[1]贾川,黎俊,赵洪,等.单侧经横突-椎弓根入路与双侧经椎弓根入路经皮椎体成形术治疗重度骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折合并脊柱侧弯的比较研究[J].中医正骨,2018,30(12):23-29.
　JIA Chuan,LI Jun,ZHAO Hong,et al.Percutaneous vertebroplasty through unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach versus bilateral transpedicular approach for treatment of severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and scoliosis:a comparative study[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2018,30(12):23-29.
点击复制

单侧经横突-椎弓根入路与双侧经椎弓根入路经皮椎体成形术治疗重度骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折合并脊柱侧弯的比较研究 ()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第30卷
期数:
2018年12期
页码:
23-29
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2018-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Percutaneous vertebroplasty through unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach versus bilateral transpedicular approach for treatment of severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and scoliosis:a comparative study
作者:
贾川1; 黎俊2; 赵洪2; 彭立波2; 谢子康2; 瞿玉兴2
(1.南京中医药大学,江苏 南京 210046; 2.江苏省常州市中医医院,江苏 常州 213003)
Author(s):
JIA Chuan1; LI Jun2; ZHAO Hong2; PENG Libo2; XIE Zikang2; QU Yuxing2
1.Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Nanjing 210046,Jiangsu,China 2.Changzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Changzhou 213003,Jiangsu,China
关键词:
骨折; 压缩性;  骨质疏松性骨折;  胸椎;  腰椎;  脊柱侧凸;  椎体成形术;  手术入路;  临床试验
Keywords:
fractures; compression;  osteoporotic fractures;  thoracic vertebrae;  lumbar vertebroplasy;  scoliosis;  ertebroplasty;  surgical approach;  clinical trial
摘要:
目的:比较单侧经横突-椎弓根入路经皮椎体成形术(percutaneous vertebroplasty,PVP)与双侧经椎弓根入路PVP治疗重度骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures,OVCF)合并脊柱侧弯的临床疗效和安全性。方法:将符合要求的36例重度OVCF合并脊柱侧弯患者随机分为2组,每组18例,分别采用单侧经横突-椎弓根入路PVP治疗(单侧组)和双侧经椎弓根入路PVP治疗(双侧组)。记录并比较2组患者的手术时间、X线透视次数、骨水泥灌注量、住院时间、并发症发生情况以及术后第2天椎体高度恢复率[(术后椎体高度-术前椎体高度)/术后椎体高度]和脊柱侧弯Cobb角纠正度数(术前Cobb角-术后Cobb角),并分别于术前及术后1周、3个月、12个月比较2组患者腰背部疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分及Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)。结果:①一般情况。2组患者均获随访,随访时间(18.3±6.4)个月。2组患者术后第2天椎体高度恢复率和脊柱侧弯Cobb角纠正度数以及骨水泥灌注量、住院时间比较,差异均无统计学意义[(27.6±5.6)%,(28.3±4.9)%,t=0.400,P=0.700; 8.2°±2.8°,8.9°±3.1°,t=0.710,P=0.480;(4.0±0.7)mL,(4.2±0.8)mL,t=0.800,P=0.430;(9.5±2.1)d,(9.6±2.2)d,t=0.140,P=0.890]; 单侧组手术时间短于双侧组[(23.4±4.3)min,(32.6±5.6)min,t=5.530,P=0.000],X线透视次数少于双侧组[(5.8±0.8)次,(9.7±1.1)次,t=12.170,P=0.000]。②腰背部疼痛VAS评分。时间因素与分组因素不存在交互效应(F=2.520,P=0.270); 2组患者腰背部疼痛VAS评分比较,组间差异无统计学意义,即不存在分组效应(F=1.420,P=0.150); 手术前后不同时间点之间腰背部疼痛VAS评分的差异有统计学意义,即存在时间效应(F=34.620,P=0.000); 2组患者腰背部疼痛VAS评分随时间均呈降低趋势,且2组的降低趋势完全一致[(6.7±0.9)分,(2.8±1.2)分,(2.2±0.7)分,(1.6±0.7)分,F=8.870,P=0.000;(6.6±0.8)分,(2.8±1.1)分,(2.0±0.6)分,(1.4±0.7)分,F=6.320,P=0.000]。③ODI。时间因素与分组因素不存在交互效应(F=20.360,P=0.380); 2组患者ODI比较,组间差异无统计学意义,即不存在分组效应(F=3.440,P=0.640); 手术前后不同时间点之间ODI的差异有统计学意义,即存在时间效应(F=25.480,P=0.000); 2组患者ODI随时间均呈降低趋势,且2组的降低趋势完全一致[(68.1±6.1)%,(32.6±5.9)%,(22.2±3.8)%,(18.2±2.6)%,F=22.740,P=0.000;(70.5±5.3)%,(32.4±4.6)%,(20.7±4.1)%,(17.3±3.4)%,F=50.910,P=0.000]。④安全性。双侧组2例出现邻近椎体再骨折,单侧组1例出现邻近椎体再骨折,均给予卧床休息及抗骨质疏松等治疗后骨折愈合; 双侧组1例穿刺部位出现血肿,给予活血药治疗1周后血肿消退; 2组均未出现骨水泥渗漏致脊髓损伤、硬膜囊撕裂及气胸等并发症; 2组并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.603)。结论:单侧经横突-椎弓根入路PVP与双侧经椎弓根入路PVP治疗重度OVCF合并脊柱侧弯畸形,均能恢复椎体高度,矫正侧弯畸形,缓解腰背部疼痛,促进腰椎功能的恢复,住院时间短,并发症少,且骨水泥灌注量相当,但前者比后者的手术时间短、X线辐射少。