[1]钟熙强,何少奇,董伊隆,等.上胸椎后路椎板螺钉固定的可行性研究[J].中医正骨,2016,28(01):1-5.
　ZHONG Xiqiang,HE Shaoqi,DONG Yilong,et al.A feasibility study of upper thoracic vertebral plate screw fixation through posterior approach[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(01):1-5.
点击复制

上胸椎后路椎板螺钉固定的可行性研究()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第28卷
期数:
2016年01期
页码:
1-5
栏目:
基础研究
出版日期:
2016-01-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A feasibility study of upper thoracic vertebral plate screw fixation through posterior approach
作者:
钟熙强; 何少奇; 董伊隆; 刘良乐; 黄益奖; 戴鸣海; 汤呈宣
温州医科大学附属第三医院,浙江 瑞安 325200
Author(s):
ZHONG Xiqiang; HE Shaoqi; DONG Yilong; LIU Liangle; HUANG Yijiang; DAI Minghai; TANG Chengxuan
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University,Rui'an 325200,Zhejiang,China
关键词:
胸椎;  椎板;  内固定器;  解剖学;  可行性研究
Keywords:
thoracic vertebrae;  vertebral plate;  internal fixators;  anatomy;  feasibility studies
摘要:
目的:了解国人上胸椎椎板的解剖学参数,探讨对国人进行上胸椎后路椎板螺钉固定的可行性。方法:选择40具国人成人尸体T1～T4标本,用游标卡尺和量角器测量与上胸椎椎板螺钉进钉技术相关的解剖参数,包括椎板上、中、下部分的厚度和椎板高度、椎板钉道长度、椎板轴线与矢状面的夹角。结果:20具成人女性尸体T4椎板中部分厚度、T1～T4椎板轴线与矢状面轴线的夹角与男性比较,差异均无统计学意义[(5.94±0.13)mm,(6.00±0.22)mm,t=1.609,P=0.112; 46.00°±1.10°,46.50°±1.10°,t=1.955,P=0.054; 46.30°±0.80°,46.60°±1.10°,t=1.383,P=0.171; 45.40°±1.40°,45.30°±1.40°,t=0.404,P=0.688; 45.20°±1.40°,45.30°±1.40°,t=0.410,P=0.683]。成人女性尸体T1～T3椎板中部分厚度小于男性[(5.86±0.10)mm,(5.93±0.18)mm,t=2.083,P=0.040;(5.88±0.11)mm,(5.97±0.20)mm,t=2.581,P=0.012;(5.90±0.09)mm,(6.00±0.19)mm,t=2.885,P=0.006]; T1～T4椎板上部分厚度、椎板下部分厚度、椎板高度、椎板钉道长度均小于男性[椎板上部分厚度:(5.39±0.12)mm,(5.51±0.13)mm,t=4.202,P=0.000;(5.43±0.09)mm,(5.52±0.11)mm,t=4.184,P=0.000;(5.43±0.10)mm,(5.53±0.10)mm,t=4.279,P=0.000;(5.41±0.08)mm,(5.53±0.07)mm,t=7.557,P=0.000; 椎板下部分厚度:(5.43±0.12)mm,(5.55±0.12)mm,t=4.513,P=0.000;(5.43±0.07)mm,(5.57±0.10)mm,t=7.068,P=0.000;(5.44±0.08)mm,(5.57±0.11)mm,t=6.182,P=0.000;(5.44±0.07)mm,(5.58±0.09)mm,t=7.353,P=0.000; 椎板高度:(16.86±0.50)mm,(18.64±0.71)mm,t=13.028,P=0.000;(16.89±0.62)mm,(19.22±0.76)mm,t=15.150,P=0.000;(17.22±0.52)mm,(20.09±0.92)mm,t=17.179,P=0.000;(17.45±0.59)mm,(21.10±0.95)mm,t=14.976,P=0.000; 椎板钉道长度:(29.23±1.24)mm,(31.43±2.01)mm,t=5.898,P=0.000;(29.77±1.48)mm,(31.29±2.44)mm,t=3.358,P=0.000;(29.58±1.50)mm,(30.68±2.25)mm,t=2.590,P=0.000;(29.94±1.48)mm,(30.69±2.05)mm,t=1.873,P=0.000]。结论:对国人进行上胸椎后路椎板螺钉固定在解剖学上具有可行性,该方法可以作为下颈椎后路固定技术的补充。
Abstract:
