[1]邝孝坤,田可为,范克杰,等.股骨颈骨折空心螺钉内固定术后股骨颈短缩危险因素的Meta分析[J].中医正骨,2024,36(10):44-51.
　KUANG Xiaokun,TIAN Kewei,FAN Kejie,et al.Risk factors for femoral neck shortening after hollow screw internal fixation for femoral neck fracture:a meta analysis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2024,36(10):44-51.
点击复制

股骨颈骨折空心螺钉内固定术后股骨颈短缩危险因素的Meta分析()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第36卷
期数:
2024年10期
页码:
44-51
栏目:
文献研究
出版日期:
2024-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Risk factors for femoral neck shortening after hollow screw internal fixation for femoral neck fracture:a meta analysis
作者:
邝孝坤1; 田可为2; 范克杰2; 马文龙2; 刘英科1; 严嘉祥2; 王敬威2; 田燃2; 栗林1; 陈柯2
1.河南中医药大学研究生院,河南 郑州 450046; 2.河南省洛阳正骨医院/河南省骨科医院,河南 洛阳 471002
Author(s):
KUANG Xiaokun1; TIAN Kewei2; FAN Kejie2; MA Wenlong2; LIU Yingke1; YAN Jiaxiang2; WANG Jingwei2; TIAN Ran2; LI Lin1; CHEN Ke2
1.Postgraduate College of Henan University of Chinese Medicine,Zhengzhou 450046,Henan,China 2.Luoyang Orthopedic-Traumatological Hospital,Luoyang 471002,Henan,China
关键词:
股骨颈骨折;  骨折固定术; 内;  骨螺丝;  股骨颈短缩;  危险因素;  专题Meta分析
Keywords:
femoral neck fractures;  fracture fixation; internal;  bone screws;  femoral neck shortening;  risk factors;  meta-analysis as topic
摘要:
目的:系统评价股骨颈骨折(femoral neck fracture,FNF)空心螺钉内固定术后股骨颈短缩(femoral neck shortening,FNS)的危险因素。方法:检索中国知网、中国生物医学文献服务系统、万方数据库、维普网、PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、Web of Science,搜集有关FNF空心螺钉内固定术后FNS危险因素的队列研究或病例对照研究,检索时限均为建库至2024年3月1日。由2名研究人员独立筛选文献、提取数据并评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后,采用Stata16.0软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入16项研究,均为病例对照研究,共涉及1583例FNF患者。Meta分析结果显示,年龄[MD=3.10,95%CI(0.36,5.84),P=0.026]、骨质疏松[OR=3.44,95%CI(2.50,4.75),P=0.000]、Singh指数Ⅳ～Ⅵ级[OR=1.57,95%CI(1.11,2.23),P=0.011]、GardenⅢ～Ⅳ型[OR=3.65,95%CI(1.95,6.85),P=0.000]、PauwelsⅢ型[OR=5.01,95%CI(2.98,8.43),P=0.000]、切开复位[OR=3.29,95%CI(1.69,6.42),P=0.000]、Garden指数Ⅲ～Ⅳ级[OR=5.15,95%CI(3.94,6.74),P=0.000]均为FNF空心螺钉内固定术后FNS的危险因素; 性别、高血压病史、糖尿病病史、置钉方式、住院时间与FNS的关联性均无统计学意义。体质量指数按照数据类型进行亚组分析,二分类变量组(≤24 kg·m-2/>24 kg·m-2)的分析结果显示,体质量指数>24 kg·m-2是FNS的危险因素[OR=3.32,95%CI(2.19,5.03),P=0.000]; 连续性变量组的分析结果显示,体质量指数与FNS的关联性无统计学意义。受伤至手术时间按照时间划分的界值进行亚组分析,24 h界值组(≤24 h/>24 h)的分析结果显示,受伤至手术时间与FNS的关联性无统计学意义; 4 d界值组(≤4 d/>4 d)的分析结果显示,受伤至手术时间>4 d是FNS的危险因素[OR=2.04,95%CI(1.46,2.86),P=0.000]。完全负重时间按照时间划分的界值进行亚组分析,2个月界值组(≤2个月/>2个月)的分析结果显示,术后2个月内完全负重是FNS的危险因素[OR=2.57,95%CI(1.03,6.38),P=0.000]; 3个月界值组(≤3个月/>3个月)的分析结果显示,完全负重时间与FNS的关联性无统计学意义。分别采用固定效应模型和随机效应模型对上述指标进行Meta分析,所得结果接近,表明研究结果稳健可靠。基于Garden分型进行发表偏倚分析,Egger's检验结果提示不存在发表偏倚(P=0.190)。结论:现有证据表明,年龄、骨质疏松、Singh指数Ⅳ～Ⅵ级、GardenⅢ～Ⅳ型、PauwelsⅢ型、切开复位、Garden指数Ⅲ～Ⅳ级是FNF空心螺钉内固定术后FNS的危险因素,体质量指数、受伤至手术时间、完全负重时间与FNS的关系尚不明确。
Abstract:
Objective:To systematically review the risk factors for femoral neck shortening(FNS)after internal fixation with hollow screw for treating femoral neck fracture(FNF).Methods:All the cohort study articles and case-control study articles about the risk factors for FNS after internal fixation with hollow screw for FNF included from database's inception to March 1,2024 were retrieved from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure,Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System,Wanfang Database,Vip Database,PubMed,Cochrane Library,Embase and Web of Science.The pertinent articles were screened,the information was