[1]邓磊,王少华,李征,等.Nano-seq宏基因组测序在关节置换术后假体周围感染诊断中的应用价值[J].中医正骨,2023,35(10):7-11.
　DENG Lei,WANG Shaohua,LI Zheng,et al.Application value of Nano-seq metagenomic sequencing in diagnosis of periprosthetic infections after arthroplasty[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2023,35(10):7-11.
点击复制

Nano-seq宏基因组测序在关节置换术后假体周围感染诊断中的应用价值()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第35卷
期数:
2023年10期
页码:
7-11
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application value of Nano-seq metagenomic sequencing in diagnosis of periprosthetic infections after arthroplasty
作者:
邓磊1; 王少华2; 李征3; 杨光亚1; 于雅丽2; 侯颖周2; 李科伟2; 孙博2
1.河南中医药大学第一临床医学院,河南 郑州 450046; 2.郑州市骨科医院,河南 郑州 450052; 3.唐山市工人医院,河北 唐山 063000
Author(s):
DENG Lei1; WANG Shaohua2; LI Zheng3; YANG Guangya1; YU Yali2; HOU Yingzhou2; LI Kewei2; SUN Bo2
1.The First Clinical Medical College of Henan University of Chinese Medicine,Zhengzhou 450046,Henan,China 2.Zhengzhou Orthopedics Hospital,Zhengzhou 450052,Henan,China 3.Tangshan Gongren Hospital,Tangshan 063000,Hebei,China
关键词:
关节成形术; 置换;  假体和植入物;  感染;  C-反应蛋白质;  血沉;  纤维蛋白原;  微生物培养检测;  Nano-seq宏基因组测序
Keywords:
arthroplasty; replacement;  prostheses and implants;  infection;  C-reactive protein;  blood sedimentation;  fibrinogen;  microorganism detection;  Nano-seq metagenomic sequencing
摘要:
目的:探讨Nano-seq宏基因组测序在关节置换术后假体周围感染诊断中的应用价值。方法:纳入38例人工关节置换术后因疑似假体周围感染再次住院的患者。患者住院后,抽血测定血清C反应蛋白(C-reactive protein,CRP)含量、血沉(erythrocyte sedimentation rate,ESR)和血浆纤维蛋白原(fibrinogen,FIB)含量等指标,抽取关节液进行病原微生物培养和Nano-seq宏基因组测序。患者出院后,从病历系统中提取患者住院时测定的血清CRP含量、ESR、血浆FIB含量及病原微生物培养检验报告、Nano-seq宏基因组测序检验报告及出院诊断结果。分别根据血清CRP含量、ESR、血浆FIB含量、病原微生物培养检验报告、Nano-seq宏基因组测序检验报告诊断假体周围感染,并以出院诊断结果为金标准,计算上述指标诊断假体周围感染的敏感度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值。采用受试者操作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线评价不同指标诊断假体周围感染的应用价值。结果:血清CRP含量诊断假体周围感染的敏感度为90.48%、特异度为41.18%、准确度为68.42%,ESR诊断假体周围感染的敏感度为66.67%、特异度为64.71%、准确度为65.79%,血浆FIB含量诊断假体周围感染的敏感度为66.67%、特异度为70.59%、准确度为68.42%,病原微生物培养诊断假体周围感染的敏感度为61.90%、特异度为94.12%、准确度为76.32%,Nano-seq宏基因组测序诊断假体周围感染的敏感度为95.24%、特异度为82.35%、准确度为89.47%。Nano-seq宏基因组测序诊断假体周围感染的敏感度高于ESR、血浆FIB含量、病原微生物培养(P=0.045,P=0.045,P=0.020),特异度高于血清CRP含量(P=0.032),准确度高于血清CRP含量、ESR、血浆FIB含量(P=0.047,P=0.026,P=0.047)。血清CRP含量、ESR、血浆FIB含量、病原微生物培养、Nano-seq宏基因组测序诊断假体周围感染的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.791(P=0.002)、0.706(P=0.031)、0.734(P=0.014)、0.780(P=0.000)、0.888(P=0.000)。结论:Nano-seq宏基因组测序在关节置换术后假体周围感染诊断中具有较高的应用价值。
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the application value of Nano-seq metagenomic sequencing in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections after arthroplasty.Methods:Thirty-eight patients re-hospitalized due to suspected periprosthetic infections after arthroplasty were included in the study.After the hospitalization,the blood and joint fluid samples were drawn from patients.The serum level of C-reactive protein(CRP),erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR)and the plasma level of fibrinogen(FIB)were measured,and the pathogenic microorganism detection and Nano-seq metagenomic sequencing were conducted.After hospital discharge,the information including serum level of CRP,ESR,plasma level of FIB,the pathogenic microorganism detection report,the Nano-seq metagenomic sequencing report and the discharge diagnosis was extracted