[1]钟良钰,杜兰翔,王志相,等.桡骨头置换术与T形钢板联合Herbert螺钉内固定术 治疗Mason-JohnstonⅢ型桡骨头骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2018,30(08):21-25.
　ZHONG Liangyu,DU Lanxiang,WANG Zhixiang,et al.A comparative study of radial head replacement versus internal fixation with T-shape steel plate and Herbert screws for treatment of Mason-Johnston typeⅢradial head fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2018,30(08):21-25.
点击复制

桡骨头置换术与T形钢板联合Herbert螺钉内固定术 治疗Mason-JohnstonⅢ型桡骨头骨折的对比研究()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第30卷
期数:
2018年08期
页码:
21-25
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2018-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A comparative study of radial head replacement versus internal fixation with T-shape steel plate and Herbert screws for treatment of Mason-Johnston typeⅢradial head fractures
作者:
钟良钰; 杜兰翔; 王志相; 厉江群; 刘盛飞; 吴秋敏
江西省赣州市中医院,江西 赣州 341000
Author(s):
ZHONG Liangyu; DU Lanxiang; WANG Zhixiang; LI Jiangqun; LIU Shengfei; WU Qiumin
Ganzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Ganzhou 341000,Jiangxi,China
关键词:
桡骨骨折;  肘关节;  关节成形术; 置换;  骨折固定术; 内;  临床试验
Keywords:
radius fractures;  elbow joint;  arthroplasty; replacement;  fracture fixation; internal;  clinical trial
摘要:
比较桡骨头置换术与T形钢板联合Herbert螺钉内固定术治疗Mason-JohnstonⅢ型桡骨头骨折的临床疗效及安全性。方法:将46例Mason-JohnstonⅢ型桡骨头骨折患者随机分为2组,采用桡骨头置换术治疗23例,采用T形钢板联合Herbert螺钉内固定术治疗23例。男21例,女25例。年龄18～63岁,中位数46岁。均为闭合性骨折,左侧16例、右侧30例。受伤至手术时间3～7 d,中位数4 d。比较2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量及并发症发生率,并于末次随访时比较2组患者的临床疗效。结果:所有患者均获随访,随访时间11～13个月,中位数12个月。桡骨头置换组的手术时间短于钢板联合螺钉组,术中出血量少于钢板联合螺钉组[(49.48±6.17)min,(58.57±12.79)min,t=-3.069,P=0.004;(50.49±9.63)mL,(64.26±12.94)mL,t=-4.096,P=0.000]。桡骨头置换组1例出现肘关节僵硬,采用肘关节松解术治疗后关节功能恢复。钢板联合螺钉组3例出现肘关节僵硬,采用肘关节松解术治疗后关节功能恢复; 1例出现内固定失效,1例出现骨折不愈合,采用桡骨头置换术治疗后效果满意。2组患者的并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.189)。末次随访时,按照Mayo肘关节功能评分标准评定疗效,桡骨头置换组的疼痛评分及运动评分高于钢板联合螺钉组[(42.39±5.81)分,(37.17±9.98)分,t=2.166,P=0.037;(19.78±1.04)分,(18.48±2.79)分,t=2.098,P=0.045]; 两组的稳定性评分、日常生活功能评分及总分比较,组间差异无统计学意义[(9.57±1.44)分,(8.69±2.24)分,t=1.563,P=0.126;(24.13±1.94)分,(21.96±4.94)分,t=1.965,P=0.059;(95.87±7.33)分,(88.91±16.85)分,t=1.815,P=0.079]。桡骨头置换组优14例、良8例、差1例,钢板联合螺钉组优8例、良8例、可4例、差3例,桡骨头置换组的临床综合疗效优于钢板联合螺钉组(Z=-2.171,P=0.030)。结论:桡骨头置换术与T形钢板联合Herbert螺钉内固定术治疗Mason-JohnstonⅢ型桡骨头骨折的安全性相当,但前者具有手术时间短、术中出血量少、疼痛程度轻、运动功能恢复良好、临床综合疗效好的优点,值得临床推广应用。
Abstract:
To compare the clinical curative effects and safety of radial head replacement versus internal fixation with T-shape steel plate and Herbert screws for treatment of Mason-Johnston typeⅢradial head fractures.Methods:Forty-six patients with Mason-Johnston typeⅢradial head fractures were randomly divided into 2 groups,23 cases in each group,and were treated with radial head replacement(group A)and internal fixation with T-shape steel plate and Herbert screws(group B)respectively.The patients consisted of 21 males and 25 females and ranged in age from 18 to 63 years(Median=46 yrs)and ranged in disease course from 3 to 7 days(Median=4 days).The fractures located in left side for 16 patients and right side for 30 patients,and belonged to closed fractures.The operative time,intraoperative blood loss and complication incidences were recorded and compared between the 2 groups,and the clinical effects were compared between the 2 groups at last follow-up.Results:All patients in the 2 groups were followed up for 11-13 months with a median of 12 months.The operative time was shorter and the intraoperative blood loss was less in group A compared to group B(49.48+/-6.17 vs 58.57+/-12.79 min,t=-3.069,P=0.004; 50.49+/-9.63 vs 64.26+/-12.94 mL,t=-4.096,P=0.000).Elbow joint stiffness was found in group A(1 case)and group B(3 cases),and the elbow joint function recovered after elbow arthrolysis.Failed internal fixation(1)and fracture nonunion(1)were found in group B and the patients got a good result after radial head replacements.There was no statistical difference in complication incidences between the 2 groups(P=0.189).The clinical effects were evaluated according to Mayo elbow performance scores at last follow-up,and the results showed that pain scores and motor scores were higher in group A compared to group B(42.39+/-5.81 vs 37.17+/-9.98 points,t=2.166,P=0.037; 19.78+/-1.04 vs 18.48+/-2.79 points,t=2.098,P=0.045)and there was no statistical difference in stability scores,activity of daily living(ADL)scores and total scores between the 2 groups(9.57+/-1.44 vs 8.69+/-2.24 points,t=1.563,P=0.126; 24.13+/-1.94 vs 21.96+/-4.94 points,t=1.965,P=0.059; 95.87+/-7.33 vs 88.91+/-16.85 points,t=1.815,P=0.079).Fourteen patients obtained an excellent result,8 good and 1 poor in group A; while 8 patients obtained an excellent result,8 good,4 fair and 3 poor in group B.The group A surpassed the group B in the total clinical curative effects(Z=-2.171,P=0.030).Conclusion:Radial head replacement and internal fixation with T-shape steel plate and Herbert screws are similar to each other in safety in treatment of Mason-Johnston typeⅢradial head fractures,however,the former has such advantages as shorter operative time,less intraoperative blood loss,less pain,better motor function and better clinical comprehensive effect,so it is worthy of popularizing in clinic.