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical curative effects and safety of percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP)through unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach versus PVP through bilateral transpedicular approach for treatment of severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures(OVCF)and scoliosis.Methods:Thirty-six patients with severe OVCF and scoliosis enrolled in the study were randomly divided into 2 groups,18 cases in each group.The patients were treated with PVP through unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach(unilateral group)and PVP through bilateral transpedicular approach(bilateral group)respectively.The operative time,frequency of X-ray exposure,consumption of bone cements,hospital stays,complications and vertebral height recovery rate(ratio of postoperative increased vertebral height to postoperative vertebral height)and Cobb angle correction degree(increased degree of Cobb angle)of scoliosis measured at postoperative day 2 were compared between the 2 groups respectively.The low back pain visual analogue scale(VAS)scores and Oswestry disability index(ODI)were compared between the 2 groups before the operation and at 1 week,3 and 12 months after the operation respectively.Results:All patients in the 2 groups were followed up for 18.3+/-6.4 months.There was no statistical difference in vertebral height recovery rate and Cobb angle correction degree of scoliosis measured at postoperative day 2,consumption of bone cements and hospital stays between the 2 groups(27.6+/-5.6 vs 28.3+/-4.9%,t=0.400,P=0.700; 8.2+/-2.8 vs 8.9+/-3.1 degrees,t=0.710,P=0.480; 4.0+/-0.7 vs 4.2+/-0.8 mL,t=0.800,P=0.430; 9.5+/-2.1 vs 9.6+/-2.2 days,t=0.140,P=0.890).The operative time was shorter and the X-ray exposure was fewer in unilateral group compared to bilateral group(23.4+/-4.3 vs 32.6+/-5.6 minutes,t=5.530,P=0.000; 5.8+/-0.8 vs 9.7+/-1.1 times,t=12.170,P=0.000).There was no interaction between time factor and group factor in low back pain VAS scores(F=2.520,P=0.270).There was no statistical difference in low back pain VAS scores between the 2 groups,in other words,there was no group effect(F=1.420,P=0.150).There was statistical difference in low back pain VAS scores between different timepoints before and after the operation,in other words,there was time effect(F=34.620,P=0.000).The low back pain VAS scores presented a time-dependent decreasing trend in both of the 2 groups,and the 2 groups were consistent with each other in the decreasing trend of low back pain VAS scores(6.7+/-0.9,2.8+/-1.2,2.2+/-0.7,1.6+/-0.7 points,F=8.870,P=0.000; 6.6+/-0.8,2.8+/-1.1,2.0+/-0.6,1.4+/-0.7 points,F=6.320,P=0.000).There was no interaction between time factor and group factor in ODI(F=20.360,P=0.380).There was no statistical difference in ODI between the 2 groups,in other words,there was no group effect(F=3.440,P=0.640).There was statistical difference in ODI between different timepoints before and after the operation,in other words,there was time effect(F=25.480,P=0.000).The ODI presented a time-dependent decreasing trend in both of the 2 groups,and the 2 groups were consistent with each other in the decreasing trend of ODI(68.1+/-6.1,32.6+/-5.9,22.2+/-3.8,18.2+/-2.6%,F=22.740,P=0.000; 70.5+/-5.3,32.4+/-4.6,20.7+/-4.1,17.3+/-3.4%,F=50.910,P=0.000).Adjacent