[1]杨贺杰,张亮,邵荣学,等.球囊扩张复位外固定支架固定与切开复位锁定加压钢板内固定治疗骨质疏松性桡骨远端C型骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2019,31(09):14-19.
　YANG Hejie,ZHANG Liang,SHAO Rongxue,et al.A comparative study of balloon dilation reduction and frame external fixation versus open reduction and locking compression plate internal fixation for treatment of osteoporotic type-C fractures of distal radius[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2019,31(09):14-19.
点击复制

球囊扩张复位外固定支架固定与切开复位锁定加压钢板内固定治疗骨质疏松性桡骨远端C型骨折的对比研究()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第31卷
期数:
2019年09期
页码:
14-19
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2019-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A comparative study of balloon dilation reduction and frame external fixation versus open reduction and locking compression plate internal fixation for treatment of osteoporotic type-C fractures of distal radius
作者:
杨贺杰; 张亮; 邵荣学; 乐军; 陈惠国; 周辉; 方宜宥
(杭州市中医院,浙江 杭州 310007)
Author(s):
YANG Hejie; ZHANG Liang; SHAO Rongxue; LE Jun; CHEN Huiguo; ZHOU Hui; FANG Yiyou
Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Hangzhou 310007,Zhejiang,China
关键词:
桡骨骨折;  骨质疏松;  球囊扩张术;  临床试验
Keywords:
radius fracture;  osteoporosis;  balloon dilation;  clinical trial
摘要:
目的:比较球囊扩张复位外固定支架固定与切开复位锁定加压钢板内固定治疗骨质疏松性桡骨远端C型骨折的临床疗效和安全性。方法:2015年1月至2017年6月收治40例骨质疏松性桡骨远端C型骨折患者,随机分为2组,每组20例。球囊复位组采用球囊扩张复位联合外固定支架固定治疗,切开复位组采用切开复位锁定加压钢板内固定治疗。观察骨折愈合情况,记录治疗及随访期间的并发症发生情况。测定患者的握力恢复情况,按照改良Lidstrom量表评定骨折复位情况,以Gartland-Werley评分系统评定腕关节功能。结果:2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量比较,组间差异均无统计学意义[(55.00±6.37)min,(52.00±6.20)min,t=0.231,P=0.814;(32.00±5.44)mL,(40.00±11.68)mL,t=0.869,P=0.092]。所有患者均获得随访,随访时间12～25个月,中位数14个月。所有骨折均愈合。球囊扩张组未出现钉道感染、固定针松动、医源性骨折、骨水泥渗漏等并发症; 切开复位组未发生切口感染、正中神经损伤及肌腱断裂等并发症。术后3个月时,2组患者的桡骨高度、掌倾角、尺偏角、握力、掌屈活动度、桡偏活动度、尺偏活动度、旋前活动度、旋后活动度及Gartland-Werley评分比较,组间差异均无统计学意义[桡骨高度:(11.13±2.17)mm,(10.82±2.61)mm,t=0.675,P=0.107; 掌倾角:11.14°±2.26°,11.64°±1.86°,t=0.275,P=0.394; 尺偏角:22.36°±3.01°,22.96°±2.89°,t=0.231,P=0.579; 握力:(4.83±1.81)kg,(5.11±1.44)kg,t=0.493,P=0.152; 掌屈活动度:39.05°±9.67°,36.91°±8.03°,t=0.871,P=0.081; 桡偏活动度:15.37°±4.43°,14.61°±3.93°,t=0.392,P=0.267; 尺偏活动度:24.69°±5.84°,25.36°±5.17°,t=0.383,P=0.283; 旋前活动度:63.35°±9.19°,66.47°±9.32°,t=0.862,P=0.085; 旋后活动度:60.36°±8.58°,60.85°±7.81°,t=0.254,P=0.510; Gartland-Werley评分:(5.98±2.71)分,(5.13±2.26)分,t=0.431,P=0.218]; 球囊复位组的关节面台阶和腕关节背伸活动度均小于切开复位组[(0.84±0.67)mm,(1.38±1.14)mm,t=4.812,P=0.007; 29.11°±7.71°,38.36°±9.17°,t=5.374,P=0.006]。术后12个月时,2组患者的掌倾角、尺偏角、握力、掌屈活动度、背伸活动度、桡偏活动度及旋前活动度比较,组间差异均无统计学意义[掌倾角:11.26°±1.17°,11.58°±1.32°,t=0.224,P=0.629; 尺偏角:22.17°±2.69°,22.86°±2.13°,t=0.275,P=0.394; 握力:(8.42±1.88)kg,(8.51±1.52)kg,t=0.195,P=0.861; 掌屈活动度:45.68°±4.91°,43.71°±3.73°,t=0.796,P=0.936; 背伸活动度:50.37°±9.03°,50.84°±9.95°,t=0.210,P=0.725; 桡偏活动度:18.41°±5.17°,19.10°±4.36°,t=0.372,P=0.306; 旋前活动度:70.70°±8.91°,71.36±°7.36°,t=0.492,P=0.152]; 球囊复位组的桡骨高度高于切开复位组[(10.80±1.74)mm,(9.31±2.73)mm,t=3.930,P=0.009],关节面台阶低于切开复位组[(0.65±0.32)mm,(1.25±0.93)mm,t=5.287,P=0.006],尺偏活动度和旋后活动度均大于切开复位组(31.54°±4.39°,27.14°±6.07°,t=0.383,P=0.013; 73.18°±8.25°,66.73°±7.71°,t=5.871,P=0.005),Gartland-Werley评分低于切开复位组[(1.58±1.11)分,(2.87±1.76)分,t=4.178,P=0.009]。