参考文献/References:

[1] DUCKWORTH AD,CLEMENT ND,JENKINS PJ,et al.The epidemiology of radial head and neck fractures[J].J Hand Surg Am,2012,37(1):112-119.
[2] 李庭,刘刚,蒋协远.桡骨头骨折治疗的研究进展[J].中华创伤杂志,2017,33(5):424-429.
[3] 张世民,李海丰,黄轶刚.骨折分类与功能评定[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2008:120-121.
[4] CHARALAMBOUS CP,STANLEY JK,MILLS SP,et al.Comminuted radial head fractures:aspects of current management[J].J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2011,20(6):996-1007.
[5] 中华医学会.临床诊疗指南:骨科分册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:18.
[6] 蒋协远,王大伟.骨科临床疗效评价标准[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:50-51.
[7] 代杰志,柴益民.MasonⅢ型桡骨头骨折治疗研究进展[J].国际骨科学杂志,2016,37(3):145-148.
[8] 尹爱民,黄建锋,杨述华.桡骨头假体置换术与切开复位内固定术治疗MasonⅢ型桡骨头骨折的临床对比研究[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2016,15(10):944-948.
[9] 郑世雄,施毅,林煜,等.假体置换和切开复位内固定治疗MasonⅢ型桡骨头骨折的Meta分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2015,23(6):488-495.
[10] BURKHART KJ,WEGMANN K,MÜLLER LP,et al.Fractures of the Radial Head[J].Hand Clin,2015,31(4):533-546.
[11] 毛谡,罗琪,张军.组配式人工桡骨头置换治疗桡骨头粉碎性骨折[J].中医正骨,2012,24(4):44-45.
[12] 赵萌,陈云丰,周祖忠.切开复位T形钢板联合空心钉内固定治疗MasonⅢ型桡骨头骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(7):58-60.
[13] 邢顺民,来津,杨雷,等.假体置换与切开复位内固定对不同数量骨折碎片的桡骨头骨折近期疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2015,30(9):944-947.
[14] HASHEMI-NEJAD A,GODDARD NJ.Radial head fractures[J].Br J Hosp Med,1994,51(5):223-226.
[15] 刘立春,丁文军,周小祥,等.人工桡骨头置换术治疗桡骨头粉碎性骨折[J].中国骨伤,2017,30(4):360-363.
[16] GIANNICOLA G,MANAUZZI E,SACCHETTI FM,et al.Anatomical variations of the proximal radius and their effects on osteosynthesis[J].J Hand Surg Am,2012,37(5):1015-1023.
[17] VAN RIET RP,MORREY BF.Documentation of associated injuries occurring with radial head fracture[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2008,466(1):130-134.
[18] 林光锚,刘良乐,叶丽洁,等.综合康复计划在肘部骨折术后康复中的应用[J].中医正骨,2014,26(4):26-28.
[19] PASCHOS NK,MITSIONIS GI,VASILIADIS HS,et al.Comparison of early mobilization protocols in radial head fractures[J].J Orthop Trauma,2013,27(3):134-139.

相似文献/References:

[1]李艺彬,朱勇,吴昭克.关节镜下多入路全关节滑膜清理术治疗肘关节类风湿关节炎[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):56.
[2]张容超,徐卫国,万春友,等.手法整复小夹板固定治疗桡骨远端骨折168例[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):61.
[3]徐善强,陈星,张兴平,等.功能锻炼对桡骨远端骨折拆除石膏外固定后 腕关节康复的影响[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):58.
[4]赵萌,陈云丰,周祖忠.切开复位T形钢板联合空心钉内固定治疗 MasonⅢ型桡骨头骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(07):58.
[5]王海敏,汤志刚,诸葛天瑜,等.桥接组合式内固定系统固定治疗肱骨远端骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(12):63.
[6]刘昕,邓志强,叶家军.撬拨复位弹性髓内钉固定治疗JudetⅣ型儿童桡骨颈骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(12):65.
[7]刘欣,刘文刚,吴淮,等.3种方法治疗C型桡骨远端骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(05):12.
　LIU Xin,LIU Wengang,WU Huai,et al.A comparative study of three methods for treatment of type C distal radius fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(08):12.
[8]郭世明,石玲玲,郭志民,等.手法复位石膏外固定和切开复位钢板内固定治疗 骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折的比较研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):15.
　GUO Shiming,SHI Lingling,GUO Zhimin,et al.A comparative study of manual reduction and plaster external fixation versus open reduction and plate internal fixation for treatment of osteoporotic distal radius fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(08):15.
[9]彭玉兰,周英,王英.分步手法复位肘关节外翻位固定联合外用中药治疗 婴幼儿肱骨髁上骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):56.
[10]明晓锋,陈登山,张晓强.闭合复位弹性髓内钉固定和经皮克氏针撬拨复位固定 治疗儿童O'BrienⅡ、Ⅲ型桡骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中医正骨,2016,28(02):15.
　MING Xiaofeng,CHEN Dengshan,ZHANG Xiaoqiang.A clinical comparison of closed reduction and internal fixation with elastic intramedullary nails versus percutaneous leverage reduction and internal fixation with Kirschner wire for treatment of O'Brien typeⅡandⅢradial neck fractures in children[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(08):15.
[11]贾高永,潘浩,胡庆丰,等.切开复位Bold钉内固定治疗MasonⅡ、Ⅲ型桡骨头骨折[J].中医正骨,2016,28(12):49.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
通讯作者:钟良钰 E-mail:381963652@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-08-31