[1]张延海,吕杰,杨戈尔,等.基于仿真技术比较脉冲激励手法和振荡激励手法治疗腰椎疾患的有效性和安全性[J].中医正骨,2020,32(06):1-6.
　ZHANG Yanhai,LYU Jie,YANG Geer,et al.A comparison of clinical efficacy and safety of pulse excitation manipulation and oscillation excitation manipulation for treatment of lumbar vertebral diseases based on simulation technology[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2020,32(06):1-6.
点击复制

基于仿真技术比较脉冲激励手法和振荡激励手法治疗腰椎疾患的有效性和安全性()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第32卷
期数:
2020年06期
页码:
1-6
栏目:
基础研究
出版日期:
2020-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A comparison of clinical efficacy and safety of pulse excitation manipulation and oscillation excitation manipulation for treatment of lumbar vertebral diseases based on simulation technology
作者:
张延海1; 吕杰2; 杨戈尔2; 徐军2; 张培茗2; 吕强3; 周楠3; 郭婧1; 饶兰1; 张存亮1
(1.上海理工大学医疗器械与食品学院,上海200093; 2.上海健康医学院医疗器械学院,上海201318; 3.上海中医药大学附属岳阳中西医结合医院,上海200437)
Author(s):
ZHANG Yanhai1; LYU Jie2; YANG Geer2; XU Jun2; ZHANG Peiming2; LYU Qiang3; ZHOU Nan3; GUO Jing1; RAO Lan1; ZHANG Cunliang1
1.School of Medical Instrument and Food Engineering of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology,Shanghai 200093,China 2.School of Medical Instruments of Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences,Shanghai 201318,China 3.Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai 200437,China
关键词:
手法; 捏脊;  脉冲;  振荡;  生物力学;  仿真
Keywords:
manipulation; chiropractic;  pulse;  oscillation;  biomechanics;  simulation
摘要:
目的:比较脉冲激励手法与振荡激励手法治疗腰椎疾患的有效性与安全性。方法:选择1名无腰椎疾患的健康志愿者。由2位推拿医生分别对志愿者实施腰椎调整手法,其中一位采用作用力为脉冲力的脉冲激励手法,另一位采用作用力为振荡力的振荡激励手法。通过T4500高敏度触觉压力测量系统采集手法实施过程中的作用力,并进行归一化处理,使2种手法作用力的最大值保持一致。假设腰椎椎体为刚体,椎间盘、韧带等周围软组织作为连接刚体的弹簧和阻尼器,建立五自由度振动系统腰椎生物力学模型,归一化的作用力作为模型的输入载荷。运用MatlabSimulink仿真技术,模拟得到腰椎各节段在2种手法作用下的轴向位移和轴向加速度随时间变化的情况,并进行比较。结果:脉冲激励手法作用时,L1～L5节段轴向最大位移的绝对值分别为0.154 1 m、0.123 3 m、0.092 5 m、0.061 7 m、0.030 9 m,轴向最大加速度的绝对值分别为3.721 2 m·s-2、2.940 3 m·s-2、2.206 7 m·s-2、1.444 4 m·s-2、0.731 0 m·s-2; 振荡激励手法作用时,L1～L5节段轴向最大位移的绝对值分别为0.160 0 m、0.128 1 m、0.096 1 m、0.064 1 m、0.032 0 m,轴向最大加速度的绝对值分别为2.788 3 m·s-2、2.243 1 m·s-2、1.634 9 m·s-2、1.125 1 m·s-2、0.536 1 m·s-2。在2种手法作用时,L1～L5节段的轴向最大位移绝对值相当; 在脉冲激励手法作用时,L1～L5节段的轴向最大加速度绝对值均明显高于振荡激励手法。结论:采用手法治疗腰椎疾患时,在最大作用力保持一致的情况下,脉冲激励手法和振荡激励手法的有效性几乎一致,但振荡激励手法更加安全。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of pulse excitation manipulation versus oscillation excitation manipulation in treatment of lumbar vertebral diseases.Methods:A healthy volunteer without lumbar vertebral diseases was selected.The lumbar vertebrae adjustment was performed on the volunteer by two massagists using pulse excitation manipulation and oscillation excitation manipulation respectively.The acting forces were measured by using T4500 high-sensitivity tactile pressure measuring system during the implementation of the manipulation,and were normalized to make the maximum acting force of the two manipulations in consistency with each other.A five-degree-freedom vibration biomechanical model of lumbar vertebrae was built by assuming lumbar vertebral body as rigid-body and assuming surrounding soft tissues including intervertebral discs and ligaments as spring and damper which served as connection of rigid bodies.The normalized acting forces served as the input load of the model.The time-dependent changes of axial displacements and axial acceleration of each segment of lumbar vertebrae under the action of pulse excitation manipulation and oscillation excitation manipulation were measured by using MatlabSimulink simulation technology,and were compared between the 2 kinds of manipulations.Results:The absolute values of the maximum axial displacement of lumbar vertebrae from L1 to L5 were 0.154 1,0.123 3,0.092 5,0.061 7 and 0.030 9 metres respectively,and the absolute values of the maximum axial acceleration were 3.721 2,2.940 3,2.206 7,1.444 4 and 0.731 0 ms(2)respectively under the action of pulse excitation manipulation.The absolute values of the maximum axial displacement of lumbar vertebrae from L1 to L5 were 0.160 0,0.128 1,0.096 1,0.064 1 and 0.032 0 metres respectively,and the absolute values of the maximum axial acceleration were 2.788 3,2.243 1,1.634 9,1.125 1 and 0.536 1 ms(2)respectively under the action of oscillation excitation manipulation.The two kinds of manipulations were similar to each other in absolute values of the maximum axial displacement of lumbar vertebrae from L1 to L5,while the absolute values of the maximum axial acceleration of lumbar vertebrae from L1 to L5 were obviously higher under the action of pulse excitation manipulation compared to the action of oscillation excitation manipulation.Conclusion:The pulse excitation manipulation and oscillation excitation manipulation are almost the same in clinical efficacy if their maximum acting forces are consistent with each other in the treatment of lumbar vertebral diseases,however,the latter is better than the former in safety.

