[1]谭哲,邓光桦.股骨近端防旋髓内钉联合捆扎内固定治疗股骨转子间骨折有效性和安全性的mETA分析[J].中医正骨,2023,35(11):29-36,43.
　TAN Zhe,DENG Guanghua.Clinical outcomes and safety of proximal femoral nail antirotation combined with bundling internal fixation for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures:a meta-analysis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2023,35(11):29-36,43.
点击复制

股骨近端防旋髓内钉联合捆扎内固定治疗股骨转子间骨折有效性和安全性的mETA分析()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第35卷
期数:
2023年11期
页码:
29-36,43
栏目:
文献研究
出版日期:
2023-11-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical outcomes and safety of proximal femoral nail antirotation combined with bundling internal fixation for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures:a meta-analysis
作者:
谭哲; 邓光桦
雅安市中医医院,四川 雅安 625000
Author(s):
TAN Zhe; DENG Guanghua
Ya'an Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital,Ya'an 625000,Sichuan,China
关键词:
髋骨折;  股骨转子间骨折;  骨折固定术; 内;  股骨近端防旋髓内钉;  骨固定钢丝;  捆扎;  专题Meta分析
Keywords:
hip fractures;  femoral intertrochanteric fracture;  fracture fixation; internal;  proximal femoral nail antirotation;  bone wires;  tying;  meta-analysis as topic
摘要:
目的:系统评价股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail antirotation,PFNA)联合捆扎内固定治疗股骨转子间骨折的有效性和安全性。方法:应用计算机检索中国知网、维普网、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献服务系统、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library中关于PFNA联合捆扎内固定和单纯PFNA内固定治疗股骨转子间骨折的对比研究文献,检索时限均为建库至2022年8月8日。试验组采用PFNA联合捆扎内固定治疗,对照组单纯采用PFNA内固定治疗。由2名研究人员依据文献检索及筛选方案筛选出符合要求的文献,并独立进行数据提取和质量评价。采用Stata16.0软件进行Meta分析。结果:共检索到534篇文献,最终纳入12篇文献,共涉及758例患者,其中试验组356例、对照组402例。Meta分析结果显示,试验组手术时间长于对照组[WMD=6.35,95%CI(2.73,9.97)],术中出血量多于对照组[WMD=13.15,95%CI(2.99,23.30)],术后下地负重时间、骨折愈合时间均短于对照组[WMD=-3.03,95%CI(-4.26,-1.81); WMD=-3.21,95%CI(-6.16,-0.25)],末次随访时Harris髋关节评分高于对照组[WMD=5.66,95%CI(3.47,7.85)],并发症发生率低于对照组[OR=0.25,95%CI(0.15,0.42)]。结论:PFNA联合捆扎内固定治疗股骨转子间骨折与单纯PFNA内固定比较,有利于术后早期负重、骨折愈合及髋关节功能恢复,且安全性高,但会增加手术时间和术中出血量。
Abstract:
Objective:To systematically review the clinical outcomes and safety of proximal femoral nail antirotation(PFNA)combined with bundling internal fixation in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.Methods:All the comparative study articles about PFNA combined with bundling internal fixation versus PFNA internal fixation alone for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures included from database establishing to August 8,2022 were retrieved from the China National Knowledge Internet,Vip Database,Wanfang Database,Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System,PubMed,Embase,Web of Science and Cochrane Library through computer.The patients in experiment group were treated with PFNA and bundling internal fixation,while the ones in control group merely with PFNA internal fixation.The articles were retrieved and screened and the information was extracted independently by two researchers according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.The methodological quality of researches in the included articles was evaluated respectively independently by the same two researchers,and if any disagreement was found between them,discussion was conducted or another researcher was invited for making a final decision,and then a Meta-analysis was conducted by using Stata16.0 software.Results:Five hundred and thirty-four articles were searched out.After screening,12 articles(758 patients)were included in the final analysis,356 patients in experiment group and 402 ones in control group.The results of Meta-analysis revealed that the operative time was longer,the intraoperative blood loss was more,the postoperative weight-bearing walking was earlier,the fracture healing time was shorter,the Harris hip score evaluated at the last follow-up was higher,and the postoperative complication incidence rate was lower in experiment group compared to control group(WMD=6.35,95%CI(2.73,9.97); WMD=13.15,95%CI(2.99,23.30); WMD=-3.03,95%CI(-4.26,-1.81); WMD=-3.21,95%CI(-6.16,-0.25); WMD=5.66,95%CI(3.47,7.85); OR=0.25,95%CI(0.15,0.42)).Conclusion:PFNA combined with bundling internal fixation is conducive to postoperative earlier weight-bearing,fracture healing and hip function recovery with high safety,but can increase the operative time and intraoperative blood loss compared to PFNA alone in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.

