[1]夏坤阳,慈元,李志君,等.经皮椎体支架内固定治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2022,34(08):1-7.
　XIA Kunyang,CI Yuan,LI Zhijun,et al.A clinical study of percutaneous vertebral body stenting internal fixation for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2022,34(08):1-7.
点击复制

经皮椎体支架内固定治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床研究()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第34卷
期数:
2022年08期
页码:
1-7
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2022-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A clinical study of percutaneous vertebral body stenting internal fixation for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
作者:
夏坤阳; 慈元; 李志君; 张光宇
(大连市第二人民医院,辽宁 大连 116014)
Author(s):
XIA Kunyang; CI Yuan; LI Zhijun; ZHANG Guangyu
Dalian Second People's Hospital,Dalian 116014,Liaoning,China
关键词:
脊柱;  椎体;  骨质疏松性骨折;  骨折; 压缩性;  椎体支架;  骨折固定术; 内;  后凸成型术;  临床试验
Keywords:
spine;  vertebral body;  osteoporotic fractures;  fractures; compression;  vertebral body stenting;  fracture fixation; internal;  kyphoplasty;  clinical trial
摘要:
目的:观察经皮椎体支架内固定治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture,OVCF)的临床疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性分析80例OVCF患者的病例资料,其中采用经皮椎体支架内固定治疗40例(经皮椎体支架内固定组)、采用经皮椎体后凸成形术(percutaneous kyphoplasty,PKP)治疗40例(PKP组)。比较2组患者的骨水泥注入量、术中出血量、手术时间、胸腰椎疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)、伤椎Beck指数、伤椎矢状位Cobb角和并发症发生率。结果:①一般结果。2组患者骨水泥注入量、术中出血量、手术时间比较,组间差异均无统计学意义[(2.29±1.39)mL,(1.85±1.25)mL,t=-1.541,P=0.061;(6.91±2.24)mL,(5.43±1.12)mL,t=-0.480,P=0.431;(33.61±7.31)min,(25.76±2.43)min,t=-6.59,P=0.542]。②胸腰椎疼痛VAS评分。时间因素和分组因素存在交互效应(F=44.059,P=0.000); 2组患者的胸腰椎疼痛VAS评分总体比较,组间差异无统计学意义,即不存在分组效应(F=10.250,P=0.736); 手术前后不同时间点胸腰椎疼痛VAS评分的差异有统计学意义,即存在时间效应(F=88.117,P=0.000); 2组患者胸腰椎疼痛VAS评分随时间变化均呈下降趋势,但2组的下降趋势不完全一致[(7.95±0.59)分,(3.83±0.53)分,(2.21±0.59)分,(1.75±0.55)分,F=53.256,P=0.000;(7.88±0.57)分,(3.91±0.57)分,(2.33±0.88)分,(1.82±0.62)分,F=34.861,P=0.000]; 2组患者术前胸腰椎疼痛VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.342,P=0.731); 术后2 d、3个月、6个月经皮椎体支架内固定组患者胸腰椎疼痛VAS评分均低于PKP组(t=2.556,P=0.002; t=3.251,P=0.000; t=4.101,P=0.003)。③ODI。时间因素和分组因素存在交互效应(F=45.476,P=0.000); 2组患者的ODI总体比较,组间差异无统计学意义,即不存在分组效应(F=11.029,P=1.573); 手术前后不同时间点ODI的差异有统计学意义,即存在时间效应(F=90.952,P=0.000); 2组患者ODI随时间变化均呈下降趋势,且2组的下降趋势完全一致[(56.65±6.23)%,(20.53±3.85)%,(18.27±2.27)%,(17.13±2.615)%,F=52.586,P=0.000;(55.94±5.77)%,(20.51±3.89)%,(18.62±2.21)%,(17.31±2.11)%,F=38.366,P=0.000]; 2组患者术前及术后2 d、3个月、6个月ODI比较,组间差异均无统计学意义(t=-0.801,P=0.417; t=4.772,P=0.357; t=3.154,P=0.402; t=3.904,P=0.397)。④伤椎Beck指数。时间因素和分组因素存在交互效应(F=416.582,P=0.000); 2组患者伤椎Beck指数总体比较,组间差异有统计学意义,即存在分组效应(F=34.567,P=0.000); 手术前后不同时间点伤椎Beck指数差异有统计学意义,即存在时间效应(F=287.312,P=0.000); 2组患者伤椎Beck指数随时间变化均呈先上升后基本保持不变的趋势,但2组趋势不完全一致(0.62±0.06,0.95±0.14,0.95±0.13,0.94±0.09,F=243.085,P=0.000; 0.64±0.05,0.75±0.17,0.75±0.14,0.74±0.09,F=44.227,P=0.000); 2组患者术前伤椎Beck指数比较,差异无统计学意义(t=-2.932,P=0.482); 术后2 d、3个月、6个月经皮椎体支架内固定组患者伤椎Beck指数均高于PKP组(t=9.194,P=0.000; t=10.933,P=0.000; t=17.372,P=0.000)。⑤伤椎矢状位Cobb角。时间因素和分组因素存在交互效应(F=18.642,P=0.000); 2组患者的伤椎矢状位Cobb角总体比较,组间差异无统计学意义,即不存在分组效应(F=8.822,P=0.639); 手术前后不同时间点伤椎矢状位Cobb角的差异有统计学意义,即存在时间效应(F=63.503,P=0.000); 2组患者伤椎矢状位Cobb角随时间变化均呈先下降后基本保持不变的趋势,但2组趋势不完全一致(18.85°±3.32°,11.89°±1.84°,12.21°±1.34°,11.62°±1.55°,F=25.137,P=0.000; 18.66°±3.15°,14.54°±4.21°,15.23°±3.52°,14.21°±2.77°,F=38.366,P=0.000); 2组患者术前伤椎矢状位Cobb角比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.102,P=0.635); 术后2 d、3个月、6个月经皮椎体支架内固定组患者伤椎矢状位Cobb角均小于PKP组(t=2.013,P=0.001; t=3.205,P=0.000; t=3.502,P=0.003)。⑥并发症发生率。经皮椎体支架内固定组发生骨水泥渗漏1例,PKP组发生骨水泥渗漏10例。2组患者均未发生相邻椎体骨折、神经根损伤等并发症。经皮椎体支架内固定组患者并发症发生率低于PKP组(χ2=8.538,P=0.003)。结论:经皮椎体支架内固定治疗OVCF,与PKP相比,二者在骨水泥注入量、术中出血量、手术时间及恢复椎体功能方面相当,但前者更有利于缓解胸腰椎疼痛、恢复椎体正常形态,且安全性高。
