[1]何文全,苏进益,陆红日,等.独活寄生颗粒治疗大鼠肩周炎的效果和作用机制研究[J].中医正骨,2022,34(06):1-8.
 HE Wenquan,SU Jinyi,LU Hongri,et al.Efficacy and mechanism of Duhuo Jisheng(独活寄生)granules against scapulohumeral periarthritis in rats:an experimental study[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2022,34(06):1-8.
点击复制

独活寄生颗粒治疗大鼠肩周炎的效果和作用机制研究()
分享到:

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第34卷
期数:
2022年06期
页码:
1-8
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2022-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Efficacy and mechanism of Duhuo Jisheng(独活寄生)granules against scapulohumeral periarthritis in rats:an experimental study
作者:
何文全苏进益陆红日张洪彬赖伟伟
(台州市中医院,浙江 台州 318001)
Author(s):
HE WenquanSU JinyiLU HongriZHANG HongbinLAI Weiwei
Taizhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital,Taizhou 318001,Zhejiang,China
关键词:
关节周围炎 独活寄生颗粒 信号传导 类Toll受体 髓样分化因子88 大鼠 动物实验
Keywords:
periarthritis Duhuo Jisheng granules signal transduction toll-like receptors myeloid differentiation factor 88 rats animal experimentation
摘要:
目的:探讨独活寄生颗粒治疗大鼠肩周炎的效果和作用机制。方法:从50只大鼠中随机选取10只作为正常对照组,其余建立肩周炎模型。将建模成功的大鼠随机分为肩周炎模型组、独活寄生颗粒干预组、独活寄生颗粒联合脂多糖干预组。独活寄生颗粒干预组每天按照3 g·kg-1独活寄生颗粒进行灌胃,独活寄生颗粒联合脂多糖干预组每天按照3 g·kg-1独活寄生颗粒、3 mg·kg-1脂多糖进行灌胃,均以生理盐水制成5 mL溶液; 正常对照组和肩周炎模型组以5 mL生理盐水灌胃; 每天灌胃1次,持续5周。干预结束后第1天,进行旷场实验,并记录大鼠中央停留时间及活动总路程。旷场实验结束后大鼠禁食禁水12 h,处死,切取肩关节组织样本,采用酶联免疫吸附分析法检测肩关节组织中肿瘤坏死因子-α(tumor necrosis factor-α,TNF-α)、白细胞介素(interleukin,IL)-1β、前列腺素E2(prostaglandin E2,PGE2)及5-羟色胺(5-hydroxytryptamine,5-HT)含量,采用免疫印迹法检测肩关节组织中Toll样受体(Toll-like receptor,TLR)4、TLR2、髓样分化因子88(myeloid differentiation factor 88,MyD88)蛋白表达量。结果:①模型建立及分组结果。成功建立肩周炎模型大鼠32只,肩周炎模型组10只、独活寄生颗粒干预组11只、独活寄生颗粒联合脂多糖干预组11只。②大鼠运动能力评价结果。4组大鼠中央停留时间、活动总路程比较,组间差异均有统计学意义[(5.18±0.52)s,(40.37±4.14)s,(24.81±2.63)s,(33.19±3.51)s,F=253.430,P=0.000;(1 587.43±160.12)cm,(1 008.65±104.17)cm,(1 321.71±135.87)cm,(1 156.08±120.54)cm,F=35.836,P=0.000]。肩周炎模型组、独活寄生颗粒干预组、独活寄生颗粒联合脂多糖干预组大鼠的中央停留时间均长于正常对照组(LSD-t=26.670,P=0.000; LSD-t=23.143,P=0.000; LSD-t=24.930,P=0.000),活动总路程均短于正常对照组(LSD-t=9.581,P=0.000; LSD-t=4.113,P=0.001; LSD-t=7.017,P=0.000); 独活寄生颗粒干预组、独活寄生颗粒联合脂多糖干预组大鼠的中央停留时间均短于肩周炎模型组(LSD-t=10.385,P=0.000; LSD-t=4.300,P=0.000)、活动总路程均长于肩周炎模型组(LSD-t=5.878,P=0.000; LSD-t=2.984,P=0.008); 独活寄生颗粒联合脂多糖干预组大鼠中央停留时间长于独活寄生颗粒干预组(LSD-t=6.337,P=0.000),活动总路程短于独活寄生颗粒干预组(LSD-t=3.024,P=0.000)。③病理学观察结果。HE染色结果显示,正常对照组大鼠肩关节肌细胞、肌纤维排列整齐,肌组织结构完整,未见增生的毛细血管及炎性细胞; 肩周炎模型组大鼠肩关节肌细胞、肌纤维排列混乱,肌组织结构不完整,可见大量增生的毛细血管及炎性细胞; 独活寄生颗粒干预组、独活寄生颗粒联合脂多糖干预组大鼠肩关节肌细胞、肌纤维排列及肌组织结构较肩周炎模型组有所改善,增生的毛细血管及炎性细胞较肩周炎模型组少,且独活寄生颗粒干预组大鼠肩关节肌细胞、肌纤维排列及肌组织结构改善程度大于独活寄生颗粒联合脂多糖干预组,增生的毛细血管及炎性细胞少于独活寄生颗粒联合脂多糖干预组。④炎症相关指标检测结果。