参考文献/References:

[1] ZHANG C,FENG J,WANG S,et al.Incidence of and trends in hip fracture among adults in urban China:a nationwide retrospective cohort study[J].PLoS Med,2020,17(8):e1003180.
[2] VERONESE N,MAGGI S.Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture[J].Injury,2018,49(8):1458-1460.
[3] YU F,XIA W.The epidemiology of osteoporosis,associated fragility fractures,and management gap in China[J].Arch Osteoporos,2019,14(1):32.
[4] SAUL D,RIEKENBERG J,AMMON J C,et al.Hip Fractures:therapy,timing,and complication spectrum[J].Orthop Surg,2019,11(6):994-1002.
[5] CHANG S M,HOU Z Y,HU S J,et al.Intertrochanteric femur fracture treatment in Asia:what we know and what the world can learn[J].Orthop Clin North Am,2020,51(2):189-205.
[6] TURESSON E,IVARSSON K,THORNGREN K G,et al.Hip fractures-treatment and functional outcome.The development over 25 years[J].Injury,2018,49(12):2209-2215.
[7] YU X,WANG H,DUAN X,et al.Intramedullary versus extramedullary internal fixation for unstable intertrochanteric fracture,a meta-analysis[J].Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc,2018,52(4):299-307.
[8] MAGNUSSON K A,GUNNARSSON B,SIGURDSSON G H,et al.Treatment and outcome of patients with hip fracture[J].Laeknabladid,2016,102(3):119-125.
[9] 史文骥,毛宾尧,赵艳.股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折疗效及并发症探讨[J].中国骨伤,2021,34(10):906-910.
[10] BHOWMICK K,MATTHAI T,BOOPALAN P R J,et al.Decision making in the management of malunion and nonunion of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip[J].Hip Int,2020,30(6):793-798.
[11] SHON O J,CHOI C H,PARK C H.Factors associated with mechanical complications in intertrochanteric fracture treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation[J].Hip Pelvis,2021,33(3):154-161.
[12] 杜春雨,林峰,王秋根,等.大转子再结合装置辅助股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗合并冠状面骨折的不稳定性股骨转子间骨折[J].国际骨科学杂志,2017,38(1):55-59.
[13] 农林,邓春雷,丘婷丹.钢丝PFNA内固定治疗股骨粗隆间粉碎骨折的临床研究[J].中国医学创新,2018,15(20):117-120.
[14] IMERCI A,AYDOGAN N H,TOSUN K.The effect on outcomes of the application of circumferential cerclage cable following intramedullary nailing in reverse intertrochanteric femoral fractures[J].Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol,2019,29(4):835-842.
[15] 姜昊,曹烈虎,潘思华,等.有限切开钛缆捆扎辅助PFNA与单纯微创辅助PFNA治疗老年骨质疏松性31-A3型股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效对比[J].中国骨与关节杂志,2019,8(3):191-195.
[16] 郑军,余润泽.爱惜邦缝线捆扎结合股骨近端抗旋髓内钉治疗股骨粗隆间冠状位骨折[J].生物医学工程与临床,2019,23(1):46-50.
[17] HUANG C,WU X.Surgical selection of unstable intertrochanteric fractures:PFNA combined with or without cerclage cable[J].Biomed Res Int,2021,2021:8875370.
[18] 张威,赵士君,李翔,等.改良“糖果包扎”钢丝内固定联合股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗老年A2型股骨转子间骨折的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2021,33(10):23-28.
[19] 田克超,王磊,陶勇,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉联合后内侧壁重建治疗老年A2型股骨转子间骨折[J].中国组织工程研究,2021,25(21):3337-3342.
[20] 陈光,刘涛,王冰一,等.PFNA联合股骨小粗隆环扎内固定治疗AO-A2型老年不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折疗效观察[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2021,36(4):375-377.
[21] 黄琨,黄常红,王飚.股骨近端防旋髓内钉联合钢丝环扎内固定治疗老年AO-A3型股骨粗隆间骨折疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2021,36(8):798-802.
[22] 洪魏.股骨粗隆间骨折闭合复位PFNA内固定术治疗的临床分析[J].饮食保健,2022(14):57-60.
[23] 赵东华,杜云峰,王红星,等.有限切开钛缆捆扎辅助股骨近端髓内钉固定治疗老年骨质疏松性31-A3型股骨粗隆间骨折患者的效果[J].河南医学研究,2022,31(11):2005-2008.
[24] BERGER V W.Is the Jadad score the proper evaluation of trials?[J].J Rheumatol,2006,33(8):1710-1711.
[25] 曾宪涛,庄丽萍,杨宗国,等.Meta分析系列之七:非随机实验性研究、诊断性试验及动物实验的质量评价工具[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志,2012,4(6):496-499.
[26] 孙群周,阮成群,陈武林,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定与股骨近端锁定钢板内固定治疗A2.3型股骨转子间骨折合并大转子外侧壁冠状面破损的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2021,33(4):9-14.
[27] HUANG S G,CHEN B,ZHANG Y,et al.Comparison of the clinical effectiveness of PFNA,PFLCP,and DHS in treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture[J].Am J Ther,2017,24(6):e659-666.
[28] HAO Z,WANG X,ZHANG X.Comparing surgical interventions for intertrochanteric hip fracture by blood loss and operation time:a network meta-analysis[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2018,13(1):157.
[29] RICCI W M,BELLABARBA C,LEWIS R,et al.Angular malalignment after intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures[J].J Orthop Trauma,2001,15(2):90-95.
[30] APIVATTHAKAKUL T,PHORNPHUTKUL C.Percutaneous cerclage wiring for reduction of periprosthetic and difficult femoral fractures.A technical note[J].Injury,2012,43(6):966-971.
[31] APRATO A,LO BAIDO R,CROSIO A,et al.Does lesser trochanter implication affect hip flexion strength in proximal femur fracture?[J].Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg,2015,41(5):523-529.
[32] NIE S B,ZHAO Y P,LI J T,et al.Medial support nail and proximal femoral nail antirotation in the treatment of reverse obliquity inter-trochanteric fractures(Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesfrogen/Orthopedic Trauma Association 31-A3.1):a finite-element analysis[J].Chin Med J(Engl),2020,133(22):2682-2687.
[33] DENG H L,CONG Y X,HUANG H,et al.The effect of integrity of lateral wall on the quality of reduction and outcomes in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture:a controlled study[J].Biomed Res Int,2021,2021:6563077.
[34] 何小文,吴子征,张键.股骨转子间骨折重建股骨距的临床解剖学研究[J].中国临床医学,2012,19(4):383-385.

