[1]朱耀辉,常晓盼.前路中空螺钉内固定术与后路寰枢椎融合术治疗 齿状突骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2013,25(09):25-28.
　Zhu Yaohui*,Chang Xiaopan.*.A retrospective trial of anterior hollow screw fixation versus posterior atlantoaxial fusion for odontoid process fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2013,25(09):25-28.
点击复制

前路中空螺钉内固定术与后路寰枢椎融合术治疗 齿状突骨折的对比研究()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第25卷
期数:
2013年09期
页码:
25-28
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2013-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
A retrospective trial of anterior hollow screw fixation versus posterior atlantoaxial fusion for odontoid process fractures
作者:
朱耀辉; 常晓盼
河南省郑州市骨科医院,河南 郑州 450052
Author(s):
Zhu Yaohui*; Chang Xiaopan.*
Orthopedic hospital of Zhengzhou,Zhengzhou 450052,Henan,China
关键词:
齿突尖 脊柱骨折 骨折固定术; 内
Keywords:
Odontoid process;  Spinal fractures;  Fracture fixation; internal
摘要:
目的:探讨前路中空螺钉内固定术与后路寰枢椎融合术治疗齿状突骨折的临床疗效及安全性。方法:回顾性分析45例齿状 突骨折患者的临床资料,其中采用前路中空螺钉内固定25例,采用后路寰枢椎融合20例。比较2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、 疼痛视觉模拟评分、骨折愈合情况及颈椎活动度,并观察脊髓神经功能恢复情况。结果:所有患者均获随访,随访时间6～18个月, 中位数12个月。术后3个月,所有患者疼痛等症状均消失; 术后6个月,前路中空螺钉内固定组患者骨折均获得骨性愈合; 后路寰 枢椎融合组患者1例骨折愈合情况较差,于术后12个月随访时仍未完全获得骨性愈合(P=0.000)。2组中存在神经系统症状的患 者,Frankel脊髓损伤分级均恢复至E级。前路中空螺钉内固定组的手术时间、术中出血量均小于后路寰枢椎融合组 [(48.0±9.7)min,(120±16.3)min,t=2.323,P=0.031;(57.0±10.6)mL,(200.0±19.5)mL,t=4.241,P=0.002] 。前路中空螺钉内固定组的疼痛视觉模拟评分与后路寰枢椎融合组相比,差异无统计学意义[(2.1±0.3)分,(1.9±0.4) 分,t=0.524,P=0.635]。前路中空螺钉内固定组的颈椎屈曲、后伸、左旋、右旋角度均大于后路寰枢椎融合组 [(40.3°±8.6°),(32.7°±7.8°),t=2.661,P=0.019];(41.4°±9.2°), (34.6°±8.5°),t=3.723,P=0.011;(75.3°±4.7°),(5.9°±0.6°),t=2.091,P=0.001; (76.1°±6.1°),(7.1°±0.7°),t=3.352,P=0.000]。结论:与后路寰枢椎融合术相比,采用前路中空螺钉内固定术治 疗齿状突骨折,手术时间短、创伤小、术中出血量少、骨折愈合好、术后颈椎活动度好,值得临床推广应用。
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the clinical curative effects and safety of anterior hollow screw fixation versus posterior atlantoaxial fusion in the treatment of odontoid process fractures.Methods:The clinical records of 45 patients with odontoid process fractures were analyzed retrospectively.Twenty-five patients(group A)were treated with anterior hollow screw fixation,while the others(group B)were treated with posterior atlantoaxial fusion.The two groups were compared with each other in such parameters as operative time,blood loss,visual analogue scales(VAS),fracture healing status and the range of motion(ROM)of cervical vertebrae.The recovery of spinal nerve function were also observed.Results:All the patients were available for follow-up.The median follow-up period was 12 months(range,6-18 months).Three months after surgery,the pain and other symptoms of all patients disappeared.Six months after surgery,the patients in group A got bony union.while one patient in group B had delayed union and hadn't got bony 12 months after surgery(P=0.000).The spinal function were restored (Frankel grade E)in patients with neurological symptoms in the two groups.The operative time and blood loss were less in group A compared to group B(48.0+/-9.7 vs 120+/-16.3 min,t=2.323,P=0.031; 57.0+/-10.6 vs 200.0+/- 19.5 mL,t=4.241,P=0.002).There were no statistical differences in the VAS between the two groups(2.1+/-0.3 vs 1.9+/-0.4,t=0.524,P=0.635).The angles of forward flexion,backward extension,sinistral rotation and dextral rotation of cervical vertebrae were larger in group A compare to group B(40.3+/-8.6 vs 32.7+/-7.8 degrees,t=2.661,P=0.019; 41.4+/-9.2 vs 34.6+/-8.5 degrees,t=3.723,P=0.011; 75.3+/-4.7 vs 5.9+/-0.6 degress,t=2.091,P=0.001; 76.1+/-6.1 vs 7.1+/-0.7 degrees,t=3.352,P=0.000).Conclusion:Compared with posterior atlantoaxial fusion,the therapy of anterior hollow screw fixation has such advantages as shorter operative time,less trauma,less blood loss,better fracture healing and wider postoperative range of motion of cervical vertebrae in the treatment of odontoid process fractures,so it is worth popularizing in clinic.

