[1]黎金焕,何晖,陈庆航,等.肩锁关节的形态学特征研究[J].中医正骨,2023,35(08):26-30.
　LI Jinhuan,HE Hui,CHEN Qinghang,et al.A study of morphological characteristics of acromioclavicular joints[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2023,35(08):26-30.
点击复制

肩锁关节的形态学特征研究()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第35卷
期数:
2023年08期
页码:
26-30
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A study of morphological characteristics of acromioclavicular joints
作者:
黎金焕; 何晖; 陈庆航; 黎旭军; 张亚忠; 胡东辉; 黎东兴; 黄健林; 张奇侠; 刘文涛
梧州市中医医院,广西 梧州 543002
Author(s):
LI Jinhuan; HE Hui; CHEN Qinghang; LI Xujun; ZHANG Yazhong; HU Donghui; LI Dongxing; HUANG Jianlin; ZHANG Qixia; LIU Wentao
Wuzhou Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Wuzhou 543002,Guangxi,China
关键词:
肩锁关节;  形态学;  体层摄影术; X线计算机;  X线透视检查
Keywords:
acromioclavicular joint;  morphology;  tomography; X-ray computed;  fluoroscopy
摘要:
目的:探讨肩锁关节的形态学特征。方法:纳入100例接受肩部X线和CT检查且肩锁关节正常的患者,分别在过锁骨远端后沿冠状位CT片、过锁骨远端中线冠状位CT片、肩锁关节正位X线片上测量锁骨远端高度、肩峰高度、锁骨远端上沿与纵轴线成角、肩峰下沿与纵轴线成角,比较不同性别、侧别的肩锁关节形态学特征,分析不同方法测量结果的差异。结果:①不同性别的肩锁关节形态学特征比较。在过锁骨远端后沿冠状位CT片、过锁骨远端中线冠状位CT片、肩锁关节正位X线片上,男性锁骨远端高度、肩峰高度均大于女性[锁骨远端高度:(10.44±1.93)mm,(9.53±1.56)mm,t=2.565,P=0.012;(12.49±1.76)mm,(11.20±1.73)mm,t=3.681,P=0.000;(12.47±1.66)mm,(11.18±1.68)mm,t=3.598,P=0.000; 肩峰高度:(8.51±1.49)mm,(7.28±1.57)mm,t=3.223,P=0.002;(7.26±1.49)mm,(6.37±1.24)mm,t=3.973,P=0.000;(8.47±1.38)mm,(7.25±1.48)mm,t=3.898,P=0.000]; 男性锁骨远端上沿与纵轴线成角、肩峰下沿与纵轴线成角与女性比较,差异均无统计学意义。②不同侧别的肩锁关节形态学特征比较。在过锁骨远端中线冠状位CT片、肩锁关节正位X线片上,左侧锁骨远端上沿与纵轴线成角大于右侧(90.15°±8.48°,85.75°±10.88°,t=-2.269,P=0.025; 90.12°±8.39°,85.68°±10.76°,t=-2.248,P=0.031); 左侧锁骨远端高度、肩峰高度、肩峰下沿与纵轴线成角与右侧比较,差异均无统计学意义。在过锁骨远端后沿冠状位CT片上,左侧锁骨远端高度、肩峰高度、锁骨远端上沿与纵轴线成角、肩峰下沿与纵轴线成角与右侧比较,差异均无统计学意义。③不同方法测量的肩锁关节形态学特征比较。在过锁骨远端中线冠状位CT片上测量的锁骨远端高度、肩峰高度、锁骨远端上沿与纵轴线成角、肩峰下沿与纵轴线成角,与在肩锁关节正位X线片上测量的结果比较,差异均无统计学意义。结论:男性的锁骨远端高度和肩峰高度均大于女性,左侧的锁骨远端上沿与纵轴线成角大于右侧,在过锁骨远端中线冠状位CT片和肩锁关节正位X线片上测量的肩锁关节形态学特征数据无显著差异。
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the morphological characteristics of acromioclavicular joint.Methods:One hundred subjects with normal acromioclavicular joints who were confirmed by shoulder X-ray and CT examinations were enrolled in the study.The distal clavicle height,acromion height,angle between the superior border of distal clavicle and the longitudinal axis as well as angle between the inferior border of acromion and the longitudinal axis were measured on the coronal CT films taken at the posterior border of distal clavicle,coronal CT films taken at the midline of distal clavicle and anteroposterior X-ray films of acromioclavicular joints respectively.The morphological characteristics of the acromioclavicular joints were compared between males and females as well as between left side and right side,and the differences in results measured using different methods were analyzed.Results:①The distal clavicle height and acromion height were greater in males than that in females on the coronal CT films taken at the posterior border of distal clavicle,coronal CT films taken at the midline of distal clavicle and anteroposterior X-ray films of acromioclavicular joints(distal clavicle height:10.44±1.93 vs 9.53±1.56 mm,t=2.565,P=0.012; 12.49±1.76 vs 11.20±1.73 mm,t=3.681,P=0.000; 12.47±1.66 vs 11.18±1.68 mm,t=3.598,P=0.000; acromion height:8.51±1.49 vs 7.28±1.57 mm,t=3.223,P=0.002; 7.26±1.49 vs 6.37±1.24 mm,t=3.973,P=0.000; 8.47±1.38 vs 7.25±1.48 mm,t=3.898,P=0.000),while,the angle between the superior border of distal clavicle and the longitudinal axis as well as the angle between the inferior border of acromion and the longitudinal axis were not significantly different between males and females.