[1]洪志楠,宋雨珂,何晓铭,等.股骨头前、外侧保留角和联合保留角在股骨头坏死经髋关节外科脱位打压植骨支撑术适应证选择中的作用[J].中医正骨,2024,36(09):69-75.
 HONG Zhinan,SONG Yuke,HE Xiaoming,et al.The role of anterior,lateral and combined preserved angles of femoral head in the selection of indications for impaction bone grafting through surgical hip dislocation approach for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2024,36(09):69-75.
点击复制

股骨头前、外侧保留角和联合保留角在股骨头坏死经髋关节外科脱位打压植骨支撑术适应证选择中的作用()
分享到:

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第36卷
期数:
2024年09期
页码:
69-75
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2024-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
The role of anterior,lateral and combined preserved angles of femoral head in the selection of indications for impaction bone grafting through surgical hip dislocation approach for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head
作者:
洪志楠宋雨珂何晓铭何伟魏秋实
(广州中医药大学第三附属医院,广东 广州 510378)
Author(s):
HONG ZhinanSONG YukeHE XiaomingHE WeiWEI Qiushi
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 510378,Guangdong,China
关键词:
股骨头坏死 髋关节 脱位 股骨头前侧保留角 股骨头外侧保留角 股骨头联合保留角 骨移植 适应证
Keywords:
femur head necrosis hip joint dislocations anterior preserved angle of femoral head lateral preserved angle of femoral head combined preserved angle of femoral head bone transplantation indication
摘要:
目的:探讨股骨头前侧保留角(anterior preserved angle,APA)、外侧保留角(lateral preserved angle,LPA)和联合保留角(combined preserved angle,CPA)在股骨头坏死(osteonecrosis of the femoral head,ONFH)经髋关节外科脱位打压植骨支撑术适应证选择中的作用。方法:以2020年1月至2022年12月在广州中医药大学第三附属医院接受经髋关节外科脱位打压植骨支撑术治疗的ONFH患者为研究对象。收集患者的性别、年龄、ONFH分期和分型,以及手术前后、随访期间双侧髋关节蛙位和正位X线片等信息。在患者术前双侧髋关节蛙位和正位X线片上分别测量股骨头APA和LPA,二角之和为股骨头CPA。以行全髋关节置换术为终点事件,采用Kaplan-Meier法分析经髋关节外科脱位打压植骨支撑术后股骨头生存情况; 采用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线确定股骨头APA、LPA和CPA预测经髋关节外科脱位打压植骨支撑术治疗失败的最佳临界值,并根据此临界值进行二分类后采用Kaplan-Meier法分析其对股骨头生存情况的预测效果。结果:①一般情况。共纳入109例患者,随访时间8~47个月,中位数25个月。患者术前股骨头APA 43.71°±14.43°,LPA 53.08°±15.62°,CPA 96.79°±24.60°。随访期间,18髋改行全髋关节置换术,其中17髋发生在经髋关节外科脱位打压植骨支撑术后2年内。②经髋关节外科脱位打压植骨支撑术后股骨头生存情况。术后1年、2年和3年股骨头生存率分别为97.5%、86.1%和81.6%。③股骨头APA、LPA和CPA对经髋关节外科脱位打压植骨支撑术治疗失败的预测价值评价结果。股骨头APA、LPA和CPA预测经髋关节外科脱位打压植骨支撑术治疗失败的曲线下面积分别为0.835、0.765、0.854,敏感度分别为67.3%、75.2%、91.1%,特异度分别为88.9%、72.2%、72.2%,临界值分别为39.5°、46.5°、75.0°。④股骨头APA、LPA和CPA对经髋关节外科脱位打压植骨支撑术后股骨头生存情况的预测结果。与术前股骨头APA≤39.5°、LPA≤46.5°、CPA≤75.0°相比,术前股骨头APA>39.5°、LPA>46.5°、CPA>75.0°时,股骨头生存率更高。结论:股骨头APA、LPA和CPA可用于指导ONFH经髋关节外科脱位打压植骨支撑术适应证的选择,且术前股骨头APA>39.5°、LPA>46.5°、CPA>75.0°的患者有望获得更好的手术疗效。
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the role of anterior preserved angle(APA),lateral preserved angle(LPA)and combined preserved angle(CPA)of femoral head in the selection of indications for impaction bone grafting through surgical hip dislocation(SHD)approach for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head(ONFH).Methods:The patients who underwent impaction bone grafting through SHD approach for ONFH in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine from January 2020 to December 2022 were selected as the subjects,and their information,including gender,age,ONFH staging and typing,as well as the X-ray films of bilateral hip joints in normotopia and froglike position before and after the surgery and during follow-up period,was collected.The APA and LPA of the femoral head were measured on the presurgical X-ray films of bilateral hip joints in normotopia and froglike position,respectively,and the sum of the two angles was the CPA of femoral head.With total hip arthroplasty(THA)as the endpoint event,the survival of femoral head after the impaction bone grafting through SHD approach was analyzed by using Kaplan-Meier method.Furthermore,the optimal critical values of APA,LPA and CPA of femoral head in predicting the failure of impaction bone grafting through SHD approach in treating ONFH were determined by using the receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve.The binary classification was performed on the APA,LPA and CPA of femoral head based on the critical values,and then the Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the predictive effects of APA,LPA and CPA of femoral head on the survival of the femoral head.Results:①General condition.One hundred and nine patients were included in the study,and they were followed up for 8-47 months with a median of 25 months.The preoperative femoral head APA,LPA and CPA were 43.71±14.43,53.08±15.62,and 96.79±24.60 degrees,respectively.During the follow-up period,18 hips were re-treated with THA,among which 17 ones experienced a re-operation within 2 years after impaction bone grafting through SHD approach.