Abstract:
Objective:To observe the clinical outcomes and safety of percutaneous vertebral body stenting(VBS)internal fixation for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures(OVCFs).Methods:The medical records of 80 OVCFs patients were analyzed retrospectively.Forty patients were treated with percutaneous VBS internal fixation(percutaneous VBS internal fixation group)and 40 ones with percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP)(PKP group).The consumption of bone cement,intraoperative blood loss,operative time,thoracolumbar pain visual analogue scale(VAS)score,Oswestry disability index(ODI),injured vertebrae Beck index,injured vertebrae sagittal Cobb's angle and complication incidence were compared between the 2 groups.Results:①There was no statistical difference in consumption of bone cement,intraoperative blood loss and operative time between the 2 groups(2.29±1.39 vs 1.85±1.25 mL,t=-1.541,P=0.061; 6.91±2.24 vs 5.43±1.12 mL,t=-0.480,P=0.431; 33.61±7.31 vs 25.76±2.43 minutes,t=-6.59,P=0.542).②There was interaction between time factor and group factor in thoracolumbar pain VAS score(F=44.059,P=0.000).There was no statistical difference in thoracolumbar pain VAS scores between the 2 groups in general,in other words,there was no group effect(F=10.250,P=0.736).There was statistical difference in thoracolumbar pain VAS scores between different timepoints before and after the surgery,in other words,there was time effect(F=88.117,P=0.000).The thoracolumbar pain VAS scores presented a downward trend over time in the 2 groups,while the 2 groups were inconsistent with each other in the variation tendency(7.95±0.59,3.83±0.53,2.21±0.59,1.75±0.55 points,F=53.256,P=0.000; 7.88±0.57,3.91±0.57,2.33±0.88,1.82±0.62 points,F=34.861,P=0.000).There was no statistical difference in thoracolumbar pain VAS scores between the 2 groups before the surgery(t=0.342,P=0.731),while the thoracolumbar pain VAS scores decreased in percutaneous VBS internal fixation group compared to PKP group at postsurgical day 2,month 3 and month 6(t=2.556,P=0.002; t=3.251,P=0.000; t=4.101,P=0.003).③There was interaction between time factor and group factor in ODI(F=45.476,P=0.000).There was no statistical difference in ODI between the 2 groups in general,in other words,there was no group effect(F=11.029,P=1.573).There was statistical difference in ODI between different timepoints before and after the surgery,in other words,there was time effect(F=90.952,P=0.000).The ODI presented a downward trend over time in the 2 groups,and the 2 groups were completely consistent with each other in the variation tendency(56.65±6.23,20.53±3.85,18.27±2.27,17.13±2.615%,F=52.586,P=0.000; 55.94±5.77,20.51±3.89,18.62±2.21,17.31±2.11%,F=38.366,P=0.000).There was no statistical difference in ODI between the 2 groups before the surgery and at postsurgical day 2,month 3 and month 6(t=-0.801,P=0.417; t=4.772,P=0.357; t=3.154,P=0.402; t=3.904,P=0.397).④There was interaction between time factor and group factor in injured vertebrae Beck index(F=416.582,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in injured vertebrae Beck index between the 2 groups in general,in other words,there was group effect(F=34.567,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in injured vertebrae Beck index between different timepoints before and after the surgery,in other words,there was time effect(F=287.312,P=0.000).The injured vertebrae Beck index presented a trend of going upward firstly and remaining basically unchanged subsequently over time in the 2 groups,while the 2 groups were inconsistent with each other in the variation tendency(0.62±0.06,0.95±0.14,0.95±0.13,0.94±0.09,F=243.085,P=0.000; 0.64±0.05,0.75±0.17,0.75±0.14,0.74±0.09,F=44.227,P=0.000).There was no statistical difference in injured vertebrae Beck index between the 2 groups before the surgery(t=-2.932,P=0.482),while the injured vertebrae Beck indexes increased in percutaneous VBS internal fixation group compared to PKP group at postsurgical day 2,month 3 and month 6(t=9.194,P=0.000; t=10.933,P=0.000; t=17.372,P=0.000).