结论:采用球囊扩张复位外固定支架固定治疗骨质疏松性桡骨远端C型骨折,能有效恢复桡骨远端关节面平整,患者腕关节功能恢复好,安全性高,中期疗效优于切开复位锁定加压钢板内固定治疗。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical curative effects and safety of balloon dilation reduction and frame external fixation versus open reduction and locking compression plate internal fixation in treatment of osteoporotic type-C fractures of distal radius.Methods:Forty patients with osteoporotic type-C fractures of distal radius were recruited from January 2015 to June 2017,and were randomly divided into balloon reduction group and open reduction group,20 cases in each group.The patients in balloon reduction group were treated with balloon dilation reduction and frame external fixation,while the patients in open reduction group were treated with open reduction and locking compression plate internal fixation.The fracture healing was observed,and the complication incidences were recorded during the treatment and follow-up period.The grip strengths of patients in the 2 groups were measured,and the fracture reduction and wrist joint function were evaluated according to modified Lidstrom scale and Gartland-Werley scoring system respectively.Results:There was no statistical difference in operative time and intraoperative blood loss between the 2 groups(55.00+/-6.37 vs 52.00+/-6.20 minutes,t=0.231,P=0.814; 32.00+/-5.44 vs 40.00+/-11.68 mL,t=0.869,P=0.092).All patients in the 2 groups were followed up for 12-25 months with a median of 14 months,and all fractures healed in the 2 groups.No complications such as pin-track infection,pin loosening,iatrogenic fracture and bone cement leakage were found in balloon reduction group; while no complications such as incision infection,median nerve injury and tendon rupture were found in open reduction group.There was no statistical difference in radial height,volar tilt angle,radial inclination angle,grip strength,range of motions(ROM)of palmar flexion,radial deviation,ulnar deviation,pronation and supination of wrist and Gartland-Werley scores between the 2 groups at 3 months after the surgery(11.13+/-2.17 vs 10.82+/-2.61 mm,t=0.675,P=0.107; 11.14+/-2.26 vs 11.64+/-1.86 degrees,t=0.275,P=0.394; 22.36+/-3.01 vs 22.96+/-2.89 degrees,t=0.231,P=0.579; 4.83+/-1.81 vs 5.11+/-1.44 kg,t=0.493,P=0.152; 39.05+/-9.67 vs 36.91+/-8.03 degrees,t=0.871,P=0.081; 15.37+/-4.43 vs 14.61+/-3.93 degrees,t=0.392,P=0.267; 24.69+/-5.84 vs 25.36+/-5.17 degrees,t=0.383,P=0.283; 63.35+/-9.19 vs 66.47+/-9.32 degrees,t=0.862,P=0.085; 60.36+/-8.58 vs 60.85+/-7.81 degrees,t=0.254,P=0.510; 5.98+/-2.71 vs 5.13+/-2.26 points,t=0.431,P=0.218).The joint surface step heights and dorsiflexion ROM of wrist were lower in balloon reduction group compared to open reduction group(0.84+/-0.67 vs 1.38+/-1.14 mm,t=4.812,P=0.007; 29.11+/-7.71 vs 38.36+/-9.17 degrees,t=5.374,P=0.006).There was no statistical difference in volar tilt angles,radial inclination angles,grip