4组大鼠肩关节组织中TNF-α、IL-1β、PGE2含量比较,组间差异均有统计学意义[(5.18±0.62)pg·mL-1,(11.23±1.34)pg·mL-1,(7.81±0.91)pg·mL-1,(9.03±1.03)pg·mL-1,F=63.048,P=0.000;(102.23±11.02)pg·mL-1,(153.14±15.71)pg·mL-1,(119.59±12.02)pg·mL-1,(135.76±13.61)pg·mL-1,F=27.584,P=0.000;(185.43±19.01)pg·mL-1,(379.15±39.26)pg·mL-1,(276.71±28.04)pg·mL-1,(310.43±31.21)pg·mL-1,F=71.207,P=0.000)]。肩周炎模型组、独活寄生颗粒干预组、独活寄生颗粒联合脂多糖干预组大鼠肩关节组织中TNF-α、IL-1β、PGE2含量均高于正常对照组(TNF-α:LSD-t=12.958,P=0.000; LSD-t=8.145,P=0.000; LSD-t=10.245,P=0.000; IL-1β:LSD-t=8.389,P=0.000; LSD-t=5.126,P=0.000; LSD-t=9.652,P=0.000; PGE2:LSD-t=14.044,P=0.000; LSD-t=12.365,P=0.000; LSD-t=8.335,P=0.000); 独活寄生颗粒干预组、独活寄生颗粒联合脂多糖干预组大鼠肩关节组织中TNF-α、IL-1β、PGE2含量均低于肩周炎模型组(TNF-α:LSD-t=6.901,P=0.000; LSD-t=5.746,P=0.000; IL-1β:LSD-t=5.528,P=0.000; LSD-t=16.352,P=0.000; PGE2:LSD-t=6.932,P=0.000; LSD-t=12.687,P=0.000); 独活寄生颗粒联合脂多糖干预组大鼠肩关节组织中TNF-α、IL-1β、PGE2含量均高于独活寄生颗粒干预组(LSD-t=2.944,P=0.008; LSD-t=2.954,P=0.008; LSD-t=2.666,P=0.015)。⑤疼痛相关指标检测结果。4组大鼠肩关节组织中5-HT含量比较,差异有统计学意义[(152.14±24.73)ng·mL-1,(219.58±29.20)ng·mL-1,(180.33±21.37)ng·mL-1,(201.44±25.49)ng·mL-1,F=13.301,P=0.000]。肩周炎模型组、独活寄生颗粒干预组、独活寄生颗粒联合脂多糖干预组大鼠肩关节组织中5-HT含量均高于正常对照组(LSD-t=6.813,P=0.000; LSD-t=2.802,P=0.011; LSD-t=4.489,P=0.000); 独活寄生颗粒干预组、独活寄生颗粒联合脂多糖干预组大鼠肩关节组织中5-HT含量均低于肩周炎模型组(LSD-t=4.892,P=0.000; LSD-t=2.777,P=0.012); 独活寄生颗粒联合脂多糖干预组大鼠肩关节组织中5-HT含量高于独活寄生颗粒干预组(LSD-t=2.105,P=0.048)。⑥炎症信号通路相关蛋白检测结果。4组大鼠肩关节组织中TLR4、TLR2、MyD88蛋白表达量比较,组间差异均有统计学意义(0.18±0.02,0.89±0.07,0.28±0.03,0.47±0.04,F=520.473,P=0.000; 0.22±0.02,0.91±0.09,0.30±0.03,0.63±0.05,F=353.545,P=0.000; 0.13±0.01,1.15±0.12,0.37±0.04,0.84±0.08,F=386.907,P=0.000)。肩周炎模型组、独活寄生颗粒干预组、独活寄生颗粒联合脂多糖干预组大鼠肩关节组织中TLR4、TLR2、MyD88蛋白表达量均高于正常对照组(TLR4:LSD-t=30.840,P=0.000; LSD-t=23.541,P=0.000; LSD-t=21.147,P=0.000; TLR2:LSD-t=23.667,P=0.000; LSD-t=26.985,P=0.000; LSD-t=29.654,P=0.000; MyD88:LSD-t=26.787,P=0.000; LSD-t=30.142,P=0.000; LSD-t=25.333,P=0.000); 独活寄生颗粒干预组、独活寄生颗粒联合脂多糖干预组大鼠肩关节组织中TLR4、TLR2、MyD88蛋白表达量低于肩周炎模型组(TLR4:LSD-t=26.409,P=0.000; LSD-t=20.145,P=0.000; TLR2:LSD-t=21.264,P=0.000; LSD-t=19.874,P=0.000; MyD88:LSD-t=20.393,P=0.000; LSD-t=22.987,P=0.000); 独活寄生颗粒联合脂多糖干预组大鼠肩关节组织中TLR4、TLR2、MyD88蛋白表达量均高于独活寄生颗粒干预组(LSD-t=12.603,P=0.000; LSD-t=18.770,P=0.000; LSD-t=17.428,P=0.000)。结论:采用独活寄生颗粒治疗大鼠肩周炎,能够缓解疼痛、抑制炎症反应,其作用机制可能与抑制TLR/MyD88信号通路相关蛋白的表达有关。
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the efficacy of Duhuo Jisheng(独活寄生,DHJS)granules against scapulohumeral periarthritis(SPA)in rats and its mechanism of action.Methods:Among the 50 rats,10 rats were randomly selected and served as normal control group,and the remained 40 rats were used for inducing SPA.The successfully modeled rats were then randomly assigned to SPA model group,DHJS granules intervention group and DHJS granules combined with lipopolysaccharide(LPS)intervention group.The rats in DHJS granules intervention group were intragastric administrated with DHJS granules in daily dosage of 3 g/kg(DHJS