[1]李泰贤,李晓亮,赵继阳,等.健脾活骨方治疗非创伤性股骨头坏死的生物力学机制研究[J].中医正骨,2024,36(09):29-35.
 LI Taixian,LI Xiaoliang,ZHAO Jiyang,et al.Biomechanical mechanism of Jianpi Huogu Fang(健脾活骨方)in treatment of non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2024,36(09):29-35.
点击复制

健脾活骨方治疗非创伤性股骨头坏死的生物力学机制研究()
分享到:

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第36卷
期数:
2024年09期
页码:
29-35
栏目:
技术研究
出版日期:
2024-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Biomechanical mechanism of Jianpi Huogu Fang(健脾活骨方)in treatment of non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head
作者:
李泰贤1李晓亮1赵继阳12何海军2陈黎明1赵万宁1许根荣1董士宇1白晶1郭盛君1陈卫衡3
(1.北京中医药大学第三附属医院,北京 100029; 2.中国中医科学院望京医院,北京 100102; 3.中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心,北京 100029)
Author(s):
LI Taixian1LI Xiaoliang1ZHAO Jiyang1LI Yan2HE Haijun2CHEN Liming1ZHAO Wanning1XU Genrong1DONG Shiyu1BAI Jing1GUO Shengjun1CHEN Weiheng3
1.Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Third Affiliated Hospital,Beijing 100029,China 2.Wangjing Hospital of CACMS,Beijing 100102,China 3.Engineering Research Center of Chinese Orthopaedic and Sports Rehabilitation Artificial Intelligent,Ministry of Education,Beijing 100029,China
关键词:
股骨头坏死 健脾活骨方 限定因素分析 生物力学现象
Keywords:
femur head necrosis Jianpi Huogu Fang finite element analysis biomechanical phenomena
摘要:
目的:探讨健脾活骨方治疗非创伤性股骨头坏死的生物力学机制。方法:选择20例单侧非创伤性股骨头坏死患者作为研究对象。男7例,女13例; 左髋8例,右髋12例; 年龄21~58岁,中位数48岁; 国际骨微循环研究学会分期均为Ⅱ期。所有患者均采用口服健脾活骨方和药物动脉灌注治疗,健脾活骨方每日1剂,共服用180 d; 药物动脉灌注共治疗1次。分别于治疗开始前、治疗开始后3个月及治疗开始后1年进行CT扫描,建立股骨近端和坏死骨三维有限元模型,测定股骨头负重区与坏死骨的最大总形变量和最大等效应力。结果:①股骨头负重区最大总形变量和最大等效应力。治疗开始前、治疗开始后3个月和治疗开始后1年,股骨头负重区最大总形变量比较,差异有统计学意义[(4.101±1.341)mm,(3.296±1.203)mm,(3.356±1.022)mm,F=5.646,P=0.008]。治疗开始后3个月和治疗开始后1年股骨头负重区最大总形变量均较治疗开始前减小(P=0.036,P=0.007); 治疗开始后3个月和治疗开始后1年股骨头负重区最大总形变量的差异无统计学意义(P=0.576)。治疗开始前、治疗开始后3个月和治疗开始后1年,股骨头负重区最大等效应力比较,差异无统计学意义[(1.837±0.804)MPa,(1.717±0.649)MPa,(1.586±0.593)MPa,F=1.145,P=0.332]。②坏死骨最大总形变量和最大等效应力。治疗开始前、治疗开始后3个月和治疗开始后1年,坏死骨最大总形变量和最大等效应力总体比较,差异有统计学意义[最大总形变量:(3.963±1.302)mm,(3.157±1.126)mm,(3.202±1.012)mm,F=5.930,P=0.007; 最大等效应力:(1.246±0.445)MPa,(1.470±0.601)MPa,(1.323±0.433)MPa,F=4.224,P=0.024]。治疗开始后3个月和治疗开始后1年坏死骨最大总形变量均较治疗开始前减小(P=0.032,P=0.008); 治疗开始后3个月和治疗开始后1年坏死骨最大总形变量的差异无统计学意义(P=0.517)。治疗开始后3个月坏死骨最大等效应力较治疗开始前增大(P=0.030),治疗开始后1年与治疗开始前坏死骨最大等效应力的差异无统计学意义(P=0.076); 治疗开始后3个月和治疗开始后1年坏死骨最大等效应力的差异无统计学意义(P=0.202)。结论:健脾活骨方治疗非创伤性股骨头坏死的生物力学机制,可能是通过增强坏死骨的强度与刚度,使坏死骨可以提供有效支撑,减轻股骨头负重区的应力集中现象、解除坏死骨区域正常骨组织高应力状态,从而起到治疗作用。
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the biomechanical mechanism of Jianpi Huogu Fang(健脾活骨方,JPHGF)in treatment of non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head(NONFH).Methods:Twenty patients with unilateral NONFH were selected as the subjects.The patients consisted of 7 males and 13 females ranged in age from 21 to 58 years(Median=48 years).The ONFH located in left side for 8 patients,right for 12 ones,and belonged to stageⅡaccording