extracted and the risk of bias of the included researches was assessed independently by two researchers,and then a Meta-analysis was conducted by using Stata16.0 software.Results:Sixteen case-control study articles were included in the final analysis,involving 1583 FNF patients.The results of Meta-analysis revealed that the age(MD=3.10,95%CI(0.36,5.84),P=0.026),osteoporosis(OR=3.44,95%CI(2.50,4.75),P=0.000),Singh's index graded from Ⅳ to Ⅵ(OR=1.57,95%CI(1.11,2.23),P=0.011),Garden type Ⅲ-Ⅳ(OR=3.65,95%CI(1.95,6.85),P=0.000),Pauwels type Ⅲ(OR=5.01,95%CI(2.98,8.43),P=0.000),open reduction(OR=3.29,95%CI(1.69,6.42),P=0.000),Garden's index graded from Ⅲ to Ⅳ(OR=5.15,95%CI(3.94,6.74),P=0.000)were the risk factors for FNS in patients who underwent hollow screw internal fixation for FNF; while,the associations of gender,hypertension history,diabetes mellitus history,screw placement method,and hospital stays with FNS were not statistical significant.A subgroup analysis on body mass index(BMI)was conducted according to the data type,and the results of binary variable group(BMI≤24 kg/m(2)or >24 kg/m(2))showed that a BMI greater than 24 kg/m(2)was the risk factor for FNS(OR=3.32,95%CI(2.19,5.03),P=0.000); while the results of continuous variable group indicated that the association between BMI and FNS was not statistical significant.Additionally,a subgroup analysis on time from injury to surgery was performed according to the cut-off value defined by time,and the results of 24-hour cut-off value group(time from injury to surgery≤24 hours or >24 hours)indicated that the association between time from injury to surgery and FNS was not statistical significant; while the results of 4-day cut-off value group(time from injury to surgery≤4 days or >4 days)suggested that the time from injury to surgery over 4 days was a risk factor for FNS(OR=2.04,95%CI(1.46,2.86),P=0.000).Moreover,a subgroup analysis on full weight-bearing walking start time was performed according to the cut-off value defined by time,and the results of 2-month cut-off value group(full weight-bearing walking start time≤2 months or >2 months)revealed that full weight-bearing within 2 months after surgery was a risk factor for FNS(OR=2.57,95%CI(1.03,6.38),P=0.000); while the results of 3-month cut-off value group(full weight-bearing walking start time≤3 months or >3 months)suggested that the association between full weight-bearing walking start time and FNS was not statistical significant.The Meta-analysis was performed on the aforementioned indicators by employing a fixed-effect model and a random-effect model,respectively,and the results showcased that no evident change was found in the result of each indicator,suggesting the findings of the Meta-analysis in this study were relatively stable and reliable.Moreover,the publication bias was analyzed based on the Garden typing,and the result of Egger's test showed that there was no publication bias in the included articles(P=0.190).Conclusion:Available evidences suggest that the age,osteoporosis,Singh's index graded from Ⅳ to Ⅵ,Garden type Ⅲ-Ⅳ,Pauwels type Ⅲ,open reduction,Garden's index graded from Ⅲ to Ⅳ are the risk factors for FNS after internal fixation with hollow screw for FNF; while,the relation of BMI,time from injury to surgery and full weight-bearing walking start time to FNS are not yet clear.

