[1]明立功,明立德,明新武,等.小切口克氏针内固定和小切口钢板内固定治疗青年锁骨中段 A型骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2014,26(04):29-32.
　Ming Ligong*,Ming Lide,Ming Xinwu,et al.Comparison of Kirschner wire internal fixation and minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis for the treatment of typed-A midclavicular fractures in youth patients[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2014,26(04):29-32.
点击复制

小切口克氏针内固定和小切口钢板内固定治疗青年锁骨中段 A型骨折的对比研究()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第26卷
期数:
2014年04期
页码:
29-32
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2014-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Kirschner wire internal fixation and minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis for the treatment of typed-A midclavicular fractures in youth patients
作者:
明立功; 明立德; 明新武; 明朝戈; 王自方; 马彦飞; 王明利; 范会强; 王慧
河南省滑县骨科医院,河南 滑县 456485
Author(s):
Ming Ligong*; Ming Lide; Ming Xinwu; Ming Chaoge; Wang Zifang; Ma Yanfei; Wang Mingli; Fan Huiqiang; Wang Hui.*
Orthopaedic Hospital of Hua county,Hua county 456485,Henan,China
关键词:
锁骨 骨折; 闭合性 骨折固定术; 内 外科手术; 微创性 骨钉 骨板 治疗; 临床研究性
Keywords:
Clavicle;  Fractures;  closed;  Fracture fixation; internal;  Surgical procedures; minimally invasive;  Bone nails;  Bone plates;  Therapies; investigational
摘要:
目的:比较小切口克氏针内固定和小切口钢板内固定治疗青年锁骨中段A型骨折的临床疗效、安全性及卫生经济学指标。方法:回顾性分析接受手术治疗的52例青年锁骨中段A型骨折患者的病例资料,采用小切口克氏针内固定治疗者32例(A组),采用小切口钢板内固定治疗者20例(B组)。比较2组患者的术中出血量、手术时间、骨折愈合时间、住院时间、住院费用、内固定取出费用、采用肩关节Neer评分评定的肩关节功能及并发症发生率。结果:①一般情况。52例患者均获随访,随访时间9～16个月,中位数11.5个月。2组患者的骨折愈合时间比较,差异无统计学意义[(10.70±2.20)周,(11.30±1.70)周t=0.942,P=0.351]; A组患者术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间、住院费用及内固定取出费用均少于B组,差异有统计学意义[(20.32±17.51)mL,(40.73±15.11)mL,t=-5.860,P=0.000;(20.55±10.16)min,(50.12±17.26)min,t=-12.505,P=0.000;(6.63±1.27)d,(8.34±1.11)d,t=-4.182,P=0.000;(3 500.75±500.63)元,(7 500.74±300.85)元,t=-13.317,P=0.000;(1 100.23±350.93)元,(3 500.25±200.32)元,t=-16.708,P=0.000]。②肩关节功能。A组优18例、良12例、中2例,B组优10例、良9例、中1例。2组患者肩关节功能比较,差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.362,P=0.717)。③并发症发生率。A组术后2例患者出现针尾刺激症状,B组1例患者发生钢板远端螺钉拔出。2组患者并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.000,P=1.000)。结论:小切口克氏针内固定和小切口钢板内固定都是治疗青年锁骨中段A型骨折的安全有效的治疗方法,但前者具有创伤小、费用低的优点。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical curative effects,safety and health economics indexes of Kirschner wire(K-wire)internal fixation vs minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis(MIPPO)in the treatment of typed-A midclavicular fractures in youth patients.Methods:The medical records of 52 youth patients underwent operative treatment for typed-A midclavicular fractures were analyzed retrospectively.Thirty-two patients(group A)were treated with K-wire internal fixation,while the others(group B)were treated with MIPPO.Then the two groups were compared with each other in such parameters as blood loss,operative time,fracture healing time,hospitalization time,hospitalization costs,internal fixation removement costs,shoulder joint function evaluated by using shoulder-joint Neer scores and the incidences of complications.Results:The patients in the 2 groups were all followed up for 9-16 months with a median of 11.5 months.There was no statistical differences in the fracture healing time between the 2 groups(10.70+/-2.20 vs 11.30+/-1.70 weeks,t=0.942,P=0.351).The blood loss,operative time,hospitalization time,hospitalization costs and internal fixation removement costs of group A were all less than those of group B(20.32+/-17.51 vs 40.73+/-15.11 mL,t=-5.860,P=0.000; 20.55+/-10.16 vs 50.12+/-17.26 min,t=-12.505,P=0.000; 6.63+/-1.27 vs 8.34+/-1.11 days,t=-4.182,P=0.000; 3 500.75+/-500.63 vs 7 500.74+/-300.85Yuan,t=-13.317,P=0.000; 1 100.23+/-350.93 vs 3 500.25+/-200.32 Yuan,t=-16.708,P=0.000).Eighteen patients obtained an excellent result,12 good and 2 fair in group A,while 10 patients obtained an excellent result,9 good and 1 fair in group B.There was no statistical differences in the shoulder joint function between the 2 groups(Z=-0.362,P=0.717).The skin irritation caused by K-wire were found in two patients(group A)after the surgery,while steel plate distal screw exposed was found in one patient(group B)after the surgery.There was no statistical differences in the incidences of complications between the 2 groups(χ2=0.000,P=1.000).Conclusion:The therapy of K-wire internal fixation is similar to the therapy of MIPPO in curative effect and safety in the treatment of typed-A midclavicular fractures in youth patients,while the former has the merits such as less trauma and lower cost.