to the staging standard issued by the Association Research Circulation Osseous(ARCO).All patients were treated with oral application of JPHGF,one dose a day for consecutive 180 days,and with arterial perfusion of normal saline and salvia miltiorrhiza injection in turn for one time.Furthermore,CT scans were conducted before the beginning of the treatment,at 3 and 12 months after the beginning of the treatment,respectively.Based on the CT scanning data,a three-dimensional(3D)finite element model of the proximal femur and necrotic bone was established,respectively,to measure the maximum total deformation(MTD)and maximum equivalent stress(MES)in the load-bearing area of femoral head and necrotic bone.Results:①The MTD and MES in the load-bearing area of femoral head.The difference was statistically significant in MTD in the load-bearing area of femoral head among the 3 timepoints(4.101±1.341,3.296±1.203,3.356±1.022 mm,F=5.646,P=0.008).The MTD in the load-bearing area of femoral head decreased at 3 and 12 months after the beginning of the treatment compared to pretreatment(P=0.036,P=0.007),while,the comparison between the 3 and 12 months after the beginning of the treatment revealed no significant difference(P=0.576).However,the difference was not statistically significant in MES in the load-bearing area of femoral head among the 3 timepoints(1.837±0.804,1.717±0.649,1.586±0.593 MPa,F=1.145,P=0.332).②The MTD and MES in the necrotic bone.The difference was statistically significant in MTD and MES in the necrotic bone among the 3 timepoints in general(MTD:3.963±1.302,3.157±1.126,3.202±1.012 mm,F=5.930,P=0.007; MES:1.246±0.445,1.470±0.601,1.323±0.433 MPa,F=4.224,P=0.024).The MTD in the necrotic bone decreased at 3 and 12 months after the beginning of the treatment compared to pretreatment(P=0.032,P=0.008),while,the comparison between 3 and 12 months after the beginning of the treatment revealed no significant difference(P=0.517).The MES in the necrotic bone increased at 3 months after the beginning of the treatment compared to pretreatment(P=0.030),while,the comparisons between the 12 months after the beginning of the treatment and before the beginning of the treatment,as well as between the 3 and 12 months after the beginning of the treatment revealed no significant difference(P=0.076,P=0.202).Conclusion:The JPHGF may work by making the necrotic bone to provide effective support through enhancing its strength and stiffness,which can reduce the stress concentration in the load-bearing area of femoral head,and relieve the high-stress state of the normal bone tissue in the area of necrotic bone,thereby achieving the therapeutic effects for NONFH.

参考文献/References:

[1] 章晓云,高振罡,陈锋,等.激素性股骨头坏死风险模型构建及潜在的中药治疗预测[J].中国组织工程研究,2023,27(28):4539-4545.
[2] TAN B,LI W,ZENG P,et al.Epidemiological study based on china osteonecrosis of the femoral head database[J].Orthop Surg,2021,13(1):153-160.
