[1]杨晶晶,王威,何承建,等.骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折经皮椎体成形术中骨水泥椎间盘渗漏对手术疗效的影响…[J].中医正骨,2022,34(01):15-21.
　YANG Jingjing,WANG Wei,HE Chengjian,et al.Effects of intradiscal bone cement leakage on the clinical outcome of percutaneous vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2022,34(01):15-21.
点击复制

骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折经皮椎体成形术中骨水泥椎间盘渗漏对手术疗效的影响…()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第34卷
期数:
2022年01期
页码:
15-21
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2022-01-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of intradiscal bone cement leakage on the clinical outcome of percutaneous vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture
作者:
杨晶晶; 王威; 何承建; 张志文; 文峰
(湖北省中医院,湖北 武汉 430061)
Author(s):
YANG Jingjing; WANG Wei; HE Chengjian; ZHANG Zhiwen; WEN Feng
Hubei Provincial Hospital of TCM,Wuhan 430061,Hubei,China
关键词:
骨质疏松性骨折;  骨折; 压缩性;  椎体成形术;  手术中并发症;  手术后并发症;  骨水泥渗漏
Keywords:
osteoporotic fractures;  fractures; compression;  vertebroplasty;  intraoperative complications;  postoperative complications;  bone cement leakage
摘要:
目的:观察骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture,OVCF)经皮椎体成形术(percutaneous vertebroplasty,PVP)中骨水泥椎间盘渗漏对手术疗效的影响。方法:回顾性分析2016年1月至2019年1月采用PVP治疗的162例OVCF患者的病例资料,其中30例出现骨水泥椎间盘渗漏(渗漏组)、132例未出现骨水泥渗漏(无渗漏组)。比较2组患者的伤椎疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)、Cobb角、椎间盘高度及邻近椎体骨折发生率。结果:渗漏组随访时间19～32个月,中位数26个月。无渗漏组随访时间17～33个月,中位数25个月。①伤椎疼痛VAS评分。时间因素与分组因素存在交互效应(F=3.571,P=0.039)。2组患者伤椎疼痛VAS评分总体比较,组间差异无统计学意义,即不存在分组效应(F=2.875,P=0.092)。手术前后不同时间点伤椎疼痛VAS评分的差异有统计学意义,即存在时间效应(F=792.352,P=0.000)。2组患者的伤椎疼痛VAS评分随时间变化均呈下降趋势,但2组的下降趋势不完全一致。术前、术后1 d,2组患者伤椎疼痛VAS评分的组间差异均无统计学意义[(7.21±1.32)分,(7.15±1.41)分,t=-0.227,P=0.821;(2.81±0.59)分,(2.89±0.83)分,t=0.508,P=0.612]; 末次随访时,渗漏组伤椎疼痛VAS评分低于无渗漏组[(1.58±0.64)分,(2.23±0.84)分,t=4.734,P=0.000]。②ODI。时间因素与分组因素不存在交互效应(F=1.283,P=0.279)。2组患者ODI总体比较,组间差异无统计学意义,即不存在分组效应(F=0.007,P=0.935)。手术前后不同时间点ODI的差异有统计学意义,即存在时间效应(F=662.717,P=0.000)。2组患者的ODI随时间变化均呈下降趋势,且2组的下降趋势完全一致[渗漏组:(41.29±5.74)%,(22.75±5.97)%,(11.46±5.24)%,F=192.697,P=0.000; 无渗漏组:(42.51±5.19)%,(21.27±6.37)%,(11.56±5.71)%,F=941.928,P=0.000]。③伤椎Cobb角。时间因素与分组因素不存在交互效应(F=0.157,P=0.773)。2组患者伤椎Cobb角总体比较,组间差异无统计学意义,即不存在分组效应(F=0.890,P=0.347)。手术前后不同时间点伤椎Cobb角的差异有统计学意义,即存在时间效应(F=633.877,P=0.000)。2组患者的伤椎Cobb角随时间变化均呈减小趋势,且2组的减小趋势完全一致(24.07°±4.15°,13.64°±1.48°,13.54°±1.49°,F=184.863,P=0.000; 24.70°±4.36°,13.91°±1.94°,13.86°±1.86°,F=886.434,P=0.000)。④伤椎椎间盘高度。时间因素与分组因素存在交互效应(F=94.251,P=0.000)。2组患者伤椎椎间盘高度总体比较,组间差异无统计学意义,即不存在分组效应(F=1.189,P=0.277)。手术前后不同时间点伤椎椎间盘高度的差异有统计学意义,即存在时间效应(F=786.319,P=0.000)。2组患者的伤椎椎间盘高度随时间变化均呈下降趋势,但2组的下降趋势不完全一致。术前、术后1 d,2组患者伤椎椎间盘高度的组间差异均无统计学意义[(7.01±1.49)mm,(6.92±1.30)mm,t=-0.320,P=0.750;(6.91±1.44)mm,(6.96±1.29)mm,t=0.172,P=0.864]; 末次随访时,渗漏组伤椎椎间盘高度低于无渗漏组[(5.17±1.46)mm,(6.06±1.25)mm,t=3.450,P=0.001]。⑤邻近椎体骨折发生率。末次随访时,渗漏组8例出现邻近椎体骨折,其中胸段2例、胸腰段4例、腰段2例; 无渗漏组25例出现邻近椎体骨折,其中胸段6例、胸腰段14例、腰段5例。2组患者邻近椎体骨折发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.900,P=0.343)。结论:OVCF患者PVP治疗后出现骨水泥椎间盘渗漏,不影响伤椎的Cobb角及活动功能恢复、不会增加邻近椎体骨折的风险,反而可以在短期内缓解疼痛症状,但远期可能加速椎间盘退变。