参考文献/References:

[1]邵珂,吉立新.峡部裂性腰椎滑脱症的手术治疗进展[J].中国骨伤,2019,32(3):283-287.
[2]纪品川,陈亚军,赵艳娟,等.腰椎间盘突出症的中医治疗进展[J].医疗装备,2016,29(22):193-194.
[3]SVENSSON G L,LUNDBERG M,OSTGAARD H C,et al.High degree of kinesiophobia after lumbar disc herniation surgery:a cross-sectional study of 84 patients[J].Acta Orthop,2011,82(6):732-736.
[4]严隽陶.推拿学[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2017:5-7.
[5]黄大智,蔡萍,戎宽,等.中医正骨手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症[J].中医正骨,2019,31(1):41-42.
[6]饶子龙,廖安庭,宋南昌.推拿治疗急性腰扭伤的系统评价[J].中医正骨,2019,31(12):29-33.
[7]王晓迪,谢建荣,刘云滨,等.补阳还五汤联合推拿手法治疗青年腰椎间盘突出症[J].广西中医药,2019,42(2):63-64.
[8]尹训良,姜丽梅,李华东.推拿联合神经触激术治疗腰椎管狭窄症临床观察[J].河北中医,2019,41(1):106-110.
[9]何天翔,顾非,孔令军,等.推拿手法结合爬行器训练治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床研究[J].中华中医药杂志,2019,34(8):3851-3854.
[10] 吕立江,陆森伟,王晓东,等.杠杆定位手法对正常腰椎影响的生物力学实时测试[J].中华中医药学刊,2015,33(1):15-17.
[11] 赵文韬,向俊宜,李具宝.不同牵引力对腰椎间盘突出症生物力学效应的三维有限元分析[J].山西医药杂志,2018,47(24):2907-2909.
[12] 陈小刚,林瑞新,李桂锦,等.腰部核心肌群锻炼对腰椎间盘突出症患者腰背伸肌群的生物力学影响[J].中医正骨,2018,30(5):71-73.
[13] 冯其金,赵玲娟,郑昆仑,等.有限元分析法在腰椎生物力学中的研究进展[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,2018,24(2):255-258.
[14] 李连琨,袁艺,罗志勇,等.改良腰椎斜扳法治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效评价[J].西部医学,2012,24(6):1165-1166.
[15] 李思斌,王立新,李正祥,等.改良斜扳法治疗急性腰扭伤的临床疗效评价[J].中国现代医生,2014,52(11):95-97.
[16] 豆梦琳,方舟,周楠,等.中医斜扳疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出的生物力学研究[J].医用生物力学,2013,28(3):304-309.
[17] 薛定宇,陈阳泉.基于MATLABSimulink的系统仿真技术与应用[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2002.
[18] KUAI S Z,GUAN X Y,ZHOU W Y,et al.Continuous lumbar spine rhythms during level walking,stair climbing and trunk flexion in people with and without lumbar disc herniation[J].Gait Posture,2018,63:296-301.

相似文献/References:

[1]邸保林,董国顺,林红猛.俯卧斜扳法治疗神经根型颈椎病[J].中医正骨,2015,27(07):70.
[2]王翔,詹红生,张明才,等.石氏手法治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):12.
　WANG Xiang,ZHAN Hongsheng,ZHANG Mingcai,et al.Observation on the curative effect of Shi's manipulation in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(06):12.
[3]周东辉.肌平衡三步手法治疗落枕[J].中医正骨,2015,27(01):58.
[4]刘辉,刘波,张鑫,等.关节粘连传统松解术联合运动疗法治疗 下肢骨折术后膝关节功能障碍[J].中医正骨,2013,25(09):47.
[5]赵冬梅,阮海军.三维正脊复位治疗腰椎间盘突出症的预见性护理[J].中医正骨,2014,26(07):72.
[6]张鑫,刘波,刘辉,等.中医传统关节粘连松解术 在足踝部损伤术后康复治疗中的应用[J].中医正骨,2013,25(04):34.
[7]秦杰,李振宇.三法十式手法配合中药腰痹汤治疗腰椎间盘突出症[J].中医正骨,2011,23(02):71.
[8]李俊毅,孔赏,马虎升,等.手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的作用机制研究进展[J].中医正骨,2019,31(04):40.
[9]黄帆,林郁桐,李义凯.中医正骨与整骨的含义及发展脉络[J].中医正骨,2024,36(06):44.
[10]张兴元,张国辉,张宏.整骨疗法和整脊疗法的异同[J].中医正骨,2021,33(06):57.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
(收稿日期:2019-12-30本文编辑:李晓乐)基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(81574096)通讯作者:吕杰E-mail:lvj@sumhs.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-10-10