[3] LIU W,YUE J,GUO X,et al.Epidemiological investigation and diagnostic analysis of osteonecrosis of the femoral head in three northeastern provinces of China[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2024,19(1):292.
[4] 陈卫衡,周宇,何海军,等.健脾活骨方治疗早中期非创伤性股骨头坏死的前瞻性临床研究[J].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2013,7(3):287-293.
[5] 陈卫衡,周宇,何海军,等.健脾活骨方治疗早中期非创伤性股骨头坏死临床回顾性研究[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2013,33(8):1054-1058.
[6] 中国医师协会骨科医师分会骨循环与骨坏死专业委员会,中华医学会骨科分会骨显微修复学组,国际骨循环学会中国区.中国成人股骨头坏死临床诊疗指南(2020)[J].中华骨科杂志,2020,40(20):1365-1376.
[7] YOON B H,MONT M A,KOO K H,et al.The 2019 revised version of Association Research Circulation Osseous staging system of osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J].J Arthroplasty,2020,35(4):933-940.
[8] 中华中医药学会.股骨头坏死中医辨证标准(2019年版)[J].中医正骨,2019,31(6):1-2.
中医正骨2024年9月第36卷第9期 J Trad Chin Orthop Trauma,2024,Vol.36,No.9(总675)
(总676)中医正骨2024年9月第36卷第9期 J Trad Chin Orthop Trauma,2024,Vol.36,No.9
[9] 薛志鹏,李泰贤,李龚,等.基于CT灰度值赋值的股骨头坏死有限元模型对比[J].中国组织工程研究,2020,24(3):395-400.
[10] ZHANG Z,LIN T,ZHONG Y,et al.Effect of femoral head necrosis cystic area on femoral head collapse and stress distribution in femoral head:a clinical and finite element study[J].Open Med(Wars),2022,17(1):1282-1291.
[11] WEN M T,LIANG X Z,LUO D,et al.The effect of the hip flexion angle in osteonecrosis of the femoral head based on China-Japan friendship hospital classification—a finite element study[J].Orthop Surg,2023,15(10):2689-2700.
[12] BROWN T D,PEDERSEN D R,BAKER K J,et al.Mechanical consequences of core drilling and bone-grafting on osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1993,75(9):1358-1367.
[13] VAN DEN BOGERT A J,READ L,NIGG B M.An analysis of hip joint loading during walking,running,and skiing[J].Med Sci Sports Exerc,1999,31(1):131-142.
[14] 庄至坤,郭金花,赵岩,等.股骨头坏死髋关节疼痛和活动度与ARCO分期的相关性分析[J].中医正骨,2020,32(1):21-24.
[15] 魏秋实,李子祺,袁颖嘉,等.“标本兼治”理论在股骨头坏死中医药治疗中的指导作用[J].中医正骨,2020,32(1):56-59.
[16] 陆舜,林天烨,何敏聪,等.基于前外侧保留角预测股骨头坏死塌陷的有限元分析[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2023,37(11):1394-1402.
[17] 郭邵逸,邓旺,邵宏翊,等.改良髓芯减压技术治疗股骨头缺血性坏死的疗效及其影响因素分析[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2023,16(6):523-530.
[18] 李伯瑞,赵德伟,覃开蓉,等.带血管蒂髂骨瓣移植治疗股骨头缺血性坏死填充位置的有限元分析[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2021,14(4):272-277.
[19] YUAN D,WU Z,YANG L,et al.Biomechanical analysis of the drilling parameters for early osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J].Comput Methods Programs Biomed,2022,219:106737.
[20] 杨挺,郑建河,姚子龙,等.行走中股骨生物力学特性的有限元分析[J].广东医学,2016,37(4):512-515.
[21] 凌观汉,李永斌,潘学文,等.中日友好医院分型股骨头坏死腓骨植入治疗的三维有限元分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2020,24(18):2817-2822.