granules were dissolved into 5 mL normal saline(NS)),the ones in DHJS granules combined with LPS intervention group with DHJS granules and LPS in daily dosages of 3 g/kg and 3 mg/kg respectively(DHJS granules and LPS were dissolved into 5 mL NS),and the ones in normal control group and SPA model group with 5 mL NS.All rats in each group were intragastric administration once a day for consecutive 5 weeks.On day 1 after the end of intervention,the open field test was conducted,and the time spent in the central square and total moving distance of the rats were recorded.After the end of open field test,the rats were deprived of food and water for 12 hours,then they were sacrificed and their shoulder tissues were harvested for detecting the levels of tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α),interleukin(IL)-1β,prostaglandin E2(PGE2)and 5-hydroxytryptamine(5-HT)by using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA)and the protein expression levels of Toll-like receptor(TLR)4,TLR2 and myeloid differentiation factor 88(MyD88)by using Western blotting.Results:①Thirty-two SPA rat models were successfully established,10 ones in SPA model group,11 ones in DHJS granules intervention group and DHJS granules combined with LPS intervention group respectively.②There was statistical difference in the time spent in the central square and total moving distance among the 4 groups(5.18±0.52,40.37±4.14,24.81±2.63,33.19±3.51 seconds,F=253.430,P=0.000; 1 587.43±160.12,1 008.65±104.17,1 321.71±135.87,1 156.08±120.54 cm,F=35.836,P=0.000).The time spent in the central square was longer in SPA model group,DHJS granules intervention group and DHJS granules combined with LPS intervention group in contrast to normal control group(LSD-t=26.670,P=0.000; LSD-t=23.143,P=0.000; LSD-t=24.930,P=0.000),and was longer in SPA model group compared to DHJS granules intervention group and DHJS granules combined with LPS intervention group(LSD-t=10.385,P=0.000; LSD-t=4.300,P=0.000),and was longer in DHJS granules combined with LPS intervention group compared to DHJS granules intervention group(LSD-t=6.337,P=0.000).The total moving distance was shorter in SPA model group,DHJS granules intervention group and DHJS granules combined with LPS intervention group in contrast to normal control group(LSD-t=9.581,P=0.000; LSD-t=4.113,P=0.001; LSD-t=7.017,P=0.000),and was shorter in SPA model group compared to DHJS granules intervention group and DHJS granules combined with LPS intervention group(LSD-t=5.878,P=0.000; LSD-t=2.984,P=0.008),and was shorter in DHJS granules combined with LPS intervention group compared to DHJS granules intervention group(LSD-t=3.024,P=0.000).