⑤There was interaction between time factor and group factor in injured vertebrae sagittal Cobb's angle(F=18.642,P=0.000).There was no statistical difference in injured vertebrae sagittal Cobb's angle between the 2 groups in general,in other words,there was no group effect(F=8.822,P=0.639).There was statistical difference in injured vertebrae sagittal Cobb's angle between different timepoints before and after the surgery,in other words,there was time effect(F=63.503,P=0.000).The injured vertebrae sagittal Cobb's angle presented a trend of going downward firstly and remaining basically unchanged subsequently over time in the 2 groups,while the 2 groups were inconsistent with each other in the variation tendency(18.85±3.32,11.89±1.84,12.21±1.34,11.62±1.55 degrees,F=25.137,P=0.000; 18.66±3.15,14.54±4.21,15.23±3.52,14.21±2.77 degrees,F=38.366,P=0.000).There was no statistical difference in injured vertebrae sagittal Cobb's angle between the 2 groups before the surgery(t=0.102,P=0.635),while the injured vertebrae sagittal Cobb's angle decreased in percutaneous VBS internal fixation group compared to PKP group at postsurgical day 2,month 3 and month 6(t=2.013,P=0.001; t=3.205,P=0.000; t=3.502,P=0.003).⑥The bone cement leakage was found in 1 patient in percutaneous VBS internal fixation group and 10 patients in PKP group.No complications such as adjacent vertebral fracture and nerve root injury were found in the 2 groups.The complication incidence rate was lower in percutaneous VBS internal fixation group compared to PKP group(χ2=8.538,P=0.003).Conclusion:The percutaneous VBS internal fixation is similar to PKP in consumption of bone cement,intraoperative blood loss,operative time and vertebral function recovery in treatment of OVCFs,while the former can be more conducive to thoracolumbar pain relief and vertebral body morphology recovery with high safety compared to the latter.

参考文献/References:

[1] BIJLSMA A Y,MESKERS C G M,WESTENDORP R G J,et al.Chronology of age-related disease definitions osteoporosis and sarcopenia[J].Ageing Res Rev,2012,11(2):320-324.
[2] 中华医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会.骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折诊疗与管理专家共识[J].中华骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病杂志,2018,11(5):425-437.
[3] ALEXANDRU D,SO W.Evaluation and management of vertebral compression fractures[J].Perm J,2012,16(4):46-51.
[4] PAPANASTASSIOU I D,PHILLIPS F M,VAN MEIRHAEGHE J,et al.Comparing effects of kyphoplasty,vertebroplasty,and non surgical management in a systematic review of randomized and non-randomized controlled studies[J].Eur Spine J,2012,21(9):1826-1843.
[5] BENNEKER L M,HOPPE S.Percutaneous cement augmentation techniques for osteoporotic spinal fractures[J].Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg,2013,39(5):445-453.
[6] SCHÜTZENBERGER S,SCHWARZ S M,GREINER L,et al.Is vertebral body stenting in combination with CaP cement superiorto kyphoplasty[J].Eur spine J,2018,27(10):2602-2608.
[7] 中国康复医学会骨质疏松预防与康复专业委员会.骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折诊治专家共识(2021版)[J].中华医学杂志,2021,101(41):3371-3379.
