[1]林光锚,刘良乐,叶丽洁,等.综合康复计划在肘部骨折术后康复中的应用[J].中医正骨,2014,26(04):26-28.
 Lin Guangmao*,Liu Liangle,Ye Lijie,et al.Application of comprehensive rehabilitation program to postoperative rehabilitation of elbow fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2014,26(04):26-28.
点击复制

综合康复计划在肘部骨折术后康复中的应用()
分享到:

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第26卷
期数:
2014年04期
页码:
26-28
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2014-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of comprehensive rehabilitation program to postoperative rehabilitation of elbow fractures
作者:
林光锚刘良乐叶丽洁戴鸣海王伟良
温州医科大学附属第三医院,浙江 瑞安 325200
Author(s):
Lin Guangmao*Liu LiangleYe LijieDai MinghaiWang Weiliang.*
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University,Ruian 325200,Zhejiang,China
关键词:
肘关节 骨折 手术后并发症 肘关节僵硬 中医康复 综合疗法
Keywords:
Elbow joint Fracturesbone Postoperative complications Elbow joint rigidity Rehabilitation(TCM) Combined modality therapy
摘要:
目的:探讨综合康复计划在肘部骨折术后康复中的应用效果。方法:将72例肘部骨折术后患者随机分为2组,观察组35例和对照组37例。观察组采用综合康复计划治疗,对照组采用传统康复锻炼法治疗。分别于术后2周、4周和12周,采用Mayo评分法评价2组患者的肘关节功能。同时,观察对比2组患者肘关节僵硬的发生率。结果:①肘关节功能。不同时间点间肘关节功能Mayo评分的差异有统计学意义(F=143.693,P=0.000); 2组患者肘关节功能Mayo评分的组间差异总体上有统计学意义(t=19.924,P=0.000),进一步比较显示术后2周、4周、12周观察组的肘关节功能Mayo评分均高于对照组[(48.52±7.78)分,(36.68±5.28)分,t=24.025,P=0.000;(71.92±6.57)分,(55.78±4.72)分,t=25.234,P=0.000;(88.65±9.47)分,(61.36±7.76)分,t=28.338,P=0.000]; 时间因素与分组因素存在交互效应(F=21.863,P=0.000)。②肘关节僵硬发生率。观察组1例患者术后出现肘关节僵硬而影响日常生活,需返院行关节镜下松解术; 对照组15例患者术后出现肘关节僵硬而影响日常生活,需返院行黏连松解术。观察组术后肘关节僵硬的发生率低于对照组(χ2=14.770,P=0.000)。结论:在肘部骨折术后康复中采用综合康复计划,可以预防肘关节僵硬的发生,改善肘关节功能,康复效果确切,值得临床推广应用。
Abstract:
Objective:To observe the effect of comprehensive rehabilitation program on postoperative rehabilitation of elbow fractures.Methods:Seventy-two patients with elbow fractures were randomly divided into 2 groups after the surgery,35 cases in observation group were treated with comprehensive rehabilitation,while 37 cases in control group were treated with traditional rehabilitation exercise.The function of elbow joint were evaluated by using Mayo Elbow Performance Score(MEPS)at 2,4 and 12 weeks after the surgery.Meanwhile,the incidence of elbow joint stiffness were observed and compared between the 2 groups.Results:There was statistical difference in MEPS between different time points(F=143.693,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in the MEPS between the 2 groups(t=19.924,P=0.000),and further comparison indicated that the MEPS of observation group were higher than those of control group 2,4 and 12 weeks after the surgery(48.52+/-7.78 vs 36.68+/-5.28 points,t=24.025,P=0.000; 71.92+/-6.57 vs 55.78+/-4.72 points,t=25.234,P=0.000; 88.65+/-9.47 vs 61.36+/-7.76 points,t=28.338,P=0.000).There was interaction effect between time factor and grouping factor(F=21.863,P=0.000).Postoperative elbow joint stiffness were found in one patient(observation group)and 15 patients(control group),whose daily life were affected,and then the patients were treated with arthroscopic lysis.The incidence of postoperative elbow joint stiffness of observation group was lower than that of the control group(χ2=14.770,P=0.000).Conclusion:The application of comprehensive rehabilitation program can prevent the elbow joint stiffness and improve the elbow joint function after the surgery for elbow fractures,and it is worth popularizing in clinic for its reliable rehabilitative effect.

参考文献/References:

[1] 蒋协远,公茂琪,查晔军.肘关节外科新进展[J].中医正骨,2012,24(4):3-11.
[2] Lindenhovius AL,Jupiter JB.The posttraumatic stiff elbow:a review of the literature[J].J Hand Surg Am,2007,32(10):1605-1623.
[3] Morrey BF,Bryan RS,Dobyns JH,et al.Total elbow arthroplasty.A five-year experience at the Mayo Clinic[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1981,63(7):1050-1063.
[4] 吴乐燕,刘春玲,陈梅娇,等.骨科专职康复护士工作模式的建立和实践[J].护理学报,2007,14(8):37.
[5] 李莹,蒋协远,张力丹,等.肘关节僵硬的原因分析与切开松解手术治疗[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2007,9(10):940-943.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:浙江省中医药科学研究基金项目(2010ZB140), 浙江省瑞安科技基金资助项目(201102056) 通讯作者:刘良乐 E-mail:liuliangle@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01