[1]林海青,贾少华,许伟斌,等.InterTAN与股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗股骨转子间骨折疗效和安全性的Meta分析[J].中医正骨,2021,33(05):34-39.
　LIN Haiqing,JIA Shaohua,XU Weibin,et al.Clinical curative effects and safety of internal fixation with InterTAN nail versus proximal femoral nail antirotation for treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures:a meta analysis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2021,33(05):34-39.
点击复制

InterTAN与股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗股骨转子间骨折疗效和安全性的Meta分析()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第33卷
期数:
2021年05期
页码:
34-39
栏目:
文献研究
出版日期:
2021-05-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical curative effects and safety of internal fixation with InterTAN nail versus proximal femoral nail antirotation for treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures:a meta analysis
作者:
林海青; 贾少华; 许伟斌; 孙哲思
(嘉兴市第二医院,浙江 嘉兴 314001)
Author(s):
LIN Haiqing; JIA Shaohua; XU Weibin; SUN Zhesi
The Second Hospital of Jiaxing City,Jiaxing 314001,Zhejiang,China
关键词:
髋骨折;  骨折固定术; 髓内;  髓内钉;  Meta分析;  系统评价
Keywords:
hip fractures;  fracture fixation; intramedullary;  intramedullary nail;  meta-analysis;  systematic review
摘要:
目的:比较InterTAN与股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail anti-rotation,PFNA)内固定治疗股骨转子间骨折的疗效和安全性。方法:应用计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Springer、The Cochrane Library、中国知网和万方数据库中关于InterTAN与PFNA内固定治疗股骨转子间骨折对比研究的文献,检索时限均为建库至2018年12月。PFNA组采用PFNA内固定治疗,InterTAN组采用InterTAN髓内钉内固定治疗。依据文献检索及筛选方案筛选出符合要求的文献后,由2名研究人员分别独立进行数据提取和质量评价。采用Revman5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果:共检索到356篇文献,最终纳入8篇,共涉及1335例患者。Meta分析结果显示,InterTAN组的手术时间、X线透视时间均比PFNA组长[MD=8.94,95%CI(1.10,16.78),P=0.030; MD=1.26,95%CI(0.40,2.11),P=0.004],术中出血量比PFNA组多[MD=21.58,95%CI(3.73,39.42),P=0.020]; 2组骨折愈合时间、髋关节Harris评分的组间差异均无统计学意义[MD=-0.53,95%CI(-1.09,0.03),P=0.070; MD=0.01,95%CI(-0.68,0.71),P=0.970]; InterTAN组术后髋部及大腿疼痛的发生率、内固定失败率及翻修率均低于PFNA组[OR=0.36,95%CI(0.21,0.60),P=0.000; OR=0.26,95%CI(0.18,0.38),P=0.000; OR=0.31,95%CI(0.18,0.54),P=0.000]。结论:InterTAN与PFNA内固定治疗股骨转子间骨折,在骨折愈合时间和髋关节功能恢复方面没有明显差异,但PFNA内固定在控制手术时间、X线透视时间及术中出血方面具有优势,而InterTAN内固定在降低术后髋部及大腿疼痛发生率、内固定失败率及翻修率方面具有优势。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical curative effects and safety of internal fixation with InterTAN nail(ITN)versus proximal femoral nail antirotation(PFNA)in treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures.Methods:All randomized controlled trial(RCT)and non-RCT articles about clinical curative effects and safety of internal fixation with ITN(ITN group)versus PFNA(PFNA group)for treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures included from database establishing to December 2018 were retrieved from PubMed,Embase,Springer,The Cochrane Library,China national knowledge internet and WanFang Database through computer.The articles were screened and the information was extracted independently by two searchers according to the retrieval and screening scheme.The methodological quality of research in the articles was evaluated independently by the same two searchers and a Meta-analysis was conducted by using Revman5.3 software.Results:Three hundred and fifty-six articles were searched out.After screening,8 articles(1335 patients)were included in the final analysis.The results of Meta-analysis revealed that the operative time and X-ray fluoroscopy time were longer,and the intraoperative blood loss was more in InterTAN group compared to PFNA group(MD=8.94,95%CI(1.10,16.78),P=0.030; MD=1.26,95%CI(0.40,2.11),P=0.004; MD=21.58,95%CI(3.73,39.42),P=0.020).There were no statistical difference in fracture healing time and Harris hip scores between the 2 groups(MD=-0.53,95%CI(-1.09,0.03),P=0.070; MD=0.01,95%CI(-0.68,0.71),P=0.970).The incidence rates of postoperative hip and thigh pain,failure rate and revision rate of internal fixation were lower in InterTAN group compared to PFNA group(OR=0.36,95%CI(0.21,0.60),P=0.000; OR=0.26,95%CI(0.18,0.38),P=0.000; OR=0.31,95%CI(0.18,0.54),P=0.000).Conclusion:There is no obvious difference in fracture healing time and hip function recovery between ITN internal fixation and PFNA internal fixation in treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures.However,PFNA internal fixation has advantages in operative time,X-ray fluoroscopy time and intraoperative hemorrhage,while ITN internal fixation has advantages in reducing the incidence rates of postoperative hip and thigh pain,as well as failure rate and revision rate of internal fixation.

