[1]姜文涛,梅伟,王庆德,等.腰椎融合术后邻近节段退变的影响因素分析[J].中医正骨,2017,29(03):3-5.
　JIANG Wentao,MEI Wei,WANG Qingde,et al.Analysis of factors influencing adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2017,29(03):3-5.
点击复制

腰椎融合术后邻近节段退变的影响因素分析()
分享到：

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第29卷
期数:
2017年03期
页码:
3-5
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2017-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of factors influencing adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion
作者:
姜文涛; 梅伟; 王庆德;  郭润栋; 李格
河南省郑州市骨科医院,河南 郑州 450052
Author(s):
JIANG Wentao; MEI Wei; WANG Qingde; GUO Rundong; LI Ge
Zhengzhou Orthopaedic Hospital,Zhengzhou 450052,Henan,China
关键词:
腰椎;  脊柱融合术;  手术后并发症;  邻近节段退变;  影响因素分析
Keywords:
lumbar vertebrae;  spinal fusion;  postoperative complications;  adjacent segment degeneration;  root cause analysis
摘要:
目的:分析腰椎融合术后邻近节段退变的影响因素。方法:收集2010年1月至2014年6月因腰椎间盘突出症、腰椎管狭窄症、腰椎滑脱在郑州市骨科医院行后路腰椎间融合术患者的治疗和随访资料,包括性别、年龄、术前邻近节段退变情况、融合节段、术后邻近节段退变情况。结果:共收集到146例患者的资料,术后所有患者腰腿痛症状均明显缓解。所有患者均获得随访,随访时间18～37 个月,中位数28个月。随访期间2例患者发生断钉,3 例患者出现椎间植骨吸收,其余141例患者椎间植骨均融合。141例术后椎间植骨融合的患者中,男性患者腰椎融合术后邻近节段退变的发生率(17/79)与女性(14/62)相比,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.023,P=0.880); 年龄≥60岁的患者腰椎融合术后邻近节段退变的发生率(27/89)高于年龄<60岁的患者(4/52),差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.813,P=0.000); 术前存在邻近节段退变的患者,腰椎融合术后邻近节段退变的发生率(22/67)高于术前不存在邻近节段退变的患者(9/74),差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.762,P=0.000); 多节段融合的患者术后邻近节段退变的发生率(21/54)高于单节段融合的患者(10/87),差异有统计学意义(χ2=14.578,P=0.000)。结论:年龄大、术前存在邻近节段退变、多节段腰椎融合,是术后发生邻近节段退变的风险因素。
Abstract:
ABSTRACT Objective:To analyze the factors influencing adjacent segment degeneration(ASD)after lumbar spinal fusion.Methods:The medical records of patients with lumbar disc herniation,lumbar spinal stenosis or lumbar spondylolisthesis who were treated with lumbar spinal fusion through posterior approach from January 2010 to June 2014 in Zhengzhou Orthopaedic Hospital were collected.The collected clinical data consisted of gender,age,preoperative ASD,fused segments and postoperative ASD.Results:The clinical data of 146 patients were collected and the medical records showed that the lumbocrural pain were relieved obviously in all patients after surgery.All patients were followed up for 18-37 months with a median of 28 months.The breakage of nail(1 case)and intervertebral bone-graft absorption(3 cases)were found during the follow-up period.One hundred and forty-one patients obtained intervertebral bone graft fusion.There was no statistical differences in the incidence rate of ASD between males(17/79)and females(14/62)after surgery of intervertebral fusion with bone graft(χ2=0.023,P=0.880).The incidence rate of postoperative ASD was higher in patients≥60 years old(27/89)compared to patients<60 years old(4/52)(χ2=9.813,P=0.000).The incidence rate of postoperative ASD was higher in patients with preoperative ASD(22/67)compared to patients without preoperative ASD(9/74)(χ2=8.762,P=0.000).The incidence rate of postoperative ASD was higher in patients with multiple-segment intervertebral fusion(21/54)compared to patients with single-segment intervertebral fusion(10/87)(χ2=14.578,P=0.000).Conclusion:Old age,preoperative ASD and multiple-segment lumbar intervertebral fusion are the risk factors for postoperative ASD.

参考文献/References:

