[1]鲍雷,冯冬前,余加生,等.骨水泥强化型与传统型股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗老年骨质疏松性股骨转子间不稳定性骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2023,35(10):16-20,36.
　BAO Lei,FENG Dongqian,YU Jiasheng,et al.A comparative study of bone cement-reinforced versus conventional proximal femoral nail antirotation internal fixation for treatment of unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2023,35(10):16-20,36.
点击复制

骨水泥强化型与传统型股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗老年骨质疏松性股骨转子间不稳定性骨折的对比研究()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第35卷
期数:
2023年10期
页码:
16-20,36
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A comparative study of bone cement-reinforced versus conventional proximal femoral nail antirotation internal fixation for treatment of unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures in the aged
作者:
鲍雷1; 冯冬前1; 余加生1; 张斌1; 孙玉明2
1.沭阳县中医院,江苏 沭阳 223600; 2.江苏省中医院,江苏 南京 210029
Author(s):
BAO Lei1; FENG Dongqian1; YU Jiasheng1; ZHANG Bin1; SUN Yuming2
1.Shuyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shuyang 223600,Jiangsu,China 2.Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine,Nanjing 210029,Jiangsu,China
关键词:
髋骨折;  骨质疏松性骨折;  股骨转子间骨折;  老年人;  骨折固定术; 内;  股骨近端防旋髓内钉;  骨粘合剂
Keywords:
hip fractures;  osteoporotic fractures;  femoral intertrochanteric fracture;  aged;  fracture fixation; internal;  proximal femoral nail antirotation;  bone cements
摘要:
目的:比较骨水泥强化型与传统型股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail antirotation,PFNA)内固定治疗老年骨质疏松性股骨转子间不稳定性骨折的临床疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性分析60例老年骨质疏松性股骨转子间不稳定性骨折患者的临床资料,其中采用骨水泥强化型PFNA内固定治疗28例(骨水泥强化组)、采用传统型PFNA内固定治疗32例(传统组)。比较2组患者的手术时间、术中失血量、尖顶距(tip-apex distance,TAD)、术后辅助下负重时间、骨折愈合时间、并发症发生率,以及术后3个月、6个月、12个月的Harris髋关节评分。结果:①一般指标。骨水泥强化组患者手术时间长于传统组[(63.79±3.72)min,(58.06±4.52)min,t=5.309,P=0.000],术后辅助下负重时间、骨折愈合时间均短于传统组[(4.39±1.66)d,(5.81±1.96)d,t=-3.003,P=0.004;(5.75±1.51)个月,(6.65±1.62)个月,t=-2.235,P=0.029]; 2组患者术中失血量、TAD的组间差异均无统计学意义[(69.29±10.78)mL,(67.19±10.77)mL,t=0.753,P=0.455;(22.29±1.80)mm,(22.47±1.85)mm,t=-0.387,P=0.700]。②Harris髋关节评分。术后3个月、6个月,骨水泥强化组Harris髋关节评分均高于传统组[(70.07±5.33)分,(66.97±5.51)分,t=2.210,P=0.031;(83.00±2.57)分,(77.16±4.24)分,t=6.550,P=0.000]; 术后12个月,两组Harris髋关节评分的差异无统计学意义[(90.25±3.42)分,(88.91±3.57)分,t=1.480,P=0.143]。③并发症发生率。骨水泥强化组出现1例谵妄,传统组出现2例骶尾部压伤、2例坠积性肺炎、1例尿路感染、1例谵妄、2例螺旋刀片切出、1例退钉; 传统组并发症发生率高于骨水泥强化组(χ2=4.835,P=0.028)。结论:采用骨水泥强化型PFNA内固定治疗老年骨质疏松性股骨转子间不稳定性骨折,与传统型PFNA内固定比较,患者术后辅助下负重早、骨折愈合快、髋关节功能恢复快,且安全性更高,但手术时间较长。