[1]卢承印,石淇允,张来福,等.掌侧入路与背侧入路加压螺钉固定治疗腕舟骨骨折疗效和安全性的Meta分析[J].中医正骨,2021,33(06):42-48.
　LU Chengyin,SHI Qiyun,ZHANG Laifu,et al.Clinical efficacy and safety of compression screw fixation through volar approach versus dorsal approach for treatment of scaphoid fractures:a meta analysis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2021,33(06):42-48.
点击复制

掌侧入路与背侧入路加压螺钉固定治疗腕舟骨骨折疗效和安全性的Meta分析()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第33卷
期数:
2021年06期
页码:
42-48
栏目:
文献研究
出版日期:
2021-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical efficacy and safety of compression screw fixation through volar approach versus dorsal approach for treatment of scaphoid fractures:a meta analysis
作者:
卢承印1; 石淇允2; 张来福1; 王孝辉3
1.河南中医药大学,河南 郑州 450046; 2.湖南中医药大学,湖南 长沙 410208; 3.河南省洛阳正骨医院/河南省骨科医院,河南 洛阳 471002
Author(s):
LU Chengyin1; SHI Qiyun2; ZHANG Laifu1; WANG Xiaohui3
1.Henan University of Chinese Medicine,Zhengzhou 450046,Henan,China 2.Hunan University of Chinese Medicine,Changsha 410208,Hunan,China 3.Luoyang Orthopedic-Traumatological Hospital,Luoyang 471002,Henan,China
关键词:
舟骨;  腕损伤;  骨折;  手术入路;  Meta分析
Keywords:
scaphoid bone;  wrist injuries;  fractures; bone;  operative approach;  meta-analysis
摘要:
目的:比较掌侧入路与背侧入路加压螺钉固定治疗腕舟骨骨折的疗效与安全性。方法:应用计算机检索PubMed、Embase、The Cochrane Library、中国知网、维普网、中国生物医学文献数据库和万方数据库中关于掌侧入路与背侧入路加压螺钉固定治疗腕舟骨骨折对比研究的文献,检索时限为建库至2020年10月。依据文献检索及筛选方案筛选出符合要求的文献后,由2名研究人员分别独立进行数据提取和质量评价。采用RevMan5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果:共检索到316篇文献,最终纳入17篇文献,共涉及872例患者。Meta分析结果显示,掌侧入路组和背侧入路组手术时间和腕关节掌屈、背伸、桡偏、尺偏活动度及Mayo腕关节评分的组间差异均无统计学意义[I2=60%,MD=2.37,95%CI(-0.13,4.88),P=0.060; I2=40%,SMD=0.10,95%CI(-0.15,0.34),P=0.440; I2=18%,SMD=-0.02,95%CI(-0.26,0.23),P=0.880; I2=48%,SMD=-0.06,95%CI(-0.31,0.18),P=0.610; I2=26%,SMD=0.17,95%CI(-0.08,0.41),P=0.180; I2=0%,MD=-0.15,95%CI(-1.44,1.13),P=0.820]; 掌侧入路组术中出血量少于背侧入路组[I2=95%,MD=-4.63,95%CI(-8.64,-0.62),P=0.020],骨折愈合时间短于背侧入路组[I2=92%,MD=-2.42,95%CI(-4.19,-0.65),P=0.007],综合疗效优良率高于背侧入路组[I2=0%,OR=2.64,95%CI(1.50,4.67),P=0.001],骨折不愈合率及其他并发症发生率均低于背侧入路组[I2=18%,OR=0.41,95%CI(0.19,0.91),P=0.030; I2=0%,OR=0.48,95%CI(0.28,0.82),P=0.007]。结论:现有的证据表明,掌侧入路与背侧入路加压螺钉固定治疗腕舟骨骨折,在手术时间、腕关节功能恢复方面无明显差异,但掌侧入路加压螺钉固定比背侧入路加压螺钉固定术中出血少、骨折愈合快、综合疗效好、并发症发生率低。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of compression screw fixation through volar approach(VA)versus dorsal approach(DA)in treatment of scaphoid fractures.Methods:All the randomized controlled trial(RCT)and non-RCT articles about compression screw fixation through VA(VA group)versus DA(DA group)for treatment of scaphoid fractures included from database establishing to October 2020 were retrieved from PubMed,Embase,The Cochrane Library,China National Knowledge Internet,Vip Database,Chinese Biomedical Literature Database and WanFang Database through computer.The articles were screened and the information was extracted independently by two researchers according to the retrieval and screening scheme.The methodological quality of research in the articles was evaluated independently by the same two researchers and a Meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan5.3 software.Results:Three hundred and sixteen articles were searched out.After screening,17 articles(872 patients)were included in the final analysis.The results of Meta-analysis revealed that there was no statistical difference in operative time,range of motion of wrist(palmar flexion,dorsal expansion,radial deviation and ulnar deviation)and Mayo wrist scores between VA group and DA group(I2=60%,MD=2.37,95%CI(-0.13,4.88),P=0.060; I2=40%,SMD=0.10,95%CI(-0.15,0.34),P=0.440; I2=18%,SMD=-0.02,95%CI(-0.26,0.23),P=0.880; I2=48%,SMD=-0.06,95%CI(-0.31,0.18),P=0.610; I2=26%,SMD=0.17,95%CI(-0.08,0.41),P=0.180; I2=0%,MD=-0.15,95%CI(-1.44,1.13),P=0.820).The intraoperative blood loss was less,fracture healing time was shorter,excellent rate of comprehensive curative effect was higher,and fracture nonunion rate as well as other complication incidence were lower in VA group compared to DA group(I2=95%,MD=-4.63,95%CI(-8.64,-0.62),P=0.020; I2=92%,MD=-2.42,95%CI(-4.19,-0.65),P=0.007; I2=0%,OR=2.64,95%CI(1.50,4.67),P=0.001; I2=18%,OR=0.41,95%CI(0.19,0.91),P=0.030; I2=0%,OR=0.48,95%CI(0.28,0.82),P=0.007).Conclusion:Available evidences suggest that there is no obvious difference in operative time and wrist function recovery between VA and DA in compression screw fixation for treatment of scaphoid fractures,however,the former has such advantages as less intraoperative blood loss,faster fracture healing,better comprehensive curative effects and lower complication incidence compared to the latter.