③The HE staining results showed that(1)the regularly arranged muscle cells and muscle fibers as well as the intact muscle tissue structure were observed,while the proliferative capillaries and inflammatory cells were unobserved in rat shoulder tissues of normal control group;(2)the disordered and irregularly arranged muscle cells and muscle fibers as well as the incomplete muscle tissue structure with numerous proliferative capillaries and inflammatory cells were observed in rat shoulder tissues of SPA model group;(3)the arrangement of muscle cells and muscle fibers as well as the structure of muscle tissues were improved,and the proliferative capillaries and inflammatory cells decreased in DHJS granules intervention group and DHJS granules combined with LPS intervention group compared with that of SPA model group; furthermore,the improvement degree was greater,and the proliferative capillaries and inflammatory cells were less in DHJS granules intervention group compared to DHJS granules combined with LPS intervention group.④There was statistical difference in the levels of TNF-α,IL-1β and PGE2 in rat shoulder tissues among the 4 groups(5.18±0.62,11.23±1.34,7.81±0.91,9.03±1.03 pg/mL,F=63.048,P=0.000; 102.23±11.02,153.14±15.71,119.59±12.02,135.76±13.61 pg/mL,F=27.584,P=0.000; 185.43±19.01,379.15±39.26,276.71±28.04,310.43±31.21 pg/mL,F=71.207,P=0.000).The levels of TNF-α,IL-1β and PGE2 in rat shoulder tissues were higher in SPA model group,DHJS granules intervention group and DHJS granules combined with LPS intervention group in contrast to normal control group(TNF-α:LSD-t=12.958,P=0.000; LSD-t=8.145,P=0.000; LSD-t=10.245,P=0.000; IL-1β:LSD-t=8.389,P=0.000; LSD-t=5.126,P=0.000; LSD-t=9.652,P=0.000; PGE2:LSD-t=14.044,P=0.000; LSD-t=12.365,P=0.000; LSD-t=8.335,P=0.000),and were higher in SPA model group compared to DHJS granules intervention group and DHJS granules combined with LPS intervention group(TNF-α:LSD-t=6.901,P=0.000; LSD-t=5.746,P=0.000; IL-1β:LSD-t=5.528,P=0.000; LSD-t=16.352,P=0.000; PGE2:LSD-t=6.932,P=0.000; LSD-t=12.687,P=0.000),and were higher in DHJS granules combined with LPS intervention group compared to DHJS granules intervention group(LSD-t=2.944,P=0.008; LSD-t=2.954,P=0.008; LSD-t=2.666,P=0.015).⑤There was statistical difference in the level of 5-HT in rat shoulder tissues among the 4 groups(152.14±24.73,219.58±29.20,180.33±21.37,201.44±25.49 ng/mL,F=13.301,P=0.000).The level of 5-HT in rat shoulder tissues was higher in SPA model group,DHJS granules intervention group and DHJS granules combined with LPS intervention group in contrast to normal control group(LSD-t=6.813,P=0.000; LSD-t=2.802,P=0.011; LSD-t=4.489,P=0.000),and was higher in SPA model group compared to DHJS granules intervention group and DHJS granules combined with LPS intervention group(LSD-t=4.892,P=0.000; LSD-t=2.777,P=0.012),and was higher in DHJS granules combined with LPS intervention group compared to DHJS granules intervention group(LSD-t=2.105,P=0.048).