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical outcomes and safety of bone cement-reinforced versus conventional proximal femoral nail antirotation(PFNA)internal fixation in treatment of unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures in the aged.Methods:The clinical data of 60 patients with unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures were retrospectively analyzed.Twenty-eight patients were treated with bone cement-reinforced PFNA internal fixation(bone cement-reinforced group),and 32 ones with conventional PFNA internal fixation(conventional group).The operative time,intraoperative blood loss,tip-apex distance(TAD),postoperative partial weight-bearing walk start time,fracture healing time,complication incidence rate,and the Harris hip score evaluated at postoperative month 3,6 and 12 were compared between the 2 groups.Results:①The operative time was longer,the postoperative partial weight-bearing walk start time and fracture healing time were shorter in bone cement-reinforced group compared to conventional group(63.79±3.72 vs 58.06±4.52 minutes,t=5.309,P=0.000; 4.39±1.66 vs 5.81±1.96 days,t=-3.003,P=0.004; 5.75±1.51 vs 6.65±1.62 months,t=-2.235,P=0.029); while the comparison of intraoperative blood loss and TAD between the 2 groups revealed no significant differences(69.29±10.78 vs 67.19±10.77 mL,t=0.753,P=0.455; 22.29±1.80 vs 22.47±1.85 mm,t=-0.387,P=0.700).②The Harris hip score was higher in bone cement-reinforced group compared to conventional group at postoperative month 3 and 6(70.07±5.33 vs 66.97±5.51 points,t=2.210,P=0.031; 83.00±2.57 vs 77.16±4.24 points,t=6.550,P=0.000); while,at postoperative month 12,the difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant(90.25±3.42 vs 88.91±3.57 points,t=1.480,P=0.143).③After the procedure,the delirium(1 case)was found in bone cement-reinforced group; while the sacrococcygeal compression injury(2 cases),hypostatic pneumonia(2 cases),urinary tract infection((1 case),delirium(1 case),spiral blade protrusion from femoral head(2 cases)and nail dropped out(1 case)were found in conventional group.The incidence rate of postoperative complications was lower in bone cement-reinforced group compared to conventional group(χ2=4.835,P=0.028).Conclusion:The bone cement-reinforced PFNA internal fixation displays the advantages of earlier postoperative partial weight-bearing walk,faster fracture healing and hip function recovery with higher safety,but the disadvantage of longer operative time compared to the conventional PFNA internal fixation in treatment of unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures in the aged.