from the electronic medical record system.Periprosthetic infections were diagnosed based on the serum level of CRP,ESR,plasma level of FIB,pathogenic microorganism detection report and Nano-seq metagenomic sequencing report respectively.With the hospital discharge diagnosis as the gold standard,the sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the above-mentioned indicators in diagnosing periprosthetic infections were calculated.The application value of different indicators in diagnosing periprosthetic infections was evaluated by using the receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve.Results:The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of serum CRP level in diagnosing periprosthetic infections were 90.48%,41.18% and 68.42% respectively.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of ESR were 66.67%,64.71% and 65.79% respectively.The sensitivity,specificity,and accuracy of plasma FIB level were 66.67%,70.59% and 68.42% respectively.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of pathogenic microorganism detection were 61.90%,94.12% and 76.32% respectively.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of Nano-seq metagenomic sequencing were 95.24%,82.35% and 89.47% respectively.The Nano-seq metagenomic sequencing had higher sensitivity than ESR,plasma FIB level and pathogenic microorganism detection(P=0.045,P=0.045,P=0.020),higher specificity than the serum CRP level(P=0.032),and higher accuracy than the serum CRP level,ESR and plasma FIB level(P=0.047,P=0.026,P=0.047)in diagnosing periprosthetic infections.The areas under the ROC curves of serum CRP level,ESR,plasma FIB level,pathogenic microorganism detection and Nano-seq metagenomic sequencing in diagnosing periprosthetic infections were 0.791(P=0.002),0.706(P=0.031),0.734(P=0.014),0.780(P=0.000)and 0.888(P=0.000)respectively.Conclusion:Nano-seq metagenomic sequencing demonstrates a high application value in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections after arthroplasty.

参考文献/References:

[1] MADRY H.Surgical therapy in osteoarthritis[J].Osteoarthritis Cartilage,2022,30(8):1019-1034.
[2] 芦珊,唐虎子,朱贤友,等.关节置换术后手术部位及假体周围感染与营养不良相关性的Meta分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2021,31(5):685-690.
[3] AKINDOLIRE J,MORCOS M W,MARSH J D,et al.The economic impact of periprosthetic infection in total hip arthroplasty[J].Can J Surg,2020,63(1):E52-56.
[4] TAN J,LIU Y,EHNERT S,et al.The effectiveness of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Front Cell Infect Microbiol,2022,12:875822.
[5] YIN H,XU D,WANG D.Diagnostic value of next-generation sequencing to detect periprosthetic joint infection[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2021,22(1):252.
[6] ATHANASOPOULOU K,BOTI M A,ADAMOPOULOS P G,et al.Third-generation sequencing:the spearhead towards the radical transformation of modern genomics[J].Life(Basel),2021,12(1):30.
[7] HOANG M T V,IRINYI L,HU Y,et al.Long-reads-based metagenomics in clinical diagnosis with a special focus on fungal infections[J].Front Microbiol,2021,12:708550.
[8] YOUNG K T,LAHMERS K K,SELLERS H S,et al.Randomly primed,strand-switching,MinION-based sequencing for the detection and characterization of cultured RNA viruses[J].J Vet Diagn Invest,2021,33(2):202-215.
[9] 谭聃,欧铜.第三代测序技术的研究进展与临床应用[J].生物工程学报,2022,38(9):3121-3130.