Abstract:
Objective:To observe the effects of intradiscal bone cement leakage on the clinical outcome of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP)in treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture(OVCF).Methods:The medical records of 162 patients who underwent PVP for OVCF from January 2016 to January 2019 were analyzed retrospectively.The intradiscal bone cement leakage was found in 30 patients(leakage group)and unfound in 132 patients(non-leakage group).The injured vertebrae pain visual analogue scale(VAS)score,Oswestry disability index(ODI),Cobb angle,intervertebral disc(IVD)height and incidence rate of adjacent vertebral fracture(AVF)were compared between the 2 groups.Results:The patients in leakage group were followed up for 19-32 months with a median of 26 months,and the ones in non-leakage group for 17-33 months with a median of 25 months.①There was interaction between time factor and group factor in injured vertebrae pain VAS scores(F=3.571,P=0.039).There was no statistical difference in injured vertebrae pain VAS scores between the 2 groups in general,in other words,there was no group effect(F=2.875,P=0.092).There was statistical difference in injured vertebrae pain VAS scores between different timepoints before and after the PVP,in other words,there was time effect(F=792.352,P=0.000).The injured vertebrae pain VAS scores presented a time-dependent decreasing trend in the 2 groups,while the 2 groups were inconsistent with each other in the variation tendency.There was no statistical difference in injured vertebrae pain VAS scores between the 2 groups before the PVP and at 1 day after the PVP(7.21±1.32 vs 7.15±1.41 points,t=-0.227,P=0.821; 2.81±0.59 vs 2.89±0.83 points,t=0.508,P=0.612).The injured vertebrae pain VAS scores were lower in leakage group compared to non-leakage group at the last follow-up(1.58±0.64 vs 2.23±0.84 points,t=4.734,P=0.000).②There was no interaction between time factor and group factor in injured vertebrae ODI(F=1.283,P=0.279).There was no statistical difference in injured vertebrae ODI between the 2 groups in general,in other words,there was no group effect(F=0.007,P=0.935).There was statistical difference in injured vertebrae ODI between different timepoints before and after the PVP,in other words,there was time effect(F=662.717,P=0.000).The injured vertebrae ODI presented a time-dependent decreasing trend in the 2 groups,and the 2 groups were completely consistent with each other in the variation tendency(leakage group:41.29±5.74,22.75±5.97,11.46±5.24%,F=192.697,P=0.000; non-leakage group:42.51±5.19,21.27±6.37,11.56±5.71%,F=941.928,P=0.000)...

