[1]郭世明,石玲玲,郭志民,等.手法复位石膏外固定和切开复位钢板内固定治疗 骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折的比较研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):15-20.
　GUO Shiming,SHI Lingling,GUO Zhimin,et al.A comparative study of manual reduction and plaster external fixation versus open reduction and plate internal fixation for treatment of osteoporotic distal radius fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(04):15-20.
点击复制

手法复位石膏外固定和切开复位钢板内固定治疗 骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折的比较研究()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第27卷
期数:
2015年04期
页码:
15-20
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2015-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
A comparative study of manual reduction and plaster external fixation versus open reduction and plate internal fixation for treatment of osteoporotic distal radius fractures
作者:
郭世明1; 石玲玲2; 郭志民2; 林燕萍3
1.福建中医药大学,福建 福州 350100;
2.中国人民解放军第175医院, 福建 漳州 363000;
3.福建中医药大学中西医结合研究院,福建 福州 350100
Author(s):
GUO Shiming1; SHI Lingling2; GUO Zhimin2; LIN Yanping3
1.Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Fuzhou 350100,Fujian,China
2.The 175th Hospital of PLA,Zhangzhou 363000,Fujian,China
3.Academy of Integrative Medicine affiliated to Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Fuzhou 350100,Fujian,China
关键词:
桡骨骨折;  骨质疏松性骨折;  正骨手法;  石膏; 外科;  骨折固定术; 内;  内固定器;  治疗; 临床研究性
Keywords:
radius fractures;  osteoporotic fractures;  bone setting manipulation;  casts; surgical;  fracture fixation; internal;  internal fixators;  therapies; investigational
摘要:
目的:比较手法复位石膏外固定和切开复位钢板内固定治疗骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折的临床疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性分析73例骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折患者的病例资料,其中采用手法复位石膏外固定44例,采用切开复位钢板内固定29例。男32例,女41例; 年龄60～79例,中位数69岁; 左侧27例,右侧46例; 按照桡骨远端骨折的AO分类,A3型18例、B2型8例、B3型12例、C1型19例、C2型16例。记录并比较2组患者骨折愈合时间、掌倾角和尺偏角及并发症发生情况。记录并比较2组患者骨折愈合时及骨折愈合后6个月的前臂旋前角度、前臂旋后角度及Robbins腕关节评分。结果:手法复位石膏外固定组骨折愈合时间、掌倾角、尺偏角均小于切开复位钢板内固定组[(9.75±1.04)周,(11.83±0.75)周,t=17.280,P=0.001; 9.88°±1.47°,12.43°±1.27°,t=10.509,P=0.007; 21.13°±0.85°,22.72°±0.66°,t=14.350,P=0.003]。骨折愈合时手法复位石膏外固定组前臂旋前、旋后角度及Robbins腕关节评分均低于切开复位钢板内固定组[25.63°±6.72°,51.17°±8.93°,t=37.555,P=0.000; 22.13°±4.58°,51.33°±5.72°,t=113.150,P=0.000;(3.88±0.64)分,(6.00±0.59)分,t=67.632,P=0.000]; 骨折愈合后6个月2组患者前臂旋前、旋后角度及Robbins腕关节评分比较,组间差异均无统计学意义[77.50°±6.74°,81.50°±4.60°,t=1.554,P=0.236; 73.63°±5.71°,73.50°±1.87°,t=0.003,P=0.960;(7.63±0.92)分,(8.00±1.06)分,t=1.479,P=0.236]。2组患者并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.052,P=0.820)。结论:对于骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折患者而言,在骨折复位以及骨折愈合时的腕关节活动能力和功能方面,切开复位钢板内固定优于手法复位石膏外固定; 但手法复位石膏外固定的骨折愈合时间短,且骨折愈合后6个月的腕关节功能及安全性方面与切开复位钢板内固定无明显差异,符合老年患者的治疗要求,可作为临床治疗骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折的一种较为理想的选择。