[1]张方舒,梅伟,王金炉,等.椎间融合器原位植骨与自体髂骨植骨治疗脊髓型颈椎病的疗效比较…[J].中医正骨,2017,29(12):38-42.
　ZHANG Fangshu,MEI Wei,WANG Jinlu,et al.A clinical comparison of bone transplantation with cage in natural position versus autologous iliac bone transplantation for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2017,29(12):38-42.
点击复制

椎间融合器原位植骨与自体髂骨植骨治疗脊髓型颈椎病的疗效比较…()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第29卷
期数:
2017年12期
页码:
38-42
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2017-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A clinical comparison of bone transplantation with cage in natural position versus autologous iliac bone transplantation for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy
作者:
张方舒1; 梅伟2; 王金炉1; 李格3; 栾继耀1; 王坤1
1.河南中医药大学,河南 郑州 450046; 2.河南省郑州市骨科医院,河南 郑州 450052; 3.河南中医药大学第一附属医院,河南 郑州 450000
Author(s):
ZHANG Fangshu1; MEI Wei2; WANG Jinlu1; LI Ge3; LUAN Jiyao1; WANG Kun1
1.Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Zhengzhou 450046,Henan,China 2.Zhengzhou Orthopedic Hospital,Zhengzhou 450052,Henan,China 3.The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Zhengzhou 450000,Henan,China
关键词:
颈椎病;  脊髓压迫症;  椎间盘切除术;  脊柱融合术;  骨移植;  髂骨;  椎间融合器
Keywords:
Key word cervical spondylosis;  spinal cord compression;  discectomy;  spinal fusion;  bone transplantation;  ilium;  cage
摘要:
目的:比较椎间融合器原位植骨与自体髂骨植骨治疗脊髓型颈椎病的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2012年4月至2015年7月接受颈椎前路减压椎间植骨融合术治疗的70例脊髓型颈椎病患者的病例资料。男34例,女36例; 年龄30～66岁,中位数54岁。病变节段,C3～43例、C4～519例、C5～621例、C6～727例。术中充分减压后,采用聚醚醚酮(polyetheretherketone,PEEK)椎间融合器原位植骨融合者归入椎间融合器原位植骨组,采用自体髂骨植骨融合者归入自体髂骨植骨组,每组35例。记录2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量及住院时间。观察植骨融合及并发症发生情况。依据日本整形外科协会(Japanese orthopaedic association,JOA)脊髓型颈椎病评分标准分别对术前和术后12个月时患者颈椎情况进行评价,并对2组患者的颈椎JOA评分进行比较。结果:70例患者均顺利完成手术。椎间融合器原位植骨组较自体髂骨植骨组手术时间和住院时间短,术中出血量少[(49.5±5.1)min,(74.5±5.1)min,t=20.412,P=0.000;(6.9±0.5)d,(13.8±1.0)d,t=34.997,P=0.000;(44.5±3.6)mL,(60.3±5.1)mL,t=14.832,P=0.000]。2组患者均获随访,随访时间12～15个月,中位数14个月。术后12个月,2组患者融合节段均达到骨性融合。术前2组患者颈椎JOA评分比较,差异无统计学意义[(9.8±0.8)分,(9.7±0.3)分,t=0.715,P=0.477]。术后12个月,2组患者颈椎JOA评分均高于术前[(16.7±0.5)分,(9.8±0.8)分,t=50.306,P=0.000;(14.0±0.6)分,(9.7±0.3)分,t=37.329,P=0.000],且椎间融合器原位植骨组高于自体髂骨植骨组[(16.7±0.5)分,(14.0±0.6)分,t=19.529,P=0.000]。椎间融合器原位植骨组术后无血肿、感染等并发症发生。自体髂骨植骨组术后并发颈部切口血肿1例,血肿清除后切口愈合; 并发取骨处疼痛3例,未行特殊处理,术后3个月后疼痛缓解。结论:颈椎前路减压植骨融合术治疗脊髓型颈椎病,术中采用PEEK椎间融合器原位植骨比自体髂骨植骨更有利于颈椎功能的恢复,且具有手术时间和住院时间短、术中出血量和术后并发症少的优势。
Abstract:
ABSTRACT Objective:To compare the clinical effects of bone transplantation with cage in natural position versus autologous iliac bone transplantation for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy(CSM).Methods:The medical records of 70 patients with CSM who received surgery of cervical decompression and intervertebral bone graft fusion in anterior access from April 2012 to July 2015 were analyzed retrospectively.The patients consisted of 34 males and 36 females,and ranged in age from 30 to 66 years(Median=54 yrs).The pathological changes located at C3～4(3),C4～5(19),C5～6(21)and C6～7(27).The patients were treated with adequate cervical decompression and intervertebral bone graft fusion with polyetheretherketone(PEEK)cage in natural position(group A)or autologous iliac bone(group B),35 cases in each group.The operative time,intraoperative blood loss,hospital stay,bone graft fusion rate and complication incidence were recorded and compared between the 2 groups.The cervical vertebras were evaluated according to Japanese orthopaedic association(JOA)CSM scoring standard before surgery and at 12 months after surgery respectively,and the JOA scores were compared between the 2 groups.Results:The surgeries were finished successfully in all patients.The operative time and hospital stay were shorter and the intraoperative blood loss were less in group A compared to group B(49.5+/-5.1 vs 74.5+/-5.1 min,t=20.412,P=0.000; 6.9+/-0.5 vs 13.8+/-1.0 days,t=34.997,P=0.000; 44.5+/-3.6 vs 60.3+/-5.1 ml,t=14.832,P=0.000).All patients in the 2 groups were followed up for 12-15 months with a median of 14 months,and all patients in the 2 groups achieved intervertebral osseous bone graft fusion.There was no statistical difference in JOA scores of cervical vertebra between the 2 groups before surgery(9.8+/-0.8 vs 9.7+/-0.3 points,t=0.715,P=0.477),and the JOA scores of cervical vertebra of the 2 groups were higher at 12 months after the surgery compared to pre-surgery(16.7+/-0.5 vs 9.8+/-0.8 points,t=50.306,P=0.000; 14.0+/-0.6 vs 9.7+/-0.3 points,t=37.329,P=0.000),and the JOA scores of cervical vertebra were higher in group A compared to group B at 12 months after the surgery(16.7+/-0.5 vs 14.0+/-0.6 points,t=19.529,P=0.000).No postoperative complications such as hematoma and infection were found in group A.Cervical incision hematoma(1)and bone donor site pain(3)were found in group B after surgery.The incision healed after the hematoma was cleared,and the bone donor site pain were relieved at 3 months after the surgery without special treatment.Conclusion:Bone transplantation with PEEK cage in natural position is more conducive to the cervical vertebra function recovery compared to autologous iliac bone transplantation in treatment of CSM with cervical decompression and intervertebral bone graft fusion in anterior access,and it has such advantages as shorter operative time and hospital stay,less intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications.

