[1]杨建平,谢国华,薛峰,等.单球囊单、双侧扩张经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的比较[J].中医正骨,2014,26(03):21-24.
　Yang Jianping*,Xie Guohua,Xue Feng,et al.The clinical comparison of unilateral and bilateral dilatation percutaneous kyphoplasty with single balloon for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2014,26(03):21-24.
点击复制

单球囊单、双侧扩张经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性 椎体压缩骨折的比较()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第26卷
期数:
2014年03期
页码:
21-24
栏目:
脊柱微创技术
出版日期:
2014-03-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
The clinical comparison of unilateral and bilateral dilatation percutaneous kyphoplasty with single balloon for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
作者:
杨建平; 谢国华; 薛峰; 陆根华; 牟晓峰
江苏省常州市中医医院,江苏 常州 213000
Author(s):
Yang Jianping*; Xie Guohua; Xue Feng; Lu Genhua; Mou Xiaofeng.
*Changzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Changzhou 213000,Jiangsu,China
关键词:
脊柱骨折 椎体后凸成形术 骨质疏松性骨折
Keywords:
Spinal fractures;  Kyphoplasty;  Osteoporotic fractures
摘要:
目的:比较单球囊单、双侧扩张经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性分析接受单球囊扩张经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗的44例骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者的病例资料,男9例,女35例; 年龄61～89岁,中位数72岁; 均为单节段椎体压缩骨折; 骨折部位,T102例、T116例、T1214例、L115例、L26例、L31例; 单侧扩张22例,双侧扩张22例。对2组手术时间、X线曝光次数、骨水泥注入量、骨水泥渗漏率、疼痛视觉模拟评分、伤椎前缘高度丢失百分比、伤椎中部高度丢失百分比、Cobb角进行比较。结果:2组患者均顺利完成手术,单侧经皮椎体后凸成形术组较双侧经皮椎体后凸成形术组手术时间短、X线曝光次数少、骨水泥注入量少[(32.60±9.51)min,(49.70±10.87)min,t=3.742,P=0.002;(15.50±8.37)次,(25.70±9.87)次,t=2.982,P=0.008;(3.38±0.83)mL,(6.01±1.21)mL; t=5.664,P=0.000]。术后X线及CT检查显示,双侧经皮椎体后凸成形术组骨水泥呈团块状分布于伤椎两侧或均匀弥散,单侧经皮椎体后凸成形术组骨水泥偏一侧呈团块状分布或越过中线弥散分布。2组患者均获随访,随访时间8～18个月,中位数11.5个月; 骨折均愈合,愈合时间3～6个月,中位数4.5个月。术前2组患者疼痛视觉模拟评分、伤椎前缘高度丢失百分比、伤椎中部高度丢失百分比及Cobb角的组间差异均无统计学意义[(8.518±1.921)分,(8.786±1.580)分; t=0.505,P=0.616;(29.727±4.524)%,(30.261±4.192)%; t=0.406,P=0.687;(24.750±3.872)%,(25.022±4.682)%; t=0.210,P=0.835; 24.543°±4.021°,25.121°±3.954°; t=0.481,P=0.633]。术后1 d,2组患者疼痛缓解,疼痛视觉模拟评分均较术前降低(t=25.561,P=0.000; t=35.927,P=0.000); 伤椎前缘高度丢失百分比、伤椎中部高度丢失百分比及Cobb角均较术前减小(t=42.400,P=0.000; t=38.572,P=0.000; t=47.929,P=0.000; t=27.563,P=0.000; t=38.627,P=0.000; t=31.531,P=0.000); 但2组间以上各项疗效评价指标比较,差异均无统计学意义[(2.886±1.205)分,(2.846±1.137)分; t=0.113,P=0.910;(11.546±2.903)%,(10.983±3.439)%; t=0.587,P=0.561;(10.159±2.648)%,(9.637±2.371)%; t=0.688,P=0.495; 9.872°±2.361°,9.214°±1.859°; t=1.027,P=0.310]。单侧经皮椎体后凸成形组术后并发骨水泥渗漏3例,双侧经皮椎体后凸成形组术后并发骨水泥渗漏2例,均无神经脊髓损伤、肺栓塞等并发症发生,未予特殊处理; 2组患者骨水泥渗漏发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.000,P=1.000)。结论:单球囊单、双侧扩张经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折均能有效缓解疼痛、恢复伤椎高度、纠正脊柱畸形,疗效相当,并发症少。但单侧扩张手术时间更短、X线曝光次数及骨水泥注入量更少,更适合于高龄体弱难以耐受长时间俯卧的患者。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical curative effect and safety of unilateral versus bilateral dilatation percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP)with single balloon for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures(OVCF).Methods:The medical records of 44 patients with single-segment OVCF treated with single balloon PKP were analyzed retrospectively.The patients consisted of 9 males and 35 females,and ranged in age from 61 to 89 years(Mean=72 yrs).The fractures located in T10(2),T11(6),T12(14),L1(15),L2(6)and L3(1).Unilateral dilatation PKP was performed in 22 patients and bilateral dilatation PKP was performed in 22 patients.Then the two groups were compared with each other in such parameters as operative time,frequency of X-ray exposure,consumption of bone cement,incidence rate of bone cement leakage,visual analogue scores(VAS),loss of anterior border and middle height of injured vertebrae and kyphosis Cobb angle.Results:The surgery were performed successfully in all the patients and.the unilateral PKP had shorter operative time,fewer X-ray exposure and less consumption of bone cement than did bilateral PKP(32.60+/-9.51 vs 49.70+/-10.87 min,t=3.742,P=0.002; 15.50+/-8.37 vs 25.70+/-9.87,t=2.982,P=0.008; 3.38+/-0.83 vs 6.01+/-1.21 mL; t=5.664,P=0.000).Postoperative X-ray and CT examination showed that the bone cements were well-distributed or distributed in clumps in both sides of injured vertebra in bilateral PKP group,while the bone cements were distributed in clumps in one side of injured vertebra or dispersed across the midline in unilateral PKP group.The patients in the 2 groups were all followed up for 8-18 months with a median of 11.5 months.All fractures united between 3 and 6 weeks with a median of 4.5 weeks.There was no statistical difference in VAS,percentage of loss of injured vertebrae anterior border and middle height of injured vertebrae and kyphosis Cobb angle between the 2 groups before the treatment(8.518+/-1.921 vs 8.786+/-1.580 points; t=0.505,P=0.616; 29.727+/-4.524% vs 30.261+/-4.192%; t=0.406,P=0.687; 24.750+/-3.872% vs 25.022+/-4.682%; t=0.210,P=0.835; 24.543+/-4.021 vs 25.121+/-3.954 degrees; t=0.481,P=0.633).One day after the surgery,the pain was relieved and the postoperative VAS scores were lower than the preoperative VAS scores in the two groups(t=25.561,P=0.000; t=35.927,P=0.000).The percentage of loss of injured vertebrae anterior border height,percentage of loss of injured vertebrae middle height and kyphosis Cobb angle decreased(t=42.400,P=0.000; t=38.572,P=0.000; t=47.929,P=0.000; t=27.563,P=0.000; t=38.627,P=0.000; t=31.531,P=0.000).However,there were no statistical differences between the 2 groups in all the therapeutic effect assessment indicators(2.886+/-1.205 vs 2.846+/-1.137 points; t=0.113,P=0.910; 11.546+/-2.903% vs 10.983+/-3.439%; t=0.587,P=0.561; 10.159+/-2.648% vs 9.637+/-2.371%; t=0.688,P=0.495; 9.872+/-2.361 vs 9.214+/-1.859 degrees; t=1.027,P=0.310).The bone cement leakage were found after the surgery in three patients in unilateral PKP group and in two patients in bilateral PKP group and no treatment were performed.No complications such as nerve injury,spinal cord injury and pulmonary embolism were found in the two groups.There was no statistical difference in the incidence rate of bone cement leakage between the 2 groups(χ2=0.000,P=1.000).Conclusion:Unilateral dilatation PKP with single balloon is similar to bilateral dilatation PKP with single balloon in the effect on pain relief,injured vertebral height restoration and spinal deformity correction,with few complications.However,unilateral dilatation PKP has the advantage of shorter operative time,fewer X-ray exposure and less bone cement consumption,therefore it is more suitable to weak and aged patients who can not withstand prolonged face lying.

