[1]刘欢,周涛斌,李振,等.体外冲击波治疗肱骨外上髁炎的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2019,31(10):7-11.
　LIU Huan,ZHOU Taobin,LI Zhen,et al.A clinical study of extracorporeal shock wave for treatment of humeral external epicondylitis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2019,31(10):7-11.
点击复制

体外冲击波治疗肱骨外上髁炎的临床研究()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第31卷
期数:
2019年10期
页码:
7-11
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2019-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A clinical study of extracorporeal shock wave for treatment of humeral external epicondylitis
作者:
刘欢; 周涛斌; 李振; 李谱友; 刘小敏
(江西中医药大学附属医院,江西 南昌 330006)
Author(s):
LIU Huan; ZHOU Taobin; LI Zhen; LI Puyou; LIU Xiaomin
The Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Nanchang 330006,Jiangxi,China
关键词:
网球肘;  肱骨外上髁炎;  体外冲击波;  封闭疗法;  临床试验
Keywords:
tennis elbow;  humeral external epicondylitis;  extracorporeal shock wave;  blocking therapy;  clinical trial
摘要:
目的:观察体外冲击波(extracorporeal shock wave,ESW)治疗肱骨外上髁炎的临床疗效。方法:将符合要求的72例(86肘)肱骨外上髁炎患者随机分为2组,37例(43肘)采用ESW治疗(ESW组),35例(43肘)采用局部封闭治疗(局部封闭组); 每周治疗1次,3周为1个疗程,共治疗1个疗程。分别于治疗前、治疗结束时及治疗结束后3个月、6个月比较2组患者肘部疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分和上肢功能障碍(disabilities of the arm,shoulder and hand,DASH)评分,并于治疗结束时比较2组患者的综合疗效。结果:①肘部疼痛VAS评分。时间因素和分组因素存在交互效应(F=18.692,P=0.000); 2组患者肘部疼痛VAS评分比较,差异有统计学意义,即存在分组效应(F=-3.278,P=0.002); 2组患者治疗前后不同时间点肘部疼痛VAS评分的差异有统计学意义,即存在时间效应(F=13.674,P=0.000); 2组患者肘部疼痛VAS评分随时间均呈下降趋势,但2组的下降趋势不完全一致[(7.50±2.70)分,(3.80±2.10)分,(3.20±2.30)分,(2.50±1.30)分,F=45.824,P=0.000;(7.60±2.80)分,(5.70±3.20)分,(5.80±3.70)分,(5.60±2.70)分,F=4.003,P=0.009]; 治疗前,2组患者的肘部疼痛VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(t=-0.169,P=0.867); 治疗结束时和治疗结束后3个月、6个月,ESW组的肘部疼痛VAS评分均低于局部封闭组(t=-3.255,P=0.002; t=-3.913,P=0.000; t=-6.784,P=0.000)。②DASH评分。时间因素和分组因素存在交互效应(F=24.893,P=0.000); 2组患者DASH评分比较,差异有统计学意义,即存在分组效应(F=-4.271,P=0.000); 2组患者治疗前后不同时间点DASH评分的差异有统计学意义,即存在时间效应(F=86.341,P=0.000); 2组患者DASH评分随时间均呈下降趋势,但2组的下降趋势不完全一致[(50.31±9.72)分,(31.15±5.56)分,(23.77±4.02)分,(20.05±5.12)分,F=186.136,P=0.000;(49.57±8.31)分,(40.01±7.18)分,(32.09±5.96)分,(30.19±6.36)分,F=68.196,P=0.000]; 治疗前,2组患者的DASH评分比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.379,P=0.705); 治疗结束时和治疗结束后3个月、6个月,ESW组的DASH评分均低于局部封闭组(t=-6.398,P=0.000; t=-7.589,P=0.000; t=-8.144,P=0.000)。③综合疗效。治疗结束时,ESW组临床控制21肘、显效11肘、有效7肘、无效4肘,局部封闭组临床控制10肘、显效15肘、有效8肘、无效10肘; ESW组患者的综合疗效优于局部封闭组(Z=-2.455,P=0.014)。结论:采用ESW和局部封闭治疗肱骨外上髁炎,均能缓解疼痛、促进肘关节功能恢复,但前者疗效优于后者。
Abstract:
Objective:To observe the clinical curative effects of extracorporeal shock wave(ESW)therapy for treatment of humeral external epicondylitis.Methods:Seventy-two patients(86 elbows)with humeral external epicondylitis were enrolled in the study and were randomly divided into 2 groups.Thirty-seven patients(43 elbows)were treated with ESW therapy(ESW group),while thirty-five patients(43 elbows)were treated with local blocking therapy(local blocking group).The both therapies were performed once a week for one