参考文献/References:

[1] 李来好,夏磊,王文刚,等.前路颈椎全内镜下髓核摘除射频消融术治疗神经根型颈椎病的短期疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2017,29(3):33-35.
[2] 镐英杰,张迪,李志磊,等.新型同种异体骨在颈椎前路手术应用的临床效果分析[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2015,29(5):567-570.
[3] KULKARNLI AG,HEE HT,WONG HK,et al.Solis cage(PEEK)for antetior cervicalfusion:preliminary radiological results with emphasis on fusion and subsidence[J].Spine J,2007,7(2):205-209.
[4] HERMANSEN A,HEDLUND R,VAVRACH L,et al.A comparis on between the Carbon fiber cage and the cloward procedure in cervical spine surgery:a ten-to thirteen-year follow-up of aprospective randomized study[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2011,36(12):919-925.
[5] 胥少汀,葛宝丰,徐印坎.实用骨科学[M].4版.北京:人民军医出版社,2012:1982.
[6] 蒋协远,王大伟.骨科临床疗效评价标准[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:104.
[7] 梅伟,高晓群.前路复位椎间植骨融合内固定术治疗单节段下颈椎骨折脱位合并关节突交锁[J].中医正骨,2016,28(3):42-44.
[8] DIMITRIOU R,MATALIOTAKIS GI,ANGOULES AG,et al.Complications following autologous bone graft harvesting from the iliac crest and using the RIA:a systematic review[J].Injury,2011,42(Suppl 2):3-15.
[9] 万东东,胡茂忠,许东浩.髂骨取骨术后并发症的研究进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2016,24(12):1096-1100.
[10] 曹盛生,秦育宏,饶敏杰,等.颈椎前路桥式自锁定聚醚醚酮椎间融合器治疗颈椎病的临床疗效分析[J].中国全科医学,2014,17(9):1045-1048.
[11] 曹盛生,饶敏杰,秦育宏,等.前路颈椎间盘桥式自锁定PEEK椎间融合器的临床应用及中远期疗效研究[J].中国全科医学,2017,20(5):603-605.
[12] 江兵,刘立明,曹燕庆,等.MC+PEEK融合器在颈椎间盘突出症手术中的临床应用[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2012,27(11):975-977.
[13] 鲍达,马远征.锚定式颈椎椎间融合器在颈椎前路再手术中的应用[J].脊柱外科杂志,2014,12(6):363-366.
[14] SALIH G.The effect of the PEEK cage on the cervical lordosis in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy[J].Open AccessMaced J Med Sci,2015,3(2):215-223.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙献武,于香兰,邵海燕,等.应用三维动静态平衡康复模式治疗 非脊髓型颈椎病的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):8.
　SUN Xianwu,YU Xianglan,SHAO Haiyan,et al.Clinical study on three-dimensional dynamic and static equilibrium rehabilitation modality in the treatment of non-myelopathy type cervical spondylosis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(12):8.
[2]江建春.神经根型颈椎病的中医药治疗研究概况[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):71.
[3]韦英成,董彤,吴肖梅,等.推拿手法治疗神经根型颈椎病的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):65.
[4]张莉,秦丹霞,张细姣.Orem自理理论在前路手术治疗脊髓型颈椎病 围手术期护理中的应用[J].中医正骨,2015,27(09):75.
[5]邸保林,董国顺,林红猛.俯卧斜扳法治疗神经根型颈椎病[J].中医正骨,2015,27(07):70.
[6]白玉,王爱国.郭春园教授治疗颈椎病的学术思想探究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):64.
[7]郝庆英,刘楚吟,付婵娟,等.Hybrid手术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的护理[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):78.
[8]王翔,詹红生,张明才,等.石氏手法治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):12.
　WANG Xiang,ZHAN Hongsheng,ZHANG Mingcai,et al.Observation on the curative effect of Shi's manipulation in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(12):12.
[9]史俊德,梁舒涵,海渊.毛书歌教授治疗寰枢关节错缝的经验[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):76.
[10]王树强,杨振国,刘文斌,等.董建文教授治疗神经根型颈椎病的经验[J].中医正骨,2015,27(01):69.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
通讯作者:梅伟 E-mail:13613711661@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-05-02