[1]张磊,熊鹿静,李炳坤,等.电针足少阳经穴在膝关节前交叉韧带损伤术后康复中的应用价值[J].中医正骨,2022,34(06):9-16.
　ZHANG Lei,XIONG Lujing,LI Bingkun,et al.Application value of electroacupuncture at points of foot Shaoyang meridian in postoperative rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament injuries[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2022,34(06):9-16.
点击复制

电针足少阳经穴在膝关节前交叉韧带损伤术后康复中的应用价值()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第34卷
期数:
2022年06期
页码:
9-16
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2022-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application value of electroacupuncture at points of foot Shaoyang meridian in postoperative rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament injuries
作者:
张磊1; 熊鹿静2; 李炳坤1; 唐小高1; 喻林1; 周鑫1
(1.西南医科大学附属中医医院,四川 泸州 646000; 2.西南医科大学临床医学院,四川 泸州 646000)
Author(s):
ZHANG Lei1; XIONG Lujing2; LI Bingkun1; TANG Xiaogao1; YU Lin1; ZHOU Xin1
1.The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Southwest Medical University,Luzhou 646000,Sichuan,China 2.The Clinical Medical College of Southwest Medical University,Luzhou 646000,Sichuan,China
关键词:
膝损伤;  前交叉韧带;  电针;  胆经;  本体感觉;  穴; 悬钟;  穴; 阳陵泉;  穴; 膝阳关;  穴; 环跳
Keywords:
knee injuries;  anterior cruciate ligament;  electroacupuncture;  gallbladder meridian;  proprioception;  Point GB39(Xuanzhong);  Point GB34(Yanglingquan);  Point GB33(Xiyangguan);  Point GB30(Huantiao)
摘要:
目的:探讨电针足少阳经穴在膝关节前交叉韧带(anterior cruciate ligament,ACL)损伤术后康复中的应用价值。方法:纳入膝关节ACL部分损伤患者50例。由同一组医生行膝关节镜下腓骨长肌腱单束ACL重建术,术后第2天开始电针患侧足少阳经的悬钟、阳陵泉、膝阳关、环跳4穴。每天1次,连续治疗6 d为1个疗程,2个疗程间隔1 d,共治疗6个疗程。比较治疗前及治疗开始后2周、4周、6周时双侧膝关节的被动活动察觉阈值(threshold to detection of passive motion,TTDPM)、关节位置觉(joint position sense,JPS)以及体感诱发电位(somatosensory evoked potentials,SEPs)P40起始潜伏期、波幅和运动神经传导速度(motor nerve conduction velocity,MCV)潜伏期、波幅。结果:①TTDPM。时间因素和分组因素存在交互效应(F=312.586,P=0.000)。双侧膝关节TTDPM总体比较,差异有统计学意义,即存在分组效应(F=406.942,P=0.000)。治疗前后不同时间点间膝关节TTDPM的差异有统计学意义,即存在时间效应(F=334.592,P=0.000)。患侧膝关节TTDPM随时间呈下降趋势(3.57°±0.53°,2.61°±0.47°,2.21°±0.39°,1.92°±0.28°,F=349.201,P=0.000),健侧随时间无明显变化(1.44°±0.10°,1.42°±0.12°,1.40°±0.10°,1.41°±0.07°,F=2.772,P=0.052)。治疗前后各时间点,患侧膝关节TTDPM均较健侧高(t=29.528,P=0.000; t=21.642,P=0.000; t=16.658,P=0.000; t=13.642,P=0.000)。②JPS。时间因素和分组因素存在交互效应(F=201.439,P=0.000)。双侧膝关节JPS总体比较,差异有统计学意义,即存在分组效应(F=532.141,P=0.000)。治疗前后不同时间点间膝关节JPS的差异有统计学意义,即存在时间效应(F=209.843,P=0.000)。患侧膝关节JPS随时间呈改善趋势(4.31°±0.71°,3.62°±0.65°,3.23°±0.60°,2.64°±0.54°,F=211.272,P=0.000),健侧随时间无明显变化(1.49°±0.13°,1.47°±0.11°,1.48°±0.10°,1.47°±0.10°,F=1.333,P=0.277)。治疗前后各时间点,患侧膝关节JPS均较健侧差(t=28.782,P=0.000; t=23.278,P=0.000; t=20.698,P=0.000; t=15.864,P=0.000)。③SEPsP40起始潜伏期。时间因素和分组因素存在交互效应(F=740.633,P=0.000)。双侧膝关节SEPsP40起始潜伏期总体比较,差异有统计学意义,即存在分组效应(F=12 153.958,P=0.000)。治疗前后不同时间点间膝关节SEPsP40起始潜伏期的差异有统计学意义,即存在时间效应(F=817.474,P=0.000)。患侧膝关节SEPsP40起始潜伏期随时间呈缩短趋势[(49.23±1.95)ms,(43.87±1.81)ms,(38.33±1.91)ms,(34.68±1.39)ms,F=1 406.798,P=0.000],健侧随时间无明显变化[(30.78±0.92)ms,(30.42±1.15)ms,(30.41±0.98)ms,(30.39±1.10)ms,F=1.680,P=0.173]。治疗前后各时间点,患侧膝关节SEPsP40起始潜伏期均较健侧长(t=64.829,P=0.000; t=51.154,P=0.000; t=26.471,P=0.000; t=18.256,P=0.000)。④SEPsP40波幅。时间因素和分组因素存在交互效应(F=540.382,P=0.000)。双侧膝关节SEPsP40波幅总体比较,差异有统计学意义,即存在分组效应(F=1 309.833,P=0.000)。治疗前后不同时间点间膝关节SEPsP40波幅的差异有统计学意义,即存在时间效应(F=619.578,P=0.000)。患侧膝关节SEPsP40波幅随时间呈增高趋势[(1.36±0.10)mv,(1.67±0.11)mv,(1.83±0.10)mv,(1.97±0.09)mv,F=926.454,P=0.000],健侧随时间无明显变化[(2.27±0.08)mv,(2.29±0.09)mv,(2.28±0.06)mv,(2.29±0.07)mv,F=2.258,P=0.084]。治疗前后各时间点,患侧膝关节SEPsP40波幅均较健侧低(t=-69.500,P=0.000; t=-42.342,P=0.000; t=-30.748,P=0.000; t=-22.211,P=0.000)。⑤MCV潜伏期。时间因素和分组因素存在交互效应(F=647.733,P=0.000)。双侧膝关节MCV潜伏期总体比较,差异有统计学意义,即存在分组效应(F=828.428,P=0.000)。治疗前后不同时间点间膝关节MCV潜伏期的差异有统计学意义,即存在时间效应(F=673.718,P=0.000)。患侧膝关节MCV潜伏期随时间呈缩短趋势[(20.63±1.37)ms,(17.94±1.49)ms,(16.67±1.30)ms,(14.36±0.99)ms,F=866.063,P=0.000]; 健侧随时间无明显变化[(12.27±0.39)ms,(12.24±0.44)ms,(12.22±0.49)ms,(12.21±0.39)ms,F=0.282,P=0.839]。治疗前后各时间点,患侧膝关节MCV潜伏期均较健侧长