②On the coronal CT films taken at the midline of distal clavicle and anteroposterior X-ray films of acromioclavicular joints,the angle between the superior border of distal clavicle and the longitudinal axis was greater on the left side compared to the right side(90.15±8.48 vs 85.75±10.88 degrees,t=-2.269,P=0.025; 90.12±8.39 vs 85.68±10.76 degrees,t=-2.248,P=0.031),while,the distal clavicle height,acromion height and the angle between the inferior border of acromion and the longitudinal axis were not significantly different between left side and right side.On the coronal CT films taken at the posterior border of the distal clavicle,the distal clavicle height,acromion height,angle between the superior border of distal clavicle and the longitudinal axis as well as angle between the inferior border of acromion and the longitudinal axis were not significantly different between left side and right side.③The differences in distal clavicle height,acromion height,angle between the superior border of distal clavicle and the longitudinal axis as well as angle between the inferior border of acromion and the longitudinal axis were not statistically significant between the results measured on the coronal CT films taken at the midline of distal clavicle and the ones measured on anteroposterior X-ray films of acromioclavicular joints.Conclusion:The distal clavicle height and acromion height are greater in males than that in females,and the angle between the superior border of distal clavicle and the longitudinal axis is greater on the left side compared to the right side,furthermore,there are no statistical differences in the data of morphological characteristics of acromioclavicular joints between the results measured on the coronal CT films taken at the midline of distal clavicle and the ones measured on anteroposterior X-ray films of acromioclavicular joints.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张新龙,刘建平,张爽,等.RockwoodⅢ型肩锁关节损伤保守治疗的并发症研究进展[J].中医临床研究,2022,14(24):128-131.
[2] KIM A C,MATCUK G,PATEL D,et al.Acromioclavicular joint injuries and reconstructions:a review of expected imaging findings and potential complications[J].Emerg Radiol,2012,19(5):399-413.
[3] 唐富永,陈曚,陈允周,等.关节镜下Tightrope技术与锁骨钩板治疗急性RockwoodⅤ型肩锁关节损伤的中期疗效对比[J].当代医学,2022,28(16):58-62.
[4] 朱益品.肩锁关节脱位的治疗进展[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2020,41(13):1672-1674.
[5] 曾恒,牛云飞.锁骨远端骨折手术的治疗进展[J].武警医学,2019,30(4):356-358.
[6] 沈一凡,金翔赟,高洪.锁骨远端骨折治疗进展[J].国际骨科学杂志,2019,40(2):88-91.
[7] 崔鹏,东靖明,田旭,等.锁骨远端钩钢板的应用进展[J].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2021,9(3):284-286.
[8] 毕正宾,王海洋,葛武.锁骨钩钢板内固定加喙锁韧带修补术治疗肩锁关节脱位124例[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2022,30(8):68-71.
[9] 王连海.锁骨钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位合并锁骨远端骨折的临床效果研究[J].中国实用医药,2023,18(6):53-56.
[10] 张坚若,陈永坚,许金海,等.适肩峰形态锁骨钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位合并锁骨远端骨折的效果研究[J].现代实用医学,2022,34(1):113-114.
[11] 刘镇煌,黄长明,范华强,等.肩锁关节脱位钩钢板固定的并发症与对策[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2023,31(2):111-116.
[12] 胡安全,李哲,吴可沁.肩锁关节脱位患者带袢钢板与锁骨钩钢板治疗的效果及对肩峰撞击征发生率的影响对比[J].中国全科医学,2021,24(S2):103-105.
[13] 乔瑞,杨佳瑞,杨琨,等.钩钢板钩端深度与肩峰高度的差值对术后发生肩峰下撞击综合征的影响[J].骨科,2021,12(6):541-544.
[14] 李光辉.15°“钩板角”锁骨钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位的相关研究[D].广州:南方医科大学,2019.