vertebrae fractures were found in 2 patients in bilateral group and 1 patient in unilateral group,and the fractures healed after rest in bed and anti-osteoporosis treatment.The hematoma was found at the puncture site after the operation in 1 patient in bilateral group,and it subsided after 1-week treatment with blood-activating drugs.No complications such as spinal cord injuries which was caused by bone cement leakage and dural sac avulsion and aerothorax were found in the 2 groups.There was no statistical difference in complication incidences between the 2 groups(P=0.603).Conclusion:Both PVP through unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach and PVP through bilateral transpedicular approach can restore vertebral height,correct scoliosis deformity,relieve low back pain and promote lumbar function recovery in treatment of severe OVCF and scoliosis with short hospital stays and few complications,and they are similar to each other in consumption of bone cements,while the former has the advantages of shorter operative time and less X-ray radiation compared to the latter.

参考文献/References:

[1] 黄胜,许靖,项禹诚,等.单侧与双侧入路经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松压缩性骨折的比较研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2013,21(2):115-118.
[2] 苏敦鹏,陈阳,张超,等.退变性脊柱侧弯与骨质疏松症相关性探讨[J].颈腰痛杂志,2016,37(2):118-120.
[3] 翟睿,汪学松,金传峰,等.退变性脊柱侧弯与骨质疏松症相关性分析[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2014,20(3):256-259.
[4] 蒋协远,王大伟.骨科临床疗效评价标准[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:123-124.
[5] BARRIOS C,LAPUENTE JP,SAESTRE S.Treatment of chronic pain in adult scoliosis[J].Stud Health Technol Inform,2002,88:290-303.
[6] CHOW JH,CHAN CC.Validation of the Chinese version of the Oswestry disability index[J].Work,2005,25(4):307-314.
[7] LI LH,SUN TS,LIU Z,et al.Comparison of unipedicular and bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures:a meta-analysis[J].Chin Med J,2013,126(20):3956-3961.
[8] 李健,沈文龙,常兴华.单侧与双侧椎弓根入路椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的临床疗效比较[J].大连医科大学学报,2015,37(2):145-147.
[9] 钟远鸣,程俊,仇振茂,等.单双侧经椎弓根入路PVP治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的Meta分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2014,22(10):892-897.
[10] 王想福,范有福,石瑞芳,等.单侧穿刺椎体后凸成形术骨水泥分布与穿刺角度的关系[J].中国骨伤,2015,28(8):704-707.
[11] LIEBSCHNER MA,ROSENBERG WS, KEAVENY TM. Effects of bone cement volume and distribution on vertebral stiffness after vertebroplasty[J].Spine,2001,26(14): 1547-1554.
[12] AQUARIUS R, VAN DER ZIJDEN AM,HOMMINGA J,et al.Does bone cement in percutaneous vertebroplasty act as a stress riser?[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2013,38(24):2092-2097.
[13] 遇呈祥,王忠平,邱渝江,等.经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松型胸腰椎压缩性骨折的临床评价[J].骨科,2015,6(4):196-200.
[14] KOLB JP,KUENY RA,PÜESCHEL K,et al.Does the cement stiffness affect fatigue fracture strength of vertebrae after cement augmentation in osteoporotic patients?[J].Eur Spine J,2013,22(7):1650-1656.
[15] CHU W,TSUEI YC,LIAO PH,et al.Decompressed percutaneous vertebroplasty:a secured bone cement delivery procedure for vertebral augmentation in osteoporotic compression fractures[J]. Injury,2013,44(6):813-818.
[16] 王高举,谢胜荣,杨进,等.老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折和中青年胸腰椎骨折患者椎弓根宽度的CT观察[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2016,26(12):1076-1081.