参考文献/References:

[1] WU H,LI Y,TONG L,et al.Worldwide research tendency and hotspots on hip fracture:a 20-year bibliometric analysis[J].Arch Osteoporos,2021,16(1):73.
[2] HAIDER T,SCHNABEL J,HOCHPÖCHLER J,et al.Femoral shortening does not impair functional outcome after internal fixation of femoral neck fractures in non-geriatric patients[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2018,138(11):1511-1517.
[3] CROSBY J M,PARKER M J.Femoral neck collapse after internal fixation of an intracapsular hip fracture:does it indicate a poor outcome?[J].Injury,2016,47(12):2760-2763.
[4] SINGH M,RIGGS B L,BEABOUT J W,et al.Femoral trabecular-pattern index for evaluation of spinal osteoporosis[J].Ann Intern Med,1972,77(1):63-67.
[5] GARDEN R S.Low-angle fixation in fractures of the femoral neck[J].J Bone Joint Surg Br,1961,43-B(4):647-663.
[6] BARTONÍCEK J.Pauwels' classification of femoral neck fractures:correct interpretation of the original[J].J Orthop Trauma,2001,15(5):358-360.
[7] GARDEN R S.Stability and union in subcapital fractures of the femur[J].J Bone Joint Surg Br,1964,46:630-647.
[8] STANG A.Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses[J].Eur J Epidemiol,2010,25(9):603-605.
[9] 张番,杜云峰.股骨颈骨折复位内固定后股骨颈短缩的因素分析[J].数理医药学杂志,2022,35(2):197-199.
[10] 吴涛华.青壮年外展嵌插型股骨颈骨折术后出现股骨颈短缩的影响因素[J].实用中西医结合临床,2022,22(23):58-61.
[11] 牟帅,肖鹏,张建亮,等.股骨颈骨折复位内固定后股骨颈短缩的发生率及相关因素[J].中国组织工程研究,2020,24(21):3304-3309.
[12] 陈德,王海洋,郭思远,等.股骨颈骨折复位内固定术后股骨颈短缩危险因素分析[J].创伤与急危重病医学,2020,8(6):434-437.
[13] 冯晓飞.股骨颈骨折内固定术后股骨颈短缩的临床研究[D].宁波:宁波大学,2018.
[14] LIU Y,AI Z S,SHAO J,et al.Femoral neck shortening after internal fixation[J].Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc,2013,47(6):400-404.
[15] 刘红伟.老年股骨颈骨折患者内固定术后发生股骨颈短缩的影响因素[J].黑龙江医药科学,2022,45(4):151-152.
[16] 潘永飞,何一成,张晓峰.股骨颈骨折空心螺钉固定术后股骨颈短缩影响因素的初步分析[J].当代医学,2019,25(33):21-24.
[17] 余波,周道政,包毅,等.股骨颈骨折内固定术后股骨颈短缩的影响因素分析[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2016,24(6):41-44.
[18] 蒲晓斌,李裕标,马波,等.内固定术后股骨颈短缩的多因素分析及其对骨折的影响[J].现代生物医学进展,2012,12(17):3263-3266.
[19] ZHAO F,GUO L,WANG X,et al.Analysis on risk factors for neck shortening after internal fixation for Pauwels Ⅱ femoral neck fracture in young patients[J].Eur J Med Res,2021,26(1):59.
