[1]宋永伟,范华雨,樊金辉,等.卧位偏向牵引联合中药薰蒸治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2023,35(03):31-36.
　SONG Yongwei,FAN Huayu,FAN Jinhui,et al.A clinical study of the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy by deflected supine traction combined with Chinese herbal steaming[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2023,35(03):31-36.
点击复制

卧位偏向牵引联合中药薰蒸治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床研究()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第35卷
期数:
2023年03期
页码:
31-36
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A clinical study of the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy by deflected supine traction combined with Chinese herbal steaming
作者:
宋永伟; 范华雨; 樊金辉; 曹向阳; 鲍铁周; 蔡尚欢; 张杰; 海渊
(河南省洛阳正骨医院/河南省骨科医院,河南 洛阳 471002)
Author(s):
SONG Yongwei; FAN Huayu; FAN Jinhui; CAO Xiangyang; BAO Tiezhou; CAI Shanghuan; ZHANG Jie; HAI Yuan
Luoyang Orthopedic-Traumatological Hospital of Henan Province/Henan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital,Luoyang 471002,Henan,China
关键词:
颈椎病;  神经根病;  牵引术;  熏洗疗法;  临床试验
Keywords:
cervical spondylosis;  radiculopathy;  traction;  steaming washing therapy;  clinical trial
摘要:
目的:观察卧位偏向牵引联合中药薰蒸治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效。方法:将120例神经根型颈椎病患者随机分为卧位偏向牵引组、卧位常规牵引组、坐位牵引组,每组40例。卧位牵引治疗包括前屈位牵引8 d、中立位牵引2 d、背伸位牵引4 d; 卧位偏向牵引组在前屈位牵引时采用卧位偏向牵引,中立位、背伸位牵引时采用常规卧位牵引; 卧位常规牵引组全程采用常规卧位牵引法牵引; 坐位牵引组采用传统坐位间歇牵引法。3组患者均采用中药薰蒸治疗。牵引和中药薰蒸均每日2次,连续治疗14 d。分别于治疗前和治疗结束后,采用视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)评价患者颈部疼痛情况,测量患者颈椎旋转、前屈活动度,采用田中靖久神经根型颈椎病症状量表20分法和颈椎功能障碍指数(neck disability index,NDI)评价临床疗效,采用剪切波弹性成像技术测量斜方肌的杨氏模量值。结果:①颈部疼痛VAS评分。治疗结束后,3组患者颈部疼痛VAS评分均小于治疗前[(5.70±0.82)分,(1.43±0.68)分,t=37.779,P=0.000;(5.43±0.81)分,(2.53±0.93)分,t=15.945,P=0.000;(5.43±0.98)分,(3.00±1.13)分,t=16.013,P=0.000],卧位偏向牵引组患者颈部疼痛VAS评分小于卧位常规牵引组和坐位牵引组(LSD-t=6.040,P=0.000; LSD-t=7.562,P=0.000),卧位常规牵引组患者颈部疼痛VAS评分小于坐位牵引组(LSD-t=2.051,P=0.044)。②颈椎旋转活动度。治疗结束后,3组患者颈椎旋转活动度均大于治疗前(46.60°±10.45°,63.65°±7.79°,t=-9.379,P=0.000; 45.95°±9.24°,57.58°±7.54°,t=-6.694,P=0.000; 48.22°±9.96°,53.72°±9.39°,t=-2.298,P=0.000),卧位偏向牵引组患者颈椎旋转活动度大于卧位常规牵引组和坐位牵引组(LSD-t=-3.280,P=0.001; LSD-t=-5.371,P=0.000),卧位常规牵引组患者颈椎旋转活动度大于坐位牵引组(LSD-t=-2.083,P=0.040)。③颈椎前屈活动度。治疗结束后,3组患者颈椎前屈活动度均大于治疗前(28.45°±3.18°,41.57°±2.88°,t=-18.310,P=0.000; 27.70°±3.07°,38.95°±3.38°,t=-16.843,P=0.000; 28.15°±3.30°,35.25°±3.80°,t=-9.692,P=0.000),卧位偏向牵引组患者颈椎前屈活动度大于卧位常规牵引组和坐位牵引组(LSD-t=-3.482,P=0.001; LSD-t=-8.374,P=0.000),卧位常规牵引组患者颈椎前屈活动度大于坐位牵引组(LSD-t=-4.901,P=0.000)。④田中靖久神经根型颈椎病症状量表20分法评分。治疗结束后,3组患者田中靖久神经根型颈椎病症状量表20分法评分均大于治疗前[(7.58±3.87)分,(16.10±2.04)分,t=-14.437,P=0.000;(7.38±3.31)分,(13.25±2.10)分,t=-12.361,P=0.000;(7.25±2.99)分,(12.65±2.70)分,t=-10.696,P=0.000],卧位偏向牵引组患者田中靖久神经根型颈椎病症状量表20分法评分大于卧位常规牵引组和坐位牵引组(LSD-t=-6.172,P=0.001; LSD-t=-6.450,P=0.000),卧位常规牵引组患者田中靖久神经根型颈椎病症状量表20分法评分与坐位牵引组比较,差异无统计学意义(LSD-t=-1.113,P=0.271)。