[1]李克军,蒋拥军,袁海花.功能性磁刺激在创伤后肘关节僵硬康复治疗中的应用[J].中医正骨,2017,29(05):7-9.
 LI Kejun,JIANG Yongjun,YUAN Haihua.Application of functional magnetic stimulation in the treatment of post-traumatic elbow joint stiffness[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2017,29(05):7-9.
点击复制

功能性磁刺激在创伤后肘关节僵硬康复治疗中的应用()
分享到:

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第29卷
期数:
2017年05期
页码:
7-9
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2017-05-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of functional magnetic stimulation in the treatment of post-traumatic elbow joint stiffness
作者:
李克军蒋拥军袁海花
深圳平乐骨伤科医院,广东 深圳 518010
Author(s):
LI KejunJIANG YongjunYUAN Haihua
Shenzhen Pingle Orthopedic Hospital,Shenzhen 518010,Guangdong,China
关键词:
肘关节 僵硬 磁场疗法 电刺激疗法 肌肉骨骼手法 牵引术 运动疗法 康复
Keywords:
Key words elbow joint rigidity magnetic field therapy electric stimulation therapy musculoskeletal manipulations traction exercise therapy rehabilitation
摘要:
目的:探讨功能性磁刺激治疗创伤后肘关节僵硬的临床疗效。方法:创伤后肘关节僵硬患者70例,按就诊顺序采用随机数字表随机分为常规康复治疗组和功能性磁刺激治疗组,每组35例。常规康复治疗组患者进行常规康复治疗,包括中频脉冲电治疗、蜡疗、手法治疗、弹力带持续屈曲牵引及运动疗法; 功能性磁刺激治疗组患者在此基础上增加功能性磁刺激治疗。共治疗8周。分别于治疗前和治疗8周后,测量2组患者的肘关节活动度,并依据Mayo肘关节功能评分量表评价肘关节功能。结果:治疗前,2组患者肘关节屈伸活动度及Mayo肘关节功能评分比较,组间差异均无统计学意义[65.46°±10.67°,64.74°±11.25°,t=0.849,P=0.126;(51.27±4.36)分,(53.06±3.18)分,t=0.853,P=0.486]。治疗8周后,2组患者肘关节屈伸活动度及Mayo肘关节功能评分均较治疗前增加[114.68°±8.38°,65.46°±10.67°,t=2.715,P=0.019; 95.42°±9.75°,64.74°±11.25°,t=2.672,P=0.043;(85.17±8.73)分,(51.27±4.36)分,t=2.813,P=0.011;(75.64±8.49)分,(53.06±3.18)分,t=2.154,P=0.045],且功能性磁刺激治疗组肘关节屈伸活动度及Mayo肘关节功能评分均高于常规康复治疗组[114.68°±8.38°,95.42°±9.75°,t=2.547,P=0.036;(85.17±8.73)分,(75.64±8.49)分,t=2.183,P=0.046]。结论:对于创伤后肘关节僵硬患者,在常规康复治疗的基础上增加功能性磁刺激治疗,更有利于肘关节屈伸活动度及肘关节功能的恢复。
Abstract:
ABSTRACT Objective:To explore the clinical curative effects of functional magnetic stimulation in the treatment of post-traumatic elbow joint stiffness.Methods:Seventy patients with post-traumatic elbow joint stiffness were randomly divided into conventional rehabilitation therapy group and functional magnetic stimulation therapy group according to the visit sequence by using random digits table,35 cases in each group.All patients in both of the 2 groups were treated for consecutive 8 weeks with conventional rehabilitation therapy,including medium-frequency pulse electrotherapy,wax therapy,manipulation therapy,continuous flexion traction with elastic band and exercise therapy.Meanwhile the patients in functional magnetic stimulation therapy group were treated with functional magnetic stimulation.The range of motion of elbow joint were measured and compared between the 2 groups before treatment and after 8-week treatment respectively,and the elbow joint function were evaluated by using Mayo elbow joint function scale.Results:There was no statistical difference in elbow flexion-extension range and Mayo elbow joint function scores between the 2 groups before the treatment(65.46+/-10.67 vs 64.74+/-11.25 degrees,t=0.849,P=0.126; 51.27+/-4.36 vs 53.06+/-3.18 points,t=0.853,P=0.486).Both elbow flexion-extension range and Mayo elbow joint function scores increased in the 2 groups after 8-week treatment(114.68+/-8.38 vs 65.46+/-10.67 degrees,t=2.715,P=0.019; 95.42+/-9.75 vs 64.74+/-11.25 degrees,t=2.672,P=0.043; 85.17+/-8.73 vs 51.27+/-4.36 points,t=2.813,P=0.011; 75.64+/-8.49 vs 53.06+/-3.18 points,t=2.154,P=0.045),and the elbow flexion-extension range and Mayo elbow joint function scores were higher in functional magnetic stimulation therapy group compared to conventional rehabilitation therapy group(114.68+/-8.38 vs 95.42+/-9.75 degrees,t=2.547,P=0.036; 85.17+/-8.73 vs 75.64+/-8.49 points,t=2.183,P=0.046).Conclusion:For patients with post-traumatic elbow joint stiffness,combination of conventional rehabilitation therapy with functional magnetic stimulation therapy is more conducive to the recovery of elbow flexion-extension range and elbow joint function.