参考文献/References:

[1] MUSBAHI O,ALI A M,HASSANY H,et al.Vertebral compression fractures[J].Br J Hosp Med(Lond),2018,79(1):36-40.
[2] 胡元裕,张嘉.经皮椎体强化术骨水泥椎间盘渗漏的研究进展[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2019,12(12):1003-1007.
[3] 蒋协远,王大伟.骨科临床疗效评价标准[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:119-121.
[4] ZHAO H,NI C F,HUANG J,et al.Effects of bone cement on intervertebral disc degeneration[J].Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 2014,7(4):963-969.
[5] PIAO M,DARWONO A B,ZHU K,et al.Extrapendicular approach of unilateral percutaneous vesselplasty for the treatment of kummell disease[J].Int J Spine Surg,2019,13(2):199-204.
[6] 陈亮,杨惠林,唐天驷.椎体后凸成形术骨水泥椎间隙内渗漏的随访分析[J].中华骨科杂志,2008,28(12):1015-1018.
[7] 陈晓斌,任继鑫,张建政,等.PVP手术中骨水泥渗漏至椎间隙与术后疼痛恢复的关系[J].北京医学,2015,37(11):1040-1043.
[8] MIROVSKY Y,ANEKSTEIN Y,SHALMON E,et al.Intradiscal cement leak following percutaneous vertebroplasty[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2006,31(10):1120-1124.
[9] MOUSAVI P,ROTH S,FINKELSTEIN J,et al.Volumetric quantification of cement leakage following percutaneous vertebroplasty in metastatic and osteoporotic vertebrae[J].J Neurosurg,2003,99(1 Suppl):56-59.
[10] 孙启才,茹选良,宋柏杉,等.经皮椎体后凸成形术骨水泥渗漏的中期随访及应对策略[J].中国骨伤,2017,30(9):810-816.
[11] SHEN M,NIU J,ZHOU H,et al.Adjacent disc height reduction and clinical outcome after intradiscal cement lea-kage[J].Int J Spine Surg,2016,10:34.
[12] 卢海波,刘利群,吴长明,等.椎体后凸成形术并发椎间隙骨水泥渗漏的临床研究[J].实用骨科杂志,2017,23(11):966-969.
[13] JESSE M K,PETERSEN B,GLUECK D,et al.Effect of the location of endplate cement extravasation on adjacent level fracture in osteoporotic patients undergoing vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty[J].Pain Physician,2015,18(5):E805-E814.
[14] 赵辉,倪才方,黄健,等.椎体成形术中骨水泥渗漏对椎间盘生化改变的影响[J].介入放射学杂志,2011,20(8):641-644.
[15] BORENSZTEIN M,CAMINO WILLHUBER G O,POSADAS MARTINEZ M L,et al.Analysis of risk factors for new vertebral fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty[J].Global Spine J,2018,8(5):446-452.
[16] REYAD R M,GHOBRIAL H Z,HAKIM S M,et al.Thick cement usage in percutaneous vertebroplasty for malignant vertebral fractures at high risk for cement leakage[J].Diagn Interv Imaging,2017,98(10):721-728.
[17] 黄天霁,寇玉辉,殷晓峰,等.椎体强化术后再发椎体骨折的临床特点和危险因素[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2015,47(2):237-241.
[18] JANSSEN I,RYANG Y M,GEMPT J,et al.Risk of cement leakage and pulmonary embolism by bone cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation of the thoracolumbar spine[J].Spine J,2017,17(6):837-844.
[19] 费琦,李秋军,李东,等.椎体后凸成形术后骨水泥椎间盘渗漏对邻近节段力学影响的有限元分析[J].中华医学杂志,2011,91(1):51-55.
[20] SUN Y C,TENG M M,YUAN W S,et al.Risk of post-vertebroplasty fracture in adjacent vertebral bodies appears correlated with the morphologic extent of bone cement[J].J Chin Med Assoc,2011,74(8):357-362.