⑤NDI。治疗结束后,3组患者NDI均小于治疗前[(49.85±15.29)%,(18.93±12.05)%,t=10.694,P=0.000;(51.73±15.31)%,(29.95±9.08)%,t=10.728,P=0.000;(53.10±12.67)%,(33.85±10.33)%,t=7.190,P=0.000],卧位偏向牵引组患者NDI小于卧位常规牵引组和坐位牵引组(LSD-t=4.622,P=0.001; LSD-t=5.951,P=0.000),卧位常规牵引组患者NDI与坐位牵引组比较,差异无统计学意义(LSD-t=1.790,P=0.077)。⑥斜方肌杨氏模量值。治疗结束后,3组患者斜方肌杨氏模量值均小于治疗前[(92.67±17.96)%,(62.80±13.35)%,t=14.696,P=0.000;(87.05±12.30)%,(77.03±13.10)%,t=5.959,P=0.000;(87.33±14.48)%,(82.58±15.81)%,t=2.337,P=0.025],卧位偏向牵引组患者斜方肌杨氏模量值小于卧位常规牵引组和坐位牵引组(LSD-t=4.811,P=0.001; LSD-t=6.044,P=0.000),卧位常规牵引组患者斜方肌杨氏模量值与坐位牵引组比较,差异无统计学意义(LSD-t=1.711,P=0.091)。结论:卧位偏向牵引联合中药薰蒸治疗神经根型颈椎病,能够缓解颈部疼痛、改善颈部功能和斜方肌僵硬,疗效优于常规卧位牵引和坐位牵引联合中药薰蒸。
Abstract:
Objective:To observe the clinical efficacy of deflected supine traction combined with Chinese herbal steaming in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy(CSR).Methods:A total of 120 CSR patients were randomly divided into a deflected supine traction(DST)group,a conventional supine traction(CST)group,and a sitting traction(ST)group,with 40 cases in each group.The supine traction consisted of traction in the forward flexion position for 8 days,in the neutral position for 2 days,and in the back flexion position for 4 days.In the DST group,DST was adopted in the traction in the forward flexion position,and CST was adopted in the traction in the neutral position and back flexion position.In the CST group,CST was employed throughout the whole treatment cycle.In the ST group,conventional intermittent ST was employed.All patients were treated with Chinese herbal steaming.Traction and Chinese herbal steaming were performed twice a day for 14 days.Before and after treatment,the visual analogue scale(VAS)was used to evaluate the cervical pain of patients,and ranges of motion in cervical rotation and cervical flexion were measured.The clinical efficacy was evaluated by the Yasuhisa Tanaka 20 Score Scale and neck disability index(NDI).Young's modulus of trapezius muscle was measured by shear wave elasticity imaging(SWEI).Results:①Cervical pain VAS score.After treatment,cervical pain VAS scores in all groups were lower than those before treatment(5.70±0.82 vs 1.43±0.68 points,t=37.779,P=0.000; 5.43±0.81 vs 2.53±0.93 points,t=15.945,P=0.000; 5.43±0.98 vs 3.00±1.13 points,t=16.013,P=0.000).The cervical pain VAS score in the DST group was lower than those in the CST group and the ST group(LSD-t=6.040,P=0.000; LSD-t=7.562,P=0.000).The cervical pain VAS score in the CST group was lower than that in the ST group(LSD-t=2.051,P=0.044).②Range of motion in cervical rotation.After treatment,ranges of motion in cervical rotation in all groups were greater than those before treatment(46.60°±10.45° vs 63.65°±7.79°,t=-9.379,P=0.000; 45.95°±9.24° vs 57.58°±7.54°,t=-6.694,P=0.000; 48.22°±9.96° vs 53.72°±9.39°,t=-2.298,P=0.000).The range of motion in cervical rotation in the DST group was greater than those in the CST group and the ST group(LSD-t=-3.280,P=0.001; LSD-t=-5.371,P=0.000).The range of motion in cervical rotation in the CST group was greater than that in the ST group(LSD-t=-2.083,P=0.040).