course of treatment,3 weeks for each course.The elbow pain visual analogue scale(VAS)scores and disabilities of the arm,shoulder and hand(DASH)scores were compared between the 2 groups before treatment,at the end of treatment and at 3 and 6 months after the end of the treatment respectively,and the total curative effects were compared between the 2 groups at the end of treatment.Results:There was interaction between time factor and group factor in elbow pain VAS scores(F=18.692,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in elbow pain VAS scores between the 2 groups,in other words,there was group effect(F=-3.278,P=0.002).There was statistical difference in elbow pain VAS scores between different timepoints before and after treatment,in other words,there was time effect(F=13.674,P=0.000).The elbow pain VAS scores presented a time-dependent decreasing trend in both of the 2 groups,while the 2 groups were inconsistent witheach other in the variation tendency(7.50+/-2.70,3.80+/-2.10,3.20+/-2.30,2.50+/-1.30 points,F=45.824,P=0.000; 7.60+/-2.80,5.70+/-3.20,5.80+/-3.70,5.60+/-2.70 points,F=4.003,P=0.009).There was no statistical difference in elbow pain VAS scores between the 2 groups before the treatment(t=-0.169,P=0.867).The elbow pain VAS scores were lower in ESW group compared to local blocking group at the end of treatment and at 3 and 6 months after the end of the treatment(t=-3.255,P=0.002; t=-3.913,P=0.000; t=-6.784,P=0.000).There was interaction between time factor and group factor in DASH scores(F=24.893,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in DASH scores between the 2 groups,in other words,there was group effect(F=-4.271,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in DASH scores between different timepoints before and after treatment,in other words,there was time effect(F=86.341,P=0.000).The DASH scores presented a time-dependent decreasing trend in both of the 2 groups,while the 2 groups were inconsistent with each other in the variation tendency(50.31+/-9.72,31.15+/-5.56,23.77+/-4.02,20.05+/-5.12 points,F=186.136,P=0.000; 49.57+/-8.31,40.01+/-7.18,32.09+/-5.96,30.19+/-6.36 points,F=68.196,P=0.000).There was no statistical difference in DASH scores between the 2 groups before the treatment(t=0.379,P=0.705).The DASH scores were lower in ESW group compared to local blocking group at the end of treatment and at 3 and 6 months after the end of the treatment(t=-6.398,P=0.000; t=-7.589,P=0.000; t=-8.144,P=0.000).At the end of the treatment,21 elbows were controlled,11 good,7 fair and 4 poor in ESW group; while 10 elbows were controlled,15 good,8 fair and 10 poor in local blocking group.The ESW group surpassed local blocking group in the total clinical curative effects(Z=-2.455,P=0.014).Conclusion:Both ESW therapy and local blocking therapy can relieve the pain and improve the elbow function recovery in the treatment of humeral external epicondylitis,however,the former surpasses the latter in clinical curative effects.