[1] 周英杰.腰椎融合与非融合在腰椎间盘突出症手术中的合理选择[J].中医正骨,2014,26(10):3-6.
[2] 李丁,凡进, 沈国蔚,等.腰椎后路融合术后邻近节段早期改变[J].南京医科大学学报,2009,29(2):240-244.
[3] 林斌,黎秋生,何勇,等.椎弓根螺钉单侧固定与双侧固定治疗腰椎间盘突出症对邻近节段退变的影响[J].中医正骨,2015,27(1):16-19.
[4] 刘明立,李放.腰椎融合联合非融合技术预防邻近节段退变的应用分析[J].中华临床医师杂志:电子版,2016,10(18):2762-2765.
[5] 胡国鹏,张贤.腰椎融合术后邻近节段退变影响因素的研究进展[J].中国医药导报,2016,13(6):50-53.
[6] GHISELLI G,WANG JC,HSU WK,et al.L5～S1 segment survivorship and clinical outcome analysis after L4-5 isolated fusion[J].Spine,2003,28(12):1275-1280.
[7] MIN JH,JANG JS,JUNG BJ,et al.The clinical characteristics and risk factors for the adjacent segment degeneration in instrumented lumbar fusion[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2008,21(5):305-309.
[8] 张骞,徐宏光.单节段腰椎后路融合术后邻近节段退变的临床研究[J].中外医学研究,2016,14(7):8-10.
[9] LEE JC,CHOI SW.Adjacent segment pathology after lumbar spinal fusion[J].Asian Spine J,2015,9(5):807-817.
[10] 楚野,梁斌,曾佳兴,等.腰椎退变性疾病融合术后邻近节段退变的研究进展[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2014,24(2):175-178.
[11] 王凌挺,徐宏光,王弘.单节段与多节段腰椎融合术后邻近节段退变的临床观察[J].皖南医学院学报,2014,33(4):311-313.
[12] 赵宇,杨开舜,李绍波.腰椎融合节段数与术后相邻节段退变及远期疗效的关系[J]. 西南国防医药,2013,23(4):388-391.
[13] 龚冰南,徐皓,陈建梅,等.腰椎融合内固定对邻近节段退变的影响[J].中国组织工程研究,2013,17(9):1673-1678.
[14] 王洪立,姜建元.腰椎融合术后邻近节段退变的相关因素研究进展[J].中华骨科杂志,2012,32(6):590-594.
[15] 施荣茂,王浩明,陈道森,等.腰椎融合辅以邻近节段动态固定与腰椎融合治疗腰椎退行性疾病早期疗效的对比观察[J].第三军医大学学报,2013,35(12):1288-1293.

相似文献/References:

[1]郭小伟,梅伟,潘玉林,等.一期后路病灶清除纳米仿生骨椎体支撑体植骨融合 内固定治疗胸腰椎结核[J].中医正骨,2015,27(07):66.
[2]刘彦璐,林耐球,李绍旦,等.正骨手法结合中药外敷治疗腰椎间盘突出症[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):26.
[3]邵礼晖,潘浩.Coflex棘突间动态稳定系统治疗腰椎退变性疾病40例[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):37.
[4]魏社军,王宇,郑标,等.单侧椎弓根螺钉内固定结合椎间融合器植骨融合治疗 相邻双节段腰椎间盘突出症合并腰椎管狭窄[J].中医正骨,2015,27(06):46.
[5]周鑫,刘世珑,刘鹏,等.髓核摘除结合Wallis棘突间动态稳定系统 内固定治疗腰椎间盘突出症[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):67.
[6]郭新军,朱卉敏,王衡,等.一次性纤维环缝合器在腰椎间盘突出症髓核摘除术中的应用[J].中医正骨,2015,27(03):59.
[7]王世龙.腰椎椎管内外痛风石1例[J].中医正骨,2012,24(02):69.
[8]秦杰,李振宇.三法十式手法配合中药腰痹汤治疗腰椎间盘突出症[J].中医正骨,2011,23(02):71.
[9]梅伟,高晓群.前路复位椎间植骨融合内固定术治疗 单节段下颈椎骨折脱位合并关节突交锁[J].中医正骨,2016,28(03):42.
[10]杨子情,豆贲,谢义松,等.微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术联合中药封包疗法治疗腰椎滑脱症的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2016,28(07):28.
　YANG Ziqing,DOU Ben,XIE Yisong,et al.A clinical comparison of three kinds of fixation for treatment of type C distal radius fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(03):28.
[11]林斌,黎秋生,何勇,等.椎弓根螺钉单侧固定与双侧固定治疗腰椎间盘突出症 对邻近节段退变的影响[J].中医正骨,2015,27(01):16.
　LIN Bin,LI Qiusheng,HE Yong,et al.Effect of unilateral versus bilateral fixation with pedicle screws on adjacent segment degeneration in patients with lumbar disc herniation[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(03):16.
[12]颜 峰.椎间融合术配合中药外敷治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症[J].中医正骨,2016,28(01):38.
[13]聂富祥,贺海怿,朱文辉,等.一次性可扩张通道下微创经椎间孔入路腰椎间融合术治疗单节段腰椎退行性疾病[J].中医正骨,2017,29(05):34.
[14]周成洪,谭军,龙亨国,等.单侧椎间融合器45°旋转稳定技术在腰椎滑脱症治疗中的应用[J].中医正骨,2019,31(01):43.
[15]马潇苒,马虎升,李无阴,等.撬拨复位技术在难复性腰椎滑脱症治疗中的应用[J].中医正骨,2019,31(01):47.
[16]王海峰,曾忠友,金辉.双侧皮质骨轨迹椎弓根螺钉内固定联合椎间融合治疗腰椎退行性病变[J].中医正骨,2020,32(05):52.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
通讯作者:梅伟 E-mail:meiwei9606@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01