[1]郭伟,赵颀,龚成,等.颈椎力学评价指标在非手术疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效评价中的应用[J].中医正骨,2018,30(03):22-26.
　GUO Wei,ZHAO Qi,GONG Cheng,et al.Application of cervical mechanical evaluation indexes to curative effect evaluation of nonoperative therapy in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2018,30(03):22-26.
点击复制

颈椎力学评价指标在非手术疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效评价中的应用()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第30卷
期数:
2018年03期
页码:
22-26
栏目:
颈椎疾患
出版日期:
2018-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of cervical mechanical evaluation indexes to curative effect evaluation of nonoperative therapy in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy
作者:
郭伟; 赵颀; 龚成; 赵平
中国人民解放军空军总医院,北京 100142
Author(s):
GUO Wei; ZHAO Qi; GONG Cheng; ZHAO Ping
Airforce General Hospital of PLA,Beijing 100142,China
关键词:
颈椎病;  非手术疗法;  疗效评价;  生物力学
Keywords:
Keywords cervical spondylosis;  nonoperative therapy;  curative effect evaluation;  biomechanics
摘要:
目的:探讨颈椎力学评价指标在非手术疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效评价中的应用价值。方法:2016年10月至2017年6月,采用手法等非手术疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病患者46例。男26例、女20例,年龄(48.91±9.77)岁,体质量指数(24.57±2.99)kg·m-2,病程(2.32±1.97)月。病变节段,单节段11例、2节段16例、3节段10例、4节段7例、5节段2例。分别在治疗前和治疗结束后,采用颈椎功能障碍指数(neck disability index,NDI)评分量表对患者颈椎功能进行临床评价; 采用DAVID脊柱智能康复系统测定患者颈椎关节活动度、颈椎关节活动协调性、颈部肌群最大等长肌力矩和颈部肌群协调性,对患者颈椎进行力学评价。计算NDI及颈椎力学评价各项指标治疗前后的差值(治疗后-治疗前),分析临床评价指标变化与颈椎力学评价指标变化之间的相关性。结果:①临床评价与颈椎力学评价结果。46例患者均顺利完成治疗。治疗结束后,患者颈椎NDI较治疗前降低[(34.32±13.11)%,(18.21±10.65)%,t=-11.041,P=0.000]; 颈椎前屈、后伸、左右侧屈、左右旋6个方向的关节活动度均较治疗前增加[(39.67°±14.04°),(48.11°±10.76°),t=4.362,P=0.000;(46.76°±12.71°),(57.48°±11.22°),t=5.523,P=0.000;(33.13°±10.58°),(40.00°±11.68°),t=4.428,P=0.000;(35.70°±8.32°),(42.80°±39.55°),t=4.356,P=0.000;(51.17°±12.93°),(56.54°±11.11°),t=3.304,P=0.002;(51.28°±11.25°),(55.63°±10.95°),t=2.715,P=0.009]; 颈椎关节屈伸活动协调性较治疗前改善,但侧屈和旋转活动协调性与治疗前相比,差异无统计学意义[(1.37±0.87),(0.85±0.20),t=-3.775,P=0.000;(1.15±0.36),(1.10±0.17),t=-1.074,P=0.291;(1.05±0.33),(0.99±0.14),t=-1.202,P=0.211]; 颈部肌群后伸、前屈及左右侧屈最大等长肌力矩均较治疗前增加[(1.00±0.00)N·m-1,(1.00±1.00)N·m-1,Z=-2.312,P=0.021;(2.00±6.25)N·m-1,(5.00±11.00)N·m-1,Z=-3.545,P=0.000;(1.00±1.25)N·m-1,(2.00±5.00)N·m-1,Z=-3.903,P=0.000;(1.00±2.00)N·m-1,(2.00±5.00)N·m-1,Z=-2.465,P=0.014]; 颈部肌群屈伸力量协调性较治疗前改善,而侧屈力量协调性与治疗前相比,差异无统计学意义[(2.00±5.00),(3.50±5.00),Z=-2.043,P=0.041;(1.00±0.62),(1.00±0.04),Z=-1.725,P=0.085]。②临床评价指标变化与颈椎力学评价指标变化的相关性分析结果。治疗前后患者NDI的差值与治疗前后颈部肌群前屈、后伸最大等长肌力矩的差值呈负相关(r=-0.455,P=0.002; r=-0.334,P=0.024),即颈部肌群前屈、后伸最大等长肌力矩增加越多,NDI降低越多; 与治疗前后颈部肌群屈伸力量协调性的差值呈正相关(r=0.344,P=0.020),即颈部肌群屈伸力量协调性改善越多,NDI降低越多; 与其他颈椎力学评价指标治疗前后的差值均无相关性。结论:在非手术疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效评价中应用颈椎力学评价指标,有利于疗效评价的客观化和精确化。
Abstract:
ABSTRACT Objective:To explore the applied value of cervical mechanical evaluation indexes in curative effect evaluation of nonoperative therapy in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.Methods:Forty-six patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy received nonoperative treatment from October 2016 to June 2017.The patients consisted of 26 males and 20 females.Their ages were 48.91+/-9.77 years,and body mass indexes(BMI)were 24.57+/-2.99,and disease courses were 2.32+/-1.97 months.The pathological changes located at single segment(11),two segments(16),three segments(10),four segments(7)and five segments(2)respectively.The clinical evaluation of cervical vertebra function of patients was conducted by using neck disability index(NDI)scoring scale before treatment and after the end of the treatment respectively.Meanwhile,the mechanical evaluation