参考文献/References:

[1] SKULADOTTIR S S,RAMEL A,HJALTADOTTIR I,et al.Correction to:characteristics of incidence hip fracture cases in older adults participating in the longitudinal AGES-Reykjavik study[J].Osteoporos Int,2020,31(12):2501.
[2] PEETERS C M M,VISSER E,VAN DE REE C L P,et al.Quality of life after hip fracture in the elderly:a systematic literature review[J].Injury,2016,47(7):1369-1382.
[3] ALEXIOU K I,ROUSHIAS A,VARITIMIDIS S E,et al.Quality of life and psychological consequences in elderly patients after a hip fracturea review[J].Clin Interv Aging,2018,13:143-150.
[4] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会医政司.老年髋部骨折诊疗与管理指南(2022年版)[J].骨科临床与研究杂志,2023,8(2):77-83.
[5] 中国医师协会急救复苏专业委员会创伤骨科与多发伤学组,中国医药教育学会骨质疾病专业委员会修复重建学组,中国老年学和老年医学学会老年病分会骨科专家委员会,等.中国老年髋部骨折病人行微创手术治疗专家共识[J].临床外科杂志,2022,30(4):394-400.
[6] IBRAHIM I,APPLETON P T,WIXTED J J,et al.Implant cut-out following cephalon-medullary nailing of intertrochanteric femur fractures:are helical blades to blame? [J].Injury,2019,50(4):926-930.
[7] MAVROGENIS A F,PANAGOPOULOS G N,MEGALOIKONOMOS P D,et al.Complications after hip nailing for frac-tures[J].Orthopedics,2016,39(1):e108-116.
[8] SERMON A,ZDERIC I,KHATCHADOURIAN R,et al.Bone cement augmentation of femoral nail head elements increases their cut-out resistance in poor bone quality—A biomechanical study[J].J Biomech,2021,118(6):110301.
[9] 胥少汀,葛宝丰,卢世璧.实用骨科学[M].4版.郑州:河南科学技术出版社,2019:950.
[10] 刘忠厚.骨内科学[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2015:319-341.
[11] 蔡群斌,邹霞,胡剑涛,等.有限元法分析尖顶距与股骨近端防旋髓内钉固定股骨转子间骨折稳定性的关系[J].中国组织工程研究,2021,25(6):831-836.
[12] 张世民,李海丰,黄轶刚.骨折分类与功能评定[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2008:321-322.
[13] 石淇允,李无阴,张颖.老年髋部骨折危险因素的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2019,31(8):45-47.
[14] 彭光福,杨述华.髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的决策分析[J].中国骨与关节杂志,2021,10(6):401-404.
[15] 王人楷,章浩,李迪,等.股骨粗隆间骨折临床分型研究进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2018,26(20):1882-1887.
[16] 张雨,李钧,李志民,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗老年股骨转子间骨折内固定失效的危险因素分析[J].中医正骨,2022,34(2):3-6.
[17] 田大为,万华,熊敏,等.PFNA治疗股骨粗隆间骨折内固定手术失败的原因分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2018,26(20):1830-1834.
[18] 田大为,万华,熊敏,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉联合骨水泥强化治疗老年股骨转子间骨折[J].临床骨科杂志,2023,26(3):413-416.
[19] 赵晓涛,张殿英,郁凯,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉固定治疗股骨转子间骨折的失效原因分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2021,23(3):202-208.
[20] 陈宏峰,杨冬松,凌建生,等.骨水泥强化型股骨近端防旋髓内钉固定治疗严重骨质疏松性股骨转子间骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2020,22(3):259-262.
[21] 田智勇,陈洪强,戴科晶,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉骨水泥增强固定治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的疗效分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2021,23(6):539-542.
[22] 王勇,潘骏.标准骨水泥强化型PFNA治疗老年股骨粗隆间不稳定骨折[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2018,26(18):1653-1658.
[23] 郭昊,陈广新,陈晓琴,等.骨水泥强化型股骨近端防旋髓内钉在不同骨质下治疗不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的有限元分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2023,27(21):3281-3286.
[24] HINES C B,COLLINS-YODER A.Bone cement implantation syndrome:key concepts for perioperative nurse[J].ARONJ,2019,109(2):202-216.

相似文献/References:

[1]许兵,叶小雨,王萧枫,等.小管径经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗 骨质疏松性椎体重度压缩骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):29.
[2]温超海,何忠,李永斌,等.闭合复位伽玛钉改良成锁定支架内固定治疗 老年股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):32.
[3]孙群周,阮成群,李光明,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗 老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):20.
[4]方策,倪新宇,王宏伟,等.迟氏正骨手法复位单臂外固定支架固定治疗 老年股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):22.
[5]赵云昌.人工股骨头置换治疗老年粉碎性股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):31.
[6]姜自伟,黄枫,郑晓辉,等.老年股骨转子间骨折患者的围手术期风险评估与控制[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):33.
[7]倪新宇,方策.外固定器治疗股骨转子间骨折的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2015,27(07):48.
[8]张明强.生物型加长柄半髋关节置换术治疗 高龄不稳定股骨转子间骨折疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):56.
[9]李书良,李启义,李建明,等.锁定钢板内固定联合自体髂骨植骨治疗 股骨近端粉碎性骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(05):31.
[10]王智勇,陈柯,田可为,等.联合应用摇杆技术和钳夹技术微创治疗股骨转子部骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(05):36.
[11]刘悦,钟辉,戴蓉丹,等.骨折联络服务模式防治老年髋部脆性骨折的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2021,33(05):40.
　LIU Yue,ZHONG Hui,DAI Rongdan,et al.Advancement of research on fracture liaison service model for prevention and treatment of fragility hip fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2021,33(10):40.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
通讯作者:孙玉明 E-mail:sunyumingliuxq@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01