[1]喻永新,尚如国.掌侧入路与背侧入路对腕舟骨骨折愈合率的影响[J].中医正骨,2014,26(07):20-23.
　Yu Yongxin*,Shang Ruguo..Effect of volar approach versus dorsal approach on the healing rate of scaphoid bone fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2014,26(07):20-23.
点击复制

掌侧入路与背侧入路对腕舟骨骨折愈合率的影响()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第26卷
期数:
2014年07期
页码:
20-23
栏目:
文献研究
出版日期:
2014-07-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of volar approach versus dorsal approach on the healing rate of scaphoid bone fractures
作者:
喻永新; 尚如国
广东省广州市正骨医院,广东 广州 510045
Author(s):
Yu Yongxin*; Shang Ruguo.
*Guangzhou Orthopedic Hospital,Guangzhou 510045,Guangdong,China
关键词:
舟骨 骨折 骨折愈合 手术入路 Meta分析
Keywords:
Scaphoid bone;  Fractures; bone;  Fracture healing;  Surgical approach;  Meta-analysis
摘要:
目的:探讨掌侧入路与背侧入路对腕舟骨骨折愈合率的影响。方法:中文数据库以“腕舟骨骨折”与“掌侧入路”和“背侧入路”的布尔逻辑搭配结果作为检索词,英文数据库以“scaphoid fractures”与“dorsal”、“volar”及“palmar”的布尔逻辑搭配结果作为检索词。用计算机检索中国知网、万方学术期刊数据库、维普中文期刊数据库、中国生物医学文献服务系统、中国生物医学期刊网引文数据库、Pubmed及Sciencedirect数据库建库至2013年11月收录的所有相关文献。利用Revman5.2统计软件进行统计分析。结果:共纳入9篇文献,涉及435例患者,其中随机对照实验2篇,非随机对照实验7篇; 中文文献4篇,外文文献5篇。漏斗图显示文献不存在发表偏倚。掌侧入路组与背侧入路组总的骨折愈合率比较,差异无统计学意义[Z=149,P=0.140; OR=0.420,95%CI(0.140,1.310)]; 掌侧入路组术后6～8个月的骨折愈合率优于背侧入路组[Z=2.840,P=0.004; OR=6.930,95%CI(1.820,26.320)]。掌侧入路组与背侧入路组术后并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义[Z=0.590,P=0.560; OR=0.760,95%CI(0.310,1.890)]。掌侧入路组与背侧入路组术后腕部活动功能比较,差异无统计学意义[Z=0.990,P=0.320; OR=1.900,95%CI(-1.840,5.840)]。结论:掌侧入路与背侧入路治疗腕舟骨骨折对骨折愈合率的影响没有差异,但经掌侧入路固定的患者骨折愈合更快。
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the effect of volar approach versus dorsal approach on the healing rate of scaphoid bone fractures.Methods:The Boolean logical combination of Scaphoid fractures,Dorsal,Volar and Palmar were used as index terms.All the literatures of controlled trial included from database establishing to November 2013 were retrieved from China national knowledge internet,Wanfang Database,Vip Database of Chinese journal,Chinese biomedical literature service system(SinoMed),Chinese Medical Citation Index(CMCI),Pubmed and Sciencedirect database through computer,and the statistical analysis was conducted by using Revman5.2 software.Results:Nine literatures(435 patients)were included in the final analysis,including two randomized controlled trials and seven nonrandomized controlled trials,four Chinese literatures and five English literatures.The symmetrical funnel plot demonstrated that there was no publication bias.There was no statistical difference in the total fracture healing rate between volar approach and dorsal approach(Z=149,P=0.140; OR=0.420,95%CI(0.140,1.310)).The volar approach surpassed the dorsal approach in the fracture healing rate 6 to 8 months after the surgery(Z=2.840,P=0.004; OR=6.930,95%CI(1.820,26.320)).There was no statistical difference in postoperative complication incidences between the two approaches(Z=0.590,P=0.560; OR=0.760,95%CI(0.310,1.890)).There was no statistical difference in postoperative wrist activity function between the two approaches(Z=0.990,P=0.320; OR=1.900,95%CI(-1.840,5.840)).Conclusion:There is no difference in fracture healing rate between volar approach and dorsal approach in the treatment of scaphoid bone fracture,while the fracture would heal faster by using volar surgical approach.

参考文献/References:

[1] Miri D,Karovi B,Senohradski K.Role of wrist instability in the onset of pseudoarthrosis of the scaphoid bone[J].Srp Arh Celok Lek,2000,128(11-12):384-388.
[2] 陈国奋,史占军.腕舟骨骨折的诊断与治疗[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2008,26(5):580-581.
[3] 冯晰旻,赵旭鹏,李哲,等.两种入路手术治疗腕舟骨骨折远期腕关节功能比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2011,26(11):1043-1044.
[4] 高剑锐,何一平,王建伟.两种不同入路治疗腕舟骨骨折46例分析[J].中国医师进修杂志,2006,29(35):36-37.
[5] 喻林波,李晓文,欧春培,等.腕桡背侧入路和腕掌侧入路治疗腕舟骨骨折对骨折愈合影响的比较[J].贵阳中医学院学报,2013,34(1):154-156.
[6] Gürbüz Y,Kayalar M, Bal E,et al.Comparison of dorsal and volar percutaneous screw fixation methods in acute Type B scaphoid fractures[J].Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc,2012,46(5):339-345.
[7] Drac P,Cizmar I,Manak P,et al.Comparison of the results and complications of palmar and dorsal miniinvasive approaches in the surgery of scaphoid fractures.A prospective randomized study[J].Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub,2014,158(2):277-281.
[8] Delaney A,Bagshaw SM,Ferland A,et al.The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal[J].Crit Care Med,2007,35(2):589-594.
[9] Drác P,Manák P,Cizmár I,et al.A Palmar percutaneous volar versus a dorsal limited approach for the treatment of non- and minimally-displaced scaphoid waist fractures:an assessment of functional outcomes and complications[J].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech,2010,77(2):143-148.
[10] Jeon IH,Micic ID,Oh CW,et al.Percutaneous screw fixation for scaphoid fracture:a comparison between the dorsal and the volar approaches[J].J Hand Surg Am,2009,34(2):228-236.
[11] Polsky MB,Kozin SH,Porter ST,et al.Scaphoid fractures:dorsal versus volar approach[J].Orthopedics,2002,25(8):817-819.
[12] 王国宗.两种不同手术入路治疗腕舟骨骨折的临床研究[D].济南:山东中医药大学,2008.
[13] Freedman DM,Botte MJ,Gelberman RH.Vascularity of the carpus[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2001,(383):47-59.
[14] 刘树清,胥少汀,孙博.腕舟骨血供与手术入路的关系[J].骨与关节损伤杂志,1990,5(4):199-200.
[15] 霍华春,纪磊,周陈刚,等.腕舟骨骨不连原因分析及防治措施[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2012,27(11):1050-1051.

更新日期/Last Update: 2014-07-28