[22] 徐腾腾,王金霞,明瑞蕊,等.健脾活骨方对糖皮质激素致血管内皮细胞功能损伤的干预作用[J].中国中药杂志,2022,47(6):1625-1631.
[23] 万蓉,林诗富,林娜,等.不同治法方药对激素性股骨头坏死的骨组织形态学影响[J].中国骨伤,2010,23(12):915-919.
[24] 孔祥英,万蓉,李莉,等.不同治法方药对激素性股骨头坏死鸡成骨相关因子的影响[J].中国中药杂志,2011,36(5):614-617.
[25] 胡元斌,周岳来,李永顺,等.有限元分析髓芯减压并同种异体植骨治疗股骨头缺血性坏死的生物力学改变[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(2):243-248.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈雷雷,张颖.何伟教授采用中医药疗法治疗股骨头坏死的经验[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):74.
[2]徐西林,赵永兰,张晓峰,等.活骨注射液髋关节腔灌注对兔股骨头坏死模型 血管内皮生长因子表达的动态影响[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):1.
 XU Xilin,ZHAO Yonglan,ZHANG Xiaofeng,et al.Dynamic effect of intra-articular hip injection of Huogu injection on the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in rabbit models with femur head necrosis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(09):1.
[3]周勇,任菲菲,丰凡翔,等.血管内皮生长因子和骨形态发生蛋白2 在非创伤性股骨头坏死不同区域的表达[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):7.
 ZHOU Yong,REN Feifei,FENG Fanxiang,et al.Expressions of vascular endothelial growth factor and bone morphogenetic protein 2 in different zones of femoral head with non-traumatic osteonecrosis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(09):7.
[4]鲍荣华,王国平,夏晓斌,等.钽棒植入治疗非创伤性股骨头坏死的疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):28.
[5]张兵,马凰富,刘波,等.非创伤性股骨头坏死的舌象定量研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):8.
 ZHANG Bing,MA Huangfu,LIU Bo,et al.Quantitative study on tongue manifestation of patients with nontraumatic osteonecrosis of femoral head[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(09):8.
[6]李刚,程春生.股骨头坏死血瘀证症状与平乐郭氏正骨方药药物组成 最大频繁关联模式挖掘[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):21.
 LI Gang,CHENG Chunsheng.Maximal frequent association pattern mining for studying the relationship between BLOOD STASIS syndrome in patients with osteonecrosis of femoral head and drug components of Pingle Guo's orthopedics prescription[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(09):21.
[7]李文龙,梅沉成,杜贵强,等.微创减压植骨多孔钽棒植入治疗 ARCOⅡ期非创伤性缺血性股骨头坏死[J].中医正骨,2016,28(02):43.
[8]张磊,金红婷,童培建.骨健口服液早期干预非创伤性股骨头坏死的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2016,28(03):14.
 ZHANG Lei,JIN Hongting,TONG Peijian.Clinical study on Gujian Koufuye(骨健口服液)for early intervention of nontraumatic osteonecrosis of femoral head[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(09):14.
[9]鲍荣华,王国平,夏晓斌,等.直接前入路微创全髋关节置换术治疗晚期股骨头坏死[J].中医正骨,2016,28(03):61.
[10]张超,姚晨,沈计荣.微创髓芯减压打压支撑植骨术结合补肾活血汤口服治疗ARCOⅡ、Ⅲ期股骨头坏死的近期疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2016,28(03):20.
 ZHANG Chao,YAO Chen,SHEN Jirong.[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(09):20.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(82030122,81373801,81973888); 北京市自然科学基金项目(7182186); 北京中医药大学新教师启动基金项目(2022-JYB-XJSJJ-085); 北京中医药大学科研平台建设项目(2023-JYB-KYPT-03); 北京中医药大学中医骨伤治疗与运动康复智能化教育部工程研究中心培育项目(BZYSY-2022-GCYJZXQX-07)
通讯作者:陈卫衡 E-mail:drchenweiheng@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01