[15] 鞠文,蒋富贵,钱学峰,等.锁骨钩钢板内固定术后并发症分析及防治[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2015,30(7):706-708.
[16] 房燚,赵文志,潘德悦,等.肩锁关节脱位研究:如何达到解剖复位和持续性稳定及关节微动[J].中国组织工程研究,2020,24(5):796-802.
[17] 梁振,冯宗权,欧阳汉斌,等.肩锁关节应用解剖及生物力学研究进展[J].中国临床新医学,2019,12(5):577-580.
[18] 周日,谢小肖,王霜,等.肩锁关节形态学及组织结构特点[J].解剖学报,2022,53(1):103-107.
[19] 叶福生,洪俊毅,王伟,等.不同术式治疗肩锁关节完全脱位的生物力学研究[J].浙江临床医学,2022,24(4):478-481.
[20] 王晨,杨娜,衡立松,等.肩锁关节功能解剖及垂直方向的生物力学研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2019,21(11):986-990.
[21] 费冀,杨砥,曾靖云,等.锁骨远端骨折锁骨钩钢板内固定术后严重肩关节功能障碍1例[J].中医正骨,2021,33(5):77-79.
[22] 庞广兴,刘先银,汪宇,等.手术操作因素对NeerⅡ型锁骨远端骨折切开复位锁骨钩钢板内固定术后肩峰骨溶解的影响[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2020,35(11):1140-1142.
[23] 桂景雄,邓志成,朱小华,等.肩锁关节脱位锁骨钩钢板内固定术后肩峰下撞击综合征与肩峰解剖形态和肩峰下间隙的关系研究[J].中医正骨,2017,29(3):17-19.
[24] OH H S,KIM S,HYUN J H,et al.Effect of subacromial erosion shape on rotator cuff and clinical outcomes after hook plate fixation in type 5 acromioclavicular joint dislocations:a retrospective cohort study[J].BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders,2022,23(1):42.
[25] 姜晨轶,林森.肩峰形态对锁骨钩钢板固定术后肩峰骨溶解及骨折的影响[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2019,21(5):405-410.
[26] SHEN P C,ZHU Y,ZHANG H,et al.Three-dimensional morphological analysis of acromioclavicular joint in patients with and without subacromial erosion after hook plate fix-ation[J].J Int Med Res,2018,46(1):511-521.

相似文献/References:

[1]徐洪伟,康信勇,贺振年,等.带袢钢板内固定治疗急性肩锁关节脱位[J].中医正骨,2015,27(11):48.
[2]孙辽军,卢迪,余贤斌,等.喙突骨隧道位置对双Endobutton钢板重建 术后喙锁韧带力学性能的影响[J].中医正骨,2015,27(05):1.
　SUN Liaojun,LU Di,YU Xianbin,et al.Effect of location of coracoid tunnel on the mechanical property of coracoclavicular ligament after reconstruction using double Endobutton[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(08):1.
[3]田玉鹏,汤善兵,褚向明,等.关节镜下Endobutton钢板联合指骨钢板内固定治疗 新鲜RockwoodⅢ型肩锁关节脱位[J].中医正骨,2015,27(05):21.
[4]卢启贵,李长树,黄东红,等.关节镜下Endobutton钢板内固定治疗肩锁关节脱位[J].中医正骨,2015,27(05):23.
[5]赵胜春,吴国林.Endobutton钢板内固定治疗急性肩锁关节脱位[J].中医正骨,2018,30(02):72.
[6]熊昌文,赵喆.肩锁关节脱位治疗的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2020,32(06):44.
[7]沈哲源,彭巧英,李恒,等.双袢与“Y”形三袢TightRope纽扣钢板内固定治疗新鲜RockwoodⅢ～Ⅴ型肩锁关节脱位的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2024,36(07):22.
　SHEN Zheyuan,PENG Qiaoying,LI Heng,et al.A comparative study of double-loop versus Y-shaped triple-loop TightRope button plate internal fixation for treatment of Rockwood typeⅢ-Ⅴ fresh acromioclavicular joint dislocation[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2024,36(08):22.
[8]张志猛,袁道通,王旭,等.3种手术方法治疗RockwoodⅢ型及以上肩锁关节脱位临床疗效的网状Meta分析[J].中医正骨,2024,36(10):25.
　ZHANG Zhimeng,YUAN Daotong,WANG Xu,et al.Clinical efficacy of three surgical procedures in treatment of Rockwood typeⅢand above acromioclavicular joint dislocation:a network meta-analysis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2024,36(08):25.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:梧州市科技计划项目(202002187); 广西名中医传承工作室建设项目(桂中医药科教发〔2021〕6号) 通讯作者:何晖 E-mail:176338675@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01