③Range of motion in cervical flexion.After treatment,the ranges of motion in cervical flexion in all groups were greater than those before treatment(28.45°±3.18° vs 41.57°±2.88°,t=-18.310,P=0.000; 27.70°±3.07° vs 38.95°±3.38°,t=-16.843,P=0.000; 28.15°±3.30° vs 35.25°±3.80°,t=-9.692,P=0.000).The range of motion in cervical flexion in the DST group was greater than those in the CST group and the ST group(LSD-t=-3.482,P=0.001; LSD-t=-8.374,P=0.000).The range of motion in cervical flexion in the CST group was greater than that in the ST group(LSD-t=-4.901,P=0.000).④Yasuhisa Tanaka 20 Score Scale score.After treatment,Yasuhisa Tanaka 20 Score Scale scores in all groups were higher than those before treatment(7.58±3.87 vs 16.10±2.04 points,t=-14.437,P=0.000; 7.38±3.31 vs 13.25±2.10 points,t=-12.361,P=0.000; 7.25±2.9 vs 12.65±2.70 points,t=-10.696,P=0.000).The Yasuhisa Tanaka 20 Score Scale score in the DST group was higher than those in the CST group and the ST group(LSD-t=-6.172,P=0.001; LSD-t=-6.450,P=0.000).There was no statistically significant difference in Yasuhisa Tanaka 20 Score Scale score between the CST group and the ST group(LSD-t=-1.113,P=0.271).⑤NDI.After treatment,NDI in all groups was lower than that before treatment(49.85±15.29 vs 18.93±12.05%,t=10.694,P=0.000; 51.73±15.31 vs 29.95±9.08%,t=10.728,P=0.000; 53.10±12.67 vs 33.85±10.33%,t=7.190,P=0.000).The NDI in the DST group was lower than those in the CST group and the ST group(LSD-t=4.622,P=0.001; LSD-t=5.951,P=0.000).There was no statistically significant difference in NDI between the CST group and the ST group(LSD-t=1.790,P=0.077).⑥Young's modulus of trapezius muscle.After treatment,Young's modulus of trapezius muscle in all groups was lower than those before treatment(92.67±17.96 vs 62.80±13.35%,t=14.696,P=0.000; 87.05±12.30 vs 77.03±13.10%,t=5.959,P=0.000; 87.33±14.48 vs 82.58±15.81%,t=2.337,P=0.025).The Young's modulus of trapezius muscle in the DST group was lower than those in the CST group and the ST group(LSD-t=4.811,P=0.001; LSD-t=6.044,P=0.000).There was no statistically significant difference in Young's modulus of trapezius muscle between the CST group and the ST group(LSD-t=1.711,P=0.091).Conclusion:In the treatment of CSR,DST combined with Chinese herbal steaming can relieve cervical pain and improve cervical function and trapezius muscle stiffness,and the efficacy is superior to those of CST and ST combined with Chinese herbal steaming.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张新酩,刘治华,张新民,等.全颈椎模型建立及不同牵引方位下的牵引力与牵引角度特征[J].中国组织工程研究,2021,25(30):4805-4811.
