[1]蒋雯,韩骁,王晋超,等.常规序列和弥散张量成像序列MRI在颈椎后路椎管扩大成形术 治疗脊髓型颈椎病疗效评价中的应用[J].中医正骨,2018,30(02):37-40.
点击复制

常规序列和弥散张量成像序列MRI在颈椎后路椎管扩大成形术 治疗脊髓型颈椎病疗效评价中的应用()
分享到:

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第30卷
期数:
2018年02期
页码:
37-40
栏目:
影像诊断
出版日期:
2018-02-20

文章信息/Info

作者:
蒋雯1韩骁1王晋超1马晓栋2史晓林3梁博程3刘钟4宋卿鹏1郭华2于爱红1程晓光1
1.北京积水潭医院,北京 100035; 2.清华大学医学院,北京 100084; 3.浙江中医药大学 附属第二医院,浙江 杭州 310005; 4.浙江中医药大学,浙江 杭州 310053
关键词:
颈椎病 椎管 减压术外科 磁共振成像 弥散张量成像
摘要:
目的:探讨常规序列及弥散张量成像(diffusion tensor imaging,DTI)序列MRI在颈椎后路椎管扩大成形术治疗脊髓型颈椎病疗效评价中的应用价值。方法:脊髓型颈椎病患者59例,均为接受过颈椎后路椎管扩大成形术治疗的患者,手术至本次检查时间12~14个月。按日本骨科学会脊髓型颈椎病评分计算患者术后临床改善率,根据改善率将患者分为2组,2组患者均行颈椎常规序列及DTI序列MRI检查。分析术后病变节段最狭窄层面脊髓MRI表现,记录2组患者T2加权像高信号影情况,采集DTI序列各向异性分数(fractional anisotropy,FA)、平均弥散率(mean diffusivity,MD)、轴向弥散率(axial diffusivity,AD)及纵向弥散率(radial diffusivity,RD)参数图像,测量FA、MD、AD及RD参数值,并分别做两组间对比。结果:59例患者中临床改善较好29例(改善较好组)、改善较差30例(改善较差组)。2组患者常规序列MRI检查均示手术减压彻底,但部分患者T2加权像可见高信号影,其中改善较好组17例、改善较差组25例; 改善较好组T2加权像出现高信号影的比例较改善较差组低(χ2=4.390,P=0.036)。DTI序列上,改善较好组FA信号强度较改善较差组高,MD、AD及RD信号强度较改善较差组低。2组患者间MD、RD参数值比较,差异有统计学意义,改善较好组低于改善较差组[(0.86±0.13)×10-3mm2·s-1,(0.93±0.13)×10-3mm2·s-1,t=-2.231,P=0.030;(0.58±0.16)×10-3mm2·s-1,(0.67±0.16)×10-3mm2·s-1,t=﹣2.142,P=0.036]; 2组患者间FA、AD参数值比较,差异无统计学意义[0.54±0.10,0.49±0.10,t=1.704,P=0.094;(1.42±0.12)×10-3mm2·s-1,(1.47±0.13)×10-3mm2·s-1,t=-1.677,P=0.099]。结论:脊髓型颈椎病患者行颈椎后路椎管扩大成形术后,尽管手术减压彻底,但部分患者的脊髓仍可能存在不同程度的损伤,临床改善较好者的脊髓损伤发生率低于改善较差者,且前者脊髓微结构的破坏程度较后者轻。常规序列和DTI序列MRI检查有助于颈椎后路椎管扩大成形术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的疗效评估。

参考文献/References:

