[1]贺文楠,蒋振刚,董学亮,等.前交叉韧带、半月板损伤后膝关节骨密度的变化[J].中医正骨,2011,23(03):6-8.
 HE Wen-nan*,JIANG Zhen-gang,DONG Xue-liang,et al.Study on the change of bone mineral density around the knee joint after anterior cruciate ligament injury and meniscus injury[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2011,23(03):6-8.
点击复制

前交叉韧带、半月板损伤后膝关节骨密度的变化()
分享到:

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第23卷
期数:
2011年03期
页码:
6-8
栏目:
基础研究
出版日期:
2011-03-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the change of bone mineral density around the knee joint after anterior cruciate ligament injury and meniscus injury
作者:
贺文楠1蒋振刚1董学亮2左新成3
1.河南省新乡市中心医院,河南 新乡 453003;
2.河南省渑池县人民医院, 河南 渑池 472400;
3.中国人民解放军第150中心医院,河南 洛阳 471031
Author(s):
HE Wen-nan*JIANG Zhen-gangDONG Xue-lianget al.*
The central hospital of Xinxiang city,Xinxiang 453003,Henan,China
关键词:
膝关节 前交叉韧带 半月板胫骨 骨密度 动物实验 兔
Keywords:
Knee joint Anterior cruciate ligament MenisciTibal Bone density Animal experimentation Rabbits
摘要:
目的:观察前交叉韧带、半月板损伤后膝关节周围骨密度的变化,探讨其影响因素及可能的影响机制。方法:健康纯种新西 兰大白兔16只随机分为前交叉韧带切断组8只,半月板切除+前交叉韧带切断组8只,分别于造模前、造模后第4、8、12周末测量膝 关节周围4个目的区的骨密度,比较各目的区不同造模方法、不同时间点间骨密度的变化。结果:R3区,A组骨密度低于B组,差异有 统计学意义(F=22.326,P=0.001); 各时间点间骨密度差异有统计学意义(F=7.031,P=0.033); R4区,两种造模方法间骨密度差异 有统计学意义(F=14.821,P=0.007),各时间点间骨密度差异有统计学意义(F=5.632,P =0.031); 造模方法和测量时间无交互作用 (R3区:P=0.063; R4区:P=0.055)。R1、 R2区,造模方法间骨密度值差异均无统计学意义(F=2.330,P=0.057; F=1.960,P=0.081); 各时间点间骨密度值差异无统计学意义(F=2.190,P=0.074,F=2.510,P=0.067)。结论:前交叉韧带切断、半月板切除术后膝关节 周围发生骨密度改变可能是适应性骨重建作用的结果,关节不稳、应力改变是主要的影响因素。
Abstract:
Objective:To observe the change of bone mineral density(BMD)around the knee joint after anterior cruciate ligament(ACL)injury and meniscus injury,and to explore the influencing factors and the possible mechanism for the change.Methods:16 healthy New Zealand pure rabbits were randomly divided into ACL transection group(group A)and meniscectomy combined with ACL transection group(group B),8 cases in each group.BMD of the 4 regions of interesting around the knee joint of the rabbits were measured before model building and at the 4th,8th,12th weekend after model building respectively.The change of BMD of the 4 regions of interesting were compared between different methods of model building and between different time points.Results:In the region 3,BMD of group A was lower than that of group B,and there was statistical difference between the 2 groups (F=22.326,P=0.001); and there was statistical difference in BMD among different time points(F=7.031,P=0.033).In the region 4,there was statistical difference in BMD between the 2 methods of model building (F=14.821,P=0.007),and there was statistical difference in BMD among different time points(F=5.632,P=0.031),and there was no interaction between molding method and measurement time(region 3:P=0.063; region4:P=0.055).In the region 1 and region 2,there was no statistical difference in BMD between the different molding methods (F=2.330,P=0.057; F=1.960,P=0.081),and there was no statistical difference in BMD among the measurement time points(F=2.190,P=0.074,F=2.510,P=0.067).Conclusion:It is possible that BMD change around the knee joint after ACL transaction and meniscectomy is the result of adaptive bone remodeling,and joint instability and stress change may play an important role in the process.

参考文献/References:

[1] 敖英方,田得祥,崔国庆,等.运动员前交叉韧带损伤的流行病学研究[J].体育科学,2000,20(4):47-48.
[2] 张辉,王凯利,卢福成,等.关节镜清理配合玻璃酸钠关节腔内注射治疗膝关节骨性关节炎[J].中医正骨,2005,17(7):55.
[3] 于长隆,敖英方,张美荣,等.前交叉韧带损伤与膝关节骨密度的关系研究[J].中国运动医学杂志,2001,20(3):270-271.
[4] 曾凯斌,雷光华,李康华.骨质疏松症与骨关节炎的相关性研究进展[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2007,13(1):63-68.
[5] 李西海,梁文娜.软骨下骨骨重塑与骨关节炎的关系[J].国际骨科学杂志, 2007,28(1):35-37.
[6] 孙秀江,王韶进,刘文广,等.全膝关节置换术后假体周围骨密度的临床观察[J].山东大学学报:医学版,2006,44(12):1265- 1267.
[7] Soininvaara TA,Miettinnen HJ,Jurvelin JS,et al.Periprosthetic femoral bone loss after total knee replacement:1-year follow-up study of 69 patiebts [J].knee,2004,11(4):297-302.
[8] 刘英杰,高顺红,白俊清.外侧半月板切除术对成人膝关节周围骨密度的影响[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2006,12(3):232-235.
[9] Petersen MM,Olsen C,Lauritzen JB,et al.Late changes in bone mineral density of the proximal tibia following total or partial medial meniscectomy.A randomized study[J].J Orthop Res,1999,14(1):16-21.

更新日期/Last Update: 2011-03-30