[1]姚华海,孙龙泰,崔龙慷,等.肩峰下前外侧入路与胸大肌三角肌入路锁定钢板内固定治疗老年肱骨近端二、三部分骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2017,29(09):1-6.
 YAO Huahai,SUN Longtai,CUI Longkang,et al.A comparative study of locking plate internal fixation through subacromial anterolateral approach versus ectopectoralis-deltoid approach for treatment of Neer 2-part and 3-part proximal humeral fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2017,29(09):1-6.
点击复制

肩峰下前外侧入路与胸大肌三角肌入路锁定钢板内固定治疗老年肱骨近端二、三部分骨折的对比研究()
分享到:

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第29卷
期数:
2017年09期
页码:
1-6
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2017-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A comparative study of locking plate internal fixation through subacromial anterolateral approach versus ectopectoralis-deltoid approach for treatment of Neer 2-part and 3-part proximal humeral fractures in the aged
作者:
姚华海1孙龙泰1崔龙慷1王晓洛1吴连国2
1.浙江中医药大学,浙江 杭州 310053; 2.浙江中医药大学附属第二医院,浙江 杭州 310005
Author(s):
YAO Huahai1SUN Longtai1CUI Longkang1WANG Xiaoluo1WU Lianguo2
1.Zhejiang Chinese Medical University,Hangzhou 310053,Zhejiang,China 2.The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengjiang Chinese Medical University,Hangzhou 310005,Zhejiang,China
关键词:
肩骨折 肱骨骨折 骨折固定术 内固定器 锁定钢板 手术入路 老年人 临床试验
Keywords:
Key words shoulder fractures humeral fractures fracture fixationinternal internal fixators locking plate operative approach aged clinical trial
摘要:
目的:比较肩峰下前外侧入路与胸大肌三角肌入路锁定钢板内固定治疗老年肱骨近端二、三部分骨折的临床疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性分析72例老年肱骨近端二、三部分骨折患者的病例资料,其中采用肩峰下前外侧入路锁定钢板内固定37例,采用胸大肌三角肌入路锁定钢板内固定35例。男31例,女41例。年龄61~92岁,中位数73岁。肱骨近端骨折Neer二部分骨折33例,三部分骨折39例。受伤至手术时间1~7 d,中位数3 d。比较2组患者手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、骨折愈合时间及并发症发生情况,并分别比较术后3个月、6个月及12个月时2组患者的Neer肩关节评分。结果:①一般指标。肩峰下前外侧入路组的手术时间、住院时间、骨折愈合时间均短于胸大肌三角肌入路组[(52.31±21.34)min,(87.52±22.71)min,t=2.874,P=0.023;(10.21±3.17)d,(14.21±2.91)d,t=1.952,P=0.037;(11.73±3.51)周,(14.18±2.90)周,t=2.357,P=0.047],术中出血量小于胸大肌三角肌入路组[(87.93±2.74)mL,(153.24±3.51)mL,t=-3.237,P=0.017]。②Neer肩关节评分。时间因素和分组因素存在交互效应(F=12.734,P=0.000); 2组患者Neer肩关节评分总体比较,组间差异有统计学意义,即存在分组效应(t=2.714,P=0.032); 术后不同时间点间Neer肩关节评分的差异有统计学意义,即存在时间效应(F=297.094,P=0.000); 2组患者Neer肩关节评分随时间均呈增加趋势,但是2组的增加趋势不完全一致; 术后3个月、术后6个月,肩峰下前外侧入路组Neer肩关节评分均高于胸大肌三角肌入路组[(74.53±16.35)分,(63.25±15.27)分,t=2.173,P=0.023;(87.74±5.35)分,(74.83±6.58)分,t=3.137,P=0.017]; 术后12个月,2组患者Neer肩关节评分比较,差异无统计学意义[(94.75±7.85)分,(92.36±6.27)分,t=1.541,P=0.435]。③安全性。肩峰下前外侧入路组1例出现螺钉松动,胸大肌三角肌入路组1例出现螺钉松动、1例出现肱骨头缺血性坏死、2例出现肩峰下撞击征; 2组患者安全性比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.984,P=0.145)。结论:对于老年肱骨近端二、三部分骨折而言,肩峰下前外侧入路锁定钢板内固定与胸大肌三角肌入路锁定钢板内固定在安全性方面无明显差异,但前者具有手术时间短、术中出血量少、住院时间短、骨折愈合快、肩关节功能恢复快等优点,值得临床推广应用。
Abstract:
ABSTRACT Objective:To compare the clinical curative effects and safety of locking plate internal fixation through subacromial anterolateral approach versus ectopectoralis-deltoid approach for treatment of 2-part and 3-part proximal humeral fractures in the aged.Methods:The medical records of 72 aged patients with 2-part or 3-part proximal humeral fractures were analyzed retrospectively.Thirty-seven patients were treated with locking plate internal fixation through subacromial anterolateral approach(group A),while the others were treated with locking plate internal fixation through ectopectoralis-deltoid approach(group B).The patients consisted of 31 males and 41 females and they ranged in age from 61 to 92 years(Median=73 yrs)and ranged in disease course from 1 to 7 days(Median=3 days).The fractures belonged to Neer 2-part(33)and 3-part(39)proximal humeral fractures.The operative time,intraoperative blood loss,hospital stay,fracture healing time and complications were compared between the 2 groups.The Neer shoulder scores were also compared between the 2 groups at 3,6 and 12 months after the surgery respectively.Results:The operative time,hospital stay and fracture healing time were shorter in group A compared to group B(52.31+/-21.34 vs 87.52+/-22.71 min,t=2.874,P=0.023; 10.21+/-3.17 vs 14.21+/-2.91 days,t=1.952,P=0.037; 11.73+/-3.51 vs 14.18+/-2.90 weeks,t=2.357,P=0.047),and the intraoperative blood loss were less in group A compared to group B(87.93+/-2.74 vs 153.24+/-3.51 ml,t=-3.237,P=0.017).There was interaction between