[1]曹军社,王星,陈伯亮,等.前置与上置重建钢板内固定治疗成人锁骨中段骨折的 比较研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(01):13-15.
 CAO Junshe,WANG Xing,CHEN Boliang,et al.A comparative study of internal fixation with praevia versus superior reconstruction plate for treatment of middle clavicular fractures in adults[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(01):13-15.
点击复制

前置与上置重建钢板内固定治疗成人锁骨中段骨折的 比较研究()
分享到:

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第27卷
期数:
2015年01期
页码:
13-15
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2015-01-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
A comparative study of internal fixation with praevia versus superior reconstruction plate for treatment of middle clavicular fractures in adults
作者:
曹军社王星陈伯亮李军
陕西省宝鸡市中医医院,陕西 宝鸡 721001
Author(s):
CAO JunsheWANG XingCHEN BoliangLI Jun
Baoji Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Baoji 721001,Shanxi,China
关键词:
锁骨 骨折 骨折固定术 内固定器 治疗临床研究性
Keywords:
clavicle fractures fracture fixationinternal internal fixators therapiesinvestigational
摘要:
目的:比较前置与上置重建钢板内固定治疗成人锁骨中段骨折的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析42例成人锁骨中段骨折患者的病例资料,其中采用前置重建钢板内固定23例,采用上置重建钢板内固定19例; 左侧28例,右侧14例; 均符合Nowak等制定的锁骨中段定位标准。比较2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量及骨折断端内、外侧螺钉长度。参照侯春林等制定的锁骨骨折的疗效标准评定2组患者的临床疗效。结果:①一般指标。2组患者切口均甲级愈合,骨折均愈合。前置钢板组骨折断端内、外侧螺钉长度均长于上置钢板组[(18.20±1.76)mm,(16.22±1.20)mm,t=2.836,P=0.011;(21.40±2.84)mm,(17.78±0.67)mm,t=3.370,P=0.002]。前置钢板组患者术中出血量和手术时间与上置钢板组比较,差异均无统计学意义[(71.50±6.26)mL,(73.89±4.86)mL,t=0.921,P=0.370;(56.50±4.74)min,(53.89±6.01)min,t=1.057,P=0.305]。②临床疗效。前置钢板组优22例、良1例,上置钢板组优17例、良2例。2组患者临床疗效比较,差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.765,P=0.445)。结论:对于成人锁骨中段骨折而言,虽然前置与上置重建钢板在术中出血量、手术时间和临床疗效方面无明显差异,但是前置重建钢板内固定所用螺钉长度长于上置重建钢板内固定所用螺钉长度,提示其把持力更强、更具备力学稳定性,但还需进一步的生物力学实验证实。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical curative effects of praevia versus superior reconstruction plate internal fixation for treatment of middle clavicular fractures in adults.Methods:The medical records of 42 adult patients with middle clavicular fracture were analyzed retrospectively,twenty-three patients(praevia plate group)were treated with praevia reconstruction plate internal fixation,while the others(superior plate group)were treated with superior reconstruction plate internal fixation.The fractures located in left side for 28 patients and right for 14 patients.The operative time,blood loss,length of medial and lateral screws were compared between the 2 groups.The clinical curative effects were also evaluated between the 2 groups.Results:All of the patients in the 2 groups got primary healing in the operative incisions and all fractures united.The length of medial and lateral screws was longer in praevia plate group compared to superior plate group(18.20+/-1.76 vs 16.22+/-1.20 mm,t=2.836,P=0.011; 21.40+/-2.84 vs 17.78+/-0.67 mm,t=3.370,P=0.002).There was no statistical difference in the operative time and blood loss between the 2 groups(71.50+/-6.26 vs 73.89+/-4.86 mL,t=0.921,P=0.370; 56.50+/-4.74 vs 53.89+/-6.01 min,t=1.057,P=0.305).Twenty-two patients obtained an excellent result and 1 good in praevia plate group,while 17 patients obtained an excellent result and 2 good in superior plate group.There was no statistical difference in the clinical curative effects between the 2 groups(Z=-0.765,P=0.445).Conclusion:There is no obvious difference in the operative time,blood loss and clinical curative effects between praevia and superior reconstruction plate internal fixation for treatment of adult middle clavicular fractures,while the screws used in praevia reconstruction plate internal fixation are longer than those of superior reconstruction plate internal fixation,suggesting that the former has much stronger pullout strength and better mechanical stability.However,the conclusion need to be verified by further biomechanical experiments.