[2] 孙震,雷立健,刘鹏,等.大学生群体颈椎健康状况及影响因素分析[J].中国学校卫生,2019,40(4):631-633.
[3] WANG Z,LI Y.Warming acupuncture in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Acupunct Electrother Res,2021,47(1):101-113.
[4] 王勤俭,王燕.圣愈汤加减结合针刺对气血不足型神经根型颈椎病患者的临床疗效及对T淋巴细胞亚群的影响[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2020,26(11):130-135.
[5] HUANG Y,ZHANG J,XIONG B,et al.Thunder-fire moxibustion for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy:study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J].Trials,2020,21(1):143.
[6] 刘圳,陈海良,庞瑞明.电针颈三针联合颈椎牵引治疗单节段神经根型颈椎病的临床观察[J].中医药导报,2020,26(8):27-31.
[7] 李远栋,苏瑾,李嘉钰,等.定点侧屈旋扳整颈手法联合颈痛颗粒治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床研究[J].辽宁中医杂志,2020,47(3):120-123.
[8] HU J,CHEN F,QIU G,et al.Jingshu Keli for treating cervical spondylotic radiculopathy:the first multicenter,rando-mized,controlled clinical trial[J].J Orthop Translat,2021,27:44-56.
[9] DING X,WU J,SHEN Q,et al.Clinical control study of traditional Chinese medicine hot compress combined with traction in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy:Study protocol[J].Medicine(Baltimore),2021,100(4):e23880.
[10] 李水琴,欧妍.牵引联合颈椎关节松动术治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效观察[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2018,40(1):63-65.
[11] 冯超博,樊云山,贺石生.颈椎牵引的若干问题讨论[J].上海医药,2020,41(2):3-5.
[12] 中华外科杂志编辑部.颈椎病的分型、诊断及非手术治疗专家共识(2018)[J].中华外科杂志,2018,56(6):401-402.
[13] 中国康复医学会颈椎病专业委员会,上海市社区卫生协会脊柱专业委员会.颈椎病牵引治疗专家共识[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2020,30(12):1136-1143.
[14] 席世珍,王佳佳,何兰兰.优值牵引配合中药薰蒸治疗神经根型颈椎病的护理[J].中医正骨,2014,26(10):79-80.
[15] 高轩,刘佳,李道通,等.优值牵引法结合提拉推顶手法治疗神经根型颈椎病临床观察[J].风湿病与关节炎,2015,4(3):20-22.
[16] 姜宏,施杞.介绍一种神经根型颈椎病的疗效评定方法[J].中华骨科杂志,1998,18(6):62.
[17] VERNON H,MIOR S.The neck disability index:a study of reliability and validity[J].J Manipulative Physiol Ther,1991,14(7):409-415.
[18] 刘佳,李志强,李道通,等.平脊疗法结合偏位牵引治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效观察[J].颈腰痛杂志,2021,42(2):281-283.
[19] 李道通.前屈并健侧屈治疗下颈椎病变所致神经根型颈椎病的临床研究[D].郑州:河南中医药大学,2016.
