[1]邓真,王辉昊,王宽,等.石氏伤科颈椎定位旋转扳法的动力学参数在体测量[J].中医正骨,2018,30(03):17-21.
　DENG Zhen,WANG Huihao,WANG Kuan,et al.In vivo measurement of kinetic parameters of cervical fixed-position rotary pulling manipulation of Shi's department of traumatology[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2018,30(03):17-21.
点击复制

石氏伤科颈椎定位旋转扳法的动力学参数在体测量()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第30卷
期数:
2018年03期
页码:
17-21
栏目:
颈椎疾患
出版日期:
2018-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
In vivo measurement of kinetic parameters of cervical fixed-position rotary pulling manipulation of Shi's department of traumatology
作者:
邓真; 王辉昊; 王宽; 沈知彼; 陈威烨; 詹红生
上海中医药大学附属曙光医院,上海市中医药研究院骨伤科研究所,上海 201203
Author(s):
DENG Zhen; WANG Huihao; WANG Kuan; SHEN Zhibi; CHEN Weiye; ZHAN Hongsheng
Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,The Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics Affiliated to Shanghai Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203,China
关键词:
颈椎;  手法; 整骨;  扳法;  动力学
Keywords:
Keywords cervical vertebrae;  manipulation; osteopathic;  pulling manipulation;  kinetics
摘要:
目的:探讨石氏伤科颈椎定位旋转扳法动力学参数的特征及各参数之间的相互关系。方法:招募34名无明显手法治疗禁忌证的健康志愿者,男29名、女5名,年龄(22.30±4.60)岁。由同一位操作者分别对所有受试者进行石氏伤科颈椎定位(C5棘突)旋转扳法操作,左右两侧各操作1次。手法操作前,分别在受试者C5棘突两侧和双侧颏结节处粘贴测力片。采用Runinsense运动力学测量系统记录测定的力-时间曲线图,通过分析力-时间曲线图获取预载荷、载荷峰值、扳动力、扳动时间和施术时间等动力学参数。结果:34名受试者全部完成试验,未发生不良事件。左右两侧施术时间比较,差异无统计学意义[(2 362.65±559.28)ms,(2 403.24±645.33)ms,t=3.591,P=0.631]。C5棘突左侧的预载荷、扳动力均大于右侧[(7.84±4.03)kg,(6.42±3.20)kg,t=3.374,P=0.042;(6.93±3.21)kg,(6.90±2.36)kg,t=3.363,P=0.049]; C5棘突两侧的载荷峰值、扳动时间比较,两侧间差异均无统计学意义[(14.78±4.78)kg,(13.33±4.50)kg,t=3.202,P=0.069;(159.12±34.50)ms,(148.82±33.00)ms,t=3.271,P=0.056]。左侧颏结节处的载荷峰值、扳动力均大于右侧[(7.68±2.90)kg,(6.68±2.82)kg,t=3.025,P=0.034;(4.49±2.10)kg,(3.42±2.03)kg,t=3.403,P=0.017],扳动时间小于右侧[(165.59±33.59)ms,(182.94±55.21)ms,t=3.786,P=0.025]; 双侧颏结节处的预载荷比较,差异无统计学意义[(3.18±1.29)kg,(3.27±1.30)kg,t=3.423,P=0.067]。C5棘突左侧的扳动时间比右侧颏结节处的扳动时间短(t=3.356,P=0.042),C5棘突右侧的扳动时间比左侧颏结节处的扳动时间短(t=3.307,P=0.038)。左侧颈椎定位旋转扳法操作时,C5棘突左侧的预载荷与载荷峰值呈正相关(r=0.747,P=0.000); 载荷峰值与扳动力呈正相关(r=0.551,P=0.003); C5棘突左侧其他动力学参数相互之间均不存在直线相关关系。右侧颏结节处的预载荷与载荷峰值、扳动力均呈正相关(r=0.756,P=0.001; r=0.413,P=0.023); 载荷峰值与扳动力呈正相关(r=0.908,P=0.007); 右侧颏结节处的其他动力学参数相互之间均不存在直线相关关系。右侧颈椎定位旋转扳法操作时,C5棘突右侧的预载荷与载荷峰值呈正相关(r=0.861,P=0.002),与扳动时间呈负相关(r=-0.434,P=0.031); 载荷峰值与扳动力呈正相关(r=0.728,P=0.001); C5棘突右侧的其他动力学参数相互之间均不存在直线相关关系。左侧颏结节处的预载荷与载荷峰值、扳动力均呈正相关(r=0.758,P=0.002; r=0.434,P=0.027); 载荷峰值与扳动力呈正相关(r=0.917,P=0.000); 左侧颏结节处的其他动力学参数相互之间均不存在直线相关关系。结论:在颈椎两侧施行石氏伤科颈椎定位旋转扳法的施术时间相同,但作用力特征存在一定差异; 手法操作过程具有“寸劲”的特征; 手法作用力的大小与预载荷有关。
Abstract:
ABSTRACT Objective:To explore the characteristics of kinetic parameters of cervical fixed-position rotary pulling manipulation of Shi's department of traumatology and the relationship between these parameters.Methods:Thirty-four healthy volunteers without obvious contraindications for manipulation were recruited.They consisted of 29 males and 5 females and their ages were 22.30+/-4.60 years.The cervical fixed-position(C5 spinous process)rotary pulling manipulation of Shi's department of traumatology was performed on all subjects by the same doctor on the left and the right side respectively.Force measuring sensors were fixed on both sides of C5 spinous process and bilateral mental tubercles of subjects before the manipulation.The force-time curve chart was drawn and recorded by