[1]周成洪,龙亨国,沈万祥,等.胸腰椎爆裂骨折伴椎间盘损伤形态学分型的临床应用研究[J].中医正骨,2011,23(11):10-13.
 ZHOU Cheng-hong*,LONG Heng-guo,SHEN Wan-xiang,et al.Research of clinical application of morphological typing of thoracolumbar burst-fracture with intervertebral disc injury[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2011,23(11):10-13.
点击复制

胸腰椎爆裂骨折伴椎间盘损伤形态学分型的临床应用研究()
分享到:

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第23卷
期数:
2011年11期
页码:
10-13
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2011-11-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research of clinical application of morphological typing of thoracolumbar burst-fracture with intervertebral disc injury
作者:
周成洪龙亨国沈万祥黄伟洪文跃刘玖行虞杰
浙江省舟山市中医骨伤联合医院,浙江 舟山 316000
Author(s):
ZHOU Cheng-hong*LONG Heng-guoSHEN Wan-xianget al.*
Zhoushan TCM and Orthopedic Union Hospital,Zhoushan 316000,Zhejiang,China
关键词:
脊椎骨折 胸椎 腰椎 椎间盘 手术方式
Keywords:
Spinal fractures Thoracic vertebrae Lumbar vertebrae Intervertebral disk Surgical approach
摘要:
目的:探讨胸腰椎爆裂骨折伴椎间盘损伤患者,根据骨折和椎间盘损伤程度不同分型采用不同植骨融合手术方式的疗效。方法:回顾分析我院80例胸腰椎爆裂骨折伴椎间盘损伤患者,根据胸腰椎爆裂骨折Denis分型和椎间盘损伤Oner分型进行分型分组并采用不同手术方式:A组28例,其中A/Ⅰ型2例、A/Ⅱ型5例、A/Ⅲ型3例、B/Ⅱ型3例、B/Ⅲ型2例、C/Ⅲ型9例、E/Ⅱ型3例、E/Ⅲ型1例,采用单纯后路内固定伤椎椎体内植骨术; B组26例,其中A/Ⅳ型3例、A/Ⅴ型4例、B/Ⅳ型5例、B/Ⅴ型3例、C/Ⅳ型4例、E/Ⅴ型4例,后路内固定伤椎椎体内植骨加后路植骨融合术; C组14例,其中D/Ⅰ型2例、D/Ⅱ型7例、D/Ⅲ型5,采用后路内固定伤椎椎体内植骨加后路植骨融合术; D组12例,其中D/Ⅳ型7例、D/Ⅴ型5例,采用后路内固定伤椎椎体内植骨加椎间植骨融合术。术后通过观察伤椎高度,Cobbs角丢失,三维CT平扫评价植骨愈合情况。结果:四组患者术后均获随访,随访时间18~36个月,平均24.4个月,所有患者影像学复查未见内固定松动、断裂,无假关节形成及后凸畸形的发生,椎体的高度和曲度无明显丢失,三维CT显示术后3个月以上植骨界面完全融合。结论:术前对胸腰椎爆裂骨折类型及椎间盘损伤情况的综合评估,制定有效的固定融合手术方法,可有效防止内固定失败,复位丢失和后凸畸形,是治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折伴椎间盘损伤的有效方法。
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate each operational efficacy after the patients suffered from thoracolumbar burst-fracture with intervertebral disc injury were treated with different surgical approach to graft and fuse bone by typing them according to the degree of fracture and injury of intervertebral disc.Methods:To type and group the 80 patients suffered from thoracolumbar burst-fracture with intervertebral disc injury according to Denis type of thoracolumbar burst-fracture and Oner type of intervertebral disc injury,and to adopt different surgical approach:Group A,28 cases,including 2 cases A/I,5 cases A/II,3 cases A/III,B/III 2 cases,C/III 9 cases,E/II 3 cases,E/III 1cases,o be done the operations of fixing the ill intervertebral bodys internally and grafting bone inside it by the pure posterior approach; Group B,26 cases,including A/IV 3 cases,A/V 4cases,B/IV 5 cases,B/V 3 cases,C/IV 4 cases,E/V 4 cases,to be done the operations of fixing the ill intervertebral bodys internally and grafting and fusing bone by the posterior approach; Group C,14 cases,including D/I 2 cases,D/II 7 cases,D/III 5 cases,to be done the operations of fixing the ill intervertebral bodys internally and grafting and fusing bone by the posterior approach; Group D,12 cases,including D/IV 7 cases,D/V 5 cases,to be done the operations of fixing the ill intervertebral bodys and grafting bone inside it,and grafting and fusing bone between the intervertebral body by the posterior approach.To evaluate the condition of bone graft healing by observing the ill vertebral height,lost of Cobbs horns,three-dimensional CT flat esau after operations.Results:All the 4 groups of cases were followed up for 18-36months,average 24.4 months,no internal fixation loosening or fracture,no occurrence of pseudarthrosis and after protrusion deformity,no obvious lost of the height and curvature of vertebral body were seen in their imaging review.Three-dimensional CT after 3 months showed bone graft interface merged fully.Conclusion:To evaluate comprehensively the types of thoracolumbar burst-fracture and the condition of intervertebral disc injury before operations,then make the efficient surgical approach of fixing and fusing; which can efficiently prevent the failure of internal fixation,reset lost and after prodrusion deformity.It is efficient approach to treat thoracolumbar burst fracture with intervertebral disc injury.

参考文献/References:

[1] Denis F.The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal in-juries[J].Spine,1983,8:817-831.
[2] Oner FC,van der Rijt RR,Ramos,LM,et al.Changes in the disc space after fractures of the thoracolumbar spine[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Br),1998,80(5):833-839.
[3] Oner FC,van Gils AP,Dhert WJ,et al.MRI findings of thoracolumbar spine fractures:a categorisation based on MRI examinations of 100 fractures[J].Skeletal Radiol,1999,28(8):433.
[4] 郝勇,周跃,任先军,等.严重胸腰椎骨折合并椎间盘损伤的手术治疗[J].骨与关节损伤杂志,2003,18(1):14.
[5] Lin RM,Panjabi MM,Oxland TR.Functional Radiographs of Acute Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures[J].Spine,1993,18(16):2431-2437.
[6] Aiki H,Ohwada O,Kobayashi H,et al.Adjacent segmentstenosis after lumbar fusion requiring second operation[J].J Orthop Sci,2005,10(5):490-495.
[7] Schulte TL,Leistra F,Bullmann V,et al.Disc height reduction in adjacent segments and clinical outcome 10 years after lumbar 360 degrees fusion[J].Eur Spine J,2007,16(12):2152-2158.
[8] Miyakoshi N,Abe E,Shimada Y,et al,Anterior decompression with single segmental spinal interbody fusion for lumber burst fracture[J].Spine,1999,24(1):67.
[9] Jeanneret B,Ho PK,Magerl F1Burst-shear flexion-distraction injuries of the lumber spine[J].Spinal Disord,1993,6(6):473–476.
[10] 王华东,史亚民,李利.经椎弓椎体内植骨在胸腰椎新鲜爆裂骨折治疗中的应用[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2003,11(2):88-90.
[11] 阮狄克.脊柱内固定后植骨融合的重要性[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2002,12(5):326.
[12] 党晓谦,王坤正,王春生,等.AF系统治疗胸腰椎骨折失败原因分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2002,5:439-441.
[13] 张英泽,李宝俊,张奇,等.胸腰椎骨折椎弓根内固定术后失败原因探讨[J].中华骨科杂志,2009,29(1):7-11.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01