indexes,including joint range of motion(ROM)of cervical vertebrae,coordination of cervical joint motion,maximal isometric torque of cervical muscle group and coordination of cervical muscle group,were measured by using DAVID intelligent spine rehabilitation system.The differences of NDI and cervical mechanical evaluation indexes between pretreatment and posttreatment were calculated,and the correlation between the change of clinical evaluation indexes and the change of cervical mechanical evaluation indexes were analyzed.Results:The treatment were finished successfully in all patients.The NDI of cervical vertebrae decreased(34.32+/-13.11% vs 18.21+/-10.65%,t=-11.041,P=0.000),while the joint ROM of cervical vertebrae in 6 kinds of states of motion,including anteflexion,backward extension,left-right lateral flexion and left-right rotation increased(39.67+/-14.04 vs 48.11+/-10.76 degrees,t=4.362,P=0.000; 46.76+/-12.71 vs 57.48+/-11.22 degrees,t=5.523,P=0.000; 33.13+/-10.58 vs 40.00+/-11.68 degrees,t=4.428,P=0.000; 35.70+/-8.32 vs 42.80+/-39.55 degrees,t=4.356,P=0.000; 51.17+/-12.93 vs 56.54+/-11.11 degrees,t=3.304,P=0.002; 51.28+/-11.25 vs 55.63+/-10.95 degrees,t=2.715,P=0.009)after the end of the treatment.The flexion-extension coordination of cervical vertebrae was improved after the end of the treatment,while there was no statistical difference in the coordination of cervical lateral flexion and rotation between pre-treatment and posttreatment(1.37+/-0.87 vs 0.85+/-0.20,t=-3.775,P=0.000; 1.15+/-0.36 vs 1.10+/-0.17,t=-1.074,P=0.291; 1.05+/-0.33 vs 0.99+/-0.14,t=-1.202,P=0.211).The maximal isometric torque of cervical muscle group increased after the end of the treatment in the states of backward extension,anteflexion and left-right lateral flexion(1.00+/-0.00 vs 1.00+/-1.00 N/m,Z=-2.312,P=0.021; 2.00+/-6.25 vs 5.00+/-11.00 N/m,Z=-3.545,P=0.000; 1.00+/-1.25 vs 2.00+/-5.00 N/m,Z=-3.903,P=0.000; 1.00+/-2.00 vs 2.00+/-5.00 N/m,Z=-2.465,P=0.014).The flexion-extension coordination of cervical muscle group was improved after the end of the treatment,while there was no statistical difference in the coordination of lateral flexion of cervical muscle group between pre-treatment and posttreatment(2.00+/-5.00 vs 3.50+/-5.00,Z=-2.043,P=0.041; 1.00+/-0.62 vs 1.00+/-0.04,Z=-1.725,P=0.085).The analytic results of correlation between changes of clinical evaluation indexes and changes of cervical mechanical evaluation indexes showed that the differences of NDI between pretreatment and posttreatment were negatively correlated with the differences of maximal isometric torque of cervical muscle group between pretreatment and posttreatment in states of anteflexion and backward extension(r=-0.455,P=0.002; r=-0.334,P=0.024),in other words,the more the maximal isometric torque of cervical muscle group in states of anteflexion and backward extension increased,the more the NDI decreased.The differences of NDI between pretreatment and posttreatment were positively correlated with the differences of flexion-extension coordination of cervical muscle group between pretreatment and posttreatment(r=0.344,P=0.020),in other words,the more the flexion-extension coordination of cervical muscle group was improved,the more the NDI decreased.The differences of NDI between pretreatment and posttreatment had no correlations with the differences of other cervical mechanical evaluation indexes between pretreatment and posttreatment.Conclusion:It is helpful to objective and accurate curative effect evaluation of nonoperative treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy to apply cervical mechanical evaluation indexes.