参考文献/References:

[1] IACOBELLIS C,BADAN S,ALDEGHERI R.Percutaneous screw fixation for scaphoid fractures[J].Musculoskelet Surg,2011,95(3):199-203.
[2] MOSER V L,KRIMMER H,HERBERT T J.Minimal invasive treatment for scaphoid fractures using the cannulated herbert screw system[J].Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg,2003,7(4):141-146
[3] CHAN K W,MCADAMS T R.Central screw placement in percutaneous screw scaphoid fixation:a cadaveric comparison of proximal and distal techniques[J].J Hand Surg Am,2004,29(1):74-79.
[4] 徐立明,石法亮,王仁款,等.腕舟骨骨不连手术治疗16例临床分析[J].国际医药卫生导报,2015,21(7):927-930.
[5] 张昌军,戴磊,王海峰.经皮穿针Herbert空心加压螺钉内固定治疗非移位性新鲜舟骨骨折[J].中国继续医学教育,2014,6(2):22-23.
[6] JADAD A R,MOORE R A,CARROLL D,et al.Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials:is blinding necessary?[J].Control Clin Trials,1996,17(1):1-12.
[7] 曾宪涛,刘慧,陈曦,等.Meta分析系列之四:观察性研究的质量评价工具[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志,2012,4(4):297-299.
[8] DRAC P,MANAK P,CIZMAR I,et al.A palmar percut-aneous volar versus a dorsal limited approach for the treatment of non- and minimally-displaced scaphoid waist fractures:an assessment of functional outcomes and complications[J].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech,2010,77(2):143-148.
[9] DRAC P,CIZMAR I,MANAK P,et al.Comparison of the results and complications of palmar and dorsal miniinvasive approaches in the surgery of scaphoid fractures.A prospective randomized study[J].Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub,2014,158(2):277-281.
[10] G?RB?Z Y,KAYALAR M,BAL E,et al.Comparison of dorsal and volar percutaneous screw fixation methods in acute Type B scaphoid fractures[J].Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc,2012,46(5):339-345.
[11] JEON I H,MICIC I D,OH C W,et al.Percutaneous screw fixation for scaphoid fracture:a comparison between the dorsal and the volar approaches[J].J Hand Surg Am,2009,34(2):228-236.
[12] PARAJULI N P,SHRESTHA D,DHOJU D,et al.Scaphoid fracture:functional outcome following fixation with Herbert screw[J].Kathmandu Univ Med J(KUMJ),2011,9(36):267-273.
[13] POLSKY M B,KOZIN S H,PORTER S T,et al.Scaphoid fractures:dorsal versus volar approach[J].Orthopedics,2002,25(8):817-819.
[14] 何国云,张友忠,杜暠,等.微创加压螺钉固定术不同入路治疗腕舟骨骨折的疗效及安全性分析[J].创伤外科杂志,2018,20(9):670-674.
[15] 冯晰旻,赵旭鹏,李哲,等.两种入路手术治疗腕舟骨骨折远期腕关节功能比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2011,26(11):1043-1044.
[16] 喻元,喻宙,屈增辉,等.不同入路手术治疗Herbert B2型腕舟骨骨折疗效比较[J].海南医学,2019,30(21):2768-2771.
[17] 姜叶飞,徐阿炳,丁彬杰.掌侧入路微创加压螺钉固定术治疗腕舟骨骨折的临床观察[J].浙江创伤外科,2019,24(4):764-765.
