[1]高宏文,唐志荣,陈景宇,等.俯卧位骨盆牵引下手法复位治疗胸腰椎单纯压缩骨折的疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2014,26(01):38-42.
 Gao Hongwen*,Tang Zhirong,Chen Jingyu,et al.Observation on the curative effect of pelvic traction in prone position combined with manipulative reduction on thoracolumbar compression fracture[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2014,26(01):38-42.
点击复制

俯卧位骨盆牵引下手法复位治疗胸腰椎单纯压缩骨折的疗效 观察()
分享到:

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第26卷
期数:
2014年01期
页码:
38-42
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2014-01-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Observation on the curative effect of pelvic traction in prone position combined with manipulative reduction on thoracolumbar compression fracture
作者:
高宏文唐志荣陈景宇顾海洋张译文
江苏省射阳县中医院,江苏 射阳 224300
Author(s):
Gao Hongwen*Tang ZhirongChen JingyuGu HaiyangZhang Yiwen.
*Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital of Sheyang county,Sheyang 224300,Jiangsu,China
关键词:
脊柱骨折 骨折压缩性 胸椎 腰椎 骨牵引复位法 正骨手法 治疗临床研究性
Keywords:
Spinal fractures Fractures compression Thoracic vertebrae Lumbar vertebrae Skeletal tracting reposition Bone setting manipulation Therapiesinvestigational
摘要:
目的:探讨俯卧位骨盆牵引下手法复位治疗胸腰椎单纯压缩骨折的临床疗效。方法:将符合要求的78例胸腰椎单纯压缩骨折患者随机分为2组,治疗组41例,采用俯卧位骨盆牵引下手法复位治疗; 对照组37例,采用卧硬板床腰背部垫软枕治疗。2组患者均同时按照骨折三期辨证用药原则服用中药治疗,并进行腰背部功能锻炼。分别于治疗前、治疗后2周、治疗后1个月及治疗后6个月,测定2组患者脊柱后凸Cobb's角和伤椎前缘高度,同时于治疗后6个月采用口述分级评分法评定患者的腰部疼痛情况,参照《中医病证诊断疗效标准》中胸腰椎骨折的疗效评定标准评定患者的总体疗效。结果:①腰部疼痛。治疗组0级32例、1级8例、2级1例,对照组0级22例、1级12例、2级2例、3级1例。2组患者的腰部疼痛程度比较,差异无统计学意义[R^-治疗组=0.454,95%CI(0.389,0.519); R^-对照组=0.551,95%CI(0.466,0.636)]。②脊柱后凸Cobb's角。治疗前后不同时间Cobb's角的差异有统计学意义,即存在时间效应[治疗组:(18.40°±0.94°),(5.00°±0.92°),(4.30°±0.98°),(3.90°±0.45°),对照组:(18.10°±1.21°),(8.10°±1.02°),(7.80°±1.01°),(7.60°±0.82°),F=14.573,P=0.017]; 2组患者Cobb's角的组间差异总体上有统计学意义,即存在分组效应(F=22.350,P=0.008),除治疗前外(t=0.973,P=0.139),其余各时点对照组的Cobb's角均大于治疗组(t=20.573,P=0.007; t=22.840,P=0.005; t=22.350,P=0.003); 时间因素和分组因素之间存在交互效应(F=11.567,P=0.012)。③伤椎前缘高度。治疗前后不同时间伤椎前缘高度的差异有统计学意义,即存在时间效应[治疗组:(11.70±0.78)mm,(18.90±0.22)mm,(18.90±0.26)mm,(18.90±0.36)mm,对照组:(11.70±0.68)mm,(13.10±1.02)mm,(13.90±0.23)mm,(13.90±0.24)mm,F=14.553,P=0.014]; 2组患者伤椎前缘高度的组间差异总体上有统计学意义,即存在分组效应(F=14.670,P=0.016),除治疗前外(t=0.987,P=0.175),其余各时点对照组的伤椎前缘高度均小于治疗组(t=13.654,P=0.018; t=13.986,P=0.017; t=18.535,P=0.014); 时间因素和分组因素之间存在交互效应(F=12.597,P=0.011)。④总体疗效。治疗组治愈36例、好转3例、未愈2例,对照组治愈29例、好转4例、未愈4例。2组患者的总体疗效比较,差异无统计学意义[R^-治疗组=0.477,95%CI(0.425,0.529); R^-对照组=0.525,95%CI(0.455,0.596)]。结论:俯卧位骨盆牵引下手法复位可有效缓解胸腰椎单纯压缩骨折患者的腰背部疼痛症状,在纠正脊柱后凸畸形、恢复伤椎前缘高度方面疗效优于卧硬板床腰背部垫软枕疗法,是治疗该病的有效方法。
Abstract:
Objective:To observe the clinical effects of pelvic traction in prone position combined with manipulative reduction on thoracolumbar compression fracture.Methods:Seventy-eight patients with thoracolumbar compression fracture who met the requirement were randomly divided into 2 groups,41 patients(treatment group)were treated with pelvic traction in prone position combined with manipulative reduction,while 37 patients(control group)were ordered to stay in hard bed with a soft pillow under the low back.Meanwhile,the patients in both of the 2 groups were treated with low back functional exercise and oral application of traditional Chinese medicine according to syndrome differentiation principles.The Cobb angle and the anterior border height of injured vertebrae were measured in both of the 2 groups before the treatment and at 2 weeks and 1 and 6 months after the treatment respectively.The low back pain were evaluated according to verbal rating scale,and the total curative effect were also evaluated according to Standard for diagnosis and therapeutic effectiveness evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine syndromes 6 months after the treatment.Results:Thirty-two patients were categorized as grade 0,8 patients as gradeⅠ,1 patients as gradeⅡin treatment group,while 22 patients were categorized as grade 0,12 patients as gradeⅠ,2 patients as gradeⅡand 1 patients as gradeⅢin control group.There was no statistical difference in the low back pain degree between the 2 groups(treatment group:(-overR)=0.454,95%CI 0.389 to 0.519; control group:(-overR)=0.551,95%CI 0.466 to 0.636).There was statistical difference in kyphosis Cobb angle between different time points,in other words,there was time effect(treatment group:18.40+/-0.94,5.00+/-0.92,4.30+/-0.98,3.90+/-0.45 degrees; control group:18.10+/-1.21,8.10+/-1.02,7.80+/-1.01,7.60+/-0.82 degrees; F=14.573,P=0.017).There was statistical difference in kyphosis Cobb angle between the 2 groups in general,in other words,there was grouping effect(F=22.350,P=0.008).The kyphosis Cobb angle of control group was higher than that of treatment group at posttreatment timepoints(t=20.573,P=0.007; t=22.840,P=0.005; t=22.350,P=0.003)except at pretreatment point(t=0.973,P=0.139).There was interaction between time factor and grouping factor(F=11.567,P=0.012).There was statistical difference in anterior border height of injured vertebrae between different time points,in other words,there was time effect(treatment group:11.70+/-0.78,18.90+/-0.22,18.90+/-0.26,18.90+/-0.36 mm; control group:11.70+/-0.68,13.10+/-1.02,13.90+/-0.23,13.90+/-0.24 mm; F=14.553,P=0.014).There was statistical difference in anterior border height of injured vertebrae between the 2 groups in general,in other words,there was grouping effect(F=14.670,P=0.016).The anterior border height of injured vertebrae of control group was less than that of treatment group at posttreatment timepoints(t=13.654,P=0.018; t=13.986,P=0.017; t=18.535,P=0.014)except at pretreatment point(t=0.987,P=0.175).There was interaction between time factor and grouping factor(F=12.597,P=0.011).Thirty-six patients obtained an excellent result,3 good and 2 poor in the treatment group; while 29 patients obtained an excellent result,4 good and 4 poor in the control group.There was no statistical difference in total curative effect between the 2 groups(treatment group:(-overR)=0.477,95%CI 0.425 to 0.529; control group:(-overR)=0.525,95%CI 0.455 to 0.596).Conclusion:The therapy of pelvic traction in prone position combined with manipulative reduction can relieve the low back pain effectively,and it surpassed the therapy of staying in hard bed with a soft pillow under the low back in kyphotic deformity correction and injured vertebral anterior border height restoration,so it is an effective method in the treatment of simplex thoracolumbar compression fracture.