using Runinsense kinematic measuring system.The kinetic parameters,including preload,peak load,thrust force,thrust time and operating time,were obtained through analyzing the force-time curve chart.Results:The trials were finished in all subjects and no adverse events occurred.There was no statistical difference in operating time between the left side and the right side(2 362.65+/-559.28 vs 2 403.24+/-645.33 ms,t=3.591,P=0.631).The preload and the thrust force were greater on the left side compared to the right side of C5 spinous process(7.84+/-4.03 vs 6.42+/-3.20 kg,t=3.374,P=0.042; 6.93+/-3.21 vs 6.90+/-2.36 kg,t=3.363,P=0.049).There was no statistical difference in peak load and thrust time between the left side and the right side of C5 spinous process(14.78+/-4.78 vs 13.33+/-4.50 kg,t=3.202,P=0.069; 159.12+/-34.50 vs 148.82+/-33.00 ms,t=3.271,P=0.056).The peak load and the thrust force were greater and the thrust time was shorter on the left mental tubercle compared to the right mental tubercle(7.68+/-2.90 vs 6.68+/-2.82 kg,t=3.025,P=0.034; 4.49+/-2.10 vs 3.42+/-2.03 kg,t=3.403,P=0.017; 165.59+/-33.59 vs 182.94+/-55.21 ms,t=3.786,P=0.025).There was no statistical difference in preload between the bilateral mental tubercles(3.18+/-1.29 vs 3.27+/-1.30 kg,t=3.423,P=0.067).The thrust time was shorter on the left side of C5 spinous process compared to the right mental tubercle(t=3.356,P=0.042),and was shorter on the right side of C5 spinous process compared to the left mental tubercle(t=3.307,P=0.038).When cervical fixed-position rotary pulling manipulation was performed on the left side,the preload was positively correlated with the peak load on the left side of C5 spinous process(r=0.747,P=0.000),and the peak load was positively correlated with the thrust force(r=0.551,P=0.003).There was no linear correlation between other kinetic parameters on the left side of C5 spinous process.The preload was positively correlated with the peak load and the thrust force(r=0.756,P=0.001; r=0.413,P=0.023)and the peak load was positively correlated with the thrust force(r=0.908,P=0.007)at the right mental nodule.There was no linear correlation between other kinetic parameters on the right mental nodule.When cervical fixed-position rotary pulling manipulation was performed on the right side,the preload was positively correlated with the peak load(r=0.861,P=0.002)and was negatively correlated with the thrust time(r=-0.434,P=0.031)and the peak load was positively correlated with the thrust force(r=0.728,P=0.001)on the right side of C5 spinous process.There was no linear correlation between other kinetic parameters on the right side of C5 spinous process.The preload on the left mental nodule was positively correlated with the peak load and the thrust force(r=0.758,P=0.002; r=0.434,P=0.027),and the peak load was positively correlated with the thrust force(r=0.917,P=0.000).There was no linear correlation between other kinetic parameters on the left mental nodule.Conclusion:The operating time is the same and the characteristics of applied force is a little different when cervical fixed-position rotary pulling manipulation of Shi's department of traumatology is performed on both sides of cervical vertebrae.“High-velocity low-amplitude”is the characteristic of the manipulation,and the magnitude of the applied force is related to that of the preload.