strengths and ROMs of palmar flexion,dorsiflexion,radial deviation and pronation between the 2 groups at 12 months after the surgery(11.26+/-1.17 vs 11.58+/-1.32 degrees,t=0.224,P=0.629; 22.17+/-2.69 vs 22.86+/-2.13 degrees,t=0.275,P=0.394; 8.42+/-1.88 vs 8.51+/-1.52 kg,t=0.195,P=0.861; 45.68+/-4.91 vs 43.71+/-3.73 degrees,t=0.796,P=0.936; 50.37+/-9.03 vs 50.84+/-9.95 degrees,t=0.210,P=0.725; 18.41+/-5.17 vs 19.10+/-4.36 degrees,t=0.372,P=0.306; 70.70+/-8.91 vs 71.36+/-7.36 degrees,t=0.492,P=0.152).The radial heights were higher,and the joint surface step heights were lower,and the ROM of ulnar deviation and supination were greater,and the Gartland-Werley scores were lower in balloon reduction group compared to open reduction group(10.80+/-1.74 vs 9.31+/-2.73 mm,t=3.930,P=0.009; 0.65+/-0.32 vs 1.25+/-0.93 mm,t=5.287,P=0.006; 31.54+/-4.39 vs 27.14+/-6.07 degrees,t=0.383,P=0.013; 73.18+/-8.25 vs 66.73+/-7.71 degrees,t=5.871,P=0.005; 1.58+/-1.11 vs 2.87+/-1.76 points,t=4.178,P=0.009).Conclusion:The combination therapy of balloon dilation reduction and frame external fixation can effectively restore the smoothness of articular surface of distal radius,and patients can obtain good wrist joint function and high safety,and its mid-term curative effect is better than that of combination therapy of open reduction and locking compression plate internal fixation in treatment of osteoporotic type-C fractures of distal radius.

参考文献/References:

[1] JUNG H J,PARK H Y,KIM J S,et al.Bone mineral density and prevalence of osteoporosis in postmenopausal korean women with low-energy distal radius fractures[J].J Korean Med Sci,2016,31(6):972-975.
[2] 郑博,蒋涛,黄佳涌,等.我国中老年脆性髋部骨折及桡骨远端骨折骨质疏松诊断标准与WHO诊断标准的比较分析[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2018,24(10):1299-1304.
[3] PLOEGMAKERS J J,MADER K,PENNIG D,et al.Four distal radial fracture classification systems tested amongst a large panel of dutch trauma surgeons[J].Injury,2007,38(11):1268-1272.
[4] 王古衡,谢仁国,潘张军,等.不同桡骨远端骨折分型方法中骨折类型与预后功能的关系分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2016,18(1):74-78.
[5] LOUER C R,BOONE S L,GUTHRIE A K,et al.Postural stability in older adults with a distal radial fracture[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2016,98(14):1176-1182.
[6] 张沉冰,乔静敏,高金宝,等.不同钢板内固定治疗老年骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折的效果对比[J].河北医科大学学报,2017,38(9):1083-1086.
[7] IIDA K,SUDO A,ISHIGURO S.Clinical and radiological results of calcium phosphate cement-assisted balloon osteoplasty for Colles' fractures in osteoporotic senile female patients[J].J Orthop Sci,2010,15(2):204-209.
[8] 中华医学会.临床诊疗指南·骨科分册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:21.
[9] 中国老年学学会骨质疏松委员会骨质疏松症诊断标准学科组.中国人骨质疏松症诊断标准专家共识(第三稿·2014版)[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2014,20(9):1007-1010.
[10] MULDERS M A,RIKLI D,GOSLINGS J C,et al.Classification and treatment of distal radius fractures:a survey among orthopaedic trauma surgeons and residents[J].Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg,2017,43(2):239-248.