[20] 朱峰,郑丹妮,张英泽,等.中药熏蒸联合补肾强督方加减治疗肾虚督寒型强直性脊柱炎临床研究[J].中华中医药杂志,2020,35(11):5890-5894.
[21] 曹利华,白明,苗明三,等.中药外治的“双微调平衡”机制探析[J].中华中医药杂志,2018,33(3):819-823.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙献武,于香兰,邵海燕,等.应用三维动静态平衡康复模式治疗 非脊髓型颈椎病的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):8.
　SUN Xianwu,YU Xianglan,SHAO Haiyan,et al.Clinical study on three-dimensional dynamic and static equilibrium rehabilitation modality in the treatment of non-myelopathy type cervical spondylosis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(03):8.
[2]江建春.神经根型颈椎病的中医药治疗研究概况[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):71.
[3]韦英成,董彤,吴肖梅,等.推拿手法治疗神经根型颈椎病的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):65.
[4]张莉,秦丹霞,张细姣.Orem自理理论在前路手术治疗脊髓型颈椎病 围手术期护理中的应用[J].中医正骨,2015,27(09):75.
[5]邸保林,董国顺,林红猛.俯卧斜扳法治疗神经根型颈椎病[J].中医正骨,2015,27(07):70.
[6]白玉,王爱国.郭春园教授治疗颈椎病的学术思想探究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):64.
[7]郝庆英,刘楚吟,付婵娟,等.Hybrid手术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的护理[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):78.
[8]王翔,詹红生,张明才,等.石氏手法治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):12.
　WANG Xiang,ZHAN Hongsheng,ZHANG Mingcai,et al.Observation on the curative effect of Shi's manipulation in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(03):12.
[9]史俊德,梁舒涵,海渊.毛书歌教授治疗寰枢关节错缝的经验[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):76.
[10]王树强,杨振国,刘文斌,等.董建文教授治疗神经根型颈椎病的经验[J].中医正骨,2015,27(01):69.
[11]袁娜,金秀均,魏戌,等.常规疗法联合耳穴埋豆治疗急性期神经根型颈椎病[J].中医正骨,2017,29(01):71.
[12]雷腾飞,张玉民,熊轶喆,等.复方紫荆消伤巴布膏外用联合益气活血方内服治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2018,30(03):13.
　LEI Tengfei,ZHANG Yumin,XIONG Yizhe,et al.A clinical study of external application of Fufang Zijing Xiaoshang Babugao(复方紫荆消伤巴布膏)combined with oral application of Yiqi Huoxue Fang(益气活血方)for treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2018,30(03):13.
[13]孙武权,房敏,周楠,等.颈椎特异性短杠杆微调手法治疗神经根型颈椎病的多中心临床研究[J].中医正骨,2018,30(05):1.
　SUN Wuquan,FANG Min,ZHOU Nan,et al.A multicenter clinical study of cervical specific short-lever fine-regulation manipulation for treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2018,30(03):1.
[14]袁菊莲,罗伦,赵燕,等.八段锦锻炼联合常规康复疗法在老年神经根型颈椎病患者康复治疗中的应用[J].中医正骨,2019,31(08):25.
　YUAN Julian,LUO Lun,ZHAO Yan,et al.Application of BADUANJIN(八段锦)exercises combined with conventional rehabilitation therapy to the rehabilitation of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy in aged patients[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2019,31(03):25.
[15]吴卓檀,任晓平,兰荣玉,等.活血化瘀类中成药辅助治疗神经根型颈椎病有效性的网状Meta分析[J].中医正骨,2024,36(01):33.
　WU Zhuotan,REN Xiaoping,LAN Rongyu,et al.Clinical outcomes of promoting blood circulation and removing blood stasis Chinese patent drugs for adjuvant treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy:a network meta-analysis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2024,36(03):33.
[16]萧若朴,赵英杰,王义善,等.旋提手法治疗神经根型颈椎病的生物力学研究进展[J].中医正骨,2024,36(05):45.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01