[10] PARVIZI J,TAN T L,GOSWAMI K,et al.The 2018 definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection:an evidence-based and validated criteria[J].J Arthroplasty,2018,33(5):1309-1314.
[11] 黄金承,高宗炎,代志鹏,等.假体周围感染诊断新检验指标的探讨[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2021,29(16):1441-1445.
[12] 宏翊,邓旺,李桦,等.关节液分析对诊断假体周围感染价值的探讨[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2021,14(2):112-115.
[13] PAZIUK T,RONDON A J,GOSWAMI K,et al.A novel adjunct indicator of periprosthetic joint infection:platelet count and mean platelet volume[J].J Arthroplasty,2020,35(3):836-839.
[14] LI C,RENZ N,TRAMPUZ A.Management of periprosthetic joint infection[J].Hip Pelvis,2018,30(3):138-146.
[15] SHI W,JIANG Y,WANG Y,et al.The diagnostic value of various inflammatory biomarkers for diagnosing periprosthe-tic joint infection is gender-specific[J].J Inflamm Res,2022,15:3975-3982.
[16] PAZ Z,ZHU C,LIEBER S B,et al.Presentation and outcomes of peri-prosthetic joint infection:a comparison of culture-positive and culture-negative disease[J].Surg Infect(Larchmt),2021,22(8):828-835.
[17] AKGUN D,MULLER M,PERKA C,et al.The serum level of C-reactive protein alone cannot be used for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections,especially in those caused by organisms of low virulence[J].Bone Joint J,2018,100-B(11):1482-1486.
[18] WATANABE S,KOBAYASHI N,TOMOYAMA A,et al.Clinical characteristics and risk factors for culture-negative periprosthetic joint infections[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2021,16(1):292.
[19] SIGMUND I K,PUCHNER S E,WINDHAGER R.Serum inflammatory biomarkers in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections[J].Biomedicines,2021,9(9):1128.
[20] XIONG L,LI S,DAI M.Comparison of D-dimer with CRP and ESR for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2019,14(1):240.
[21] GRZELECKI D,WALCZAK P,GRAJEK A,et al.Elevated plasma D-dimer concentration has higher efficacy for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection of the knee than of the hip-a single-center,retrospective study[J].J Orthop Res,2021,39(2):291-298.
[22] BIN G,YANG X,FAN L,et al.Serum fibrinogen test performs well for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection[J].J Arthroplasty,2020,35(9):2607-2612.
[23] YU X,JIANG W,SHI Y,et al.Applications of sequencing technology in clinical microbial infection[J].J Cell Mol Med,2019,23(11):7143-7150.
[24] LUO W,HE Y,XU J,et al.Comparison of third-generation sequencing technology and traditional microbiological detection in pathogen diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infection[J].Discov Med,2023,35(176):332-342.
[25] WANG C X,HUANG Z,FANG W,et al.Preliminary assessment of nanopore-based metagenomic sequencing for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection[J].Int J Infect Dis,2020,97:54-59.
[26] YU X,JIANG W,HUANG X,et al.Rrna analysis based on long-read high-throughput sequencing reveals a more accurate diagnostic for the bacterial infection of ascites[J].Biomed Res Int,2021,2021:6287280.
[27] HUANG Q,FU A,WANG Y,et al.Microbiological diagnosis of endophthalmitis using nanopore targeted sequencing[J].Clin Exp Ophthalmol,2021,49(9):1060-1068.
[28] PALAN J,NOLAN C,SARANTOS K,et al.Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infections[J].EFORT Open Rev,2019,4(10):585-594.
[29] KALBIAN I,PARK J W,GOSWAMI K,et al.Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection:prevalence,aetiology,evaluation,recommendations,and treatment[J].Int Orthop,2020,44(7):1255-1261.
[30] 俞晓玲,姜文倩,郑玲,等.单分子测序技术及应用研究进展[J].生物化学与生物物理进展,2020,47(1):5-16.

相似文献/References:

[1]邢金明.切开复位锁定钢板内固定术和人工半肩关节置换术 治疗老年肱骨近端复杂骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):11.