[17] 彭伟雄,梁洁红,张志.椎体后凸成形术在脊柱侧弯骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折治疗中的应用[J].实用医学杂志,2011,27(13):2416-2418.
[18] 陈柏龄,谢登辉,黎艺强,等.单侧PKP骨水泥注射过中线分布对压缩性骨折椎体两侧刚度的影响[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2011,21(2):118-121.
[19] 王松,王清,钟德君,等.经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的并发症及防治[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2010,18(21):1781-1783.
[20] 王松,康建平,王清,等.腰椎经横突-椎弓根入路PVP/PKP手术的影像解剖学研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2013,21(20):1359-1364.
[21] 祁振良,李为勇,于永刚,等.单侧和双侧经皮椎体成形术治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性压缩性骨折的疗效比较[J].颈腰痛杂志,2016,37(6):501-503.
[22] 龙淼.骨水泥弥散范围对单侧穿刺PVP术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折疗效的影响[J].颈腰痛杂志,2017,38(4):364-367.
[23] 张大鹏,强晓军,杨光.应用弯角装置单侧穿刺行PVP治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩骨折的疗效分析[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2017,27(7):599-604.

相似文献/References:

[1]许兵,叶小雨,王萧枫,等.小管径经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗 骨质疏松性椎体重度压缩骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):29.
[2]茆军,张惠法,严培军,等.Ilizarov外固定支架结合克氏针固定治疗Pilon骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):32.
[3]伍辉国,江克罗,张文正,等.手法复位杉树皮小夹板固定治疗儿童闭合性指骨骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):63.
[4]孙群周.组合式外固定器固定结合有限内固定治疗 GustiloⅢ型胫骨开放性骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(09):25.
[5]朱旭伟,万春友,张涛,等.外固定架固定结合髓腔内异体骨支撑治疗四肢粉碎性骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(12):68.
[6]杨少辉,许红霞,邢健昆.正骨伸筋胶囊在膝关节周围骨折术后康复中的应用[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):43.
[7]谭新欢,毕宏政,聂伟志,等.SandersⅡ型跟骨骨折手法复位克氏针 内固定术中植骨的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(06):6.
　TAN Xinhuan,BI Hongzheng,NIE Weizhi,et al.Clinical research on bone grafting after manipulative reduction and kirschner wire internal fixation for treatment of sandersⅡcalcaneal fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(12):6.
[8]孙德舜,王小鹤,王晓燕,等.气囊托板复位配合骨伤复元汤口服治疗 胸腰椎单纯压缩骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(05):65.
[9]林全艺,丁振贝,陈庆运,等.弹性髓内钉内固定治疗儿童四肢长骨干骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(03):52.
[10]董乐乐,连建强.生物学内固定原则在手术治疗长骨骨折不愈合中的应用[J].中医正骨,2013,25(03):73.
[11]冯树生,孙波,张凌,等.牵引结合中药外敷治疗老年腰椎压缩性骨折临床研究[J].中医正骨,2011,23(02):18.
　FENG Shu-sheng*,SUN Bo,ZHANG Ling,et al.Combination of external Chinese herb and traction for senile lumbar vertebral compression fracture[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2011,23(12):18.
[12]牛强卫.手法复位联合经皮椎体成形术和中医骨折三期辨证用药治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩骨折的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2017,29(04):16.
　NIU Qiangwei.A clinical study of manipulative reduction combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty and oral application of traditional Chinese medicine according ……[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2017,29(12):16.
[13]唐振坤,俞桂松,范奕松,等.骨填充网袋椎体成形术与经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的Meta分析[J].中医正骨,2019,31(10):31.
　TANG Zhenkun,YU Guisong,FAN Yisong,et al.Comparison of bone filling mesh container vertebroplasty versus percutaneous kyphoplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture:a meta analysis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2019,31(12):31.
[14]茹云,乔宏宇,李新苗.MRI水-脂分离Dixon技术与弥散加权成像技术在良恶性椎体压缩性骨折诊断中的应用[J].中医正骨,2021,33(10):47.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
通讯作者:瞿玉兴 E-mail:qyx8848@163.com(收稿日期:2018-05-17 本文编辑:时红磊)
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-05-30