[20] CHEN X,ZHANG J,WANG X,et al.Incidence of and factors influencing femoral neck shortening in elderly patients after fracture fixation with multiple cancellous screws[J].Med Sci Monit,2017,23:1456-1463.
[21] SLOBOGEAN G P,STOCKTON D J,ZENG B F,et al.Femoral neck shortening in adult patients under the age of 55 years is associated with worse functional outcomes:analysis of the prospective multi-center study of hip fracture outcomes in China(SHOC)[J].Injury,2017,48(8):1837-1842.
[22] ZIELINSKI S M,KEIJSERS N L,PRAET S F,et al.Femoral neck shortening after internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture[J].Orthopedics,2013,36(7):e849-e858.
[23] SUNG Y B,JUNG E Y,KIM K I,et al.Risk factors for neck shortening in patients with valgus impacted femoral neck fractures treated with three parallel screws:is bone density an affecting factor?[J].Hip Pelvis,2017,29(4):277-285.
[24] 朴海旺,祖思源,陈申跳,等.股骨颈骨折空心钉内固定术后股骨颈短缩的危险因素分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2023,38(12):1238-1241.
[25] 中华医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会.原发性骨质疏松症诊疗指南(2022)[J].中华骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病杂志,2022,15(6):573-611.
[26] HAJAR R.Risk factors for coronary artery disease:historical perspectives[J].Heart Views,2017,18(3):109-114.
[27] YOU L,TEMIYASATHIT S,LEE P,et al.Osteocytes as mechanosensors in the inhibition of bone resorption due to mechanical loading[J].Bone,2008,42(1):172-179.
[28] 秦威城,何博文,尚奇,等.从脂代谢指标探究骨质疏松症和骨质疏松性骨折的风险因素[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2023,29(12):1791-1796.
[29] 栗林,徐铖菡,周英杰,等.腰椎椎体间融合术后cage后移危险因素的Meta分析[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2023,33(10):917-927.
[30] VAN EMBDEN D,ROUKEMA G R,RHEMREV S J,et al.The Pauwels classification for intracapsular hip fractures: is it reliable?[J].Injury,2011,42(11):1238-1240.
[31] VAN EMBDEN D,RHEMREV S J,GENELIN F,et al.The reliability of a simplified Garden classification for intracapsular hip fractures[J].Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2012,98(4):405-408.
[32] BEIMERS L,KREDER H J,BERRY G K,et al.Subcapital hip fractures:the Garden classification should be replaced,not collapsed[J].Can J Surg,2002,45(6):411-414.
[33] POLAT A,MISIR A,BUYUKKUSCU M O,et al.Factors associated with femoral neck shortening after closed or open reduction and screw fixation[J].Indian J Orthop,2022,56(2):303-311.
[34] 吾米提·塔西,马信龙,韩哲,等.断端皮质粉碎对青壮年股骨颈骨折股骨颈动力交叉钉系统固定术后疗效的影响研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2021,23(9):775-781.
[35] JAIN R,KOO M,KREDER H J,et al.Comparison of early and delayed fixation of subcapital hip fractures in patients sixty years of age or less[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2002,84(9):1605-1612.
[36] ALKHATIB N,YOUNIS M H,HEGAZY A,et al.Early versus late treatment of paediatric femoral neck fractures:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Int Orthop,2019,43(3):677-685.
[37] 中华医学会骨科学分会创伤骨科学组,中国医师协会骨科医师分会创伤专家工作委员会.成人股骨颈骨折诊治指南[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2018,20(11):921-928.
[38] QIU L,HUANG Y,LI G,et al.Essential role of reliable reduction quality in internal fixation of femoral neck fractures in the non-elderly patients—a propensity score matching analysis[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2022,23(1):346.
[39] WANG Y,MA J X,YIN T,et al.Correlation between reduction quality of femoral neck fracture and femoral head ne-crosis based on biomechanics[J].Orthop Surg,2019,11(2):318-324.