Objective:To study the anatomical parameters of upper thoracic vertebral plate of Chinese adults and explore the feasibility of upper thoracic vertebral plate screw fixation through posterior approach in Chinese adults.Methods:The cadaveric T1-4 specimens of 40 Chinese adults were selected and the anatomical parameters that related to the upper thoracic vertebral plate screw fixation technique were measured by using vernier caliper and conimeter.The anatomical parameters included the thickness of upper,middle and lower part of vertebral plate,the height of vertebral plate,the screw path length and the included angle between vertebral plate axis and sagittal plane.Results:There was no statistical difference in the thickness of the middle part of T4 vertebral plate and the included angle between T1-4 vertebral plate axis and sagittal plane axis between 20 females and 20 males(5.94+/-0.13 vs 6.00+/-0.22 mm,t=1.609,P=0.112; 46.00+/-1.10 vs 46.50+/-1.10 degrees,t=1.955,P=0.054; 46.30+/-0.80 vs 46.60+/-1.10 degrees,t=1.383,P=0.171; 45.40+/-1.40 vs 45.30+/-1.40 degrees,t=0.404,P=0.688; 45.20+/-1.40 vs 45.30+/-1.40 degrees,t=0.410,P=0.683).The thickness of the middle part of T1-3 vertebral plate were less in adult female cadavers compared to adult male cadavers(5.86+/-0.10 vs 5.93+/-0.18 mm,t=2.083,P=0.040; 5.88+/-0.11 vs 5.97+/-0.20 mm,t=2.581,P=0.012; 5.90+/-0.09 vs 6.00+/-0.19 mm,t=2.885,P=0.006).Such parameters of T1-4 were less in adult female cadavers compared to adult female cadavers as thickness of upper part of vertebral plate(5.39+/-0.12 vs 5.51+/-0.13 mm,t=4.202,P=0.000; 5.43+/-0.09 vs 5.52+/-0.11 mm,t=4.184,P=0.000; 5.43+/-0.10 vs 5.53+/-0.10 mm,t=4.279,P=0.000; 5.41+/-0.08 vs 5.53+/-0.07 mm,t=7.557,P= 0.000),thickness of lower part of vertebral plate(5.43+/-0.12 vs 5.55+/-0.12 mm,t=4.513,P=0.000; 5.43+/-0.07 vs 5.57+/-0.10 mm,t=7.068,P=0.000; 5.44+/-0.08 vs 5.57+/-0.11 mm,t=6.182,P=0.000; 5.44+/-0.07 vs 5.58+/-0.09 mm,t=7.353,P=0.000),height of vertebral plate(16.86+/-0.50 vs 18.64+/-0.71 mm,t=13.028,P=0.000; 16.89+/-0.62 vs 19.22+/-0.76 mm,t=15.150,P=0.000; 17.22+/-0.52 vs 20.09+/-0.92 mm,t=17.179,P=0.000; 17.45+/-0.59 vs 21.10+/-0.95 mm,t=14.976,P=0.000)and screw path length(29.23+/-1.24 vs 31.43+/-2.01 mm,t=5.898,P=0.000; 29.77+/-1.48 vs 31.29+/-2.44 mm,t=3.358,P=0.000; 29.58+/-1.50 vs 30.68+/-2.25 mm,t=2.590,P=0.000; 29.94+/-1.48 vs 30.69+/-2.05 mm,t=1.873,P=0.000).Conclusion:It is feasible to conduct the upper thoracic vertebral plate screw fixation in Chinese adults through posterior approach in the view of anatomy,so this method can be used as a complement to the lower cervical vertebra fixation technique through posterior approach.