参考文献/References:

[1] 秦泗河,蔡刚,郑学建.肘关节牵伸成形术治疗外伤后曲肘挛缩畸形(附3例报告)[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(8):579-582.
[2] 秦大平,张晓刚,宋敏等.基于Ilizarov技术原理矫正器在矫正肘关节屈伸挛缩畸形中的临床应用[J].医用生物力学,2014,29(4):79-83.
[3] 陈舒.运动疗法联合针刀治疗创伤后肘关节强直疗效观察[D].杭州:浙江中医药大学,2015.
[4] 林光锚,刘良乐,叶丽洁,等.综合康复计划在肘部骨折术后康复中的应用[J].中医正骨,2014,26(4):26-28.
[5] 李晶.临床诊疗指南—物理医学与康复分册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:54-75.
[6] 郭建峰,王雪冰,董易环,等.平乐郭氏荣肌揉筋法治疗肱骨髁间及髁上骨折肘关节僵硬[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2013,21(7):42-43.
[7] 蒋拥军,李克军,陈佳旭,等.荣肌揉筋手法治疗成人肱骨髁间骨折术后肘关节僵硬[J].中医正骨,2016,28(6):21-23.
[8] 恽晓平.康复疗法评定学[M].北京:华夏出版社,2005:65-97.
[9] 刘志雄.骨科常用诊断分类方法和功能结果评定标准[M].北京:北京科学技术出版社,2005:321-325.
[10] CIOPPA-MOSCA J,CAHILL JB,CAVANAUGH JT,et al.骨折术后康复指南[M].陆芸,周谋望,李世民,译.天津:天津科技翻译出版公司,2009:77-83.
[11] 陈建军,王梅生,周斌.成人肱骨髁间髁上骨折术后影响肘关节功能恢复的相关因素[J].实用骨科杂志,2013,19(2):159-161.
[12] 白梅梅.损伤或术后长期肘部制动并发肘关节僵硬的康复治疗[J].中国误诊学杂志,2008,8(32):7846-7847.
[13] CEFO I,EYGENDAAL D.Arthroscopic arthrolysis for posttraumatic elbow stiffness[J].Shoulder Elbow Surg,2011,20(3):434-439.
[14] 李庭,蒋协远,尤海峰,等.肘关节松解术治疗儿童创伤后肘关节僵硬17例回顾分析[J].中国骨与关节杂志,2016,5(4):245-250.
[15] 尤春景,韩韶华.功能性磁刺激的康复应用研究现状[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2003,25(11):697-700.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈红卫,王子阳,李军,等.肘关节后外侧入路联合前内侧入路治疗 肘关节恐怖三联征[J].中医正骨,2015,27(09):40.
[2]翟利锋,陈亿民,许桦,等.经指伸肌劈开入路治疗MasonⅡ型桡骨头骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(06):59.
[3]邓明月,徐虹霞,胡晓川,等.关节镜下松解术治疗肘关节僵硬的护理方法[J].中医正骨,2015,27(06):73.
[4]丁方平,王人彦,杨寅.“4点法”小针刀松解术治疗肘关节僵硬[J].中医正骨,2015,27(05):29.
[5]孙燕,何东,孙炜,等.外侧楔形截骨矫正儿童肘内翻畸形手术中内固定方式的选择[J].中医正骨,2016,28(01):43.
[6]蒋拥军,李克军,陈佳旭,等.荣肌揉筋手法治疗成人肱骨髁间骨折术后肘关节僵硬[J].中医正骨,2016,28(06):21.
 JIANG Yongjun,LI Kejun,CHEN Jiaxu,et al.Rongji Roujin(荣肌揉筋)manipulation for treatment of postoperative elbow joint stiffness in adults with humeral intercondylar fracture[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(05):21.
[7]何影浩,郭跃明,李伟强.一期切开复位内固定联合肱骨外侧楔形截骨治疗儿童肘内翻畸形合并肱骨外髁骨折[J].中医正骨,2016,28(11):62.
[8]冯瑞萍,王巧,刘桂凌,等.关节镜下肘关节松解术治疗创伤性肘关节僵硬的护理[J].中医正骨,2017,29(01):76.
[9]陈红卫,杨新东,吴国林.改良肘关节前内侧过顶入路显露冠突骨折的解剖学研究[J].中医正骨,2017,29(06):8.
 CHEN Hongwei,YANG Xindong,WU Guolin.Anatomical research on improved anteromedial elbow over-the-top approach to ulnar coronoid process fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2017,29(05):8.
[10]刘亚非,李兴华,王冰.肘关节外侧入路固定联合分时康复干预治疗肘关节三联征[J].中医正骨,2017,29(09):61.

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-05-20