[40] 魏文卿,崔海坡,陈舰,等.不同固定方式对股骨颈骨折固定效果的影响[J].医用生物力学,2020,35(2):216-222.

相似文献/References:

[1]温超海,何忠,李永斌,等.闭合复位伽玛钉改良成锁定支架内固定治疗 老年股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):32.
[2]肖善富,张喜善,于凤珍.髌下小切口钢丝纽扣式内固定治疗胫骨髁间隆突骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):34.
[3]朱峰,宋相建,吴蔚,等.手法复位经皮克氏针内固定治疗 儿童闭合性肱骨远端全骨骺分离[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):51.
[4]裘人华,胡培阳,裘天强,等.闭合复位外固定架固定治疗Colles骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):59.
[5]葛波涌,王玉波,王明太,等.交锁髓内钉内固定治疗胫骨干骨折的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):8.
　GE Boyong,WANG Yubo,WANG Mingtai,et al.Clinical study on the internal fixation with interlocking intramedullary nail for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(10):8.
[6]邓红敏,刘志诚.转子间斜行截骨结合股骨近端防旋髓内钉固定治疗 股骨近端骨折术后髋内翻畸形[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):17.
[7]孙群周,阮成群,李光明,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗 老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):20.
[8]方策,倪新宇,王宏伟,等.迟氏正骨手法复位单臂外固定支架固定治疗 老年股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):22.
[9]全先辉,万春友,刘磊,等.Taylor空间支架外固定治疗胫腓骨开放性骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):30.
[10]茆军,张惠法,严培军,等.Ilizarov外固定支架结合克氏针固定治疗Pilon骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):32.
[11]刘震,胡志国,付伟.抖牵旋按复位结合钢针撬拨复位空心钉内固定治疗 难复性股骨颈骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):28.
[12]林统,徐强,包海燕.闭合复位经皮空心加压螺钉内固定联合口服中药 治疗股骨颈骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(07):61.
[13]陈武林,阮成群.缝匠肌肌蒂髂骨骨瓣移植联合股骨近端外侧锁定钢板固定治疗青壮年股骨颈骨折不愈合[J].中医正骨,2017,29(02):41.
[14]严卫锋,曾忠友,裴斐.髋关节直接前方入路切开复位空心加压螺钉内固定治疗难复位性股骨颈骨折[J].中医正骨,2017,29(09):45.
[15]王斌,钟浩博,杨剑锋.3种内固定治疗PauwelsⅢ型股骨颈骨折的生物力学研究[J].中医正骨,2018,30(07):6.
　WANG Bin,ZHONG Haobo,YANG Jianfeng.A biomechanical study of three kinds of internal fixation for treatment of Pauwels typeⅢfemoral neck fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2018,30(10):6.
[16]李少帅,张宏军.PauwelsⅢ型股骨颈骨折内固定方式的选择及常见问题探讨[J].中医正骨,2018,30(11):57.
[17]王淼鑫,袁西岐,郑作超,等.股骨近端锁定钛板内固定治疗股骨颈骨折[J].中医正骨,2018,30(11):68.
[18]张忠良,林俊宏,费霖莉.代谢综合征对股骨颈骨折空心螺钉内固定术预后的影响[J].中医正骨,2020,32(04):21.
　ZHANG Zhongliang,LIN Junhong,FEI Linli.Effects of metabolic syndrome on prognosis of patients who received surgery of hollow screw internal fixation for femoral neck fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2020,32(10):21.
[19]范克杰,陈柯,田可为,等.手法闭合复位联合平行螺钉和偏轴螺钉内固定治疗青壮年垂直不稳定型股骨颈骨折[J].中医正骨,2020,32(07):47.
[20]丁强,刘玉峰,苏艺,等.克氏针与空心螺钉内固定治疗儿童DelbetⅡ、Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折[J].中医正骨,2020,32(11):69.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:河南省重点研发与推广专项项目(182102310467); 河南省医学科技攻关计划项目(LHGJ20230483); 河南省中医药科学研究专项课题(20-21ZY2253,20-21ZY2238)
通讯作者:陈柯 E-mail:115946827@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01