[8] AZIMI P,MOHAMMADI H R,AZHARI S,et al.The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system:a reliability and agreement study[J].Asian J Neurosurg,2015,10(4):282-285.
[9] GENANT H K,WU C Y,VAN KUIJK C,et al.Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique[J].J Bone Miner Res,1993,8(9):1137-1148.
[10] 蒋协远,王大伟.骨科临床疗效评价标准[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:119-121.
[11] 邹季,邹定斌,郭帮富.Beck指数在脊椎压缩性骨折疗效评价中的应用[J].中医正骨,1992,4(3):17-18.
[12] DIEL P,RÖDER C,PERLER G,et al.Radiographic and safety details of vertebral body stenting:results from a multicenter chartreview[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2013,14:233.
[13] 张亮,高梁斌,李健,等.椎体成形术中椎体骨密度对骨水泥弥散体积的影响[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2011,21(11):915-918.
[14] 赵鹏,慈元,李志君,等.经皮椎体支架成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2022,30(4):314-318
[15] HEINI P F,TEUSCHER R.Vertebral body stenting/stentoplasty[J/OL].Swiss Med Wkly,2012,142[2021-07-16].https://smw.ch/article/doi/smw.2012.13658.
[16] FILIPPIADIS D K,MARCIA S,RYAN A,et al.New implant-based technologies in the spine [J].Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2018,41(10):1463-1473.
[17] 蔡进奎,潘和科,周健和,等.钛网植入椎体成形术与PKP治疗脆性骨折疗效比较[J].实用医学杂志,2020,36(9):1228-1232.
[18] 周腾鹏,张顺聪,袁凯,等.椎体支架成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体重度压缩骨折1例并文献回顾[J].实用骨科杂志,2019,25(12):1144-1146.
[19] MARTIN-LOPEZ J E,PAVON-GOMEZ M J,ROMERO-TABARES A,et al.Stentoplasty effectiveness and safety for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures:a systematic review[J].Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2015,101(5):627-632.
[20] 徐响阳,罗德民,刘尚礼,等.椎体支架系统经皮椎体后凸成形术结合唑来膦酸治疗重度骨质疏松性椎体骨折[J].中国骨伤,2020,33(9):827-830.
[21] 马延怀,张顺聪,袁凯,等.经皮椎体支架成形和经皮椎体后凸成形治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效观察[J].中国组织工程研究,2020,24(14):2170-2176.
[22] 李佳平,李龙,李敏.单侧入路PKP治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性骨折的效果及对患者创伤应激反应、骨代谢指标的影响[J].临床医学研究与实践,2022,7(10):42-45.
(收稿日期:2021-08-16 本文编辑:吕宁)

相似文献/References:

[1]徐帮杰,杨楠,白伟杰,等.坐位定点旋转整复法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):17.
　XU Bangjie,YANG Nan,BAI Weijie,et al.Observation on the curative effect of fixed-point rotational reduction in sitting position in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(08):17.
[2]江建春.神经根型颈椎病的中医药治疗研究概况[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):71.
[3]郭小伟,梅伟,潘玉林,等.一期后路病灶清除纳米仿生骨椎体支撑体植骨融合 内固定治疗胸腰椎结核[J].中医正骨,2015,27(07):66.
[4]张志强,刘国泰,刘杰,等.施氏整颈三步九法治疗颈性眩晕[J].中医正骨,2013,25(07):39.
[5]龚星军,马文央,王倩芬.牵引配合经筋推拿治疗颈椎间盘突出症的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2011,23(03):16.
　GONG Xing-jun*,MA Wen-yang,WANG Qian-fen.*.Clinical study on the treatment of cervical disc herniation through the method of traction combined with muscle meridian manipulation[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2011,23(08):16.
[6]高仰来.从手法角度探讨颈椎病分型的新方法[J].中医正骨,2011,23(04):43.
[7]宋永伟.应用孙氏旋提手法治疗神经根型颈椎病[J].中医正骨,2011,23(04):67.
[8]宋永伟,邓文涛.三阶段治筋正骨综合疗法治疗 复发性腰椎间盘突出症12例[J].中医正骨,2011,23(06):61.
[9]张世卿,严晓慧,冯福海.温针灸配合中药膏摩治疗强直性脊柱炎58例[J].中医正骨,2011,23(07):60.
[10]刘建航,陈道云,黄勇,等.手法治疗颈源性头痛临床疗效的Meta分析[J].中医正骨,2016,28(01):28.
　LIU Jianhang,CHEN Daoyun,HUANG Yong,et al.A meta analysis on the clinical curative effect of manipulation on cervical headache[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(08):28.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
通讯作者:慈元 E-mail:ciyuan69@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01