参考文献/References:

[1] ZWERUS E L,SOMFORD M P,MAISSAN F,et al.Physical examination of the elbow,what is the evidence?A systematic literature review[J].Br J Sports Med,2018,52(19):1253-1260.
[2] KROSLAK M,MURRELL G A C.Surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis:a prospective,randomized,double-blinded,placebo-controlled clinical trial[J].Am J Sports Med,2018,46(5):1106-1113.
[3] COOMBES B K,CONNELLY L,BISSET L,et al.Economic evaluation favours physiotherapy but not corticosteroid injection as a first-line intervention for chronic lateral epicondylalgia:evidence from a randomised clinical trial[J].Br J Sports Med,2016,50(22):1400-1405.
[4] 巩浩然,吕杭州,王振龙,等.体外冲击波治疗踝关节创伤性关节炎[J].中医正骨,2018,30(2):63-64.
[5] 王和鸣,黄桂成.中医骨伤科学[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2012:8. 中医正骨2019年10月第31卷第10期 J Trad Chin Orthop Trauma,2019,Vol.31,No.10(总731) (总732)中医正骨2019年10月第31卷第10期 J Trad Chin Orthop Trauma,2019,Vol.31,No.10
[6] ARMSTRONG A D,HUBBARD MC.美国骨科医师协会骨科疾病诊疗教程[M].王岩,译.中国医师协会骨科医师分会,2017:299.
[7] 蒋协远,王大伟.骨科临床疗效评价标准[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:123-124.
[8] DIXON D,JOHNSTON M,QUEEN M,et al.The Disabilities of the Arm,Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire(DASH)can measure the impairment,activity limitations and participation restriction constructs from the International Classification of Functioning,Disability and Health(ICF)[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2008,9:114.
[9] 郑筱萸.中药新药临床研究指导原则(试行)[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2002:349-353.
[10] 周政东.三联疗法治疗肱骨外上髁炎[J].中医正骨,2019,31(2):56-57.
[11] SHILLITO M,SOONG M,MARTIN N.Radiographic and clinical analysis of lateral epicondylitis[J].J Hand Surg Am,2017,42(6):436-442.
[12] DESCATHA A,ALBO F,LECLERC A,et al.Lateral epicondylitis and physical exposure at work?A review of prospective studies and meta-analysis[J].Arthritis Care Res(Hoboken),2016,68(11):1681-1687.
[13] 严伟,谭训香,姜红江,等.体外冲击波联合血小板裂解液局部注射治疗难治性肱骨外上髁炎[J].中医正骨,2016,28(8):52-55.
[14] LIAO C D,XIE G M,TSAUO J Y,et al.Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for knee tendinopathies and other soft tissue disorders:a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2018,19(1):278.
[15] KOSTENKO E V,ZUEV D S,ZAITSEVA T N.The role of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the combined restorative treatment of the patients presenting with myofascial pain syndrome[J].Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult,2018,95(4):62-68.
[16] KVALVAAG E,BROX J I,ENGEBRETSEN K B,et al.Effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy(rESWT)when combined with supervised exercises in patients with subacromial shoulder pain:a double-masked,randomized,sham-controlled trial[J].Am J Sports Med,2017,45(11):2547-2554.
[17] BEYAZAL M S,DEVRIMSEL G.Comparison of the effectiveness of local corticosteroid injection and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with lateral epicondylitis[J].J Phys Ther Sci,2015,27(12):3755-3758.
[18] GOLLWITZER H,SAXENA A,DIDOMENICO L A,et al.Clinically relevant effectiveness of focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis:a randomized,controlled multicenter study[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2015,97(9):701-708.
[19] LOHRER H,NAUCK T,DORN-LANGE N V,et al.Comparison of radial versus focused extracorporeal shock waves in plantar fasciitis using functional measures[J].Foot Ankle Int,2010,31(1):1-9.
[20] BUCHBINDER R,GREEN S E,YOUD J M,et al.Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of shock wave therapy for lateral elbow pain[J].J Rheumatol,2006,33(7):1351-1363.
[21] 中国研究型医院学会冲击波医学专业委员会,国际冲击波医学学会中国部.骨肌疾病体外冲击波疗法中国专家共识(第2版)[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2017,9(2):25-33.
[22] CROWTHER M A,BANNISTER G C,HUMA H,et al.A prospective,randomised study to compare extracorporeal shock-wave therapy and injection of steroid for the treatment of tennis elbow[J].J Bone Joint Surg Br,2002,84(5):678-679.
[23] YOUNG P,HOMLAR K C.Extreme postinjection flare in response to intra-articular triamcinolone acetonide(Kenalog)[J].Am J Orthop(Belle Mead NJ),2016,45(3):E108-111.
[24] VICENZINO B,BRITT H,POLLACK A J,et al.No abatement of steroid injections for tennis elbow in Australian General Practice:a 15-year observational study with random general practitioner sampling[J].PLoS One,2017,12(7):e0181631.

相似文献/References:

[1]伍辉国,江克罗,张文正,等.针刀经皮松解联合复方当归注射液局部注射治疗 肱骨外上髁炎[J].中医正骨,2015,27(09):38.
[2]严伟,谭训香,姜红江,等.体外冲击波联合血小板裂解液局部注射治疗难治性肱骨外上髁炎[J].中医正骨,2016,28(08):52.
[3]吴乐彬,于阿春.三联疗法治疗肱骨外上髁炎[J].中医正骨,2019,31(11):57.
[4]陈红燕,赵伟儿,方煜丽,等.针刀治疗肱骨外上髁炎合并肱桡关节滑膜嵌顿[J].中医正骨,2015,27(05):27.
[5]周政东.三联疗法治疗肱骨外上髁炎[J].中医正骨,2019,31(02):56.
[6]何江涛,郭华,李众毅,等.自体富血小板血浆痛点注射与小针刀松解治疗肱骨外上髁炎的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2019,31(03):5.
　HE Jiangtao,GUO Hua,LI Zhongyi,et al.A comparative study of injection of autologous platelet rich plasma in pain spots versus releasing with small knife needle for treatment of external humeral epicondylitis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2019,31(10):5.
[7]叶志孟,彭琳瑞,郑华江.肌内效贴贴扎联合耳穴贴压治疗肱骨外上髁炎[J].中医正骨,2019,31(08):57.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
通讯作者:刘小敏 E-mail:13807058668@163.com(收稿日期:2019-08-02 本文编辑:时红磊)
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-10-15