参考文献/References:

[1] 国家中医药管理局.中医病证诊断疗效标准[S].南京:南京大学出版社,1994:176.
[2] 董福慧,朱云龙.中医正骨学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:200-203.
[3] 刘效敏,张俊忠.过伸复位外固定法治疗胸腰椎压缩性骨折的临床研究[J].世界中西医结合杂志,2009,4(7):490-492.
[4] 恽晓平.康复评定学[M].北京:华夏出版社,2004:99-100.
[5] 陈肖,温清波,彭力平.胸腰椎压缩性骨折的临床疗效评价标准[J].中医正骨,2012,24(3):40-42.
[6] 谢国平,刘文刚,魏凌峰,等.椎体形成术与保守治疗胸腰椎压缩性骨折的疗效比较[J].中医中医骨伤科杂志,2010,18(12):8-10.
[7] 印红兵.过伸复位加腰椎牵引法治疗胸腰椎压缩性骨折38例[J].黑龙江中医杂志,2011,40(5):21-22.
[8] 郑平,朱育安,吕安峰,等.过伸复位治疗胸腰椎骨折脱位的生物力学实验研究[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,1998,16(3):270-272.
[9] 吴向武,播宏武,夏永法.垫枕法治疗单纯性胸腰椎骨折[J].中国骨伤,1998,11(4):38-39.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈广林,冯婷婷,张力,等.单侧穿刺椎体后凸成形术治疗Kummell病[J].中医正骨,2013,25(10):67.
[2]何升华,马笃军,余伟吉,等.过伸牵引弹性按压法联合经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩骨折的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2014,26(03):25.
 He Shenghua*,Ma Dujun,Yu Weiji,et al.Clinical study on hyperextension traction elastic pressure combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2014,26(01):25.
[3]李庆龙,吴爱悯,倪文飞,等.经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折的常见并发症分析[J].中医正骨,2014,26(03):40.
[4]史超路,蒋国强,卢斌,等.经皮椎体强化术后邻近椎体骨折原因的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2014,26(03):64.
[5]卢中道,杨勇,范富有.全麻下手法复位经皮椎体内人工骨植骨治疗 胸腰椎压缩性骨折[J].中医正骨,2013,25(09):55.
[6]樊良,金以军,何磊,等.全麻下经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折[J].中医正骨,2012,24(12):59.
[7]陈文红,陈建常,马在松,等.球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折[J].中医正骨,2012,24(07):62.
[8]李 璐.椎体球囊扩张成形术的临床应用[J].中医正骨,2012,24(08):66.
[9]冯树生,孙波,张凌,等.牵引结合中药外敷治疗老年腰椎压缩性骨折[J].中医正骨,2012,24(02):63.
[10]陈肖,温清波,彭力平.胸腰椎压缩性骨折的临床疗效评价标准[J].中医正骨,2012,24(03):40.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:江苏省盐城市科技计划项目(YK2012087)
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-01-20