参考文献/References:

[1] Grauer JN,Shafi B,Hilibrand AS,et al.Proposal of a modified,treatment-oriented classification of odontoid fractures[J].Spine J,2005,5(2):123-129.
[2] Maak TG,Grauer JN.The contemporary treatment of odontoid injuries[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2006,31(11 Suppl):S53-60.
[3] Dantas FL,Prandini MN,Caires AC,et al.Management of odontoid fractures using anterior screw fixation:analysis of 15 cases[J].Arq Neuropsiquiatr,2002,60(3-B):823-829.
[4] Doherty BJ,Heggeness MH,Esses SI.A biomechanical study of odontoid fractures and fracture fixation [J].Spine(Phila Pa1976),1993,18(2):178-184.
[5] Omeis I,Duggal N,Rubano J,et al.Surgical treatment of C2 fractures in the elderly:a multicenter retrospective analysis[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2009,22(2):91-95.
[6] Aebi M,Etter C,Coscia M.Fractures of the odontoid process.Treatment with anterior screw fixation[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),1989,14(10):1065-1070.
[7] Esses S,Langer F,Gross A.Fracture of the atlas associated with fracture of the odontoid process [J].Injury,1981,12(4):310-312.
[8] 杨双石,刘景发,吴增晖,等.齿状突Ⅱ型骨折加压螺丝钉内固定的实验和临床研究[J].中华创伤杂志,2000,16(1):20-22.
[9] Jenkins JD,Coric D,Branch CL Jr.A clinical comparison of one- and two-screw odontoid fixation[J].J Neurosurg,1998,89(3):366-370.
[10] 刘观燚,马维虎,徐荣明,等.后路寰枢关节固定融合术治疗AndersonⅡ型齿状突骨折[J].中医正骨,2011,23(10):51-52.
[11] 卜保献,孙彦鹏,吕振超,等.经皮前路微创空心螺钉内固定治疗齿状突骨折[J].中医正骨,2012,24(6):56-58.

相似文献/References:

[1]温超海,何忠,李永斌,等.闭合复位伽玛钉改良成锁定支架内固定治疗 老年股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):32.
[2]肖善富,张喜善,于凤珍.髌下小切口钢丝纽扣式内固定治疗胫骨髁间隆突骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):34.
[3]朱峰,宋相建,吴蔚,等.手法复位经皮克氏针内固定治疗 儿童闭合性肱骨远端全骨骺分离[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):51.
[4]袁伟,周晓莉.T形掌指骨微型钢板内固定治疗锁骨近端骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):47.
[5]唐剑邦,吴宇峰,高大伟,等.切开复位肱骨近端锁定钢板内固定治疗 陈旧性肩关节后脱位合并肱骨近端骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):49.
[6]刘磊,万春友,全先辉,等.锁定钢板内固定结合肱骨头植骨重建治疗 肱骨近端Neer三、四部分骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):52.
[7]白晨平.微型自攻空心螺钉内固定治疗掌指骨关节内骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(09):34.
[8]钱平康,徐锋,孙斌峰,等.肱骨近端内锁定系统固定结合植骨治疗肱骨近端骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(09):36.
[9]陈红卫,王子阳,李军,等.肘关节后外侧入路联合前内侧入路治疗 肘关节恐怖三联征[J].中医正骨,2015,27(09):40.
[10]邢金明.切开复位锁定钢板内固定术和人工半肩关节置换术 治疗老年肱骨近端复杂骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):11.
　XING Jinming.A retrospective trial of open reduction and locking plate internal fixation versus artificial shoulder hemiarthroplasty for complicated proximal humeral fractures in old patients[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(09):11.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
2012-11-26收稿 2013-03-02修回
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-09-30