参考文献/References:

[1] 朱耀辉,崔快.经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折[J].中医正骨,2013,25(6):40-41.
[2] 陈文红,陈建常,马在松,等.球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折[J].中医正骨,2012,24(7):62-63.
[3] Steinmann J,Tingey CT,Cruz G,et al.Biomechanical comparison of unipedicular versus bipedicular kyphoplasty[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2005,30(2):201-205.
[4] Tohmeh AG,Mathis JM,Fenton DC,et al.Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for themanagement of osteoporotic compression fractures[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),1999,24(17):1772-1776.
[5] 张永平,王国平,廖旭昱,等.单侧入路经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗多椎体骨质疏松性压缩性骨质[J].中医正骨,2012,24(4):52-53.
[6] Liebschner MA,Rosenberg WS,Keaveny TM.Effects of bone cement volume and distribution on vertebral stiffness after vertebroplasty[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2001,26(14):1547-1554.
[7] Hulme PA,Krebs J,Ferguson SJ,et al.Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty:a systematic review of 69 clinical studies[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2006,31(17):1983-2001.
[8] Lee MJ,Dumonski M,Cahill P,et al.Percutaneous treatment of vertebral compression fractures:a meta-analysis ofcomplications[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2009,34(11):1228-1232.

更新日期/Last Update: 2014-03-20