[18] 洪加源,胡维界,练克俭,等.掌侧与背侧经皮螺钉固定技术治疗Herbert B2型腕舟骨骨折疗效比较[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2014,22(4):30-32.
[19] 蒋继乐,刘波,陈山林,等.掌、背侧入路经皮加压螺钉内固定治疗急性舟骨腰部骨折[J].中华骨科杂志,2016,36(14):898-905.
[20] 熊涛,吴煜,沈金明,等.掌侧与背侧经皮入路空芯Herbert螺钉手术治疗新鲜腕舟状骨骨折的临床疗效分析[J].山西中医学院学报,2015,16(2):54-56.
[21] 董红,何杨,张平方,等.背侧入路与掌侧入路微创加压螺钉内固定治疗腕舟骨骨折的效果比较[J].中国医药导报,2019,16(15):69-72.
[22] 邱忠鹏,张庭,李蓓.腕掌侧入路与腕背侧入路治疗腕舟骨骨折临床疗效的比较[J].农垦医学,2015,37(1):25-27.
[23] 张及时.腕桡背侧入路和腕掌侧入路治疗腕舟骨骨折对骨折愈合影响的对比分析[J].中外健康文摘,2014(3):177.
[24] 王国宗.两种不同手术入路治疗腕舟骨骨折的临床研究[D].济南:山东中医药大学,2008.
[25] DIAS J,KANTHARUBAN S.Treatment of scaphoid fractures:European approaches[J].Hand Clin,2017,33(3):501-509.
[26] BUIJZE G A,GOSLINGS J C,RHEMREV S J,et al.Cast immobilization with and without immobilization of the thumb for nondisplaced and minimally displaced scaphoid waist fractures:a multicenter,randomized,controlled trial[J].J Hand Surg Am,2014,39(4):621-627.
[27] MAJEED H.Non-operative treatment versus percutaneous fixation for minimally displaced scaphoid waist fractures in high demand young manual workers[J].J Orthop Traumatol,2014,15(4):239-244.
[28] AL-AJMI T A,AL-FARYAN K H,AL-KANAAN F F,et al.A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing surgical versus conservative treatments for acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced sca-phoid fractures[J].Clin Orthop Surg,2018,10(1):64-73.
[29] 任家晨,付强.腕舟骨骨折的中西医治疗进展[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,2018,24(5):671-674.

相似文献/References:

[1]黎金焕,陈跃平,董盼锋,等.CT三维重建技术在桡骨远端骨折术后评价中的应用[J].中医正骨,2017,29(06):28.
　LI Jinhuan,CHEN Yueping,DONG Panfeng,et al.Application of 3D reconstructed CT imaging technique to postoperative evaluation of distal radius fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2017,29(06):28.
[2]彭松云,熊屹,唐良华,等.自制量表在非手术治疗老年桡骨远端骨折疗效评价中的应用价值[J].中医正骨,2020,32(03):42.
[3]赵玉果,程省,汤立新,等.锁定加压钢板结合Herbert螺钉内固定治疗桡骨远端骨折合并同侧舟骨骨折[J].中医正骨,2020,32(04):48.
[4]孙轶韬,马奇翰,戴宇祥,等.桡骨远端骨折的中医非手术治疗及相关并发症的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2021,33(01):43.
[5]金华,颜夏卫.血清25-羟基维生素D与胰岛素样生长因子-1水平对桡骨远端骨折内固定术后预后的影响[J].中医正骨,2023,35(08):14.
　JIN Hua,YAN Xiawei.Effects of serum levels of 25-hydroxy vitamin D and insulin-like growth factor-1 on prognosis after internal fixation for distal radius fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2023,35(06):14.
[6]孙滨,李琳琳,孙卫强,等.闭合复位经皮穿针内固定治疗尺桡骨远端不稳定性骨折[J].中医正骨,2024,36(12):70.
[7]李玉香,袁慧敏,张凯凯,等.腕舟骨骨折的诊断与治疗进展[J].中医正骨,2017,29(09):34.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
通讯作者:王孝辉 E-mail:963099784@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-12-20