[1] OHYA J,OSHIMA Y,TAKESHITA K,et al.Patient satisfaction with double-door laminoplasty for cervical compression myelopathy[J].J Orthop Sci,2015,20(1):64-70.
[2] LEBL DR,BONO CM.Update on the diagnosis and management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2015,23(11):648-660.
[3] 蒋协远,王大伟.骨科临床疗效评价标准[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:104.
[4] HIRABAYASHI K,MIYAKAWA J,SATOMI K,et al.Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),1981,6(4):354-364.
[5] TAKAHASHI M,SAKAMOTO Y,MIYAWAKI M,et al.Increased Mr signal intensity secondary to chronic cervical cord compression[J].Neuroradiology,1987,29(6):550-556.
[6] KAMEYAMA T,ANDO T,YANAGI T,et al.Neuroimaging and pathology of the spinal cord in compressive cervical myelopathy[J].Rinsho Byori,1995,43(9):886-890.
[7] BASSER PJ,MATTIELLO J,LEBIHAN D.MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging[J].Biophys J,1994,66(1):259-267.
[8] THURNHER MM,LAW M.Diffusion-weighted imaging, diffusion-tensor imaging,and fiber tractography of the spinal cord[J].Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am,2009,17(2):225-244.
[9] SASIADEK MJ,SZEWCZYK P,BLADOWSKA J.Application of diffusion tensor imaging(DTI)in pathological changes of the spinal cord[J].Med Sci Monit,2012,18(6):73-79.
[10] WEN CY,CUI JL,LIU HS,et al.Is diffusion anisotropy a biomarker for disease severity and surgical prognosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy?[J].Radiology,2014,270(1):197-204.
[11] ELLINGSON BM,SALAMON N,GRINSTEAD JW,et al.Diffusion tensor imaging predicts functional impairment in mild-to-moderate cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].Spine J,2014,14(11):2589-2597.
[12] GAO SJ,YUAN X,JIANG XY,et al.Correlation study of 3T-MR-DTI measurements and clinical symptoms of cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].Eur J Radiol,2013,82(11):1940-1945.
[13] RAJASEKARAN S,YERRAMSHETTY JS,CHITTODE VS,et al.The assessment of neuronal status in normal and cervical spondylotic myelopathy using diffusion tensor imaging[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2014,39(15):1183-1189.
[14] JONES JG,CEN SY,LEBEL RM,et al.Diffusion tensor imaging correlates with the clinical assessment of disease severity in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and predicts outcome following surgery[J].AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2013,34(2):471-478.
[15] UDA T,TAKAMI T,TSUYUGUCHI N,et al.Assessment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging parameter at 3.0 tesla[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2013,38(5):407-414.
[16] RAJASEKARAN S,KANNA RM,CHITTODE VS,et al.Efficacy of diffusion tensor imaging indices in assessing postoperative neural recovery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2017,42(1):8-13.
[17] WANG KY,IDOWU O,THOMPSON CB,et al.Tract-Specific diffusion tensor imaging in cervical spondylotic myelopathy before and after decompressive spinal surgery:preliminary results[J].Clin Neuroradiol,2017,27(1):61-69.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙献武,于香兰,邵海燕,等.应用三维动静态平衡康复模式治疗 非脊髓型颈椎病的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):8.
 SUN Xianwu,YU Xianglan,SHAO Haiyan,et al.Clinical study on three-dimensional dynamic and static equilibrium rehabilitation modality in the treatment of non-myelopathy type cervical spondylosis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(02):8.
[2]江建春.神经根型颈椎病的中医药治疗研究概况[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):71.
[3]韦英成,董彤,吴肖梅,等.推拿手法治疗神经根型颈椎病的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):65.
[4]张莉,秦丹霞,张细姣.Orem自理理论在前路手术治疗脊髓型颈椎病 围手术期护理中的应用[J].中医正骨,2015,27(09):75.
[5]邸保林,董国顺,林红猛.俯卧斜扳法治疗神经根型颈椎病[J].中医正骨,2015,27(07):70.
[6]白玉,王爱国.郭春园教授治疗颈椎病的学术思想探究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):64.
[7]郝庆英,刘楚吟,付婵娟,等.Hybrid手术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的护理[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):78.
[8]王翔,詹红生,张明才,等.石氏手法治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):12.
 WANG Xiang,ZHAN Hongsheng,ZHANG Mingcai,et al.Observation on the curative effect of Shi's manipulation in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(02):12.
[9]史俊德,梁舒涵,海渊.毛书歌教授治疗寰枢关节错缝的经验[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):76.
[10]王树强,杨振国,刘文斌,等.董建文教授治疗神经根型颈椎病的经验[J].中医正骨,2015,27(01):69.
[11]何少奇,汤呈宣,唐小君,等.颈后路单开门椎管扩大成形跳跃式与连续式微型钛板内固定术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2019,31(04):8.
 ZHOU Hongxing,YI Weiguo,ZHANG Baojian,et al.Application of tourniquets to primary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for treatment of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2019,31(02):8.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目(81271558); 北京市自然科学基金面上项目(7132061); 北京市卫生系统高层次卫生技术人才培养计划项目(2013-3-033,2009-2-03); 北京市科学技术委员会首都临床特色应用研究与成果推广项目(Z161100000516134) 通讯作者:程晓光 E-mail:xiao65@263.net
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-07-02