[1]申晟,代朋乙,袁延浩,等.改良张力带内固定与镍钛聚髌器内固定治疗髌骨横形骨折的比较研究[J].中医正骨,2018,30(04):28-31.
　SHEN Sheng,DAI Pengyi,YUAN Yanhao,et al.A comparative study of modified tension-band internal fixation versus nickel-titanium patellar concentrator internal fixation for treatment of patellar transverse fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2018,30(04):28-31.
点击复制

改良张力带内固定与镍钛聚髌器内固定治疗髌骨横形骨折的比较研究()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第30卷
期数:
2018年04期
页码:
28-31
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2018-04-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A comparative study of modified tension-band internal fixation versus nickel-titanium patellar concentrator internal fixation for treatment of patellar transverse fractures
作者:
申晟; 代朋乙; 袁延浩; 谭红略
河南省洛阳正骨医院/河南省骨科医院,河南 郑州 450016
Author(s):
SHEN Sheng; DAI Pengyi; YUAN Yanhao; TAN Honglue
Luoyang Orthopedic-Traumatological Hospital,Zhengzhou 450016,Henan,China
关键词:
骨折;  髌骨;  骨折固定术; 内;  张力带;  镍钛聚髌器
Keywords:
Keywords fractures; bone;  patella;  fracture fixation; internal;  tension band;  nickel-titanium patellar concentrator
摘要:
目的:比较改良张力带内固定与镍钛聚髌器内固定治疗髌骨横形骨折的临床疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性分析2010年6月至2014年10月接受手术治疗的63例髌骨横形骨折患者的病例资料,接受改良张力带内固定手术治疗者34例(改良张力带组),接受镍钛聚髌器内固定手术治疗者29例(镍钛聚髌器组)。比较2组患者的手术时间、骨折愈合时间、并发症发生情况及末次随访时的Böstman髌骨骨折临床疗效评分。结果:2组患者均顺利完成手术。手术时间改良张力带组(60.35±7.05)min、镍钛聚髌器组(61.83±6.23)min,2组患者手术时间的组间差异无统计学意义(t=-0.880,P=0.384)。2组患者均获随访,随访时间24～36个月,中位数26个月。骨折均愈合,骨折愈合时间改良张力带组(13.96±0.45)周、镍钛聚髌器组(14.23±0.51)周,2组患者骨折愈合时间的组间差异无统计学意义(t=-0.380,P=0.674)。末次随访时的2组患者膝关节Böstman评分比较,差异无统计学意义[(29.35±1.55)分,(29.59±1.05)分,t=0.712,P=0.496]。改良张力带组,术后并发膝关节活动时疼痛12例,骨折愈合后取出内固定,疼痛缓解; 并发克氏针或张力带钢丝(钛缆)移位、松动4例,行支具外固定至骨折愈合。镍钛聚髌器组无膝关节疼痛及内固定移位、松动等并发症发生。改良张力带组术后并发症发生率高于镍钛聚髌器组(P=0.000)。结论:镍钛聚髌器内固定与改良张力带内固定治疗髌骨横形骨折的临床疗效相当,但前者固定更牢固,安全性更高。
Abstract:
ABSTRACT Objective:To compare the clinical curative effects and the safety of modified tension-band internal fixation versus nickel-titanium patellar concentrator internal fixation in the treatment of patellar transverse fractures.Methods:The medical records of 63 patients with patellar transverse fractures who received surgical treatment from June 2010 to October 2014 were analyzed retrospectively.Thirty-four patients were treated with modified tension-band internal fixation(group A),while the others were treated with nickel-titanium patellar concentrator internal fixation(group B).Operative time,fracture healing time,complication incidence and Böstman clinical efficacy scores of patellar fracture at last follow-up were compared between the 2 groups.Results:The surgeries were finished successfully in all patients,and there was no statistical difference in the operative time between group A and group B(60.35+/-7.05 vs 61.83+/-6.23 min,t=-0.880,P=0.384).The patients in the 2 groups were all followed up for 24-36 months with a median of 26 months.All fractures healed in the 2 groups,and there was no statistical difference in the fracture healing time between the 2 group(13.96+/-0.45 vs 14.23+/-0.51 weeks,t=-0.380,P=0.674).There was no statistical difference in the Böstman knee scores between the 2 group at last follow-up(29.35+/-1.55 vs 29.59+/-1.05 points,t=0.712,P=0.496).Knee pain during daily activities were found after the surgery in 12 patients in group A and were relieved after the fractures healed and the internal fixators were removed.Displacement and loosening of kirschner wires or tension-band wires(titanium cable)were found in 4 patients in group A,and the external fixation with orthoses were performed on the 4 patients until the fracture healed completely.No complications such as knee pain and displacement and loosening of internal fixators were found in group B.The postoperative complication incidences were higher in group A compared to group B(P=0.000).Conclusion:Internal fixation with nickel-titanium patellar concentrator and internal fixation with modified tension-band are similar to each other in the clinical curative effects in treatment of patellar transverse fractures,while the former has such advantages as firmer fixation and higher safety.