参考文献/References:

[1] 石淇允,李无阴,张颖,等.老年髋部骨折危险因素的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2019,31(8):45-47.
[2] 江孝龙,蒋国华,孙贤杰.股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定与动力髋螺钉内固定治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2019,31(2):8-13.
[3] 陈立和,麦伟发.加长型股骨近端防旋髓内钉联合钢缆内固定治疗股骨转子下粉碎性骨折的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2019,31(1):5-9.
[4] YU X,WANG H,DUAN X,et al.Intramedullary versus extramedullary internal fixation for unstable intertrochanteric fracture,a meta-analysis[J].Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc,2018,52(4):299-307.
[5] HAQ R U,MANHAS V,PANKAJ A,et al.Proximal femoral nails compared with reverse distal femoral locking plates in intertrochanteric fractures with a compromised lateral wall; a randomised controlled trial[J].Int Orthop,2014,38(7):1443-1449.
[6] MATRE K,VINJE T,HAVELIN L I,et al.TRIGEN INTERTAN intramedullary nail versus sliding hip screw:a prospective,randomized multicenter study on pain,function,and complications in 684 patients with an intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture and one year of follow-up[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2013,95(3):200-208.
[7] 张天嵩,钟文昭,李博.实用循证医学方法学[M].2版.长沙:中南大学出版社,2014:128-133.
[8] 曾宪涛,刘慧,陈曦,等.Meta分析系列之四:观察性研究的质量评价工具[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志,2012,4(4):297-299. 中医正骨2021年5月第33卷第5期 J Trad Chin Orthop Trauma,2021,Vol.33,No.5(总359)(总360)中医正骨2021年5月第33卷第5期 J Trad Chin Orthop Trauma,2021,Vol.33,No.5
[9] ZHANG S,ZHANG K,JIA Y,et al.InterTan nail versus proximal femoral nail antirotation-Asia in the treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures[J].Orthopedics,2013,36(3):e288-e294.
[10] ZEHIR S,SAHIN E,ZEHIR R.Comparison of clinical outcomes with three different intramedullary nailing devices in the treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures[J].Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg,2015,21(6):469-476.
[11] SEYHAN M,TURKMEN I,UNAY K,et al.Do PFNA devices and Intertan nails both have the same effects in the treatment of trochanteric fractures?A prospective clinical study[J].J Orthop Sci,2015,20(6):1053-1061.
[12] YU W,ZHANG X,ZHU X,et al.A retrospective analysis of the InterTan nail and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation-Asia in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2016,11:10.
[13] 张军,曹烈虎,陈晓,等.PFNA与InterTAN髓内钉治疗不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折疗效的比较[J].中国骨伤,2017,30(7):597-601.
[14] ZHANG H,ZHU X,PEI G,et al.A retrospective analysis of the InterTan nail and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients with osteoporosis:a minimum follow-up of 3 years[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2017,12(1):147.
[15] ZHANG C,XU B,LIANG G,et al.Optimizing stability in AO/OTA 31-A2 intertrochanteric fracture fixation in older patients with osteoporosis[J].J Int Med Res,2018,46(5):1767-1778.
[16] GAVASKAR A S,TUMMALA N C,SRINIVASAN P,et al.Helical blade or the integrated lag screws:a matched pair analysis of 100 patients with unstable trochanteric frac-tures[J].J Orthop Trauma,2018,32(6):274-277.
[17] HUANG Y,ZHANG C,LUO Y.A comparative biomechanical study of proximal femoral nail(InterTAN)and proximal femoral nail antirotation for intertrochanteric fractures[J].Int Orthop,2013,37(12):2465-2473.
[18] CHANG S M,SONG D L,MA Z,et al.Mismatch of the short straight cephalomedullary nail(PFNA-Ⅱ)with the anterior bow of the femur in an Asian population[J].J Orthop Trauma,2014,28(1):17-22.
[19] LIU J J,SHAN L C,DENG B Y,et al.Reason and treatment of failure of proximal femoral nail antirotation internal fixation for femoral intertrochanteric fractures of senile pa-tients[J].Genet Mol Res,2014,13(3):5949-5956.
[20] DUNN J,KUSNEZOV N,BADER J,et al.Long versus short cephalomedullary nail for trochanteric femur fractures(OTA 31-A1,A2 and A3):a systematic review[J].J Orthop Traumatol,2016,17(4):361-367.