相似文献/References:

[1]温超海,何忠,李永斌,等.闭合复位伽玛钉改良成锁定支架内固定治疗 老年股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):32.
[2]孙群周,阮成群,李光明,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗 老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):20.
[3]方策,倪新宇,王宏伟,等.迟氏正骨手法复位单臂外固定支架固定治疗 老年股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):22.
[4]赵云昌.人工股骨头置换治疗老年粉碎性股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):31.
[5]姜自伟,黄枫,郑晓辉,等.老年股骨转子间骨折患者的围手术期风险评估与控制[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):33.
[6]倪新宇,方策.外固定器治疗股骨转子间骨折的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2015,27(07):48.
[7]王智勇,陈柯,田可为,等.联合应用摇杆技术和钳夹技术微创治疗股骨转子部骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(05):36.
[8]郑艳峰,吴勋,周荣昌,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定与动力髋螺钉内固定治疗 老年股骨转子间骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):24.
　ZHENG Yanfeng,WU Xun,ZHOU Rongchang,et al.A comparative study of proximal femoral nail antirotation internal fixation versus dynamic hip screw internal fixation for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(11):24.
[9]龚江浩.股骨近端防旋髓内钉联合抗骨质疏松药物治疗 不稳定型老年股骨转子间骨折的临床观察[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):29.
　GONG Jianghao.A combination therapy of proximal femoral nail antirotation and anti-osteoporotic drugs for the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(11):29.
[10]张磊,柴浩.股骨近端髓内钉与动力髋螺钉固定治疗 老年股骨转子间骨折的系统评价[J].中医正骨,2015,27(03):27.
　ZHANG Lei,CHAI Hao.Systematic review on proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw fixation for treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(11):27.
[11]张明强.生物型加长柄半髋关节置换术治疗 高龄不稳定股骨转子间骨折疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):56.
[12]李书良,李启义,李建明,等.锁定钢板内固定联合自体髂骨植骨治疗 股骨近端粉碎性骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(05):31.
[13]王国柱,肖斌,孙鹏程,等.带大转子柄人工股骨头置换术治疗高龄股骨转子间不稳定性骨折[J].中医正骨,2016,28(05):54.
[14]杨杰,张剑.人工半髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2018,30(11):71.
[15]江涛,江林,史俊德,等.多功能牵引床骨牵引治疗高龄股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2020,32(07):51.
[16]张雨,李钧,李志民,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗老年股骨转子间骨折内固定失效的危险因素分析[J].中医正骨,2022,34(02):3.
　ZHANG Yu,LI Jun,LI Zhimin,et al.Analysis of risk factors for the failure of internal fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2022,34(11):3.
[17]翟亚业,秦晓彬,李森,等.老年股骨转子间骨折股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定术后髋关节功能恢复的影响因素分析[J].中医正骨,2022,34(12):29.
　ZHAI Yaye,QIN Xiaobin,LI Sen,et al.Factors affecting hip functional recovery in the elderly with intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation internal fixation[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2022,34(11):29.
[18]鲍雷,冯冬前,余加生,等.骨水泥强化型与传统型股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗老年骨质疏松性股骨转子间不稳定性骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2023,35(10):16.
　BAO Lei,FENG Dongqian,YU Jiasheng,et al.A comparative study of bone cement-reinforced versus conventional proximal femoral nail antirotation internal fixation for treatment of unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2023,35(11):16.
[19]柳松,张德祥.老年股骨转子间骨折患者股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定术后颈干角丢失的影响因素分析[J].中医正骨,2023,35(11):5.
　LIU Song,ZHANG Dexiang.Analysis of factors influencing the loss of collodiaphyseal angle after internal fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2023,35(11):5.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
通讯作者:邓光桦 E-mail:474204120@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01