参考文献/References:

[1] 郑亦静,洪建军,程涛,等.微创经皮锁定钢板与切开复位重建钢板内固定在治疗锁骨骨折中的疗效比较[J].中华手外科杂志,2013,29(4):225-227.
[2] Smekal V1,Irenberger A,Struve P,et al.Elastic stable intramedullary nailing versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures-a randomized,controlled,clinical trial[J].J Orthop Trauma,2009,23(2):106-112.
[3] 国家中医药管理局.中医病证诊断疗效标准[S].南京:南京大学出版社,1994:162.
[4] 陈云丰,张睿,张弛,等.钛制弹性钉与重建钢板在治疗移位锁骨中段骨折中的临床疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2010,12(11):1006-1009.
[5] 明立功,明立山,明新月,等.锁骨中段骨折髓内针治疗的临床分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2007,22(12):1009-1010.
[6] Neer CS 2nd.Displaced proximal humeral fractures:part I.Classification and evaluation.1970[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2006,442:77-82.
[7] 王秀会,王喆,夏胜利,等.锁定钢板经皮治疗锁骨中段骨折的疗效评价[J].中华手外科杂志,2012,28(6):380-381.
[8] 高堪达,黄建华,高伟,等.锁定与非锁定重建钢板治疗锁骨干移位骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2010,12(11):1001-1005.
[9] 彭亮,项东,吕建华,等.微创弹性钉内固定治疗锁骨中段骨折[J].中医正骨,2011,23(1):59-61.
[10] 黎键,汤志刚.不同部位的锁骨骨折手术治疗体会[J].中医正骨,2010,22(5):366-367.
[11] 连学全,黄世民,庄耀明,等.克氏针固定锁骨的生物力学试验和临床疗效[J].中华骨科杂志,1994,149(3):163-166.

相似文献/References:

[1]宁凡友,牛素玲,夏凯,等.髂骨植骨配合重建钢板内固定 治疗锁骨骨折不愈合合并骨缺损[J].中医正骨,2012,24(03):69.
[2]王贵润,姜金杰.锁定钢板内固定并脉冲电磁刺激治疗锁骨骨折不愈合[J].中医正骨,2011,23(03):63.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01