相似文献/References:

[1]肖善富,张喜善,于凤珍.髌下小切口钢丝纽扣式内固定治疗胫骨髁间隆突骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):34.
[2]朱峰,宋相建,吴蔚,等.手法复位经皮克氏针内固定治疗 儿童闭合性肱骨远端全骨骺分离[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):51.
[3]裘人华,胡培阳,裘天强,等.闭合复位外固定架固定治疗Colles骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):59.
[4]葛波涌,王玉波,王明太,等.交锁髓内钉内固定治疗胫骨干骨折的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):8.
　GE Boyong,WANG Yubo,WANG Mingtai,et al.Clinical study on the internal fixation with interlocking intramedullary nail for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(05):8.
[5]邓红敏,刘志诚.转子间斜行截骨结合股骨近端防旋髓内钉固定治疗 股骨近端骨折术后髋内翻畸形[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):17.
[6]全先辉,万春友,刘磊,等.Taylor空间支架外固定治疗胫腓骨开放性骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):30.
[7]茆军,张惠法,严培军,等.Ilizarov外固定支架结合克氏针固定治疗Pilon骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):32.
[8]袁伟,周晓莉.T形掌指骨微型钢板内固定治疗锁骨近端骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):47.
[9]唐剑邦,吴宇峰,高大伟,等.切开复位肱骨近端锁定钢板内固定治疗 陈旧性肩关节后脱位合并肱骨近端骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):49.
[10]刘磊,万春友,全先辉,等.锁定钢板内固定结合肱骨头植骨重建治疗 肱骨近端Neer三、四部分骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):52.
[11]温超海,何忠,李永斌,等.闭合复位伽玛钉改良成锁定支架内固定治疗 老年股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):32.
[12]孙群周,阮成群,李光明,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗 老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):20.
[13]方策,倪新宇,王宏伟,等.迟氏正骨手法复位单臂外固定支架固定治疗 老年股骨转子间骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):22.
[14]倪新宇,方策.外固定器治疗股骨转子间骨折的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2015,27(07):48.
[15]李书良,李启义,李建明,等.锁定钢板内固定联合自体髂骨植骨治疗 股骨近端粉碎性骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(05):31.
[16]王智勇,陈柯,田可为,等.联合应用摇杆技术和钳夹技术微创治疗股骨转子部骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(05):36.
[17]郑艳峰,吴勋,周荣昌,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定与动力髋螺钉内固定治疗 老年股骨转子间骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):24.
　ZHENG Yanfeng,WU Xun,ZHOU Rongchang,et al.A comparative study of proximal femoral nail antirotation internal fixation versus dynamic hip screw internal fixation for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(05):24.
[18]王定,胡丰根,胡奇志,等.前侧入路可吸收螺钉内固定治疗Pipkin骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(03):49.
[19]汪迎春,吕一.经皮微创股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗 高龄股骨转子间骨折的手术室护理[J].中医正骨,2015,27(01):77.
[20]李亚楠.老年股骨转子间骨折合并2型糖尿病的围手术期护理[J].中医正骨,2016,28(02):77.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
通讯作者:孙哲思 E-mail:szs19901114@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01