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical curative effect and safety of manual reduction and plaster external fixation versus open reduction and plate internal fixation in the treatment of osteoporotic distal radius fractures(ODRF).Methods:The medical records of 73 patients with ODRF were analyzed retrospectively.Forty-four patients were treated with manual reduction and plaster external fixation,while the others were treated with open reduction and plate internal fixation.The patients consisted of 32 males and 41 females,and ranged in age from 60 to 79 years(Median=69 yrs).The fractures located in left radius for 27 patients and right radius for 46 patients.According to the AO classification of distal radius fracture,the fractures belonged to types A3(18),B2(8),B3(12),C1(19)and C2(16).The fracture healing time,volar tilt angles,radial inclination angles and complications were recorded and compared between the 2 groups.The antebrachial pronation angles,antebrachial supination angles and Robbins wrist scores were also recorded and compared between the 2 groups when the fractures healed and at 6 months after the fracture healing.Results:Fracture healing time,volar tilt angles and radial inclination angles were less in manual reduction and plaster external fixation group compared to open reduction and plate internal fixation group(9.75+/-1.04 vs 11.83+/-0.75 weeks,t=17.280,P=0.001; 9.88+/-1.47 vs 12.43+/-1.27 degrees,t=10.509,P=0.007; 21.13+/-0.85 vs 22.72+/-0.66 degrees,t=14.350,P=0.003).Antebrachial pronation angles,antebrachial supination angles and Robbins wrist scores were less in manual reduction and plaster external fixation group compared to open reduction and plate internal fixation group when the fractures healed(25.63+/-6.72 vs 51.17+/-8.93 degrees,t=37.555,P=0.000; 22.13+/-4.58 vs 51.33+/-5.72 degrees,t=113.150,P=0.000; 3.88+/-0.64 vs 6.00+/-0.59 points,t=67.632,P=0.000).There was no statistical difference in antebrachial pronation angles,antebrachial supination angles and Robbins wrist scores between the 2 groups at 6 months after the fracture healing(77.50+/-6.74 vs 81.50+/-4.60 degrees,t=1.554,P=0.236; 73.63+/-5.71 vs 73.50+/-1.87 degrees,t=0.003,P=0.960; 7.63+/-0.92 vs 8.00+/-1.06 points,t=1.479,P=0.236).There was no statistical difference in complication incidences between the two groups(χ2=0.052,P=0.820).Conclusion:For patients with ODRF,open reduction and plate internal fixation surpasses manual reduction and plaster external fixation in fracture reduction,daily activity and function of wrist when the fracture healed.However,shorter fracture healing time can be obtained by using manual reduction and plaster external fixation,and there is no significant difference in wrist joint function and safety between the 2 therapies at 6 months after the fracture healing.Therefore,the therapy of manual reduction and plaster external fixation can meet the requirement for treatment of aged patients and can be used as an ideal therapy for treatment of ODRF in clinic.