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the applied value of electroacupuncture(EA)at points of foot Shaoyang meridian in postoperative rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament(ACL)injuries.Methods:Fifty patients with partial ACL injuries were enrolled in the study,and they were treated with arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with single-bundle peroneus longus tendon by the same surgeons.The EA was performed at points of Xuanzhong(GB39),Yanglingquan(GB34),Xiyangguan(GB33)and Huantiao(GB30)at affected side from the postoperative day 2,once a day for consecutive 6 courses of treatment,6 days for each course with a 1-day rest-insertion between courses.The threshold to detection of passive motion(TTDPM),joint position sense(JPS),onset latency(OL)and amplitude of somatosensory evoked potentials(SEPs)P40 as well as latency and amplitude of motor nerve conduction velocity(MCV)were compared between affected knee and unaffected knee before the treatment and at 2,4 and 6 weeks after the beginning of the treatment respectively.Results:①There was interaction between time factor and group factor in knee TTDPM(F=312.586,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in TTDPM between affected knee and unaffected knee in general,in other words,there was group effect(F=406.942,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in TTDPM between different timepoints before and after the treatment,in other words,there was time effect(F=334.592,P=0.000).The TTDPM presented a downward trend over time in affected knee(3.57±0.53,2.61±0.47,2.21±0.39,1.92±0.28 degrees,F=349.201,P=0.000),whereas it displayed no evident change over time in unaffected knee(1.44±0.10,1.42±0.12,1.40±0.10,1.41±0.07 degrees,F=2.772,P=0.052).The TTDPM was higher in affected knee compared to unaffected knee at each timepoint before and after the treatment(t=29.528,P=0.000; t=21.642,P=0.000; t=16.658,P=0.000; t=13.642,P=0.000).②There was interaction between time factor and group factor in knee JPS(F=201.439,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in JPS between affected knee and unaffected knee in general,in other words,there was group effect(F=532.141,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in knee JPS between different timepoints before and after the treatment,in other words,there was time effect(F=209.843,P=0.000).The JPS presented an improving trend over time in affected knee(4.31±0.71,3.62±0.65,3.23±0.60,2.64±0.54 degrees,F=211.272,P=0.000),whereas it displayed no evident change over time in unaffected knee(1.49±0.13,1.47±0.11,1.48±0.10,1.47±0.10 degrees,F=1.333,P=0.277).The JPS was poorer in affected knee compared to unaffected knee at each timepoint before and after the treatment(t=28.782,P=0.000; t=23.278,P=0.000; t=20.698,P=0.000; t=15.864,P=0.000).