time factor and group factor(F=12.734,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in the Neer shoulder scores between the 2 groups in general,in other words,there was group effect(t=2.714,P=0.032).There was statistical difference in Neer shoulder scores between different postoperative time points,in other words,there was time effect(F=297.094,P=0.000).The Neer shoulder scores presented a time-dependent increasing trend in both of the 2 groups,while the 2 groups were inconsistent with each other in the increasing trend of Neer shoulder scores.The Neer shoulder scores were higher in group A compared to group B at 3 and 6 months after the surgery(74.53+/-16.35 vs 63.25+/-15.27 points,t=2.173,P=0.023; 87.74+/-5.35 vs 74.83+/-6.58 points,t=3.137,P=0.017).There was no statistical difference in the Neer shoulder scores between the 2 groups at 12 months after the surgery(94.75+/-7.85 vs 92.36+/-6.27 points,t=1.541,P=0.435).After the surgery,screw loosening(1 patient)was found in group A,while screw loosening(1 patient),ischemic necrosis of humeral head(1 patient)and subacromial impingement syndrome(2 patients)were found in group B.There was no statistical difference in safety between the 2 groups(χ2=0.984,P=0.145).Conclusion:There is no significant difference in the safety between subacromial anterolateral approach and ectopectoralis-deltoid approach in locking plate internal fixation for treatment of Neer 2-part and 3-part proximal humeral fractures in the aged,however,the former has the advantages of shorter operative time,less intraoperative blood loss,shorter hospital stay,faster fracture healing and faster recovery of shoulder function,so it is worthy of popularizing in clinic.

参考文献/References:

[1] MCKOY BE,BENSEN CV,HARTSOCK LA.Fractures about the shoulder:conservative management[J].Orthopedic Clinics of North America,2000,31(2):205-216. [2] ROBINSON CM,AMIN AK,GODLEY KC,et al.Modern perspectives of open reduction and plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures[J].J Orthop Trauma,2011,25(10):618-629. [3] 王栋,潘浩,贾高永,等.老年骨质疏松性肱骨近端骨折分型及临床治疗进展[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2015(5):77-80. [4] 张国文.肱骨近端锁定接骨板内固定治疗肱骨近端骨折[J].中医正骨,2016,28(8):50-51. [5] 喻永新,尚如国.切开复位锁定钢板内固定治疗肱骨近端骨折[J].中医正骨,2014,26(9):39-40. [6] NEER CS 2nd.Displaced proximal humeral fractures.I.Classification and evaluatio[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1970,52(6):1077-1089. [7] 中华医学会.临床诊疗指南·骨科分册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:15-16. [8] 王亦璁.骨与关节损伤[M].4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:763. [9] CONBOY VB,MORRIS RW,KISS J,et al.An evaluation of the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment[J].J Bone Joint Surg Br,1996,78(2):229-232. [10] KANNUS P,PALVANEN M,NIEMI S,et al.Rate of proximal humeral fractures in older finnish women between 1970 and 2007[J].Bone,2009,44(4):656-659. [11] 向成浩,王诗波,明玉祥.内侧柱支撑重建结合锁定钢板内固定治疗老年肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2015,23(4):289-294. [12] 方广文,舒衡生,曾宪铁,等.锁定钢板在肱骨近端骨折治疗中的应用(附21例报告)[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2009,17(8):575-577. [13] CADET ER,AHMAD CS.Hemiarthroplasty for three- and four-part proximal humerus fractures[J].J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2012,20(1):17-27. [14] GERBER C,SCHNEEBERGER AG,VINH TS.The arterial vascularization of the humeral head.An anatomical study[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1990,72(10):1486-1494. [15] GARDNER MJ,GRIFFITH MH,DINES JS,et al.The extended anterolateral acromial approach allows minimally invasive access to the proximal humerus[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2005,434(434):123-129. [16] GARDNER MJ,BORAIAH S,HELFET DL.The anterolateral acromial approach for fractures of the proximal humerus[J].J Orthop Trauma,2008,22(2):132-137. [17] TINGART MJ,LEHTINEN J,ZURAKOWSKI D,et al.Proximal humeral fractures:regional differences in bone mineral density of the humeral head affect the fixation strength of cancellous screws[J].Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery,2006,15(5):620-624.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘磊,万春友,全先辉,等.锁定钢板内固定结合肱骨头植骨重建治疗 肱骨近端Neer三、四部分骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):52.