⑥There was statistical difference in the protein expression levels of TLR4,TLR2 and MyD88 in rat shoulder tissues among the 4 groups(0.18±0.02,0.89±0.07,0.28±0.03,0.47±0.04,F=520.473,P=0.000; 0.22±0.02,0.91±0.09,0.30±0.03,0.63±0.05,F=353.545,P=0.000; 0.13±0.01,1.15±0.12,0.37±0.04,0.84±0.08,F=386.907,P=0.000).The protein expression levels of TLR4,TLR2 and MyD88 in rat shoulder tissues were higher in SPA model group,DHJS granules intervention group and DHJS granules combined with LPS intervention group in contrast to normal control group(TLR4:LSD-t=30.840,P=0.000; LSD-t=23.541,P=0.000; LSD-t=21.147,P=0.000; TLR2:LSD-t=23.667,P=0.000; LSD-t=26.985,P=0.000; LSD-t=29.654,P=0.000; MyD88:LSD-t=26.787,P=0.000; LSD-t=30.142,P=0.000; LSD-t=25.333,P=0.000),and were higher in SPA model group compared to DHJS granules intervention group and DHJS granules combined with LPS intervention group(TLR4:LSD-t=26.409,P=0.000; LSD-t=20.145,P=0.000; TLR2:LSD-t=21.264,P=0.000; LSD-t=19.874,P=0.000; MyD88:LSD-t=20.393,P=0.000; LSD-t=22.987,P=0.000),and were higher in DHJS granules combined with LPS intervention group compared to DHJS granules intervention group(LSD-t=12.603,P=0.000; LSD-t=18.770,P=0.000; LSD-t=17.428,P=0.000).Conclusion:DHJS granules can relieve pain and inhibit inflammatory reaction in rats with SPA,and its mechanism of action may be that it can inhibit the expression of TLR/MyD88 signaling pathway-related proteins.

参考文献/References:

[1] BRUN S P.Idiopathic frozen shoulder[J].Aust J Gen Pract,2019,48(11):757-761.
[2] RYAN V,BROWN H,MINNS LOWE C J,et al.The pathophysiology associated with primary(idiopathic)frozen shoulder:a systematic review[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2016,17(1):340.
[3] FRANZ A,KLOSE M,BEITZEL K.Conservative treatment of frozen shoulder[J].Unfallchirurg,2019,122(12):934-940.
[4] 赖若芸,廖桂华,农秀明,等.中药烫熨配合贴敷疗法在肩周炎治疗中的应用效果[J].中国民间疗法,2021,29(1):55-56.
[5] 岳凤昱.针灸推拿配合藏药贴敷治疗肩周炎的临床效果[J].中国民族医药杂志,2021,27(1):32-33.
[6] 于媛.火龙灸疗法治疗寒湿痹阻型肩周炎临床研究[J].新中医,2021,53(3):151-154.
[7] 程晔,王胜,范迪慧.祛风散寒通痹汤联合针灸治疗风寒湿型肩周炎的疗效观察[J].中国中医药科技,2021,28(2):253-254.
[8] 田卫卫,邸莎,丁齐又.独活的临床应用及其用量探究[J].吉林中医药,2020,40(4):530-532.
[9] 程晓平,郑文伟,倪国新.基于网络药理学的独活治疗骨关节炎的作用机制研究[J].中国组织工程研究,2019,23(11):1641-1646.
[10] CHEN J,ZHU J,ZHU T,et al.Pathological changes of frozen shoulder in rat model and the therapeutic effect of PPAR-γ agonist[J].J Orthop Res,2021,39(4):891-901.
[11] 洪杰.肩周炎防治指南[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000:10-11.
[12] CUCCHI D,MARMOTTI A,DE GIORGI S,et al.Risk factors for shoulder stiffness:current concepts[J].Joints,2017,5(4):217-223.