③There was interaction between time factor and group factor in OL of SEPsP40(F=740.633,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in OL of SEPsP40 between affected knee and unaffected knee in general,in other words,there was group effect(F=12 153.958,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in OL of SEPsP40 of knee between different timepoints before and after the treatment,in other words,there was time effect(F=817.474,P=0.000).The OL of SEPsP40 presented a shortening trend over time in affected knee(49.23±1.95,43.87±1.81,38.33±1.91,34.68±1.39 ms,F=1 406.798,P=0.000),whereas it displayed no evident change over time in unaffected knee(30.78±0.92,30.42±1.15,30.41±0.98,30.39±1.10 ms,F=1.680,P=0.173).The OL of SEPsP40 was longer in affected knee compared to unaffected knee at each timepoint before and after the treatment(t=64.829,P=0.000; t=51.154,P=0.000; t=26.471,P=0.000; t=18.256,P=0.000).④There was interaction between time factor and group factor in amplitude of SEPsP40(F=540.382,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in amplitude of SEPsP40 between affected knee and unaffected knee in general,in other words,there was group effect(F=1 309.833,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in amplitude of SEPsP40 of knee between different timepoints before and after the treatment,in other words,there was time effect(F=619.578,P=0.000).The amplitude of SEPsP40 presented an increasing trend over time in affected knee(1.36±0.10,1.67±0.11,1.83±0.10,1.97±0.09 mv,F=926.454,P=0.000),whereas it displayed no evident change over time in unaffected knee(2.27±0.08,2.29±0.09,2.28±0.06,2.29±0.07 mv,F=2.258,P=0.084).The amplitude of SEPsP40 was lower in affected knee compared to unaffected knee at each timepoint before and after the treatment(t=-69.500,P=0.000; t=-42.342,P=0.000; t=-30.748,P=0.000; t=-22.211,P=0.000).⑤There was interaction between time factor and group factor in latency of MCV(F=647.733,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in latency of MCV between affected knee and unaffected knee in general,in other words,there was group effect(F=828.428,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in latency of MCV of knee between different timepoints before and after the treatment,in other words,there was time effect(F=673.718,P=0.000).The latency of MCV presented a shortening trend over time in affected knee(20.63±1.37,17.94±1.49,16.67±1.30,14.36±0.99 ms,F=866.063,P=0.000),whereas it displayed no evident change over time in unaffected knee(12.27±0.39,12.24±0.44,12.22±0.49,12.21±0.39 ms,F=0.282,P=0.839).The latency of MCV was longer in affected knee compared to unaffected knee at each timepoint before and after the treatment(t=44.622,P=0.000; t=26.899,P=0.000; t=27.612,P=0.000; t=15.341,P=0.000).⑥There was interaction between time factor and group factor in amplitude of MCV(F=2 208.831,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in amplitude of MCV between affected knee and unaffected knee in general,in other words,there was group effect(F=3 582.216,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in amplitude of MCV of knee between different timepoints before and after the treatment,in other words,there was time effect(F=2 362.807,P=0.000).The amplitude of MCV presented an increasing trend over time in affected knee(3.76±0.10,4.26±0.13,4.58±0.11,4.78±0.09 mv,F=4 397.711,P=0.000),whereas it displayed no evident change over time in unaffected knee(5.23±0.07,5.24±0.06,5.23±0.06,5.24±0.05 mv,F=2.144,P=0.098).The amplitude of MCV was lower in affected knee compared to unaffected knee at each timepoint before and after the treatment(t=-171.500,P=0.000; t=-63.024,P=0.000; t=-48.938,P=0.000; t=-40.251,P=0.000).Conclusion:EA at points of foot Shaoyang meridian can improve the knee proprioception to some extent in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction for partial ACL injuries,but the knee proprioception cann't be completely recovered in the short term after surgery.