[11] GARTLAND J J Jr,WERLEY C W.Evaluation of healed Colles' fractures[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1951,33-A(4):895-907.
[12] 张勇,阿良,张乐,等.固定方式对C型桡骨远端骨折术后长度维持的影响[J].中国医科大学学报,2016,45(3):246-248.
[13] ALTER T H,ILYAS A M.omplications associated with volar locking plate fixation of distal radial fractures[J].JBJS Rev,2018,6(10):e7.
[14] PATERSON P,WOLFE S,PALMER A K.Technique for insertion of the conventus cage for distal radial fracture fixation[J].JBJS Essent Surg Tech,2017,7(3):e24.
[15] 王正明,鲍丰,张根福,等.锁定加压钢板治疗老年桡骨远端不稳定型骨折[J].中医正骨,2009,21(12):29-30.
[16] KIYOKAWA K.Combination of solid-type artificial bone(ceratite)and paste-type artificial bone(biopex)to treat massive defects in cranial bone[J].International Abstracts Of Plastic And Reconstructive Surgery,2004,114(3):53e-54e.
[17] NANDYALA S V,GILADI A M,PARKER A M,et al.Comparison of direct perioperative costs in treatment of unstable distal radial fractures:open reduction and internal fixation versus closed reduction and percutaneous pinning[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2018,100(9):786-792.

相似文献/References:

[1]张容超,徐卫国,万春友,等.手法整复小夹板固定治疗桡骨远端骨折168例[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):61.
[2]刘磊,万春友,全先辉,等.锁定钢板内固定结合肱骨头植骨重建治疗 肱骨近端Neer三、四部分骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):52.
[3]徐善强,陈星,张兴平,等.功能锻炼对桡骨远端骨折拆除石膏外固定后 腕关节康复的影响[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):58.
[4]赵萌,陈云丰,周祖忠.切开复位T形钢板联合空心钉内固定治疗 MasonⅢ型桡骨头骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(07):58.
[5]刘昕,邓志强,叶家军.撬拨复位弹性髓内钉固定治疗JudetⅣ型儿童桡骨颈骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(12):65.
[6]徐伟锋,叶健,吴连国.强骨饮对骨质疏松性股骨颈骨折患者全髋关节置换术后 血清骨代谢生化指标和骨密度的影响[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):12.
　XU Weifeng,YE Jian,WU Lianguo.Effect of Qianggu Yin(强骨饮,QGY)on serum bone metabolism indexes and bone density after total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoporotic femoral neck fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(09):12.
[7]刘欣,刘文刚,吴淮,等.3种方法治疗C型桡骨远端骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(05):12.
　LIU Xin,LIU Wengang,WU Huai,et al.A comparative study of three methods for treatment of type C distal radius fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(09):12.
[8]郭世明,石玲玲,郭志民,等.手法复位石膏外固定和切开复位钢板内固定治疗 骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折的比较研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):15.
　GUO Shiming,SHI Lingling,GUO Zhimin,et al.A comparative study of manual reduction and plaster external fixation versus open reduction and plate internal fixation for treatment of osteoporotic distal radius fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(09):15.
[9]龚江浩.股骨近端防旋髓内钉联合抗骨质疏松药物治疗 不稳定型老年股骨转子间骨折的临床观察[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):29.
　GONG Jianghao.A combination therapy of proximal femoral nail antirotation and anti-osteoporotic drugs for the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(09):29.
[10]明晓锋,陈登山,张晓强.闭合复位弹性髓内钉固定和经皮克氏针撬拨复位固定 治疗儿童O'BrienⅡ、Ⅲ型桡骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中医正骨,2016,28(02):15.
　MING Xiaofeng,CHEN Dengshan,ZHANG Xiaoqiang.A clinical comparison of closed reduction and internal fixation with elastic intramedullary nails versus percutaneous leverage reduction and internal fixation with Kirschner wire for treatment of O'Brien typeⅡandⅢradial neck fractures in children[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(09):15.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:杭州市科技发展计划项目(20150733Q59) 通讯作者:杨贺杰 E-mail:y17416975@163.com(收稿日期:2018-11-19 本文编辑:李晓乐)
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-09-15