[13] ABRASSART S,KOLO F,PIOTTON S,et al.Frozen shoulder is ill-defined.How can it be described better?[J].EFORT Open Rev,2020,5(5):273-279.
[14] MAMARELIS G,MORIS D.Frozen shoulder[J].Lancet,2021,397(10272):372.
[15] 黄彭,孟祥奇,吴晨熙,等.中医手法为主治疗冻结肩临床研究进展[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2020,29(34):3872-3876.
[16] 农国勇,张莉娟,肖杰云,等.运动针法联合经筋刺法对肩周炎疗效及5-羟色胺水平影响的研究[J].时珍国医国药,2020,31(3):635-637.
[17] 裴媛,马进,李姗,等.独活和独活香豆素对帕金森病模型大鼠脑黑质CHOP和Caspase12表达的影响[J].中华中医药学刊,2019,37(11):21-24.
[18] 石清芳,侯淑霞.独活寄生汤中药配方颗粒与传统中药饮片应用效果对比[J].贵州医药,2020,44(3):123-124.
[19] XU R,LIU Z,HOU J,et al.Osthole improves collagen-induced arthritis in a rat model through inhibiting inflammation and cellular stress[J].Cell Mol Biol Lett,2018,23(1):19.
[20] 乙军,李兰亚,张斌,等.独活寄生颗粒联合塞来昔布治疗膝骨性关节炎的效果及对相关细胞因子的影响[J].中国医药导报,2019,16(19):144-147.
[21] 董瑞,毕燕琳,王明山.旷场实验在鼠行为学研究中的应用[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2020,41(5):535-540.
[22] ABRAMOVA O V,ZUBKOV E A,ZORKINA Y A,et al.Social and cognitive impairments in rat offspring after ultrasound-induced prenatal stress[J].Bull Exp Biol Med,2020,168(6):730-733.
[23] MARTIN S L,POWER A,BOYLE Y,et al.5-HT modulation of pain perception in humans[J].Psychopharmacology(Berl),2017,234(19):2929-2939.
[24] 刘顶鼎,杨菁,刘冬,等.芎麻汤提取物对肝阳上亢兼瘀血型偏头痛模型大鼠脑组织中5-HT,CGRP的影响[J].中国药房,2020,31(1):24-29.
[25] 华浩昌,葛雯雯,尤福忠.激痛点推拿配合关节松动手法治疗肩周炎气滞血瘀证55例[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2020,28(2):66-68.
[26] 王莉,刘秀叶,郭琼梅,等.右美托咪定对下肢手术糖尿病老年患者外周血单核细胞TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB信号通路的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2019,39(6):665-668.
[27] WANG B,WU Y,LIU R,et al.Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG promotes M1 polarization in murine bone marrow-derived macrophages by activating TLR2/MyD88/MAPK signaling pathway[J].Anim Sci J,2020,91(1)[2021-04-06].https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asj.13439.
[28] LOPEZ-BERGAMI P,BARBERO G.The emerging role of Wnt5a in the promotion of a pro-inflammatory and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment[J].Cancer Metastasis Rev,2020,39(3):933-952.
[29] 卢国良,邹泽良,潘耀成.TLRs/MyD88信号通路在膝骨性关节炎患者滑膜炎症中的作用[J].新疆医科大学学报,2020,43(2):196-200.

相似文献/References:

[1]潘建科,李嘉晖,杨伟毅,等.麻醉下手法松解联合肩关节周围注射改良“鸡尾酒”及护肩操锻炼治疗冻结肩[J].中医正骨,2021,33(09):56.
 PAN Jianke,LI Jiahui,YANG Weiyi,et al.Manipulation under anesthesia combined with peri-shoulder modified cocktail injection and shoulder exercises for treatment of frozen shoulder[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2021,33(06):56.
[2]成子己,管翀,顾元嘉,等.传统功法在肩周炎治疗中的应用进展[J].中医正骨,2022,34(06):34.
[3]王楠,赵明宇,寇赵淅,等.基于平乐正骨筋滞骨错理论探讨肩周炎的病机及治疗方法[J].中医正骨,2023,35(06):56.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
通讯作者:赖伟伟 E-mail:353562172@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01