参考文献/References:

[1] AWAN M J,RAHIM M S M,SALIM N,et al.Efficient detection of knee anterior cruciate ligament from magnetic resonance imaging using deep learning approach[J].Diagnostics(Basel),2021,11(1):105.
[2] LAI C C H,ARDERN C L,FELLER J A,et al.Eighty-three per cent of elite athletes return to preinjury sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:a systematic review with meta-analysis of return to sport rates, graft rupture rates and performance outcomes[J].Br J Sports Med,2018,52(2):128-138.
[3] ARDERN C L,EKÅS G R,GRINDEM H,et al.2018 International Olympic Committee consensus statement on prevention,diagnosis and management of paediatric anterior cruciate ligament(ACL)injuries[J].Br J Sports Med,2018,52(7):422-438.
[4] ZHANG L,QI J,ZENG Y,et al.Proprioceptive changes in bilateral knee joints following unilateral anterior cruciate ligament injury in cynomolgus monkeys[J].Med Sci Monit,2018,24:105-113.
[5] 高丕明,罗小兵,何栩,等.运动干预防治膝骨关节炎的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2014,26(9):70-74.
[6] 马燕红,程安龙,江澜,等.本体感觉训练在膝前交叉韧带重建术后康复中的应用[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2005,27(7):413-415.
[7] 潘小燕,王鸿度,岳荣超,等.电针足少阳经穴对去卵巢大鼠骨质疏松症骨组织OPG、RANKL及CBFα1mRNA表达的影响[J].中华中医药杂志,2017,32(11):5132-5134.
[8] 于波.《黄帝内经》“少阳主骨”学说探析[J].中医正骨,2020,32(8):39-42.
[9] 张磊,李义凯,祁冀,等.电针对食蟹猴单侧前交叉韧带损伤后本体感觉的影响[J].南方医科大学学报,2017,37(9):1171-1177.
[10] SADEGHI H,HAKIM M N,HAMID T A,et al.The effect of exergaming on knee proprioception in older men:a rand-omized controlled trial[J].Arch Gerontol Geriatr,2017,69:144-150.
[11] FERLINC A,FABIANI E,VELNAR T,et al.The importance and role of proprioception in the elderly:a short review[J].Mater Sociomed,2019,31(3):219-221.
[12] KIM H J,LEE J H,LEE D H.Proprioception in patients with anterior cruciate ligament tears:a meta-analysis comparing injured and uninjured limbs[J].Am J Sports Med,2017,45(12):2916-2922.
[13] 张太良,张磊,廉志明,等.关节镜下前交叉韧带重建保留残端与否干预膝关节本体感觉功能恢复的Meta分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2017,21(3):471-477.
[14] ZHANG L,ZENG Y,QI J,et al.Mechanism of activating the proprioceptive NT-3/TrkC signalling pathway by reverse intervention for the anterior cruciate ligament-hamstring reflex arc with electroacupuncture[J/OL].Biomed Res Int,2018[2020-10-01].https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29581981.
[15] NAGAI T,BATES N A,HEWETT T E.Effects of localized vibration on knee joint position sense in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J].Clin Biomech(Bristol,Avon),2018,55:40-44.
[16] XU J,ZHOU X,GUO X,et al.Effects of unilateral electro-acupuncture on bilateral proprioception in a unilateral an-terior cruciate ligament injury model[J].Med Sci Monit,2018,24:5473-5479.
[17] 王红旗,黄久勤.术后膝关节僵硬的本体感觉康复训练[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2021,29(2):174-176.
[18] 柴浩,吴婷,舒莉,等.保留与不保留残端重建前交叉韧带后本体感觉恢复的比较[J].中国组织工程研究,2019,23(15):2332-2337.
[19] NAGELLI C V,HEWETT T E.Should return to sport be delayed until 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?Biological and functional considerations[J].Sports Med,2017,47(2):221-232.