参考文献/References:

[1] YANG L,YUEPING O,WEN Y.Management of displaced comminuted patellar fracture with Titanium cable cerclage[J].Knee,2010,17(4):283-286.
[2] MELVIN JS,MEHTA S.Patellar fractures in adults[J].J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2011,19(4):198-207.
[3] 李春江.带孔克氏针钢丝缠绕加压张力带治疗髌骨骨折疗效观察[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2015,29(12):1466-1468.
[4] 于永杰,陈德生,焦兆德,等.三种不同手术方法治疗套袖状髌骨上极骨折的疗效分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2016,24(12):1088-1091.
[5] ILLICAL E,BUCKLEY RE.Long term outcome of patella fractures:open reduction and internal fixation with stainless steel wire vs.non-absorbable braided polyester suture[J].Chin J Orthop Trauma,2011,13(11):1052-1059.
[6] 张春才,刘植珊,高建章,等.髌骨内固定形状记忆整复器的设计与临床应用[J].中华外科杂志,1989,27(11):692-695.
[7] 刘云鹏,刘沂.骨与关节损伤和疾病的诊断分类及功能评定标准[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2002:82-83.
[8] BÖSTMAN O,KIVILUOTO O,NIRHAMO J.Comminuted displaced fractures of the patella[J].Injury,1981,13(3):196-202.
[9] GOSAL HS,SINGH P,FIELD RE.Clinical experience of patellar fracture fixation using metal wire or non-absorbable polyester—a study of 37 cases[J].Injury,2001,32(2):129-135.
[10] SMITH ST,CRAMER KE,KARGES DE,et al.Early complications in the operative treatment of patella fractures[J].J Orthop Trauma,1997,11(3):183-187.
[11] XUE Z,QIN H,DING H,et al.Two-Tension-Band technique in revision surgery for fixation failure of patellar fractures[J].Med Sci Monit,2016,22(3):2736-2741.
[12] ZHANG CC,WANG JL,XIAO J,et al.The research of NiTi-Patellar concentrator(NT-PC)and biomemory mechanical characteristics for treatment of every types of patellar fracture[J].J Bone Joint Injury,1996,1(2):78-81.
[13] LIU X,XU S,ZHANG C,et al.Application of a shape-memory alloy internal fixator for treatment of acetabular fractures with a follow-up of two to nine years in China[J].Int Orthop,2010,34(7):1033-1040.
[14] ZHAO X,ZHU ZA,SUN YH,et al.Nickel-titanium shape-memory sawtooth-arm embracing fixator for periprosthetic femoral fractures[J].Int Orthop,2012,36(3):619-626.
[15] ZHAO QM,GU XF,CHENG L,et al.Comparison of Titanium cable tension band and nickel-titanium patella concentrator for patella fractures[J].Adv Clin Exp Med,2017,26(4):615-619.

相似文献/References:

[1]茆军,张惠法,严培军,等.Ilizarov外固定支架结合克氏针固定治疗Pilon骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):32.
[2]伍辉国,江克罗,张文正,等.手法复位杉树皮小夹板固定治疗儿童闭合性指骨骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):63.
[3]孙群周.组合式外固定器固定结合有限内固定治疗 GustiloⅢ型胫骨开放性骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(09):25.
[4]朱旭伟,万春友,张涛,等.外固定架固定结合髓腔内异体骨支撑治疗四肢粉碎性骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(12):68.
[5]杨少辉,许红霞,邢健昆.正骨伸筋胶囊在膝关节周围骨折术后康复中的应用[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):43.
[6]谭新欢,毕宏政,聂伟志,等.SandersⅡ型跟骨骨折手法复位克氏针 内固定术中植骨的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(06):6.
　TAN Xinhuan,BI Hongzheng,NIE Weizhi,et al.Clinical research on bone grafting after manipulative reduction and kirschner wire internal fixation for treatment of sandersⅡcalcaneal fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(04):6.
[7]林全艺,丁振贝,陈庆运,等.弹性髓内钉内固定治疗儿童四肢长骨干骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(03):52.
[8]董乐乐,连建强.生物学内固定原则在手术治疗长骨骨折不愈合中的应用[J].中医正骨,2013,25(03):73.
[9]王金华,陈建龙,张军,等.加压钢板内固定治疗儿童胫腓骨开放性骨折[J].中医正骨,2012,24(12):40.
[10]兰树华,黄淑明,郑荣宗,等.骨皮质剥离加植骨治疗锁定钢板内固定术后骨不连、骨延迟愈合[J].中医正骨,2012,24(12):46.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:河南省科技攻关计划项目(172102310455) 通讯作者:谭红略 E-mail:hnlc.love@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-08-24