　XING Jinming.A retrospective trial of open reduction and locking plate internal fixation versus artificial shoulder hemiarthroplasty for complicated proximal humeral fractures in old patients[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(10):11.
[2]赵云昌.人工股骨头置换治疗老年粉碎性股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):31.
[3]张明强.生物型加长柄半髋关节置换术治疗 高龄不稳定股骨转子间骨折疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):56.
[4]蔡云仙.围手术期耳穴按压联合平衡针疗法 在全膝关节置换术后镇痛中的应用[J].中医正骨,2015,27(06):41.
[5]喻长纯,杨明路,王战朝.不同手术方式治疗胫骨平台骨折畸形愈合的体会[J].中医正骨,2015,27(03):37.
[6]魏瑄,宋树春,王金良.术前精确测量和评估在全髋关节置换治疗 成人发育性髋关节发育不良继发骨关节炎中的价值[J].中医正骨,2015,27(01):30.
[7]鲍荣华,陈晓东,王国平,等.Wagner Cone生物型假体置换结合经股骨转子下横形截骨 治疗CroweⅣ型成人发育性髋关节发育不良[J].中医正骨,2015,27(01):33.
[8]喻长纯,杨明路,王战朝.同期髌骨脱位矫正术联合全膝关节置换术治疗 晚期膝骨关节炎合并习惯性髌骨脱位[J].中医正骨,2015,27(01):41.
[9]武理国,沈军,傅国海,等.人工肱骨头置换治疗老年肱骨近端复杂骨折[J].中医正骨,2013,25(10):70.
[10]李国梁,韩广普,闫国强,等.红花化瘀汤薰蒸联合理筋手法 在膝骨关节炎全膝关节置换术后康复中的应用[J].中医正骨,2013,25(12):31.
　Li Guoliang*,Han Guangpu,Yan Guoqiang,et al.Clinical application of HONGHUAHUAYU decoctions steaming combined with sinew adjusting manipulation in the postoperative rehabilitation of total knee arthroplasty in patients with knee osteoarthritis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2013,25(10):31.
[11]樊庆阳,任凯晶.定制3D打印切模辅助全膝关节置换术治疗 膝骨关节炎合并股骨干骨折畸形愈合[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):37.
[12]李翰林,童培建.利福平联合用药配合保留假体清创治疗 人工关节置换术后早期感染及低毒性感染[J].中医正骨,2015,27(09):56.
[13]刘晓雅,孙永强,刘国杰.主动快速康复锻炼对全膝关节置换术后关节活动度的影响[J].中医正骨,2015,27(09):73.
[14]张维平,康两期,陈卫,等.全髋关节置换术围手术期隐性失血的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):61.
[15]宋兵华,孙俊英,倪增良,等.全膝关节置换术前CT测量股骨后髁角的临床意义[J].中医正骨,2015,27(07):38.
[16]王金良,孙京涛,李玲,等.骨水泥联合螺钉修复全膝关节置换术中 胫骨平台内侧骨缺损[J].中医正骨,2015,27(12):55.
[17]徐伟锋,叶健,吴连国.强骨饮对骨质疏松性股骨颈骨折患者全髋关节置换术后 血清骨代谢生化指标和骨密度的影响[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):12.
　XU Weifeng,YE Jian,WU Lianguo.Effect of Qianggu Yin(强骨饮,QGY)on serum bone metabolism indexes and bone density after total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoporotic femoral neck fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(10):12.
[18]张荣,王健.人工全膝关节置换术的围手术期心理护理[J].中医正骨,2015,27(05):77.
[19]齐志远,陈秀民,王在斌,等.桃红四物加黄芪汤预防人工髋膝关节置换术后 下肢深静脉血栓形成[J].中医正骨,2015,27(03):71.
[20]陆吴超,季卫锋,马镇川.关节镜下清创后持续灌洗联合中药口服治疗 全膝关节置换术后急性期感染[J].中医正骨,2015,27(01):51.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:河南省医学科技攻关计划项目(LHGJ20210791)
通讯作者:王少华 E-mail:wangshaohua1719@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01