参考文献/References:

[1] Nowak J,Mallmin H,Larsson S.The aetiology and epidemiology of clavicular fractures.A prospective study during a two-year period in Uppsala,Sweden[J].Injury,2000,31(5):353-358.
[2] 王亦璁,姜保国.骨与关节损伤[M].5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:718.
[3] 侯春林,王诗波,吴韬.锁骨外科学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2004:72.
[4] 毛炳焱,刘平均,贺用礼,等.新型自制髓内钉置入髓内桥接固定锁骨中段骨折[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2010,14(43):8028-8031.
[5] 卢旻鹏,王群波,赵波,等.重建钢板上置与前置治疗老年锁骨中段骨折的疗效分析[J].中华创伤杂志,2011,27(11):995-998.
[6] 邓敦,曹成福,纪斌,等.重建钢板前置法治疗锁骨骨折回顾性研究[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2008,16(10):3-4.
[7] 吴明鲜.重建钢板前置内固定治疗17例老年锁骨骨折的疗效分析[J].重庆医学,2009,38(14):1817-1818.
[8] 石继祥,曹成福,石文俊,等.前置与上置重建钢板固定锁骨中段骨折生物力学性能比较[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2010,14(13):2333-2336.
[9] Partal G,Meyers KN,Sama N,et al.Superior versus anteroinferior plating of the clavicle revisited:a mechanical study[J].J Orthop Trauma,2010,24(7):420-425.
[10] Collinge CA,Stern S,Cordes S,et al.Mechanical properties of small fragment screws[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2000,(373):277-284.
[11] 彭方成,王贤月,王鹏,等.前置重建钢板治疗锁骨中段骨折[J].临床骨科杂志,2011,14(5):509-510.

相似文献/References:

[1]江涛,江林,史俊德,等.动气针法在踝关节骨折术后中后期康复中的应用[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):20.
 JIANG Tao,JIANG Lin,SHI Junde,et al.Application of Dongqi acupuncture(动气针法)to postoperative rehabilitation in the middle-late period in patients with ankle joint fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(01):20.
[2]许兵,叶小雨,王萧枫,等.小管径经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗 骨质疏松性椎体重度压缩骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):29.
[3]王 强.胫腓下联合骨牵引配合手法整复小夹板外固定治疗 儿童闭合移位性股骨干骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):15.
[4]全先辉,万春友,刘磊,等.Taylor空间支架外固定治疗胫腓骨开放性骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):30.
[5]白晨平.微型钢板内固定治疗掌指骨骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):26.
[6]何 涛.带尾孔髌骨针联合缆索内固定系统治疗闭合性髌骨骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):41.
[7]朱彦昭,申成春,蒋丽娜,等.早期手术修复踝关节骨折合并的三角韧带完全断裂[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):46.
[8]董正超,姚新苗.髌骨骨折的分型及内固定治疗进展[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):58.
[9]李时军,丁文军,刘立春.耻骨下支应力性骨折1例[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):74.
[10]刘昕,邓志强,叶家军.大龄儿童肱骨外髁陈旧性骨折不愈合继发肘外翻畸形的 分期手术治疗[J].中医正骨,2015,27(07):55.
[11]袁伟,周晓莉.T形掌指骨微型钢板内固定治疗锁骨近端骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):47.
[12]王俊义.胸锁钩钢板内固定治疗锁骨近端骨折合并胸锁关节脱位[J].中医正骨,2016,28(05):40.
[13]章建新,谢伟,吴向科,等.锁骨远端解剖锁定钢板联合微型锁定钢板内固定治疗锁骨远端骨折合并肩峰骨折[J].中医正骨,2016,28(06):33.
[14]张圣魁,孙海忠.2种克氏针逆行固定方式治疗锁骨中段简单骨折的比较研究[J].中医正骨,2017,29(01):27.
 ZHANG Shengkui,SUN Haizhong.A comparative study of two kinds of antidromic transfixation with Kirschner wire for treatment of middle clavicular simple fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2017,29(01):27.
[15]胡颖,徐卫星,丁伟国,等.解剖型锁定钢板内固定治疗NeerⅡ型锁骨远端骨折[J].中医正骨,2019,31(01):70.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
2014-02-13收稿 2014-09-14修回
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-01-30