参考文献/References:

[1] Zhuang Z,Chen Y,Han H,et al.Thoracic pedicle morphometry in different body height population:a three-dimensional study using reformatted computed tomography[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2011,36(24):E1547-E1554.
[2] Patel AJ,Cherian J,Fulkerson DH,et al.Computed tomography morphometric analysis for translaminar screw fixation in the upper thoracic spine of the pediatric population[J].J Neurosurg Pediatr,2011,7(4):383-388.
[3] Ma XY,Yin QS,Wu ZH,et al.C2 anatomy and dimensions relative to translaminar screw placement in an Asian population[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2010,35(6):704-708.
[4] 曹进,徐荣明,仲肇平,等.C7后路椎板螺钉固定解剖学可行性研究[J].中国骨伤,2010,23(4):282-285.
[5] 林华杰,李启运,徐荣明,等.下颈椎椎板螺钉固定的可行性研究[J].中医正骨,2012,24(12):11-14.
[6] Wang MY.C2 crossing laminar screws:cadaveric morphometric analysis[J].Neurosurgery,2006,59(1 Suppl 1):84-88.
[7] Wright NM.Posterior C2 fixation using bilateral,crossing C2 laminar screws:case series and technical note[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2004,17(2):158-162.
[8] Mclain RF,Ferrara L,Kabins M.Pedicle morphometry in the upper thoracic spine:limits to safe screw placement in older patients[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2002,27(22):2467-2471.
[9] Chung KJ,Suh SW,Desai S,et al.Ideal entry point for the thoracic pedicle screw during the free hand technique[J].Int Orthop,2008,32(5):657-662.
[10] Ebraheim NA,Xu R,Ahmad M,et al.Projection of the thoracic pedicle and its morphometric analysis[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),1997,22(3):233-238.
[11] Belmont PJ,Klemme WR,Dhawan A,et al.In vivo accuracy of thoracic pedicle screws[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2001,26(21):2340-2346.
[12] Gardner A,Millner P,Liddington M,et al.Translaminar screw fixation of a kyphosis of the cervical and thoracic spine in neurofibromatosis[J].J Bone Joint Surg Br,2009,91(9):1252-1255.
[13] Kretzer RM,Sciubba DM,Bagley CA,et al.Translaminar screw fixation in the upper thoracic spine[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2006,5(6):527-533.
[14] Wright NM.Translaminar rigid screw fixation of the axis. Technical note[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2005,3(5):409-414.
[15] Grob D,Humke T.Translaminar screw fixation in the lumbar spine:technique,indications,results[J].Eur Spine J,1998,7(3):178-186.
[16] Lehman RA,Dmitriev AE,Helgeson MD,et al.Salvage of C2 pedicle and pars screws using the intralaminar technique:a biomechanical analysis[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2008,33(9):960-965.
[17] Aepli M,Mannion AF,Grob D.Translaminar screw fixation of the lumbar spine:long-term outcome[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2009,34(14):1492-1498.
[18] Magerl FP.Stabilization of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine with external skeletal fixation[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,1984(189):125-141.
[19] Yusof MI,Shamsi SS.Translaminar screw fixation of the cervical spine in Asian population:feasibility and safety consideration based on computerized tomographic measurements[J].Surg Radiol Anat,2012,34(3):203-207.

相似文献/References:

[1]盛红枫,徐卫星,卢笛,等.上中胸椎经椎弓根-肋骨单元途径置钉的安全性及稳定性研究[J].中医正骨,2017,29(02):1.
　SHENG Hongfeng,XU Weixing,LU Di,et al.Study on the safety and stability of upper-middle thoracic pedicle screw insertion through pedicle rib unit approach[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2017,29(01):1.
[2]金勤富.后路经伤椎置钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折[J].中医正骨,2020,32(07):65.
[3]顾王健.微创经皮椎弓根钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折[J].中医正骨,2020,32(12):46.
[4]韩同坤,吴科.健康成人胸椎棘突偏歪的X线研究[J].中医正骨,2022,34(01):13.
　HAN Tongkun,WU Ke.A X-ray study of thoracic vertebral spinous process deviation in healthy adults[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2022,34(01):13.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:浙江省瑞安市科学技术局社会发展科学研究项目(201102051)
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-02-29