[1]吴燕,姚新苗,徐守宇.运动疗法联合口服消炎镇痛药及颈椎牵引治疗神经根型颈椎病[J].中医正骨,2014,26(01):24-26.
　Wu Yan*,Yao Xinmao,Xu Shouyu..Therapeutic effect of exercise therapy combined with cervical traction and oral application of anti-inflammatory agents on cervical spondylotic radiculopathy[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2014,26(01):24-26.
点击复制

运动疗法联合口服消炎镇痛药及颈椎牵引治疗神经根型颈椎病()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第26卷
期数:
2014年01期
页码:
24-26
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2014-01-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Therapeutic effect of exercise therapy combined with cervical traction and oral application of anti-inflammatory agents on cervical spondylotic radiculopathy
作者:
吴燕; 姚新苗; 徐守宇
浙江中医药大学附属第三医院,浙江 杭州 310005
Author(s):
Wu Yan*; Yao Xinmao; Xu Shouyu.
*The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Hangzhou 310005,Zhejiang,China
关键词:
颈椎病 神经根病 运动疗法 牵引术 消炎药; 非甾类
Keywords:
Cervical spondylosis;  Radiculopathy;  Exercise therapy;  Traction;  Anti-inflammatory agents; non-steroidal
摘要:
目的:观察运动疗法联合口服消炎镇痛药及颈椎牵引治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效。方法:将60例神经根型颈椎病患者随机分为运动疗法组和常规治疗组,每组30例。运动疗法组采用运动疗法联合口服消炎镇痛药及颈椎牵引治疗,常规治疗组采用口服消炎镇痛药及颈椎牵引治疗。治疗8周后比较2组患者颈椎疼痛变化情况及临床疗效。结果:①颈椎疼痛评分。治疗前2组患者颈椎疼痛视觉模拟评分比较,差异无统计学意义[(7.1±1.5)分,(7.0±1.5)分,t=0.221,P=0.826]; 治疗8周后两组颈椎疼痛视觉模拟评分均降低[(3.3±1.4)分,(4.1±0.8)分],运动疗法组降低程度大于常规治疗组[(3.8±1.1)分,(2.9±1.3)分,t=2.717,P=0.009]。②临床疗效评分。治疗前2组患者临床疗效评分比较,差异无统计学意义[(8.3±4.6)分,(8.5±4.5)分,t=0.169,P=0.867]; 治疗8周后两组临床疗效评分均提高[(15.9±4.1)分,(13.2±4.9)分],运动疗法组提高程度大于常规治疗组[(7.6±2.6)分,(4.7±3.1)分,t=3.925,P=0.000]。结论:采用运动疗法联合口服消炎镇痛药及颈椎牵引治疗神经根型颈椎病,可以明显减轻颈椎疼痛,疗效优于单纯采用口服消炎镇痛药及颈椎牵引,且简单易行,值得临床推广应用。
Abstract:
Objective:To observe the clinical effects of exercise therapy combined with cervical traction and oral application of anti-inflammatory agents on cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.Methods:Sixty patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy were randomly divided into exercise therapy group and conventional treatment group,30 cases in each group.The patients in exercise therapy group were administrated with exercise therapy combined with cervical traction and oral application of anti-inflammatory agents,while the others in conventional treatment group were administrated with anti-inflammatory agents and cervical traction.The pain changes and clinical curative effects were compared between the 2 groups after 8-week treatment.Results:There was no statistical differences in the visual analog scale(VAS)pain scores between the 2 groups before the treatment(7.1+/-1.5 vs 7.0+/-1.5 points,t=0.221,P=0.826),while the VAS pain scores decreased in both of the 2 groups after 8-week treatment(3.3+/-1.4 vs 4.1+/-0.8 points),and the decreased degree of exercise therapy group was greater than that of conventional treatment group(3.8+/-1.1 vs 2.9+/-1.3 points,t=2.717,P=0.009).There was no statistical differences in scores on the clinical curative effect between the 2 groups before the treatment(8.3+/-4.6 vs 8.5+/-4.5 points,t=0.169,P=0.867); while the scores on the clinical curative effect increased in both of the 2 groups after 8-week treatment(15.9+/-4.1 vs 13.2+/-4.9 points),and the increasing degree of exercise therapy group was greater than that of conventional treatment group(7.6+/-2.6 vs 4.7+/-3.1 points,t=3.925,P=0.000).Conclusion:For patients with cervical spondylosis radiculopathy,the combination therapy of exercise therapy and cervical traction combined with oral application of anti-inflammatory agents can relieve the pain in cervical vertebra,and its curative effect is better than that of the monotherapy of cervical traction and oral application of anti-inflammatory agents.Furthermore,it is easy to operate,so it is worthy of popularizing in clinic.

参考文献/References:

[1] 王冰,段义萍,张友常,等.颈椎病患病特征的流行病学研究[J].中南大学学报:医学版,2004,29(4):472-474.
[2] 赵定麟.颈椎伤病学[M].上海:上海科学教育出版社,1994:147-192.
[3] 魏大成,周贤刚.影响综合康复治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效的危险因素逻辑回归分析[J].中国康复医学杂志,2009,24(9):807-809.
[4] 李增春,陈德玉,吴德升,等.第三届全国颈椎病专题座谈会纪要[J].中华外科杂志,2008,46(23):1796-1799.
[5] 鲍铁周,孙树椿.颈椎病的分型牵引治疗[J].中医正骨,2005,17(5):53-54.
[6] 李占清,刘晓辉,张海廷.近年来神经根型颈椎病牵引疗法的临床研究进展[J].中华实用中西医杂志,2007,20(6):531-532.
[7] 姜宏,施杞.介绍一种神经根型颈椎病的疗效评定方法[J].中华骨科杂志,1998,18(6):381.
[8] 申军莲.针刺加TDP照射治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效观察[J].白求恩军医学院学报,2008,6(3):161.
[9] 徐蕾,李志强.电针联合颈椎牵引治疗神经根型颈椎病73例[J].中医正骨,2012,24(7):64-65.
[10] 牛明镜,王顺云.中医综合疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病97例[J].中医正骨,2012,24(3):61-62.
[11] 隋孝忠,余文青.神经根型颈椎病机械牵引程度与疗效的关系(附100例疗效分析)[J].中医正骨,1995,7(5):8-9.
[12] 万义文,徐侥,罗才贵.颈椎病的功能锻炼[J].按摩与康复医学,2011,2(2):62-63.

更新日期/Last Update: 2014-01-20