[21] NIEUWENHUIJSE M J,PUTTER H,VAN ERKEL A R,et al.New vertebral fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a clustered analysis and the relevance of intradiskal cement leakage[J].Radiology,2013,266(3):862-870.
[22] 张志刚,邹健,冯永洪,等.经皮椎体成形术骨水泥渗漏对临近节段再发骨折的影响[J].现代医学与健康研究电子杂志,2020,4(6):1-4.
[23] 陶莹,邓见键,吴辉,等.经皮椎体成形术骨水泥椎间盘渗漏的研究现状[J].实用临床医学,2019,20(6):97-101.

相似文献/References:

[1]江涛,江林,史俊德,等.动气针法在踝关节骨折术后中后期康复中的应用[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):20.
　JIANG Tao,JIANG Lin,SHI Junde,et al.Application of Dongqi acupuncture(动气针法)to postoperative rehabilitation in the middle-late period in patients with ankle joint fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(01):20.
[2]许兵,叶小雨,王萧枫,等.小管径经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗 骨质疏松性椎体重度压缩骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):29.
[3]王 强.胫腓下联合骨牵引配合手法整复小夹板外固定治疗 儿童闭合移位性股骨干骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):15.
[4]全先辉,万春友,刘磊,等.Taylor空间支架外固定治疗胫腓骨开放性骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):30.
[5]袁伟,周晓莉.T形掌指骨微型钢板内固定治疗锁骨近端骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):47.
[6]白晨平.微型钢板内固定治疗掌指骨骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):26.
[7]何 涛.带尾孔髌骨针联合缆索内固定系统治疗闭合性髌骨骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):41.
[8]朱彦昭,申成春,蒋丽娜,等.早期手术修复踝关节骨折合并的三角韧带完全断裂[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):46.
[9]董正超,姚新苗.髌骨骨折的分型及内固定治疗进展[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):58.
[10]李时军,丁文军,刘立春.耻骨下支应力性骨折1例[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):74.
[11]彭小东,张晓刚,赵文韬,等.有限元分析在过伸复位治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折生物力学研究中的应用进展[J].中医正骨,2018,30(07):25.
[12]陈晨,安忠诚,张英健,等.椎体强化术后残留腰背痛的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2020,32(05):26.
[13]王宝虎,邬博来,马智敏,等.单侧与双侧椎弓根入路经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体侧方压缩性骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2021,33(08):16.
　WANG Baohu,WU Bolai,MA Zhimin,et al.A comparative study of percutaneous kyphoplasty through unipedicular approach versus bipedicular approach for treatment of lateral osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2021,33(01):16.
[14]刘锐,龚德飞,班正涛,等.经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折术中骨水泥渗漏的危险因素分析[J].中医正骨,2022,34(11):14.
　LIU Rui,GONG Defei,BAN Zhengtao,et al.Risk factors for bone cement leakage during percutaneous vertebroplasty treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2022,34(01):14.
[15]罗金金,丁彩田.骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折经皮椎体后凸成形术后脊柱后凸畸形改善程度的影响因素分析[J].中医正骨,2022,34(08):8.
　LUO Jinjin,DING Caitian.Analysis of factors influencing the degree of improvement of spinal kyphosis deformity after percutaneous kyphoplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2022,34(01):8.
[16]黄志辉,吴钒,李志钢.骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折椎体成形术后椎体再塌陷的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2023,35(05):37.
[17]高聪,白冰心,卢汪钰,等.经皮椎体强化术中骨水泥弥散和渗漏的影响因素和干预措施的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2024,36(03):51.
[18]姚敏刚,马晓飞,孔明祥.单节段骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折经皮椎体后凸成形术后再骨折的危险因素分析[J].中医正骨,2024,36(12):14.
　YAO Mingang,MA Xiaofei,KONG Mingxiang.Risk factors for refracture after percutaneous kyphoplasty in patients with mono-segmental osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2024,36(01):14.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
通讯作者:王威 E-mail:hbzyww@hotmail.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01