②The survival of femoral head after receiving impaction bone grafting through SHD approach.The results of analysis on the Kaplan-Meier curve showed that,the survival rates of femoral head were 97.5%, 86.1%,and 81.6% at postsurgical year 1,2, and 3,respectively.③The results of evaluation on the values of APA,LPA and CPA of femoral head in predicting the failure of impaction bone grafting through SHD approach in treating ONFH.The values of APA,LPA and CPA of femoral head in predicting the failure of impaction bone grafting through SHD approach in treating ONFH was evaluated and analyzed by using ROC curve,and the results showed that the areas under the ROC curves were 0.835,0.765 and 0.854; the sensitivities were 67.3%,75.2% and 91.1%; and the specificities were 88.9%,72.2%,and 72.2%; and the critical values were 39.5,46.5,and 75.0 degrees,respectively.④The prediction results of APA,LPA and CPA of femoral head on the survival of femoral head after receiving impaction bone grafting through SHD approach.Compared to the preoperative femoral head APA ≤39.5 degrees,LPA ≤46.5 degrees,and CPA ≤75.0 degrees,the survival rate of the femoral head was higher when the preoperative APA,LPA and CPA of femoral head were greater than 39.5,46.5,and 75.0 degrees,respectively.Conclusion:The APA,LPA,and CPA of femoral head can be used to guide the selection of indications for impaction bone grafting through SHD approach in treating ONFH,and the patients with presurgical APA,LPA and CPA of femoral head greater than 39.5,46.5,and 75.0 degrees,respectively,are expected to achieve better surgical outcomes.

参考文献/References:

[1] 宋晓阳,张浩强,乔永杰,等.中青年早期股骨头坏死的保髋治疗方法研究进展[J].中华创伤杂志,2023,39(2):171-177.
[2] 陈长军,赵鑫,罗月,等.股骨头坏死保头治疗现状及预后影响因素的研究进展[J].中华骨科杂志,2021,41(1):49-57.
[3] 魏秋实,庞凤祥,陈哓俊,等.经髋关节外科脱位打压植骨支撑术治疗ARCOⅢ期股骨头坏死的临床疗效分析[J].中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版),2020,15(2):90-95.
[4] WEI Q S,LI Z Q,HONG Z N,et al.Predicting collapse in osteonecrosis of the femoral head using a new method:preserved angles of anterior and lateral femoral head[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2022,104(Suppl 2):47-53.
[5] 陆舜,林天烨,何敏聪,等.基于前外侧保留角预测股骨头坏死塌陷的有限元分析[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2023,37(11):1394-1402.
[6] 魏秋实,何晓铭,何伟,等.非手术保髋治疗ARCOⅡ期股骨头坏死的临床疗效及影响因素分析[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2022,15(6):424-430.
[7] 中国医师协会骨科医师分会骨循环与骨坏死专业委员会,中华医学会骨科分会骨显微修复学组,国际骨循环学会中国区.中国成人股骨头坏死临床诊疗指南(2020)[J].中华骨科杂志,2020,40(20):1365-1376.
[8] YOON B H,MONT M A,KOO K H,et al.The 2019 revised version of association research circulation osseous staging system of osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J].J Arthroplasty,2020,35(4):933-940.
[9] SUGANO N,ATSUMI T,OHZONO K,et al.The 2001 revised criteria for diagnosis,classification,and staging of idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J].J Orthop Sci,2002,7(5):601-605.
[10] 魏秋实,何伟,张庆文,等.围塌陷期股骨头坏死不同影像学表现研究[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2021,35(9):1105-1110.
[11] 张洪,邹吉扬,肖凯.髋关节外科脱位——髋关节内手术的基本手术入路[J].中华外科杂志,2014,52(12):915-918.
[12] 雷志强,曾平,罗钧.髋关节外科脱位技术治疗股骨头坏死的研究进展[J].广西医学,2020,42(4):474-476.
[13] 陈方,刘修齐,邓钰泓,等.髋外科脱位灯泡技术治疗早期股骨头坏死[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2021,29(13):1219-1221.
[14] 庄至坤,吴昭克,谢庆华,等.中药联合经髋关节外科脱位入路打压植骨支撑术治疗中青年ARCOⅢ期股骨头坏死22例[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2017,25(11):46-48.
[15] 盛东,宋琼,张庆文,等.经髋关节外科脱位入路自体髂骨瓣打压植骨治疗中青年ARCOⅡ、Ⅲ期股骨头缺血性坏死[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2021,36(2):153-155.