参考文献/References:

[1] Oyen J,Brudvik C,Gjesdal CG,et al.Osteoporosis as a risk factor for distal radial fractures:a case-control study[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2011,93(4):348-356.
[2] 穆光宗,张团.我国人口老龄化的发展趋势及其战略应对[J].华中师范大学学报:人文社会科学版,2011,50(5):29-36.
[3] Müller ME,Nazarian S,Koch P.Classification AO des fractures:LES os longs[M].Berlin:Springer Verlag,1987:198-201.
[4] 中华医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会.原发性骨质疏松症诊治指南(2011年)[J].中华骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病杂志,2011,4(1):2-15.
[5] Robbins RR,Ridge O,Carter PR.Iliac crest bone grafting and Herbert screw fixation of nonunions of the scaphoid with avascular proximal poles[J].J Hand Surg Am,1995,20(5):818-831.
[6] 胡庆丰,范顺武,周辉,等.掌侧T形锁定加压接骨板治疗老年桡骨远端骨折[J].中国骨伤,2007,20(4):268-270.
[7] 金建强,张骏,陆逸庭,等.解剖型桡骨远端掌侧锁定接骨板治疗老年桡骨远端骨折[J].中医正骨,2013,25(12):66-68.
[8] Wright TW,Horodyski M,Smith DW.Functional outcome of unstable distal radius fractures:ORIF with a volar fixed-angle tine plate versus external fixation[J].J Hand Surg Am,2005,30(2):289-299.
[9] 陈民,林学波,王寰,等.改进夹板固定治疗桡骨远端粉碎性骨折的临床疗效对比研究[J].中国骨伤,2008,21(2):87-89.
[10] Young BT,Rayan GM.Outcome following nonoperative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in low-demand patients older than 60 years[J].J Hand Surg Am,2000,25(1):19-28.
[11] Arora R,Gabl M,Gschwentner M,et al.A comparative study of clinical and radiologic outcomes of unstable colles type distal radius fractures in patients older than 70 years:nonoperative treatment versus volar locking plating[J].J Orthop Trauma,2009,23(4):237-242.
[12] Mackenney PJ,Mcqueen MM,Elton R.Prediction of instability in distal radial fractures[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2006,88(9):1944-1951.
[13] Gofton W,Liew A.Distal radius fractures: nonoperative and percutaneous pinning treatment options[J].Orthop Clin North Am,2007,38(2):175-185.
[14] Wu GB,Dong KF,Xu XH,et al.Case-control studies on external fixator for the treatment of comminuted distal radius fractures in senile[J].Zhongguo Gu Shang,2009,22(9):678-680.
[15] 王晓光,于大鹏,慈晓杰.中药洗剂配合手法治疗老年桡骨远端骨折关节僵直[J].中医正骨,2013,25(8):32.

相似文献/References:

[1]许兵,叶小雨,王萧枫,等.小管径经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗 骨质疏松性椎体重度压缩骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):29.
[2]张容超,徐卫国,万春友,等.手法整复小夹板固定治疗桡骨远端骨折168例[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):61.
[3]徐善强,陈星,张兴平,等.功能锻炼对桡骨远端骨折拆除石膏外固定后 腕关节康复的影响[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):58.
[4]赵萌,陈云丰,周祖忠.切开复位T形钢板联合空心钉内固定治疗 MasonⅢ型桡骨头骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(07):58.
[5]刘昕,邓志强,叶家军.撬拨复位弹性髓内钉固定治疗JudetⅣ型儿童桡骨颈骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(12):65.
[6]刘欣,刘文刚,吴淮,等.3种方法治疗C型桡骨远端骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(05):12.
　LIU Xin,LIU Wengang,WU Huai,et al.A comparative study of three methods for treatment of type C distal radius fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(04):12.
[7]谢小利,李晓程.经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体 压缩骨折的围手术期护理[J].中医正骨,2015,27(05):79.
[8]明晓锋,陈登山,张晓强.闭合复位弹性髓内钉固定和经皮克氏针撬拨复位固定 治疗儿童O'BrienⅡ、Ⅲ型桡骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中医正骨,2016,28(02):15.
　MING Xiaofeng,CHEN Dengshan,ZHANG Xiaoqiang.A clinical comparison of closed reduction and internal fixation with elastic intramedullary nails versus percutaneous leverage reduction and internal fixation with Kirschner wire for treatment of O'Brien typeⅡandⅢradial neck fractures in children[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(04):15.
[9]王仲锋,王晓,李国军,等.骨折三维形态分型在MasonⅡ型桡骨头骨折 Herbert螺钉内固定术中的应用[J].中医正骨,2016,28(03):38.
[10]郑移兵,鲍树仁,齐越峰,等.推压手法复位纸夹板外固定治疗Smith骨折[J].中医正骨,2016,28(03):45.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
2014-09-22收稿 2014-11-02修回
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(81173282)
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-04-30