[20] KAMBHAMPATI S B S,GOLLAMUDI S,SHANMUGASUND-ARAM S,et al.Cyclops lesions of the knee:a narrative review of the literature[J/OL].Orthop J Sports Med,2020,8(8)[2020-10-01].https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32923503.
[21] KIM B H,KIM J I,LEE O,et al.Preservation of remnant with poor synovial coverage has no beneficial effect over remnant sacrifice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J].Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2018,26(8):2345-2352.
[22] 谢崇新,张磊.保留与不保留残端重建前交叉韧带术后膝关节退变的比较[J].中国组织工程研究,2021,25(5):735-740.
[23] ANNEAR P T,ROHR E J,HILLE D M,et al.No clinical difference in 10-year outcomes between standard and minimal graft debridement techniques in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstrings:a randomized controlled trial[J].Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2019,27(2):516-523.
[24] 丁罗宾,赵佳,关健,等.电针对膝关节前交叉韧带重建术后膝关节运动功能康复的影响[J].中国针灸,2020,40(2):142-146.
[25] HUANG K Y,LIANG S,YU M L,et al.A systematic review and meta-analysis of acupuncture for improving learning and memory ability in animals[J].BMC Complement Altern Med,2016,16(1):297.
[26] VILLARREAL SANTIAGO M,TUMILTY S,MACZNIK A,et al.Does acupuncture alter pain-related functional connectivity of the central nervous system?A systematic review[J].J Acupunct Meridian Stud,2016,9(4):167-177.
[27] HAUCK M,SCHRÖDER S,MEYER-HAMME G,et al.Acupuncture analgesia involves modulation of pain-induced gamma oscillations and cortical network connectivity[J].Sci Rep,2017,7(1):16307.

相似文献/References:

[1]赵 丹.膝部骨折内固定术后的早期康复护理[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):79.
[2]张蕾蕾,马向浩,张颖,等.功能锻炼联合中药薰洗和手法在前交叉韧带重建术后 康复治疗中的应用[J].中医正骨,2015,27(06):35.
[3]蒙剑德,夏贤生,赵小泉,等.功能锻炼联合中药薰蒸在膝关节半月板损伤关节镜下 成形术后康复治疗中的应用[J].中医正骨,2015,27(06):37.
[4]邵文飞.内服四妙散加减配合功能锻炼治疗膝关节半月板损伤[J].中医正骨,2015,27(06):39.
[5]朱勇,徐新强,李艺彬,等.关节镜下钢丝内固定治疗陈旧性前交叉韧带 胫骨止点撕脱骨折[J].中医正骨,2016,28(01):60.
[6]王东莉.缝合锚钉内固定治疗髌骨下极撕脱性骨折[J].中医正骨,2016,28(11):37.
[7]徐向峰,王庆东,金艳南,等.关节镜下可吸收螺钉内固定治疗髌骨骨软骨骨折[J].中医正骨,2016,28(12):65.
[8]李前,陈绍军,李岗,等.“8”字悬吊法重建外侧副韧带及腘腓韧带治疗膝关节多发韧带损伤[J].中医正骨,2017,29(03):49.
[9]杨伟毅,潘建科,韩燕鸿,等.陈旧性前交叉韧带损伤诊治中需要注意的问题[J].中医正骨,2017,29(08):48.
[10]权松涛,蔡利涛,杨明路.单枚外排锚钉结合Orthocord缝合线线桥内固定治疗后交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折[J].中医正骨,2017,29(09):52.
[11]张辽,金甬,毛宇芳,等.髌旁小切口经髌股关节通道加压埋头空心钉结合缝线锚钉内固定治疗前交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折[J].中医正骨,2016,28(11):43.
[12]范国明,陈刚,潘界恩,等.关节镜下韧带重建术联合针刺治疗非接触性前交叉韧带损伤[J].中医正骨,2019,31(02):72.
[13]汤雨婷,安丙辰,郑洁皎.前交叉韧带损伤康复治疗的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2020,32(04):26.
[14]赵晓非,邹春雨,米豫飞,等.关节镜下高强线联合外排锚钉和挤压螺钉内固定治疗前交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折合并胫骨平台后外侧塌陷骨折[J].中医正骨,2023,35(01):70.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:泸州市人民政府-西南医科大学科技战略合作项目(2018LZXNYD-ZK43); 西南医科大学-西南医科大学附属中医医院联合项目(2018XYLH-001) 通讯作者:周鑫 E-mail:zhou_xin0323@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01