参考文献/References:

[1] CASSIDY JD,BRONFORT G,HARTVIGSEN J.Should we abandon cervical spine manipulation for mechanical neck pain? No[J].BMJ,2012,344:3680.
[2] 龙层花.以正骨推拿为主的治脊疗法治疗冠心病心律失常及实验研究[J].按摩与康复医学,1990,11(1):1-9.
[3] 朱立国,于杰,高景华,等.孙氏旋转手法治疗神经根型颈椎病临床规范化研究[J].医学研究杂志,2007,36(7):71.
[4] 刘洪波,沈国权.沈国权与脊柱微调手法[J].按摩与导引,2007,23(9):3-4.
[5] 张建华.中医结合美国神经整脊法治疗颈椎病100例[J].中国骨伤,1999,12(4):60-61.
[6] 陈守吉,严隽陶.中医推拿摆动类手法的动力学研究:(Ⅰ)生物力学模型及方程[J].医用生物力学,1996,11(2):112-116.
[7] 姜宏,施杞.颈椎手法的生物力学研究与探索[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,1999,7(2):52.
[8] 王辉昊,张明才,詹红生.由脊骨神经医学发展模式引发的思考[J].中国骨伤,2011,24(8):662-666.
[9] 王宽,邓真,王辉昊,等.力学测量在评估颈痛及手法治疗领域的应用[J].中国骨伤,2016,29(7):668-672.
[10] 杨桂通.医用生物力学[M].北京:科学出版社,1994:9-50.
[11] TRIANO JJ.Biomechanics of spinal manipulative therapy[J].Spine J,2001,1(2):121-130.
[12] 詹红生,石印玉,黄仕荣,等.颈椎病发病机制的再认识——兼谈中医学“骨错缝、筋出槽”理论的临床价值[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2006,14(增刊):201-202.
[13] 王辉昊,詹红生,吕桦,等.矫正颈椎“筋出槽骨错缝”手法治疗颈性眩晕的远期疗效观察[J].上海中医药杂志,2014,48(2):51-55.
[14] 张明才,石印玉,陈东煜,等.“石氏伤科”颈椎“骨错缝筋出槽”矫正手法技术规范[J].上海中医药杂志,2015,49(5):4-7.
[15] HERZOG W,CONWAY P,KAWCHUK GN,et al.Forces exerted during spinal manipulative therapy[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),1993,18(9):1206-1212.
[16] 李义凯,徐海涛,王国林,等.颈椎定点旋转手法所致咔哒声响与最大推扳力的量效关系研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2004,19(9):644-646.
[17] 冯敏山,朱立国,魏戌,等.颈椎旋提手法操作轨迹的动态捕捉研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2011,26(2):176-177.

相似文献/References:

[1]王世龙,苏纪权,刘岩,等.手法复位联合后路椎弓根螺钉系统内固定治疗 青少年特发性脊柱侧凸[J].中医正骨,2015,27(09):54.
[2]苏瑾,王平,刘爱峰.三维动态牵伸回旋手法对冻结期冻结肩患者 体表红外热像的影响[J].中医正骨,2015,27(07):11.
　SU Jin,WANG Ping,LIU Aifeng.Influence of three-dimensional dynamic drafting and convolution manipulation on body surface infrared thermal imaging in patients with frozen shoulder during frozen period[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(03):11.
[3]邸保林,董国顺,林红猛.俯卧斜扳法治疗神经根型颈椎病[J].中医正骨,2015,27(07):70.
[4]张蕾蕾,马向浩,张颖,等.功能锻炼联合中药薰洗和手法在前交叉韧带重建术后 康复治疗中的应用[J].中医正骨,2015,27(06):35.
[5]海渊,梁舒涵,史俊德.毛书歌教授治疗腰椎间盘突出症的经验[J].中医正骨,2015,27(06):70.
[6]潘其鹏,朱明海,赵文海.中医手法扳正联合支具固定治疗小儿先天性马蹄内翻足[J].中医正骨,2015,27(05):55.
[7]王翔,詹红生,张明才,等.石氏手法治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):12.
　WANG Xiang,ZHAN Hongsheng,ZHANG Mingcai,et al.Observation on the curative effect of Shi's manipulation in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(03):12.
[8]周东辉.肌平衡三步手法治疗落枕[J].中医正骨,2015,27(01):58.
[9]刘建航,陈道云,黄勇,等.手法治疗颈源性头痛临床疗效的Meta分析[J].中医正骨,2016,28(01):28.
　LIU Jianhang,CHEN Daoyun,HUANG Yong,et al.A meta analysis on the clinical curative effect of manipulation on cervical headache[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(03):28.
[10]阎伟,李金松,闫茹,等.关节镜清理术联合手法和运动疗法治疗膝骨关节炎[J].中医正骨,2016,28(01):63.
[11]沈知彼,王辉昊,王宽,等.颈椎定位旋转扳法对不同曲度颈椎内部结构应力的影响[J].中医正骨,2018,30(03):8.
　SHEN Zhibi,WANG Huihao,WANG Kuan,et al.Effect of cervical fixed-position rotary pulling manipulation on internal structure stresses of cervical vertebrae with different curvature[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2018,30(03):8.
[12]王浩,陈佳丽,钱桑.范炳华教授诊治3种常见颈椎生理结构异常的经验[J].中医正骨,2018,30(03):56.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(81473702,81503596,81202707,81001528); 上海市科学技术委员会科研计划项目(14401970402,16401970102,15401934100); 上海市卫生和计划生育委员会项目(2017ZZ02024,20170242,ZXYXZ201703,ZYKC201602006,ZY3-LCPT-2-1005); 上海市市级医院新兴前沿技术联合攻关项目(SHDC12014121); 詹红生上海市名老中医学术经验研究工作室建设项目(SHGZS-2017025,SZYMZYGZS4013) 通讯作者:王辉昊 E-mail:huihaowang@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-08-02