参考文献/References:

[1] 神经根型颈椎病诊疗规范化研究专家组.神经根型颈椎病诊疗规范化的专家共识[J].中华外科杂志,2015,53(11):812-814.
[2] 董宪传,王莉.中医传统五联疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病临床观察[J].辽宁中医药大学学报,2013,15(5):165-166.
[3] 王翔,詹红生,张明才,等.石氏手法治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2015,27(4):12-14.
[4] 冯天有,冯伟,冯宇.中西医结合治疗软组织损伤的临床研究[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,2002:59.
[5] CROSS CC,OZOA G,FISH DE,et al.162 oswestry disability index versus neck disability index scores in lumbar and cervical pain patients[J].Journal of Investigative Medicine,2007,55(1):103.
[6] HAN L,ZHAO P,GUO W,et al.Short-term study on risk-benefit outcomes of two spinal manipulative therapies in the treatment of acute radiculopathy caused by lumbar disc herniation:protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J].Trials,2015,16(1):122.
[7] 郭伟,韩磊,闵亚青,等.利用数字散斑法分析不同手法对腰背部深浅肌群肌肉应变的影响[J].北京中医药,2015,34(08):608-611.
[8] 赵平.西方脊柱手法治疗机制研究的概况[J].中国骨伤,2011,9(8):705-709.
[9] BERGMAM TF,PETERSON DH.美式整脊技术-原理与操作[M].3版.王平,译.天津:天津出版传媒集团天津科技翻译出版有限公司,2013:87-89.
[10] MANNION AF,MÜNTENER M,TAIMELA S,et al.A randomized clinical trial of three active therapies for chronic low back pain[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),1999,24(23):2435.
[11] JOHANNSEN F,REMVIG L,KRYGER P,et al.Exercises for chronic low back pain:a clinical trial[J].J Orthop Sports Phys Ther,1995,22(2):52-59.
[12] KONG YS,GU J,PARK S.The effects of prone bridge exercise on the Oswestry disability index andproprioception of patients with chronic low back pain[J].J Phys Ther Sci,2015,27(9):2749-2752.
[13] FERREIRA ML,FERREIRA PH,LATIMER J,et al.Relationship between spinal stiffness and outcome in patients with chronic low back pain[J].Manual Therapy,2009,14(1):61-67.
[14] RITTWEGER J,JUST K,KAUTZSCH K,et al.Treatment of chronic lower back pain with lumbar extension and whole-body vibration exercise[J].Spine,2002,27(17):1829-1834.
[15] KELLER A,BROX JI,GUNDERSON R,et al.Trunk muscle strength,cross-sectional area,and density in patients with chronic low back pain randomized to lumbar fusion or cognitive intervention and exercises[J].Spine,2004,29(1):3-8.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙献武,于香兰,邵海燕,等.应用三维动静态平衡康复模式治疗 非脊髓型颈椎病的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):8.
　SUN Xianwu,YU Xianglan,SHAO Haiyan,et al.Clinical study on three-dimensional dynamic and static equilibrium rehabilitation modality in the treatment of non-myelopathy type cervical spondylosis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(03):8.
[2]江建春.神经根型颈椎病的中医药治疗研究概况[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):71.
[3]韦英成,董彤,吴肖梅,等.推拿手法治疗神经根型颈椎病的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):65.
[4]张莉,秦丹霞,张细姣.Orem自理理论在前路手术治疗脊髓型颈椎病 围手术期护理中的应用[J].中医正骨,2015,27(09):75.
[5]邸保林,董国顺,林红猛.俯卧斜扳法治疗神经根型颈椎病[J].中医正骨,2015,27(07):70.
[6]白玉,王爱国.郭春园教授治疗颈椎病的学术思想探究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):64.
[7]郝庆英,刘楚吟,付婵娟,等.Hybrid手术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的护理[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):78.
[8]王翔,詹红生,张明才,等.石氏手法治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):12.
　WANG Xiang,ZHAN Hongsheng,ZHANG Mingcai,et al.Observation on the curative effect of Shi's manipulation in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(03):12.
[9]史俊德,梁舒涵,海渊.毛书歌教授治疗寰枢关节错缝的经验[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):76.
[10]王树强,杨振国,刘文斌,等.董建文教授治疗神经根型颈椎病的经验[J].中医正骨,2015,27(01):69.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
通讯作者:赵平 E-mail:kzzp@sina.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-08-02