[2]任维龙,李刚,许波,等.骨原发性非霍奇金淋巴瘤1例[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):73.
[3]江涛,史俊德,梁梯.江林主任医师运用自制弹性牵引器械治疗四肢创伤的经验总结[J].中医正骨,2016,28(05):70.
[4]蒋拥军,李克军,陈佳旭,等.荣肌揉筋手法治疗成人肱骨髁间骨折术后肘关节僵硬[J].中医正骨,2016,28(06):21.
 JIANG Yongjun,LI Kejun,CHEN Jiaxu,et al.Rongji Roujin(荣肌揉筋)manipulation for treatment of postoperative elbow joint stiffness in adults with humeral intercondylar fracture[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(09):21.
[5]胡和军,吴法强,邓雄伟,等.骨皮质切剥术联合生龙接骨胶囊口服治疗四肢长骨干骨折不愈合[J].中医正骨,2016,28(10):64.
[6]王冲,宁凡友.解剖锁定加压钢板内固定联合自体髂骨板植骨治疗肱骨干骨折不愈合[J].中医正骨,2017,29(02):62.
[7]姜献,周红云,许超,等.肱骨近端骨折钢板内固定术后常见并发症的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2018,30(05):34.
[8]张小白,罗漫丽.应用动静平衡原则指导儿童肱骨髁上骨折术后功能锻炼[J].中医正骨,2019,31(07):77.
[9]曹慎,曹谦,汤智,等.杨氏手法复位环形垫超肘夹板“8”字固定治疗儿童移位型肱骨外髁骨折的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2019,31(11):1.
 CAO Shen,CAO Qian,TANG Zhi,et al.A clinical study of Yang's manipulative reduction combined with figure-of-eight fixation with ring-shaped pads and transarticular splints for treatment of displaced humeral lateral condyle fractures in children[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2019,31(09):1.
[10]刘鸿豪,赵云昌,赵春节.闭合复位改良外侧交叉克氏针内固定治疗儿童GartlandⅡ、Ⅲ型肱骨髁上骨折的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2019,31(11):7.
 LIU Honghao,ZHAO Yunchang,ZHAO Chunjie.A clinical study of closed reduction and modified lateral cross Kirschner wire internal fixation for treatment of Gartland typeⅡandⅢhumeral supracondylar fractures in children[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2019,31(09):7.
[11]邢金明.切开复位锁定钢板内固定术和人工半肩关节置换术 治疗老年肱骨近端复杂骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):11.
 XING Jinming.A retrospective trial of open reduction and locking plate internal fixation versus artificial shoulder hemiarthroplasty for complicated proximal humeral fractures in old patients[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(09):11.
[12]盛红枫,张玉柱.微创锁定钢板内固定配合中药内服治疗肱骨近端骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):49.
[13]孙鹏,谭磊,阎乾,等.人工肱骨头置换术治疗老年肱骨近端Neer三、四部分骨折[J].中医正骨,2016,28(05):43.
[14]方 铭.“T”形双切口锁定钢板内固定治疗老年肱骨近端骨折[J].中医正骨,2016,28(05):46.
[15]张国文.肱骨近端锁定接骨板内固定治疗肱骨近端骨折[J].中医正骨,2016,28(08):50.
[16]贾柯,徐克武,胡翔.老年肱骨近端骨折分型及临床治疗进展[J].中医正骨,2017,29(03):24.
[17]柴浩,张磊,孙荣鑫.半关节成形术和反式肩关节置换术治疗老年肱骨近端Neer三、四部分骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2017,29(07):21.
 CHAI Hao,ZHANG Lei,SUN Rongxin.A comparative study of hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of Neer 3-part and 4-part proximal humeral fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2017,29(09):21.
[18]刘丹琼.手法复位杉树皮夹板固定联合补肾活血汤口服 治疗老年肱骨近端骨折肾虚血瘀证的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2018,30(08):16.
 LIU Danqiong.A clinical study of manipulative reduction and fir-bark splint external fixation combined with oral application of Bushen Huoxue Tang(补肾活血汤)for treatment of kidney-deficiency-blood-stasis-type proximal humeral fractures in the aged LIU Danqiong[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2018,30(09):16.
[19]刘凯,尚如国,梁志超,等.老年肱骨近端骨折后肩关节功能恢复的影响因素分析[J].中医正骨,2018,30(09):39.
 LIU Kai,SHANG Ruguo,LIANG Zhichao,et al.Analysis of factors influencing shoulder function recovery after proximal humeral fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2018,30(09):39.
[20]李亚楠,张起,古恩鹏.手术与非手术治疗肱骨近端骨折的Meta分析[J].中医正骨,2018,30(09):42.
 LI Yanan,ZHANG Qi,GU Enpeng.Comparison of operative treatment and non-operative treatment for treatment of proximal humeral fractures:a meta analysis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2018,30(09):42.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:浙江省一流学科(B类)建设项目 通讯作者:吴连国 E-mail:mdwu8535@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-02-23