[1]李顺东,许超,童培建.张力带别针结合钢缆内固定与空心钉结合钢丝张力带 内固定治疗髌骨横形骨折的比较研究[J].中医正骨,2014,26(10):35-39.
　Li Shundong*,Xu Chao,Tong PeiJian.*.A retrospective trial of internal fixation with tension band pin and wirerope versus hollow nail and steel-wire tension band in the treatment of patellar transverse fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2014,26(10):35-39.
点击复制

张力带别针结合钢缆内固定与空心钉结合钢丝张力带 内固定治疗髌骨横形骨折的比较研究()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第26卷
期数:
2014年10期
页码:
35-39
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2014-10-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
A retrospective trial of internal fixation with tension band pin and wirerope versus hollow nail and steel-wire tension band in the treatment of patellar transverse fractures
作者:
李顺东1; 许超2; 童培建3
1.浙江省台州市中医院,浙江 台州 318000;
2.浙江中医药大学附属第二医院,浙江 杭州 310005;
3.浙江中医药大学附属第一医院,浙江 杭州 310006
Author(s):
Li Shundong*; Xu Chao; Tong PeiJian.*
Taizhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Taizhou 318000,Zhejiang,China
关键词:
髌骨 骨折 骨折固定术; 内 内固定器 骨钉 骨固定钢丝 治疗; 临床研究性
Keywords:
Patella;  Fractures; bone;  Fracture fixation; internal;  Internal fixators;  Bone nails;  Bone wires;  Therapies; investigational
摘要:
目的:比较张力带别针结合钢缆内固定和空心钉结合钢丝张力带内固定治疗髌骨横形骨折的临床疗效与安全性。方法:回 顾性分析67例髌骨横形骨折患者的病例资料,其中采用张力带别针结合钢缆内固定33例(观察组),采用空心钉结合钢丝张力带内 固定34例(对照组); 横断骨折32例,上极骨折16例,下极骨折11例,粉碎性骨折8例。比较2组患者的手术时间、骨折愈合时间、术 后并发症的发生情况及患者满意度情况。参照Böstman髌骨骨折疗效评分标准评定2组患者的临床疗效。结果:①一般指标 。观察组患者的手术时间小于对照组[(40.80±27.50)min,(42.50±23.30)min,t=7.151,P=0.042]; 2组患者骨折愈合 时间比较,差异无统计学意义[(12.09±1.77)min,(12.51±1.21)min,t=6.823,P=0.062]。②临床疗效与患者满意度。 观察组优28例、良4例、可1例,对照组29例、良3例、可2例。2组患者临床疗效比较,差异无统计学意义(Z=0.000,P=1.000)。观 察组患者满意27例、基本满意4例、不满意2例,对照组患者满意25例、基本满意5例、不满意4例。2组患者满意度比较,差异无统 计学意义(Z=-0.853,P=0.394)。结论:对于闭合性髌骨横形骨折患者而言,虽然张力带别针结合钢缆内固定与空心钉结合钢丝张 力带内固定在骨折愈合时间、临床疗效、患者满意度及安全性方面无明显差异,但张力带别针结合钢缆内固定具有操作简单、手 术时间短的优点,是治疗髌骨横形骨折的一种较理想的方法,值得临床推广应用。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical curative effects and safety of internal fixation with tension band pin and wirerope versus hollow nail and steel-wire tension band in the treatment of patellar transverse fractures.Methods:The medical records of 67 patients with patellar transverse fracture were analyzed retrospectively.Thirty-three patients(observation group)were treated with internal fixation with tension band pin and wirerope,while the others(control group)were treated with internal fixation with hollow nail and steel-wire tension band.The fractures belonged to transverse fractures(32),upper polar fractures(16),lower polar fractures(11)and comminuted fractures(8).The two groups were compared with each other in such parameters as operative time,fracture healing time,postoperative complications and satisfaction degree of the patients.The clinical curative effects were evaluated according to Böstman patellar fracture efficacy criteria.Results:The operative time of observation group were less than that of control group(40.80+/-27.50 vs 42.50+/-23.30 min,t=7.151,P=0.042)and there was no statistical difference in the fracture healing time between the 2 groups(12.09+/-1.77 vs 12.51+/-1.21 min,t=6.823,P=0.062).Twenty-eight patients obtained an excellent result,4 good and 1 fair in the observation group,while 29 patients obtained an excellent result,3 good and 2 fair in the control group.There was no statistical difference in the clinical curative effects between the 2 groups(Z=0.000,P=1.000).Twenty-seven patients were satisfied with the results,4 basically satisfied and 2 unsatisfied in the observation group; while twenty-five patients were satisfied with the results,5 basically satisfied and 4 unsatisfied in the control group.There was no statistical difference in the satisfaction degree of the patients between the 2 groups(Z=-0.853,P=0.394).Conclusion:There are no significant difference in fracture healing time,clinical curative effects,satisfaction degree of the patients and safety between the two methods of internal fixation,However,internal fixation with tension band pin and wirerope is an ideal method for treatment of patellar transverse fractures for simple operation and short operative time,so it is worthy of popularizing in clinic.

参考文献/References:

[1] 吴震,陆建伟,徐卫星,等.张力带别针结合钢缆内固定治疗髌骨横形骨折[J].中医正骨,2012,24(12):36-37.
[2] 刘云鹏,刘沂.骨与关节损伤和疾病的诊断分类及功能评定标准[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2002.
[3] John J,Wagner WW,Kuiper JH.Tension-band wiring of transverse fractures of patella.The effect of site of wire twists and orientation of stainless steel wire loop:a biomechanical investigation[J].Int Orthop,2007,31 (5):703-707.
[4] Schnabel B,Scharf M,Schwieger K,et al.Biomechanical comparison of a new staple technique with tension band wiring for transverse patella fractures[J].Clin Biomech Bristol,Avon,2009,24(10):855-859.
[5] 庞再力.空心拉力螺钉张力带联合髌囊环扎治疗髌骨骨折[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2008,16(4):301-302.
[6] 罗东斌.改良克氏针张力带内固定治疗髌骨骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2012,14(12):1101-1102.
[7] 吴小平,程伟,范江,等.空心钉张力带在髌骨骨折中的应用[J].实用骨科杂志,2012,18(3):251-252.
[8] 王青树,张鹏,王家骐,等.空心钉钛缆内固定治疗髌骨骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2011,13(7):653-656.

相似文献/References:

[1]严成渊,李楠,曹红彬,等.髌骨骨折内固定术后感染的影响因素及对策[J].中医正骨,2014,26(03):69.
[2]傅悦渊,孟永骏,陈四木,等.老年特征性髌骨骨折 ——髌骨下极鸟嘴样粉碎性骨折的诊治体会[J].中医正骨,2013,25(08):58.
[3]肖义陂,许振波,胡敦祥,等.钢丝捆扎记忆合金聚髌器内固定治疗髌骨骨折[J].中医正骨,2014,26(07):45.
[4]吴震,陆建伟,徐卫星,等.张力带别针结合钢缆内固定治疗髌骨横形骨折[J].中医正骨,2012,24(12):36.
[5]信金党,谷福顺.空心拉力螺钉配合可吸收线荷包缝合法治疗移位型髌骨骨折[J].中医正骨,2012,24(01):48.
[6]刘卫平,黄莉萍,何岸.髌骨环内固定治疗髌骨骨折[J].中医正骨,2011,23(12):45.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:浙江省科技厅中西医结合骨关节病研究科技创新团队项目(2011R50022-05)
通讯作者:许超 E-mail:docxuchao@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-10-30