[16] 郑萍,李炜明,翁绳健,等.髋关节外科脱位技术联合手术治疗股骨头坏死的中短期疗效观察[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2020,35(2):148-150.
[17] 吴泽文,张延伟,谢家辉,等.脱位头颈开窗植骨术治疗围塌陷期股骨头坏死的疗效及随访影像学结果分析[J].河北医学,2020,26(3):498-502.
[18] 孙海忠,韦标方.髋关节外科脱位打压植骨术与髓芯减压支撑植骨术治疗ARCOⅢ期股骨头缺血性坏死疗效比较[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2019,33(5):531-536.
[19] 傅维民,刘保一,王本杰,等.激素性股骨头坏死的保髋治疗策略及疗效[J].中华骨科杂志,2019,39(23):1424-1431.
[20] 王春生,蒋武强,张栓平,等.无症状股骨头坏死病情进展及相关因素分析[J].中华外科杂志,2019,57(11):807-811.
[21] 欧阳飞,陈瑜,石磊.股骨头坏死非手术治疗研究进展[J].国际骨科学杂志,2024,45(1):15-18.
[22] 黄泽青,刘予豪,方汉军,等.基于深度迁移学习模型实现股骨头坏死与其他髋部疾病的X线片鉴别诊断[J].中华骨科杂志,2023,43(1):72-80.
[23] 陈浩,薛鹏,席洪钟,等.基于DR的深度学习模型预测非血管化腓骨移植术的保髋疗效[J].临床放射学杂志,2024,43(7):1170-1175.
[24] 周宇东,马小雨,蔡兴博,等.人工智能在股骨头坏死诊疗中的应用与展望[J].云南医药,2024,45(2):70-72.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈雷雷,张颖.何伟教授采用中医药疗法治疗股骨头坏死的经验[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):74.
[2]徐西林,赵永兰,张晓峰,等.活骨注射液髋关节腔灌注对兔股骨头坏死模型 血管内皮生长因子表达的动态影响[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):1.
 XU Xilin,ZHAO Yonglan,ZHANG Xiaofeng,et al.Dynamic effect of intra-articular hip injection of Huogu injection on the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in rabbit models with femur head necrosis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(09):1.
[3]周勇,任菲菲,丰凡翔,等.血管内皮生长因子和骨形态发生蛋白2 在非创伤性股骨头坏死不同区域的表达[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):7.
 ZHOU Yong,REN Feifei,FENG Fanxiang,et al.Expressions of vascular endothelial growth factor and bone morphogenetic protein 2 in different zones of femoral head with non-traumatic osteonecrosis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(09):7.
[4]鲍荣华,王国平,夏晓斌,等.钽棒植入治疗非创伤性股骨头坏死的疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):28.
[5]张兵,马凰富,刘波,等.非创伤性股骨头坏死的舌象定量研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):8.
 ZHANG Bing,MA Huangfu,LIU Bo,et al.Quantitative study on tongue manifestation of patients with nontraumatic osteonecrosis of femoral head[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(09):8.
[6]李刚,程春生.股骨头坏死血瘀证症状与平乐郭氏正骨方药药物组成 最大频繁关联模式挖掘[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):21.
 LI Gang,CHENG Chunsheng.Maximal frequent association pattern mining for studying the relationship between BLOOD STASIS syndrome in patients with osteonecrosis of femoral head and drug components of Pingle Guo's orthopedics prescription[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(09):21.
[7]李文龙,梅沉成,杜贵强,等.微创减压植骨多孔钽棒植入治疗 ARCOⅡ期非创伤性缺血性股骨头坏死[J].中医正骨,2016,28(02):43.
[8]张磊,金红婷,童培建.骨健口服液早期干预非创伤性股骨头坏死的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2016,28(03):14.
 ZHANG Lei,JIN Hongting,TONG Peijian.Clinical study on Gujian Koufuye(骨健口服液)for early intervention of nontraumatic osteonecrosis of femoral head[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(09):14.
[9]鲍荣华,王国平,夏晓斌,等.直接前入路微创全髋关节置换术治疗晚期股骨头坏死[J].中医正骨,2016,28(03):61.
[10]张超,姚晨,沈计荣.微创髓芯减压打压支撑植骨术结合补肾活血汤口服治疗ARCOⅡ、Ⅲ期股骨头坏死的近期疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2016,28(03):20.
 ZHANG Chao,YAO Chen,SHEN Jirong.[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(09):20.
[11]庄至坤,郭金花,赵岩,等.股骨头坏死髋关节疼痛和活动度与ARCO分期的相关性分析[J].中医正骨,2020,32(01):21.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(82274544,82004392); 广东省基础与应用基础研究基金项目(2023A1515010551); 毕节市科学技术局2022年度“揭榜挂帅”项目[毕科合重大专项〔2022〕1号]; 广东省中医骨伤研究院开放课题重点项目(GYH202101-01,GYH202101-04)
通讯作者:魏秋实 E-mail:weiqshi@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01