et al.Triceps-sparing versus olecranon osteotomy for ORIF:analysis of 67 cases of intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus[J].Injury,2011,42(4):366-370.
[6] LI SH,LI ZH,CAI ZD,et al.Bilateral plate fixation for type C distal humerus fractures:experience at a single institution[J].Int Orthop,2011,35(3):433-438.
[7] GOFTON WT,MACDERMID JC,PATTERSON SD,et al.Functional outcome of AO type C distal humeral fractures[J].J Hand Surg Am,2003,28(2):294-308.
[8] HEWINS EA,GOFTON WT,DUBBERLY J,et al.Plate fixation of olecranon osteotomies[J].J Orthop Trauma,2007,21(1):58-62.
[9] SCHMIDT-HORLOHÉ K,WILDE P,BONK A,et al.One-third tubular-hook-plate osteosynthesis for olecranon osteotomies in distal humerus type-C fractures:a preliminary report of results and complications[J].Injury,2012,43(3):295-300.
[10] HELFET DL,KLOEN P,ANAND N,et al.ORIF of delayed unions and nonunions of distal humeral fractures.Surgical technique[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2004,86-A(Suppl 1):18-29.
[11] ZUMSTEIN MA,RANIGA S,FLUECKIGER R,et al.Triceps-sparing extra-articular step-cut olecranon osteotomy for distal humeral fractures:an anatomic study[J].J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2017,26(9):1620-1628.
[12] ZUMSTEIN MA,BÜRKI A,MASSY AS,et al.Extra-articular step osteotomy of the olecranon:A biomechanical assessment[J].Clinical Biomechanics,2015,30(10):1043-1048.
[13] 朱建东,王崇佳,俞钰贤.尺骨鹰嘴截骨入路内外侧双解剖锁定钢板内固定治疗肱骨髁间骨折[J].中医正骨,2014,26(4):52-54.

相似文献/References:

[1]朱峰,宋相建,吴蔚,等.手法复位经皮克氏针内固定治疗 儿童闭合性肱骨远端全骨骺分离[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):51.
[2]沈海,刘昕,彭玉兰,等.复位架牵引下手法复位经皮穿针内固定治疗 儿童肱骨髁上骨折的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):1.
　SHEN Hai,LIU Xin,PENG Yulan,et al.Clinical study on reduction frame traction combined with manipulative reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wire internal fixation for treatment of humeral supracondylar fractures in children[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(12):1.
[3]钱平康,徐锋,孙斌峰,等.肱骨近端内锁定系统固定结合植骨治疗肱骨近端骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(09):36.
[4]姜自伟,欧阳崇志,黄枫,等.肱骨近端骨折改良Neer分型的四部评分法[J].中医正骨,2015,27(09):64.
[5]余斌峰,王伟良,林锡鹏.加长型肱骨近端内固定锁定系统治疗肱骨干骨折 合并同侧肱骨近端骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):23.
[6]黄杨,王昌兴,邹阳.AO钛制弹性髓内钉内固定与切开复位钢板内固定治疗 小儿肱骨干中下段骨折的比较研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(07):22.
　HUNAG Yang,WANG Changxing,ZOU Yang.A comparative study of AO titanium elastic stable intramedullary nail internal fixation versus open reduction plate osteosynthesis for the treatment of mid-distal humeral fractures in children[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(12):22.
[7]刘昕,邓志强,叶家军.大龄儿童肱骨外髁陈旧性骨折不愈合继发肘外翻畸形的 分期手术治疗[J].中医正骨,2015,27(07):55.
[8]江涛,江林,史俊德.逆转推压法复位克氏针内固定治疗小儿肱骨外髁Ⅲ型骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(12):60.
[9]王海敏,汤志刚,诸葛天瑜,等.桥接组合式内固定系统固定治疗肱骨远端骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(12):63.
[10]蒋健,杨晓.尺侧小切口复位结合经皮交叉克氏针内固定 治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):60.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:河南省科技攻关计划项目(152102310164) 通讯作者:张作君 E-mail:zc360006@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-05-02